The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCARIBOU - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2009-07-21Selected Issues Report Citv of Fort Collins Date: 7/20/2009 CARIBOU APARTMENTS ( RESUBMITTED) TYPE II AND FINAL PLANS SELECTION CRITERIA: Department = Engineering; Status = All ISSUES: Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Randy Maizland Topic: Engineering Number:56 Created:1/3/2007 Pending [1/3/07] Please provide a City signature approval block on sheet 8A in the lower right hand corner. Number:57 Created:1/3/2007 Pending [1/3/07] Refer to sheet 13 of the Utility Plans. The 90 degree elbow intersection shall meet the design requirements of LCUASS 7-24. Minimum distance between PC and PRC is 45 feet. Please check design requirements and revise if necessary. Remove the access easement label from the typical private street cross section. Number:58 Created:1/3/2007 Pending [1/3/07] Please add a typical detail for interim asphalt sidewalk construction to sheet 25. Asphalt should be at least 3 inches rolled and compacted with proper drainage. Number:59 Created:1/3/2007 Pending [1/3/07] Utility Plans are basically ready for mylar. Submit revised mylar original with redlines for final check and routing for signatures. Topic: General Number:41 Created:7/6/2006 Resolved [7/6/06] The sidewalks along Timberline and Caribou are adjacent to slopes in some areas. Please show in the cross sections a minimum of 1 foot of flat area behind the sidewalk for pedestrian safety per LCUASS. Number:42 Created:7/6/2006 Resolved [7/6/06] All of the variance requests submitted have been approved and shall be acurately shown on the general notes sheet of the plans. Number:43 Created:7/6/2006 Resolved [7/6/06] All retaining walls higher than 30 inches retaining shall be labeled on the plans as under separate permit by the Building Department. These walls will not be covered by the Development Construction Permit. Provide additional wall elevation data - see redlines. Number:44 Created:7/6/2006 Pending [1/3/07] No Development Agreement Info sheet has been provided. Per the staff meeting request, a DA info sheet will be emailed to Tricia with North Star. Page 1 Number:195 Created:12/9/2002 Resolved The vertical curve centered on station 22+00 has been shortened from the last submittal, and is too short. See Figure 7-17 length requirements. 8.19.03 - While the curve meets the new AASHTO requirements, the City's standards are more restrictive, and a variance would be required for the shorter length vertical curve. If the new AASHTO graph is used in support of the variance, please also address the Decision Sight Distance also required under AASHTO on page 115. Number:196 Created:12/9/2002 Resolved It does not appear that the inlet shown near station 35+20 lines up with the low point in the road. Topic: UP sheet 11-private streets Number:33 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved Please show how pedestrians will cross the "pork chop". Please provide a painted crosswalk at this location. Number:34 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved Please label the angle at which Shorebird intersects Timberline. Number:37 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved Please show centerline profile. This applies to all street designs. Number:38 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved Please show all PC and PT information on the profile and the plan view. Topic: UP sheet 12 Timberline Number:42 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved Please change all notes reading that improvements will be designed and constructed by Street oversizing to read, instead, that they will be designed and constructed as a separate project. Number:43 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved It is unclear what improvements will be built by this project that will stand alone without Street Oversizing constructing anything. Please show how the project's frontage improvements will tie into existing Timberline without any work by others. Number:44 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved Please provide a 10' crosspan at the Harmony Drive intersection with Timberline since the pan is parallel to an arterial. Topic: UP sheet 13 - private streets Number:35 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved Please show all utility crossings under the roadway (typ). Number:39 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved The maximum grade break allowed is 0.4%. There are several locations where this is not being met. Number: 40 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved Page 8 Please show how the new streets tie into the existing grades on Caribou and the proposed grades on Timberline. This type of information should be shown on all flowlines/centerlines for all streets. Topic: UP sheet 13- private streets Number:41 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved On the sag curves on Shorebird, please provide a vertical curve design since the grade break exceeds maximum, but when the grade hits 0.5%, it should continue straight to the inlet for a maximum 1 % grade break at the inlet, which is allowed. The centerline should follow the curve for the entire distance. If clarification of this comment is needed, feel free to call. Number:155 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved There is at least one location where the cross -slope does not reach the minimum 2%. (Verbena near Caribou) Number:156 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Please see detail 16-7 for the cross-section requirement for the ped refuge. Topic: UP sheet 13 Timberline Number:45 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved The left flowline profile does not make sense when compared to the plan view. Curb returns? Topic: UP sheet 14 Timberline Cross -sections Number:49 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved Please provide cross sections for the entire length of improvements (down to sta 10+76 approx). Number:52 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved The centerline shown is different than the Poudre Hospital Harmony Campus plans (which were used to construct improvements at the Harmony -Timberline intersection). Number:157 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Repeat: The most current set of plans showing the centerline/sectionline to be referred to should be referenced and used: Poudre Valley Health Systems Harmony Campus... (C3- 1745) Number:158 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Please lighten all existing items, so that what is proposed can be seen more clearly (typ). Number:159 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Please provide typical spot elevations for the intersection of Harmony Drive and Timberline. Number:160 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Please show all utility crossing under the roadway on the profiles as well as the plan views. Number:161 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved At the low point leading to the inlet, please provide a 1% grade break. Number: 162 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Page 9 One section of the left flowline does not meet the minimum 0.5% flowline grade. Topic: UP sheet 15 Timberline signing/striping Number:50 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved Please change striping to maintain left -in turns at Harmony Drive and Summerstone Drive. Number:51 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved Please show