Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLANDINGS BAY - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-03-24REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: February 4, 1999 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: 438-98 Landings Bay -Type I (LUC)-PDP PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, February 24, 1999 ElNo Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) All Plans and Suuolements Included: O Utility Plan © Site Plan © Landscape Plan 0 "Proposed Plat Language" — Handout General Comments: O See redline comments on all sheets of the utility plan, site plan, and landscape plan. More specific comments will be mentioned below. Utility Plan Comments: Cover Sheet; Sheet 1 of'12: G There are minor General Note revisions. Date: Signatur • Please send copies of marked revisions /"�­Plat X_ Site e!M ility K-Landscape City of Fort Collins All driveways must be constructed with concrete in the street R.O.W. The General Detail sheet can have a modified driveway detail that incorporates the concrete driveway within the R.O.W. ✓ The sidewalk dimensions for both Landings Drive and JFK Parkway should be a minimum of 6 feet. The sidewalk along JFK Parkway should extend to the northern boundary. ,A An additional 7.5 feet of right-of-way will have to be dedicated along JFK Par way. The centerline for Landings Drive should be depicted, and an additional eigkf feet of R.O.W. will have to be dedicated along Landings Drive. TP Plan must show complete horizontal street alignment including but not limited to: centerline of all roadways, curb return radii for all accesses, curve radii, R.O.W. dimensions, access ramps, and indication of all locations of outfall curb and gutter and where transitions occur back to inflow curb and gutter. ✓. Show all easements. CT' The nose of all medians are required to be setback 20 feet from the flowline. Sanitary Sewer Plan and Profiles; Sheet 6 of 11: The sewer lines appear to be too steep. See if the water/waste utilities agree with that comment. Show all easements. .JFK Parkway Plan and Profile; Sheet 8 of 11: Show elevations on all points of curvature in the plan view. Provide cross sections at 100 foot intervals for JFK Parkway. � Show the west flowline profile for JFK Parkway. General Details; Sheet 10 of 11: Clarify the driveway detail. It is unclear if the street intersection detail is being used for the driveway detail. Again the street intersection detail can be modified to a driveway access by depicting concrete in the R.O.W. as well as maintaining proper slopes. A minium of 1/4 inch/ 1 ft or a maximum of I inch/ 1 ft of slope from property line to flowline of pan. P.D.P. Plan Comments: • See redlined comments. • Show all access ramp locations. Date: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED Signature: — REVISIONS: PLAT [} SITE UTILITY [� LANDSCAPE Overall Utility Plan; Sheet 3 of 12: G Show all the access drives to be constructed with concrete within the R.O.W. 13 The bike lane on JFK Parkway is only 6 feet wide. Therefore, the street cut should only extend 6 feet for the construction of the access points. E #DO Site Delineation Plan, Sheet 9 of 12: 0 Show sidewalk dimensions as indicated on the utility plan. O Reference the detail sheet with the access ramp design (or standard) for all access ramps to be constructed in the R.O.W. C Label the "ramp -down" for the internal access ramps. C The internal turning movements are not sufficient and after meeting with Ron Gonzales with P.F.A. he has concerns with the highlighted areas (yellow highlight). I have met with Jon Prouty and he assured that all insufficient turning movements will be resolved before the City allows this project to go to public hearing. C The City's Traffic Operations Department is considering the design of pedestrian refuge. The pedestrian refuge is required by the development based on the LOS criteria. Therefore, the construction of the pedestrian refuge will be at the cost of the developer. The note on the utility plan shall read, "The pedestrian refuge shall be designed by the City of Fort Collins Traffic Operations. The construction of the pedestrian refuge and any access ramps or sidewalks needed as a result of the pedestrian refuge shall be constructed at the developer's expense." I have given a copy of the potential pedestrian refuge design to Jon Prouty. I will send any additional information as I receive it. General Details,- Sheet 12 of 12.- 0 Provide access ramp details for all ramps to be constructed in the R.O.W. G I thought the drive approach details were going to be separated to depict each one individually. Final Plat for Landings Bay: G There is new plat language required by the City. I have included a handout with the required language. C A 15-foot utility easement should be dedicated along JFK Parkway within the drainage easement (see redlined comment). Site Plan and Landscape Plan: 13 The site and landscape plans should match the utility plans. O The internal turning movements are not sufficient and after meeting with Ron Gonzales with P.F.A. he has concerns with the highlighted areas (yellow highlight). I have met with Jon Prouty and he assured that all insufficient turning movements will be resolved before the City allows this project to go to public hearing. C See the notes in regard to street trees. It is my opinion that trees planted in the parkway in front of the existing walk should be an ornamental or a species of tree that can either be transplanted or removed. This is to ensure that when the roadway is widen to ultimate build -out the City has the ability to construct a street without the possibility of removing mature trees or adjusting the alignment. Also, the street trees in front of the proposed sidewalk should be setback into the future 10-foot parkway. C The trees being proposed between the ditch and the existing detention should be placed so as to allow the ditch company access through the ditch easement. It might be appropriate to show the ditch company the landscape plan. PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Colllins Current Planning DATE: August 13, 1998 TO: Mapping & Drafting PROJECT: #38-98 Courtyard Commons - PDP Type II All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, September 9,1998 CI J w, . VV1 1 55 2- S a /o n cl J F /o "q 5 1'laA 5%ould jd'j�--' C SF1t7. Roo Q C The S W Gov�eY `w Nn a.'