No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBLOCK 128 814-816 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE HOWELL BUILDING - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-03-18®� Qualified Affordable ® r ®1 Housing Project J Comment Sheet Current Planning DATE: September 16, 1998 TO: Mapping & Drafting PROJECT: #46-98 The Howell Building - PDP - Type I All comments must be received by Leanne Harter no later than the staff review meeting: September 30,1998 k_ S V-0- Date: CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS�IITn .. _ Pit _ Site _ Drainage Repoli _ Others _ Utility _ Redline Utility _ lendsrape City of Foxt Collins PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: 16 September, 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: 946-98 The Howell Building - PDP - Type I PLANNER: Leanne Harter ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received by: 09/30/98 El o Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Utility Plan Comments: ❑► A State Highway Permit is required for the street cut on College Avenue. ❑► The Site Plan and the Utility Plan should coincide. The Utility Plan does not depict: • The proposed balconies, 12 feet above the ground, overlooking College Avenue. • The small addition to the back of the building. • The parking configuration. ❑► There is a new vertical control listing for the City which negates the use of the black bolt as a benchmark. Call Wally Muscott at 221-6605 for more information. ❑► There are a few more details required. • Curb and gutter details. • Sidewalk detail. ❑► As a result of the proposed balconies, encroachment permits will be needed for the balconies encroach into the ROW. Site Plan Comments: ❑► The site plan does not depict: • The proposed balconies, 12 feet above the ground, overlooking College Avenue. • The retaining wall in the parking area along the southern property line. 0 As a result of the proposed balconies, encroachment permits will be needed for the balconies encroach into the ROW. 0 There is some general concern with the parking layout: • How do vehicles maneuver within the parking lot configuration? Specifically, the vehicles will have to back out into the alley. The parking stalls meet the dimensions set forth in the standards, but they do not allow a vehicle to turn around safely. • The rear entrance for the building adjacent to the northern property line is Yz a foot into the parking stall. Date: �%� Signature - PLEASE' SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: O—PLAT SITE 0-�76TILITY Ff LANDSCAPE ®� Qualified Affordable ®l� Housing Project J Comment Sheet Current Planning DATE: September 16, 1998 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT: #46-98 The Howell Building - PDP - Type I All comments must be received by Leanne Harter no later than the staff review meeting: September 30,1998 N �, Date: signanure: CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _ Plat _ SRe _ Drainage RTOIt _ Oler -Utility — Redline Utility — Undsape City of Fort Collins DATE: October 22, 1998 TO: Engineering PROJECT: #46-98 Howell Building - Type I (LUC) - PDP vw Priority Processing `&�a All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, November 4, 1998 ❑ No Comment IdProblems or Concerns (see below or attached) GfI�GkSiiF l/S. Gfi/L/�J!`�A�fJ Date: City of Port Collins REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: December 24, 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #46-98 Howell Building -Type I (LUC)-PDP PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, January 13, 1998 No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) All Plans and Supplements Included: O Utility Plan © Site Plan © Landscape Plan © "Street Repair and Reconstruction Standards and Guidelines" General Comments: O See redline comments on all sheets of the utility plan, site plan, and landscape plan. More specific comments will be mentioned below. G The utility plans do not match the sit and landscape plans in that the utility plan balcony extends further than what is shown on the site plan. 13 The main issue to resolve is the parking lot layout. Currently, the parking configuration does not meet the parking stall dimension criteria set forth in the LUC. The pervious submittal was headed in the right direction and had only one fcwer parking space. Date: /� Signature: _�� Please send copies of marked revisions Mat ate Affility �,Eandscape City of Fort Collins 11 N N 11 11 N N 11 11 11 N 11 N 11 N .1 11 11 11 11 N 11 11 11 11 11 N N 0 , Qualified Affordable L 1 Housing Project L .1 Comment Sheet ffi ffi 0 Current Planning ffi 11 ;V 11 DATE: February 22, 1999 TO: Engineering V Ift PROJECT: #46-98 The Howell Building — PDP — Final 1p Am Type I (LUC) .1 ift All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff > 0 review meeting:ID „ 11 ID March 10, 1999 .1 11 iorJ %N&69iCor s� 7 40 aE %aES4%"s r012�- .1 THE LeT/Li77F5 hLat�(� Ti+E J?o12) tfH-rl43ull�r7� ,' �.ruza. id6�orrZ�SAo �d�c %Z ' �s�flu+nJG N '?. 11 11 .1 M 11 N u u n u n u n n n n Dater/9f Signature: i 0 CIM HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS 0 YW _/ Sitel - I _ Iha * Repod _ Ok 1( Ut R�WWG Udq hadsM Citv of Fort u J n m it