the existing offsite ROW's Number:53 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved Please make a clear distinction between what is existing striping and what is proposed. Number:54 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved Why are the lanes proposed to be sub -standard? Through lanes should be 12' wide, and bike lanes should be 8' wide. Number:55 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved Please clarify taper lengths. (drawing 8-06, LCUASS) Number:56 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved What is the existing configuration of lanes at the intersection of Caribou and Timberline? Existing and proposed striping on both the north and south legs of the intersection should be clearly displayed. Number:163 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Please dimension length of transitional taper. Number:164 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Please label the grade break approved under the variance. Number:165 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved How will the interim grading work with the taper? Topic: UP sheet 16 Timberline 6-lane design Number:57 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved Please provide much more information as outlined in the comments under the "General" heading and called for by LCUASS. Topic: UP sheet 18 Timberline Cross -sections Number:46 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved It does not appear that the cross -slopes for the 6-lane configuration match the cross -slopes proposed for the 4-lane configuration. They appear to be smaller. Number:48 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved It appears that future slopes in the parkway and on the west side of the sidewalk might exceed the maximum of 4:1. Please label these slopes. For the steep slopes adjacent to the sidewalk a width of 2' at a gentle slope needs to be provided before the steep slope begins for the safety of bicyclists and pedestrians. Number:166 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Please doublecheck the flowline elevations at sta 11 and 11+50. Page 10 Number:167 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Why don't the proposed centerline elevations tie into the existing ones? (they should.) Number:168 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved The flowline slope between sta 25 and 25+50 doesn't match sheet 15. Topic: UP sheet 3 Number:17 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved Please direct flows from the southeast drive (onto Shorebird) through an under -walk drain. Too much water is flowing over the sidewalk. Number:146 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved There are still several driveways where drainage is being routed over public sidewalks in greater amounts than are allowed under the standards. Please provide additional spot elevations on the grading plan to show that drainage will not cross the sidewalks. 12.07.02 - In general, there should be a high point at or near the back of the sidewalk at a driveway location to prevent drainage from crossing the sidewalk. The variance request was denied insofar as no more than 750 square feet of drainage is allowed over public sidewalks, which results in the need to redesign the southeastern -most driveway approach to the street. Topic: UP sheet 4 - Grading Number:18 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved Please obtain easements for offsite grading. Letter(s) of intent are required prior to hearing, with completed easements required prior to filing mylars. Number:19 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved Any utility relocations along the Timberline frontage needed for this project's improvements will be the responsibility of this project, not others. Number:20 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved Grading to the south as shown does not tie into any existing grades. Need to see how the grading will work for the 4- and 6-lane designs and (if different) the project's interim improvements without any changes to Timberline offsite (other than temporary transitions). Please feel free to call if clarification is needed. Topic: UP sheet 5 - Grading Number:21 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved Please change location of the note stating that driveways shall be concrete to the back of walk to the overall utility plan and/or the street plan and profile. Number:22 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved Please clearly label retaining walls. Number:23 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved It appears that the curb along Caribou is going to be re -graded. If so, please provide a profile. Number:149 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Please provide elevations of lot corners. Page 11 Topic: UP sheet 7a Number:205 Created:8/21/2003 Resolved Please see redlines on this sheet. Could this sheet be re -titled? The title of grading plan doesn't really fit. Topic: UP sheet 9 storm sewer Number:32 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved The Storm 4 crossing under Shorebird does not appear to have enough cover. A minimum of 2' of cover between the pipe and grade is required. Topic: UP's sheet 2 Number:15 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved Notes 41 and 47 are not accurate. The private streets are shown with Flowline stationing, and 47 needs to list the names of the private streets. Repeat 10.02.02 - note 47 still needs to list the names of the private streets. Number:16 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved Please submit a variance request for the street spacing on Timberline according to LCUASS requirements, and include this variance in note 48. Topic: Utility Plan Cover Sheet Number:11 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved Please include the cross-section for the 4 and 6-lane arterials as well as the local cross- section. Number:12 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved Please reference the soils report (title, date, engineer). Number: 13 Please list the Owner. Created:7/9/2002 Resolved Number:14 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved Please include the plat in the index (for reference only), but do not include it in the numbering of the sheets. Page 12 PROJECT A!h COMMENT SHEET City oFFort Collins Curter[ Pleminz DATE: June 14, 2002 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #18-02A Caribou Apartments PDP — Type H (LUC) All comments must be received by Bob Barkeen no later than the staff review meeting: /{ 2A July 17, 2002 c Ael&o = Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference � Wr- P,-g Z, P.a r f Z' 3 I t C-4 v IZ v C_-w a,4.St'm L'^-T' T'b S L I j lo:v c 1'(� � �' Curz►4,e•-. I rjCUr ACTT c m a^ T-- '�,, C^ c i'� Z3 l cI' 7 l 5739 / S (Jtir GcjC •4 TG � /3 � �� Name (please print) �K HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fart Collins Current Planning DATE: June 14, 2002 TO: Street Oversizing PROJECT: #18-02A Caribou Apartments PDP —Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Bob Barkeen no later than the staff review meeting: July 17, 2002 Note -.Please identify your redlines for future reference r 1`x io.-.64 .� � v�� Ge�� d � G / c. n oc C_ ci c 4 I c, L-'L U � c � C'- �c�_j' /a 17 s G` Grp tx��'(T �► /i'�`C%��i-1v c? �l 'hI V v' l"U C_,4AV5b4 C �Z2y__�'7_ j) `�'� Cv r I ✓ �� G"` Gi-C-f/ f �� 1fVqpf'e'(jAeas'_e'_prz_nt) /-,-/ CHECK HERE IF OU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape city of Fort coigns PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: June 14, 2002 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #18-02A Caribou Apartments PDP — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Bob Barkeen no later than the staff review meeting: 1� �1 July 17, 2002 c,4RlaD1/6.,ja/) Note -.Please identify your redlines for future reference ('51y" z, PL A r- `7— I T_ L C t S .^ t M 4 `9. E,4 S�' 77l 5 3`f Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS 11 _Plat Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fart Collins Current PlanninLy DATE: June 14, 2002 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT: #18-02A Caribou Apartments PDP —Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Bob Barkeen no later than the staff review meeting: July 17, 2002 Note --Please identify your redlines for future reference Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility —Landscape City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: July 23, 2002 Project: CARIBOU APARTMENTS PDP All comments must be received by BOB BARKEEN in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: July 17, 2002 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: General 8 The presentation of street improvements to Timberline is incomplete. The design of Timberline to the 6-lane standard (horizontal and vertical including grading needed beyond the ROW) should be provided for the project frontage as well as 1000' offsite in both directions (north and south). (LCUASS 7.4.1 A 8) The same information should be included in the 4-lane design. Either this project needs to construct the 4-lane configuration from Caribou to Harmony Drive, or provide stand- alone plans with improvements to the project frontage only. Street Oversizing may or may not participate in the improvements to the south, so please correct the notes that state that they will. 9 For the 4-lane design of Timberline, the street layout should be designed to standard assuming that the east curb and gutter will remain where they are. This will probably shift the road a bit to the west. Matt Baker of Street Oversizing should be contacted regarding the possibility of designing the 4-lane improvements to the constrained arterial standards. This may apply if the existing cross-section to the north is constrained. 10 For the 6-lane design of Timberline, assume that the eastern ROW line will not change, and lay out the street to standard based on that assumption. Again, this will most likely shift more ROW to the west. 36 This project needs to provide the offsite sidewalk connection from this site to a connecting sidewalk along the west side of Timberline. 1173107,- Date CHECK HVE IE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat •x Site Drainage Report Other _ Utility- Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 Number:45 Created:7/6/2006 Resolved [7/6/06] Maximum slope gradient allowed is 4 horizontal to 1 vertical. Any proposed slopes steeper than this will require a variance request and approval. No variances will likely be approved for steeper slopes in the detention pond. Please clearly show -label all slope gradients on the cross sections. Number:46 Created:7/6/2006 Resolved [7/6/06] Please provide a detail for all proposed handicap access curb ramps on sheets 21- 25. Topic: Pavement Number:47 Created:7/6/2006 Resolved [7/6/06] High swell soils will need to be addressed with pavement design for Kechter & Timberline Topic: Techical Services Number:48 Created:7/6/2006 Resolved [7/6/06] Please provide information and documentation showing how Timberline and Caribou were dedicated ? Page 2 47 For the 4-lane configuration of Timberline, it would be acceptable to use the constrained arterial standards for the frontage along Stormwater property if the appropriate tapers can be accomodated under those standards. 69 Please see redlined utility plan checklist for any additional comments on the utility plans and plat. Please re -check the checklist and return with revisions. . 86 It would be advisable to have a utility coordination meeting soon. Please contact Katie Moore at 221-6605 to schedule. 87 Please see the redlined utility plan checklist for additional items, and revise and return the checklist with the next submittal. 89 Please see redlines for additional comments. Topic: Landscape plan Sight distance easement language is incorrect. Plat language handout containing the corr uage has been included with the comments. Pleas s e ements (especially sight distance easements) and ROW. 61 There is at least one location where it appears that utility separation requirements have not been met. Topic: Plat 65 Some of the plat language is incorrect or missing. The correct plat language handout has been included with the comments. 66 Please label and dimension the current and proposed full ROW widths for all streets and clearly identify private streets. 67 The radii provided for curves in the Emergency access easements are in fficient. The radii should be a minimum of 25' interior and 50' exterior measured f m the same center (will create a bumpout). ;��i Please provide a table identifying each tract/envelope/etc. CE=?, GE=?, s tract A? etc. Topic: Site plan 62 1 It appears that there are only 261 parking spaces, as opposed to the 265 H ed on the parking table. 63 Please dimension all ar veway widt s, idewalks, drive aisle widths, parking stall depths and widths, etc. `- 64j'-Please clearly show and dimension existing and proposed Rights of Way. Page 2 Topic: Utility Plan Cover Sheet 11 Please include the cross-section for the 4 and 6-lane arterials as well as the local cross-section. 12 Please reference the soils report (title, date, engineer). 13 Please list the Owner. 14 Please include the plat in the index (for reference only), but do not include it in the numbering of the sheets. Topic: UP's sheet 2 15 Notes 41 and 47 are not accurate. The private streets are shown with Flowline stationing, and 47 needs to list the names of the private streets. 16 Please submit a variance request for the street spacing on Timberline according to LCUASS requirements, and include this variance in note 48. Topic: UP sheet 3 17 Please direct flows from the southeast drive (onto Shorebird) through an under -walk drain. Too much water is flowing over the sidewalk. Topic: UP sheet 4 - Grading 18 Please obtain easements for offsite grading. Letter(s) of intent are required prior to hearing, with completed easements required prior to filing mylars. 19 Any utility relocations along the Timberline frontage needed for this project's improvements will be the responsibility of this project, not others. 20 Grading to the south as shown does not tie into any existing grades. Need to see how the grading will work for the 4- and 6-lane designs and (if different) the project's interim improvements without any changes to Timberline offsite (other than temporary transitions). Please feel free to call if clarification is needed. Topic: UP sheet 5 — Grading 21 Please change location of the note stating that driveways shall be concrete to the back of walk to the overall utility plan and/or the street plan and profile. 22 Please clearly label retaining walls. 23 It appears that the curb along Caribou is going to be re -graded. If so, please provide a profile. Topic: Overall Utility Plan - Sheet 6 Page 3 24 Please show existing features (buildings, drives etc) for 150' from the project limits (checklist item III F) 25 Please clearly label all radii for curb returns and emergency access easements. 26 Please label retaining walls 27 Please dedicate and show additional sight distance easements needed from several driveways. 28 Please alter the design of the right turn lane off of Timberline to accommodate a bus stop. 29 Driveways serving 12 or more dwelling units are required to have a width of 28 feet. Please adjust driveway widths. 30 Please dimension all sidewalks, driveways, parking stalls, parking lot drive widths, ROW, etc. 31 Emergency access easements need to meet current standards: 25' interior radius and 50' exterior radius measured on the same centerpoint. 85 Please provide directional ramps at intersection of Caribou and the private street. 88 Please orient driveway on west side of elbow closer to a 90-degree intersection with the street. Topic: UP sheet 9 storm sewer 32 The Storm 4 crossing under Shorebird does not appear to have enough cover. A minimum of 2' of cover between the pipe and grade is required. Topic: UP sheet 11-private streets 33 Please show how pedestrians will cross the "pork chop". Please provide a painted crosswalk at this location. 34 Please label the angle at which Shorebird intersects Timberline. 35 Please show all utility crossings under the roadway (typ). 37 Please show centerline profile. This applies to all street designs. 38 Please show all P t I and PT information on the profile and the plan view. Page 4 39 The maximum grade break allowed is 0.4%. There are several locations where this is not being met. 40 Please show how the new streets tie into the existing grades on Caribou and the proposed grades on Timberline. This type of information should be shown on all flowlines/centerlines for all streets. 41 On the sag curves on Shorebird, please provide a vertical curve design since the grade break exceeds maximum, but when the grade hits 0.5%, it should continue straight to the inlet for a maximum 1 % grade break at the inlet, which is allowed. The centerline should follow the curve for the entire distance. If clarification of this comment is needed, feel free to call. Topic: UP sheet 12 Timberline 42 Please change all notes reading that improvements will be designed and constructed by Street oversizing to read, instead, that they will be designed and constructed as a separate project. 44 Please provide a 10' crosspan at the Harmony Drive intersection with Timberline since the pan is parallel to an arterial. Topic: UP sheet 13 Timberline 45 The left flowline profile does not make sense when compared to the plan view. Curb returns? Topic: UP sheet 14 Timberline Cross -sections 46 It does not appear that the cross -slopes for the 6-lane configuration match the cross -slopes proposed for the 4-lane configuration. They appear to be smaller. 48 It appears that future slopes in the parkway and on the west side of the sidewalk might exceed the maximum of 4:1. Please label these slopes. For the steep slopes adjacent to the sidewalk a width of 2' at a gentle slope needs to be provided before the steep slope begins for the safety of bicyclists and pedestrians. 49 Please provide cross sections for the entire length of improvements (down to sta 10+76 approx). Topic: UP sheet 15 Timberline signing/striping 50 Please change striping to maintain left -in turns at Harmony Drive and Summerstone Drive. 51 Please show the existing offsite ROW's Page 5 52 The centerline shown is different than the Poudre Hospital Harmony Campus plans (which were used to construct improvements at the Harmony -Timberline intersection). 53 Please make a clear distinction between what is existing striping and what is proposed. 54 Why are the lanes proposed to be sub -standard? Through lanes should be 12' wide, and bike lanes should be 8' wide. 55 Please clarify taper lengths. (drawing 8-06, LCUASS) 56 What is the existing configuration of lanes at the intersection of Caribou and Timberline? Existing and proposed striping on both the north and south legs of the intersection should be clearly displayed. Topic: UP sheet 16 Timberline 6-lane design 57 Please provide more information as outlined in the comments under the "General" heading and called for by LCUASS. Topic: Detail Sheet 58 Please use LCUASS detail for under -walk drain, add details for the 4-lane arterial and 6-lane arterial, correct some typos (certain items were wrong in LCUASS), and add LCUASS detail numbers to a few drawings lacking them. 84 Please provide details of retaining walls. Page 6 Project Comments Sheet City of Tod Selected Departments ._ y Collins Department: Transportation Planning Date: July 18, 2002 Project: CARIBOU APARTMENTS PDP All comments must be received by BOB BARKEEN in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: July 17, 2002 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Tom Reiff Topic: site plan 90 Please identify all access ramps on all plans with an 'R'. 91 Redesign the walkway / entrance in front of the clubhouse to connect to the sidewalk and remove the unnecessary concrete that connects to the drive aisle (see red lines). 92 Design the'pork chop' median at Shorebird Drive and Timberline Rd. with a pedestrian refuge that allows for the sidewalk to continue through and stripe the crosswalk (see red lines). 93 Provide a direct walkway connection out to Timberline and the future transit stop around the detention pond (see red lines). 94 Identify with wording only that d future transit stop is planned along Timberline Road. 95 The proposed commercial local designation for Caribou Road adjacent to the site would require on -street bikelanes. Are on -street bikelanes proposed for Caribou with this project? Signature' Date CHECK H I;E IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS � Plat / Site . Drainage Report _�` Other UtilityRedline Utility Landscape N� ty Page 1 Transportation Planning October 2, 2002 CARIBOU APARTMENTS PDP All comments must be received by BOB BARKEEN in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: October 02, 2002 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Tom Reiff Topic: site plan 90 Please identify all access ramps on all plans with an 'R'. (Follow-up Round #2) Please be aware that there are new ADA standards for access ramps. All ramps are now required to be truncated. Please contact the ADA website for design standards or the City's engineerig department. 96 Identify bike parking facilities on plans that are near the building's entrances for the residential units and clubhouse. (Follow-up Round #2) Does the proposed bike parking facilities accomodate 5% of the overall parking requirement? Please include an additional rack for residents on the other side of the building. 97 Sidewalks at driveways need to be designed and constructed to the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards. Please refer to Drawing 16-1 in the LCUASS. (Repeat comment Round #2) 98 The pedestrian level of service for continuity is not met for a school walking area. This will need to be addressed further in subsequent submittals. One option to achieve pedestrian LOS is to provide a southbound sidewalk on the west side of Timberline that connects to the nearest sidewalk at Harmony Drive. (Follow-up Round #2) Please identify the extent of the sidewalk improvements along Timberline Road on the utility plans that will occur with this project. Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other X_ Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 Project Comments Sheet Ci of Fort Collins Selected Departments Department: Engineering Date: October 8, 2002 Project: CARIBOU APARTMENTS PDP All comments must be received by BOB BARKEEN in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: October 02, 2002 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: General 36 This project needs to provide the offsite sidewalk connection from this site to a connecting sidewalk along the west side of Timberline. 10.2.02 - Repeat. 69 Please see redlined utility plan checklist for any additional comments on the utility plans and plat. Please re -check the checklist and return with revisions. 86 It would be advisable to have a utility coordination meeting soon. Please contact Katie Moore at 221-6605 to schedule. 89 Please see redlines for additional comments. 150 Please provide diagrams on each sheet that shows where the portion shown sits in relation to the rest of the site (for any sheet that doesn't show the site in Its entirety). 182 The following is a request: Please label existing and proposed elevations on the street profiles at each station. See sheet 13. This makes It much easier to check against the cross -sections and any spot elevations provided. This information has often been provided on plans submitted for other projects. 183 In general, any existing Items should be shown In a lighter -weight line, and any proposed Items should be shown In a darker Iineweight. 185 Any engineering comments lower in number than 138 are repeat comments as of 10.02.02 Topic: Landscape plan 60 Please show all easements (especially sight distance easements) and ROW. 10.02.02 - olease label them as well Signature t, �' -- Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS ; Plat Site Drainage Report Other — Utility_ Redline Utility = Landscape Page 1 146 There are still several driveways where drainage Is being routed over public sidewalks in greater amounts than are allowed under the standards. Please provide additional spot elevations on the grading plan to show that drainage will not cross the sidewalks. Topic: UP sheet 4 - Grading 18 Please obtain easements for offsite grading. Letter(s) of intent are required prior to hearing, with completed easements required prior to filing mylars. Topic: UP sheet 5 - Grading 149 Please provide elevations of lot corners. Topic: Horizontal Control Plan 147 Please dimension all driveway cut widths. 148 Due to the unusual driveway widenings at the street, it is recommended that the curves In these driveways be smoothed out. The bumpouts behind the sidewalks could turn into a maintenance problem later from cars hitting them. Topic: Overall Utility Plan 25 Please clearly label all radii for curb returns and emergency access easements. 85 Please provide directional ramps at intersection of Caribou and the private street. 10.2.02 - This Includes one ramp (at either corner) to cross Caribou. 151 Sidewalks shouldn't need ramps for crossing driveways. The walks should be flush with the driveways. 152 On the elbow, the driveways should be concrete to the backs of the sidewalks even though they veer outside of the ROW. 153 Please provide a detail of how the ramps will work at the northwest corner of Shorebird and Timberline. 154 Please configure the inlet and the right turn lane taper so that the Inlet will not have to be rebuilt when the 6-lane configuration of Timberline is constructed. Topic: UP sheet 13- private streets 155 There Is at least one location where the cross -slope does not reach the minimum 2%. (Verbena near Caribou) 156 Please see detail 16-7 for the cross-section requirement for the ped refuge. Topic: UP sheet 14 Timberline Cross -sections 52 The centerline shown is different than the Poudre Hospital Harmony Campus plans (which were used to construct Improvements at the Harmony -Timberline Intersection). 157 Repeat: The most current set of plans showing the centerline/sectionline to be referred to should be referenced and used: Poudre Valley Health Systems Harmony Campus... (C3-1745) 158 Please lighten all existing items, so that what is proposed can be seen more clearly (typ). 159 Please provide typical spot elevations for the Intersection of Harmony Drive and Timberline. 160 Please show all utility crossing under the roadway on the profiles as well as the plan views. 161 At the low point leading to the inlet, please provide a 1 % grade break. Page 3 178 The 6-lane design of Timberline should be an extension of the 4-lane design. The road should not have to be entirely rebuilt In the future. Please use the cross -sections for the 4-lane design and extend those slopes for the 6-lane design. 179 Please provide cross -sections every 50'. 180 Please provide all cross-section information as required by the standards. 181 Please do not grade sidewalks such that they will end up as puddles/streams. Page 5 Selected Issues Report C"itt of Fort Collins Date: 7/20/2009 CARIBOU APARTMENTS PDP AND FINAL COMPLIANCE SELECTION CRITERIA: Department = Engineering; Status = All ISSUES: Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: Timberline 6-lane Number:174 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved For all new street corners, please provide directional ramps. Number:175 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Sheet 28 shows the wrong stationing along the bottom of the sheet. Number:176 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved For the parcel just north of Caribou, please show a 10' parkway. Number:177 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Please label all intersecting streets. Number:178 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved The 6-lane design of Timberline should be an extension of the 4-lane design. The road should not have to be entirely rebuilt in the future. Please use the cross -sections for the 4- lane design and extend those slopes for the 6-lane design. Number:179 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Please provide cross -sections every 50'. Number:180 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Please provide all cross-section information as required by the standards. Number:181 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Please do not grade sidewalks such that they will end up as puddles/streams. Topic: Detail Sheet Number:58 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved Please use LCUASS detail for under -walk drain, add details for the 4-lane arterial and 6- lane arterial, correct some typos (certain items were wrong in LCUASS), and add LCUASS detail numbers to a few drawings lacking them. Number: 84 Please provide details of retaining walls. Topic: General Number: 8 Created:7/17/2002 Resolved Created:7/9/2002 Resolved Page 1 1/13 co cz a. a E W O rU 0� M o0) zw Idl M v e,�c+ric mil. e, 3/W '91'lZge, q' Le c�T, ry-) ct lam' ► � '(� c�-Y G`�,�� C) gas 5 , fo e U cfir� �G-.S 4 e bhr �`c ro df {wfe -�O bru� qr&a4ui i VI SPf- I IV , bu(l4or.�0 14M o I�N 5a� e�rev�(,w„ - initll lx buil}- S�vue,HzW��s� - rn Sfr(lu* Lcv� S t a ca 0- c O Ka+- e-- /&f e, - a+-v I i K0,-MbC>re(�) �� cwy-� gs�(c �c�uc-ram ►�Ylr.J �� vr�-r N s-ra ► Lam" Q�c,�a �r, A,)E.-r- p ` s., Tz 5.0o 14- avw c h , hAoo X�L 2-Z5-729LI5 Conn ie . Woodard Q xc-Pleneri6y, , com S-77. `yip I 'L.OV%T-%to 1406Ic ICyn g %v%.ev Cr%05kln@Cor#�. ATf -T- -494-716 6, ��r� �/��.L TEHic� (� FGGoV• cow! ZZ/—G6Ty GrTy uTitIr. sue Cfrvrg eFC Ll-r, L.) Titz, - �o-5' ' z f LS 5 t4ivt -tan oV, c4U4 Wes LQ. 10 6 u.el CiL,� op. cr—C - (t;- ItA� es aa(MwateC `P6 --,q41 g wL .woo-Y6,A" @ �c j rs✓. cv�, C/-Z&- q `—toot'- (A-V 6 e o /8 -zZ �j�q,�c�cr?c.� �Olrr�cc.r.i '7ti 5 tA REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: November 20, 2002 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #18-02A Caribou Apartments PDP-Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Bob Barkeen no later than the staff review meeting: December `R, 2002 F-1 No Comment F71 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) **PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE'* TLI _ � r '�;-�.�l�`'�ir 7-I 1 ri 7 - {' -� j' / `- L r�,, - L i •T T i ; i iE it l - ;i- ;i l_ (_) ;; r> • 1 j / 1; c r CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat ✓ Site Drainage Report Other Da�Ii -Redline Utility _ Signature: City of Fort Collins N: Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments t Department: Transportation Planning Date: December 10, 2002 Project: CARIBOU APARTMENTS PDP All comments must be received by BOB BARKEEN in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting. - December 11, 2002 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Tom Reiff Topic: site plan 98 The pedestrian level of service for continuity is not met for a school walking area. This will need to be addressed further in subsequent submittals. One option to achieve pedestrian LOS is to provide a southbound sidewalk on the west side of Timberline that connects to the nearest sidewalk at Harmony Drive. (Follow-up Round #2) Please identify the extent of the sidewalk improvements along Timberline Road on the utility plans that will occur with this project. (Round #3 ) To achieve the minimum LOS for pedestrians the sidewalk along Timberline to Harmony Drive is required. Topic: Striping 197 Stripe Caribou as a commercial local as recommended in the TIS. This will include an 8 foot parking lane, 6 foot bike lane, and a 12 foot travel lane. Drop the bike lane and parking lane at the right turn lane transition as it approaches Timberline. The striping should mirror the striping of Caribou on the east side of Timberline. CHECK HERE Plat Utility Date IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Site Drainage Report Other_ Redline Utility_ Landscape Page I Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments Department: Engineering Date: December 13, 2002 Project: CARIBOU APARTMENTS PDP All comments must be received by BOB BARKEEN in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: December 11, 2002 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: General 36 This project needs to provide the offsite sidewalk connection from this site to a connecting sidewalk along the west side of Timberline. 10.2.02 - Repeat. 69 Please see redlined utility plan checklist for any additional comments on the utility plans and plat. Please re -check the checklist and return with revisions. 89 Please see redlines for additional comments. 150 Please provide diagrams on each sheet that shows where the portion shown sits in relation to the rest of the site (for any sheet that doesn't show the site in its entirety). 12.07.02 - This includes the street design sheets. 192 All engineering comments lower in number than 190 are repeat comments. Topic: site plan 63 Please dimension all driveway widths, sidewalks, drive aisle widths, parking stall depths and widths, etc.10.2.02 - repeat regarding the driveway widths 12.07.02 - The driveway widths should be dimensioned where they hit the ROW. Topic: Landscape plan 191 It appears that a tree added since the last submittal does not meet the utility separation requirements. Topic: Plat 65 Some of the plat language is incorrect or missing. The correct plat language handout has been included with the comments. 12.09.02 - Please remove the vested rights statement. Signature Z. Date CHECK HE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ Utility Redline Utility_ Landscape Page 1 FINAL COMPLIANCE City of Fort callins Current PlannPlanningCOMMENT SHEET DATE: July 31, 2003 TO: Trans. Planning PROJECT: #18-02B CARIBOU APARTMENTS PDP -FINAL COMPLIANCE - TYPE 11 (LUC) All comments must be received by Bob Barkeen no later than the staff review meeting: Name (I CHECK —Plat —Utility August 20, 2003 Note -.Please identify your redlines for future reference YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS —Site —Drainage Report —Other. —Redline Utility —Landscape s,A Project Comments Sheet City of Fort Collins Selected Departments Department: Engineering Date: August 22, 2003 Project: CARIBOU APARTMENTS PDP, # 18-02A/B FINAL COMPLIANCE All comments must be received by Bob Barkeen in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: August 20, 2003 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: General Number: 89 Created: 7/17/2002 Please see redlines for any additional comments. Number: 206 Created: 8/21 /2003 The cross -sections showing the grading of sidewalks to slope away from Timberline (sheet 18, sta 10 thru 12) are a concern because Sidewalks should not end up in puddles/streams and because drainage from the ROW needs to stay within the ROW or offsite drainage easements will be needed when this is built. For some of the cross -sections, the drainage stays within the ROW, but puddles on the sidewalks; perhaps the low point could be shifted away from the walk. Topic: site plan Number: 204 Created: 8/21 /2003 The private roads are not ROW and should not be labeled as ROW; they are easements. Topic: Timberline 6-lane Number: 195 Created: 12/9/2002 The vertical curve centered on station 22+00 has been shortened from the last submittal, and is too short. See Figure 7-17 length requirements. 8.19.03 - While the curve meets the new AASHTO requirements, the City's standards are more restrictive, and a variance would be required for the shorter length vertical curve. If the new AASHTO graph is used in support of the variance, please also address the Decision Sight Distance also required under AASHTO on page 115. Topic: UP sheet 7a Number: 205 Created: 8/21 /2003 Please see redlines on this sheet. Could this sheet be re -titled? The title of grading plan doesn't really fit. Signature Z4, . o 77 Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISION Plat,Site Drainage Report Other ,G Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 Project Comments Sheet Cit of Fort Collins Selected Departments Department: Water Wastewater Date: August 20, 2003 Project: CARIBOU APARTMENTS PDP, # 18-02A/B FINAL COMPLIANCE All comments must be received by Bob Barkeen in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: August 20, 2003 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Jeff Hill Topic: Landscape plan Number: 71 Created: 7/15/2002 Repeat comment: A tree is shown planted within 5 feet of the existing 27-inch sanitary sewer trunk in the wet lands area. Provide required landscape/utility separation distances. Signature Dad CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 REM aws FINAL COMPLIANCE COMMENT SHEET DATE: July 31, 2003 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #18-02B CARIBOU APARTMENTS PDP — FINAL COMPLIANCE — TYPE II (LUC) All comments must be received by Bob Barkeen no later than the staff review meeting: Xm August 20, 2003 Note --Please identify your redlines for future reference (. 3outibp" # � mot- cc.Oss. �- ATry. Q.F'l'� CS' Not 6 � c3� 3 4 iv Ci z:V- C S, h.-r- 8/ l g 7 7 f 53 g ! s K b t�J E.,j C,4, r A 13 ce5- ` Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other —Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape I& City of Fort Collins 2:2 fi m ii � ii i� Current Planning AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT COMMENT SHEET DATE: June 23, 2006 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt # 18-02C Caribou Apartments Resubmitted PDP — Type II Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: Signature July 5, 2006 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference ❑ No Problems �] Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) .51A.-f%( So 1S, %.-ed1,PeeJ '7�19eA4^*Oj L✓ Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape F City of Fort Collins The presentation of street improvements to Timberline is incomplete. The design of Timberline to the 6-lane standard (horizontal and vertical including grading needed beyond the ROW) should be provided for the project frontage as well as 1000' offsite in both directions (north and south). (LCUASS 7.4.1 A 8) The same information should be included in the 4-lane design. Either this project needs to construct the 4-lane configuration from Caribou to Harmony Drive, or provide stand-alone plans with improvements to the project frontage only. Street Oversizing may or may not participate in the improvements to the south, so please correct the notes that state that they will. Number:9 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved For the 4-lane design of Timberline, the street layout should be designed to standard assuming that the east curb and gutter will remain where they are. This will probably shift the road a bit to the west. Matt Baker of Street Oversizing should be contacted regarding the possibility of designing the 4-lane improvements to the constrained arterial standards. This may apply if the existing cross-section to the north is constrained. Number:10 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved For the 6-lane design of Timberline, assume that the eastern ROW line will not change, and lay out the street to standard based on that assumption. Again, this will most likely shift more ROW to the west. Number:36 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved This project needs to provide the offsite sidewalk connection from this site to a connecting sidewalk along the west side of Timberline. 10.2.02 - Repeat. 12.13.02 - As discussed yesterday, please add a drawing of the interim sidewalk connection to the south to the plan set. Also, please ensure that all notes state the correct information regarding the sidewalk timing and who will construct it. Number:47 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved For the 4-lane configuration of Timberline, it would be acceptable to use the constrained arterial standards for the frontage along Stormwater property if the appropriate tapers can be accomodated under those standards. Number:69 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved Please see redlined utility plan checklist for any additional comments on the utility plans and plat. Please re -check the checklist and return with revisions. Number:86 Created:7/17/2002 Resolved It would be advisable to have a utility coordination meeting soon. Please contact Katie Moore at 221-6605 to schedule. Number:87 Created:7/17/2002 Resolved Please see the redlined utility plan checklist for additional items, and revise and return the checklist with the next submittal. Number:89 Created:7/17/2002 Resolved Please see redlines for any additional comments. Number:150 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Page 2 Please provide diagrams on each sheet that shows where the portion shown sits in relation to the rest of the site (for any sheet that doesn't show the site in its entirety). 12,07.02 - This includes the street design sheets. Number:182 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved The following is a request: Please label existing and proposed elevations on the street profiles at each station. See sheet 13. This makes it much easier to check against the cross -sections and any spot elevations provided. This information has often been provided on plans submitted for other projects. Number:183 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved In general, any existing items should be shown in a lighter -weight line, and any proposed items should be shown in a darker lineweight. Number:185 Created:10/8/2002 Resolved Any engineering comments lower in number than 138 are repeat comments. Number:192 Created:12/9/2002 Resolved All engineering comments lower in number than 190 are repeat comments. Number:206 Created:8/21/2003 Resolved The cross -sections showing the grading of sidewalks to slope away from Timberline (sheet 18, sta 10 thru 12) are a concern because Sidewalks should not end up in puddles/streams and because drainage from the ROW needs to stay within the ROW or offsite drainage easements will be needed when this is built. For some of the cross -sections, the drainage stays within the ROW, but puddles on the sidewalks; perhaps the low point could be shifted away from the walk. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Randy Maizland Topic: General Number:210 Created:7/5/2006 Pending [7/5/06] The sidewalks along Timberline and Caribou are adjacent to slopes in some areas. Please show in the cross sections a minimum of 1 foot of flat area behind the sidewalk for pedestrian safety per LCUASS. Number:211 Created:7/5/2006 Pending [7/5/06] All of the variance requests submitted have been approved and shall be acurately shown on the general notes sheet of the plans. Number:212 Created:7/5/2006 Pending [7/5/06] All retaining walls higher than 30 inches retaining shall be labeled on the plans as under separate permit by the Building Department. These walls will not be covered by the Development Construction Permit. Provide additional wall elevation data - see redlines. Number:213 Created:7/5/2006 Pending [7/5/06] Please submit a new Development Agreement Information Form so that a revised Development Agreement can be prepared and reviewed by the City Attorney. Some language and final estimated totals have changed since the last submittal & draft agreement was prepared. Page 3 Number:214 Created:7/5/2006 Pending [7/5/06] Maximum slope gradient allowed is 4 horizontal to 1 vertical. Any proposed slopes steeper than this will require a variance request and approval. No variances will likely be approved for steeper slopes in the detention pond. Please clearly show -label all slope gradients on the cross sections. Number:215 Created:7/5/2006 Pending [7/5/06] Please provide a detail for all proposed handicap access curb ramps on sheets 21- 25. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: Grading Number:193 Created:12/9/2002 Resolved Per Matt Baker - the grading for 6-lane Timberline needs to be completed with the construction of this project. Topic: Horizontal Control Plan Number:147 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Please dimension all driveway cut widths. Number:148 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Due to the unusual driveway widenings at the street, it is recommended that the curves in these driveways be smoothed out. The bumpouts behind the sidewalks could turn into a maintenance problem later from cars hitting them. Topic: Landscape plan Number:59 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved Sight distance easement language is incorrect. Plat language handout containing the correct language has been included with the comments. Number:60 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved Please show all easements (especially sight distance easements) and ROW. 10.02.02 - please label them as well Number:61 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved There is at least one location where it appears that utility separation requirements have not been met. Number:144 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Several trees have been shown within the sight distance easements that don't work with the restrictions. Please pull them out of the easements. Number:145 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Sheet 4 does not have the utilities layer turned on. Number:191 Created:12/9/2002 Resolved It appears that a tree added since the last submittal does not meet the utility separation requirements. Topic: Overall Utility Plan Number:25 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved Page 4 Please clearly label all radii for curb returns and emergency access easements. Number:85 Created:7/17/2002 Resolved Please provide directional ramps at intersection of Caribou and the private street. 10.2.02 - This includes one ramp (at either corner) to cross Caribou. Number:151 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Sidewalks shouldn't need ramps for crossing driveways. The walks should be flush with the driveways. Number:152 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved On the elbow, the driveways should be concrete to the backs of the sidewalks even though they veer outside of the ROW. Number:153 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Please provide a detail of how the ramps will work at the northwest corner of Shorebird and Timberline. Number:154 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Please configure the inlet and the right turn lane taper so that the inlet will not have to be rebuilt when the 6-lane configuration of Timberline is constructed. Topic: Overall Utility Plan - Sheet 6 Number:24 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved Please show existing features (buildings, drives etc) for 150' from the project limits (checklist item III F) Number:26 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved Please label retaining walls Number:27 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved Please dedicate and show additional sight distance easements needed from several driveways. Number:28 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved Please alter the design of the right turn lane off of Timberline to accommodate a bus stop. Number:29 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved Driveways serving 12 or more dwelling units are required to have a width of 28 feet. Please adjust driveway widths. Number:30 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved Please dimension all sidewalks, driveways, parking stalls, parking lot drive widths, ROW, etc. Number:31 Created:7/9/2002 Resolved Emergency access easements need to meet current standards: 25' interior radius and 50' exterior radius measured on the same centerpoint. Number: 88 Created:7/17/2002 Resolved Page 5 Please orient driveway on west side of elbow closer to a 90-degree intersection with the street. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Randy Maizland Topic: Pavement Management Number:209 Created:6/27/2006 Pending [6/27/06] High swell soils will need to be addressed with pavement design for Kechter & Timberline Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: Plat Number:65 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved Some of the plat language is incorrect or missing. The correct plat language handout has been included with the comments. 12.09.02 - Please remove the vested rights statement. Number:66 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved Please label and dimension the current and proposed full ROW widths for all streets and clearly identify private streets. 10.2.02 - private streets should not be dedicated as ROW, but as a tract. 12.09.02 - REPEAT - the private streets should not be shown as ROW, but as a Tract. Number:67 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved The radii provided for curves in the Emergency access easements are insufficient. The radii should be a minimum of 25' interior and 50' exterior measured from the same center (will create a bumpout). Number:68 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved Please provide a table identifying each tract/envelope/etc. CE=?, GE=?, What is tract A? etc. Number:138 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved The land use table is not needed on the plat. Number:139 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved The note referring to the vacation of all previously dedicated easements should continue on to say: and rededicates them as shown on this plat. This note does not cover items dedicated by separate document. The driveway easement vacations may require additional signatures on the plat, depending on to whom they were dedicated. Please provide copies of these documents. 12.07.02 - Repeat - Please provide copies of these documents. Number:140 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved The natural resources buffer line is too light. Please darken. Number:141 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved There is a portion of ROW that is being shown as previously dedicated, but I cannot find any record of it being dedicated. Please provide documentation of this. Number: 190 Created:12/9/2002 Resolved Page 6 A curve near the northwest corner of the site has 2 labels with 2 different descriptions. What's going on there? Topic: site plan Number:62 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved It appears that there are only 261 parking spaces, as opposed to the 265 listed on the parking table. Number:63 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved Please dimension all driveway widths, sidewalks, drive aisle widths, parking stall depths and widths, etc. 10.2.02 - repeat regarding the driveway widths 12.07.02 - The driveway widths should be dimensioned where they hit the ROW. Number:64 Created:7/10/2002 Resolved Please clearly show and dimension existing and proposed Rights of Way. Number:142 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Please add a ped ramp at the northwest corner of the site to connect with the future ramp across the street. Also, please add a ramp either on the east or west corner of Verbena and Caribou to cross Caribou. Number:143 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Please label all sight distance easements. Number:204 Created:8/21/2003 Resolved The private roads are not ROW and should not be labeled as ROW; they are easements. Topic: Timberline 6-1ane Number:169 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Please show all curb returns and required intersection spot elevations for all street intersections with Timberline. Number:170 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Please put the centerline profile between the right and left flowline profiles. Number:171 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved It would be very helpful to have the same stationing as the 4-lane design for the 6-lane design. Number:172 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Greater than allowed grade breaks are shown near station 26. Number:173 Created:10/7/2002 Resolved Proposed and existing grades should tie in at the ends of the design (typ). Number:194 Created:12/9/2002 Resolved At the intersection with Shorebird, please provide stations on Shorebird coinciding with those shown on sheet 13, because it is unclear whether Shorebird would be rebuilt with the expansion of Timberline. Page 7