�c� �bt4. �-a +•t di„ic� �• �/el2h'h�a-..� iov 1-o� O h ( VieEC3S �-o �E lb c4.l�.�Le' �i, 11I�e}e '; oOLA J�Q Q t-\ L'Llse-,&+4 Date: CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Pit _ Site _ Drainage Repot _ Oter — Utility — ItE& Utility _ landscape REVISION COMMENT 4,1" ay DATE: Apfiil-34, 1999 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: #38-98A Landings Bay — Final Compliance All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, Mfty�P, 1999 General Comments: ♦ The City of Fort Collins needs to see a copy of the temporary grading easement filed at the County before we will sign the Utility Plan mylars. ♦ Please design the access ramps redlined on sheet 3 per the fax that I send back in response to my meeting with Daryl Sigler. ♦ The plat should include the language that is attached (see following page). ♦ Please take all notes off the utility plans, which suggests that the pedestrian refuge will be done "by others" (See Sheet 9 of 12). Date: aSignature: Please s Epics of marked revisions _Plat Site _Utility _Landscape JIM COMMEN"fS —SUBMIT MYLAKS City of Fort Collins PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Callins, Current Plannine DATE: April 30, 1999 TO: PROJECT: #38-98A Landings Bay — PDP — Final Compliance (LUC) J-CRM&>2t_y co7Ad� Q'�( COLNLNOI'7S All comments must be received by Ron Vuehs no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, May 12, 1999 D j:�. — -A1zt� Signature: �i �jlCAGCLi-IC IJ CHECK HERE IF YOU WITH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape ^�i Citv of Fort Collins REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: December 10, 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #38-98 Courtyard Commons -Type II (LUC)-PDP PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, December 30, 1998 e. No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) All Plans and Supplements Included: O Utility Plan © Site Plan © Landscape Plan 0 "Street Repair and Reconstruction Standards and Guidelines" © Attorney's Certificate Handout General Comments: O See redline comments on all sheets of the utility plan, site plan, and landscape plan. More specific comments will be mentioned below. ■ Include copy of the utility coordination sheet with all utility locations. This could be included on the overall utility plan sheet, but it might be better to include it separate. Utility Plan Comments: Cover Sheet; Sheet 1 of 10: ■ Include the following note: o Any work done by the City with in the ROW that causes damage to the decorative concrete surfacing will be repaired with a suitable patch determined appropriate by the City Engineer. The repair of decorative concrete surfacing will be the responsibility of the owners. _�,w, -r ri we ye'r" Plat; Sheet I of 2. 0 The attorney's certificate is not correct. I have placed a copy of the correct attorney's certificate as a handout. ■ The ditch company should have a signature block on the plat for approval. 0 The date of preparation should be included on the plat. Plat; Sheet 2 of 2: — ■ 1 have received copies of letters from the utility companies except PSCO. 1n order to decrease the 15 utility easement required along JFK Parkway and Landings Drive, a formal variance letter should be submitted. I will present the variance to the City Engineer and responded back GGtNNo the developer with the decision. Overall Utility Plan; Sheet 3 of 10: 0 The internal sidewalk connections do not promote pedestrian traffic, and internal sidewalks are not inviting to handicapped pedestrians. e The nose of the median at both multi -family entrances should be setback to the new R.O.W. line. —0 Both multi-fannily entrances should provide a 20-foot wide emergency access entrance, should have a 20-foot curb return, and maintain a 90-degree angle until the R.O.W. line (i.e. Landings Drive entrance). Plan must show complete horizontal alignment including but not limited to: centeriine of all roadways, access ramps (check site plan ), curb return radii at all accesses, curve radii Im internal drive aisles (show on a curve table), drive aisle dimensions (must maintain 20 feet), R.O.W. dimensions, and indication where curb and gutter transition. iIf The site does not allow for adequate vehicular truck movements. In particular, this would include fire truck and SU-30 truck accessibility. See the areas highlighted in green. Design for an SU-30 truck. UThe entrances to the residential need to provide 20-foot drive entrance for fire access. Check with the PFA. ■ A crosswalk is shown on the site plan as midblock crossing to Bockman Drive. Show on the utility 7oA4*r o t �''On- ■ The sidewalk should not meander along JFK Parkway adjacent to the detention pond. Grading Plan; Sheet 4 of 10. ■ A cross-section of the redlined area would be helpful to sec how it drains. Indicate what is drawn adjacent to buildings E, F, G, and H to prevent flooding. —7 MPi� iv S r 9 Sanitary Sewer Plan and Profile; Sheet 6 of 10: ■ All services should be at right angles to mains. ■ Check the invert elevations for profiles "Line B" and "Line C". Sec redlined comments. General details; Sheet 9 of 10: ■ Show sidewalk transition detail. Show cross-section of the driveway detail as indicated on the plan set. <✓� „Jr traJ? A.J 7-l�cdSs L�gzu,� �'c �1� r.5 PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: 8, AipgaO 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: 038-98 Courtyard Commons (LUC) Type 11 PDP PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received by: 09/09/98 ❑ ,No Problems L- Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) General Comments: See redlined comments on all sheets of the utility plans. More specific comments and concerns will be mentioned below. Utility Plan Comments: Cover Sheet: There is a new vertical control listing for the City of Fort Collins which does not include fire hydrant benchmark descriptors as being accurate. Therefore, the benchmark descriptors for this project should come from the new vertical control listing. Reference the updated/current soils investigation report. See redlined comments for completed General Notes. Plat: A plat must be included in the utility plans. Overall Utility Plan; Sheet 3 of 11: