HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOTTONWOOD GLEN PARK SOUTHWEST PUMP STATION - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2004-11-04RESPONSES TO CONCEPTUAL REVIEW COMMENTS
Responses to each comment are highlighted in red following each comment.
ITEM: City of Fort Collins Utilities — Southwest Water Pump
Station
MEETING DATE: July 7, 2003
APPLICANT: City of Fort Collins Water Utility c/o Mr. Keith Meyer, 700
Wood Street, Fort Collins, CO. 80521 with consulting
services provided by Mr. Roger Sherman, BHA Design,
4803 Innovation Drive, Fort Collins, CO. 80525, and Mr.
Doug Simon, CH2MHill.
LAND USE DATA: Request to construct a water pump station for southwest Fort
Collins at one of two locations. Option one is located within Cottonwood Glen Park next
to the existing pump station for the park's irrigation system. Option Two is located on
the north side of Horsetooth Road west of the intersection with Horsetooth Court within
the future Southwest Community Park. Under either option, the facility consists of a 400
square foot structure that would house two pumps for the City's High Pressure Zone.
The building would be constructed out of materials to match the existing pump station in
Cottonwood Glen Park. Response: The Southwest Pump Station will be located in
Cottonwood Glen Park (Option One). A 750 square foot structure is proposed that
will house two pumps with an option for a third pump. The pump station will serve
the City's High Pressure Zone.
COMMENTS:
1. The site is zoned POL, Public Open Land, which permits the pump station as a
Public Facility, subject to administrative (type one) review. Response:
Understood
2. The pump station may be considered an accessory use to the park in which case, a
building permit may be issued without having to be on approved and recorded
subdivision plat. For verification, please confirm with Peter Barnes, Zoning
Administrator, 221-6760. Response: The park was previously platted with
development of Cottonwood Glen Park, per a conversation with Peter Barnes
3. The site will be served by City of Fort Collins Light and Power. Three-phase
power is available in Cottonwood Park (Option One) and an electrical transformer
is located nearby. For Option Two, however, power would have to be extended
west from Auntie Stone Street. Extension of this power would be at the Water
Utility's expense. Normal development charges would not apply to the
Cottonwood Glen site as these charges have already been paid. Development
3. Please add a note to Sheet 1: "All grading, landscaping, and utility work within the 100-
year floodplain requires an approved Floodplain Use Permit prior to start of
construction." (One permit can cover all work.)
4. Please add Benchmark and elevation to plans.
5. Although the structure is out of the floodplain, the drainline does extend into the
floodplain. What measures ensure water would not back-up into the structure during a
flood?
Topic: Sediment and Erosion Control Comments
Number: 9 Created: 12/9/2003
112i9i031 December 9, 2003 (Bob Zakely)
Plan looks OK.
Page 2
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
BHA DESIGN
ROGER SHERMAN
4803 INNOVATION DR.
FT. COLLINS, COO 80525
Date: 12/10/2003
Staff has reviewed your submittal for CITY OF FTC SOUTHWEST WATER
PUMP STATION PDP - TYPE I, and we offer the following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Engineering
Topic. General
Number: 13
Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Created: 12/9/2003
[12/9/03] The plan sets have not been submitted in accordance with the Larimer
County Urban Area Street Standards (LCUASS). Please see chapters 2, 3, and 7
for design requirements as well as Appendix El, E2, and E4. Any items not
included in the next submittal will become a new outstanding item.
RESPONSE: The plan sets have been revised to reflect the requirerents of Larimer
County Urban Area Street Standards (LCUASS) where applicable.
Topic: Utility Plan
Number: 14 Created: 12/9/2003
[12/9/03] See attached appendix E4 for missing or incorrectly shown requirements
not specifically addressed in this comment letter. Any items unaddressed with the
next submittal will become a new comment.
RESPONSE: The plan sets have been revised to reflect the requirements of
Appendix E4 of LCUASS where applicable.
Number: 16
Created: 12/9/2003
[12/9/03] Gravel is not an acceptable surface for the proposed driveway. Identify
how you will handle the curb cut to accommodate the proposed driveway. Show the
approximate area of construction if getting into the existing parking lot and add the
street cut note:
RESPONSE Class 6 roadbase will be used to construct the access drive. The
existing curb cut near the southwest corner of the parking lot will be used for access
to the Southwest Pump Station. Curb cut repair details have been added to the
grading plan should any damage occur to the existing curb during construction.
Paee I
Construction limits are shown on the plans. No construction is anticipated within the
existing parking lot area.
Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by
the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair
standards.
RESPONSE: Street cut is not required. The existing curb cut will be used. City curb
standards have been added to the grading plan.
Number: 17 Created: 12/9/2003
[12/9/03] Show the grading at the proposed drainage swale.
RESPONSE: Typical section for the drainage swale has been added to the grading
plan.
Number: 18 Created: 12/9/2003
[12/9/03] Show the limits of the existing pond.
RESPONSE: Limits of existing pond has been added.
Number: 19 Created: 12/9/2003
[12/9/03] Remove the SF line off the grading sheet and show it only on the drainage
and erosion control sheet.
RESPONSE: Silt fence has been removed from the grading plan.
Number: 20 Created: 12/9/2003
[12/9/03] Provide a legend, each sheet.
RESPONSE: Legend has been provided on the Construction Notes- Sheet 3 of the
Utility Plans.
Number: 21 Created: 12/9/2003
[12/9/03] Show, label & dimension all property boundaries, utility easements, ROW,
etc, each sheet.
RESPONSE: Utility easement for existing waterlines has been added to the Utility
Plan drawings.
Number: 22
Created: 12/9/2003
[12/9/03] Provide dimensions and radii for driveway or list all in a curve table so that
it can be laid out in the field.
RESPONSE: Curve table has been added for the access drive on the Grading Plan.
Department: Light: & Power
Topic: General
Number: 6
Page 2
Issue Contact: Monica Moore
Created: 12/5/2003
[12/5/03Coordinate power requirements with Light and Power Engineering (221-
6700). The electrical contractor should complete the Commercial Service Form to
determine entrance capacity and to verify whether or not the existing transformer is
sufficient.
RESPONSE: Note has been added to the Utility Plan drawings. C-1 form has been
completed and coordination of power is ongoing with Doug Martine.
Department: PFA
Topic: General
Number: 7
Issue Contact: Michael Chavez
Created: 12/8/2003
The minimum width of the access road shall be 12 Ft. This includes the road up to
the existing irrigation pump station. The gravel access road shall be compacted road
base able to support a 40-ton vehicle. The road cannot be 3/ inch gravel.
RESPONSE. Class 6 Roadbase will be used. The access drive will be constructed
to the Southwest Pump Station only.
Department: Storrnwater Utility
Topic: Grading Plan
Number: 10
Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan
Created: 12/9/2003
[12/9/03]
Please add a legend to the plan.
RESPONSE. A lecrend has been added to the Construction Notes — Sheet 3 of the
Utility Plans.
Provide a proposed finished floor elevation for the building, and call out spot
elevation along the access road.
RESPONSE. Finished floor elevation for building and curve table for access drive
has been added to the Grading Plan.
Please add a proposed cross-section for the swale.
RESPONSE: Proposed cross-section for drainage swale has been added to the
Grading Plan.
Topic: Utility Plan
Number: 11
Created: 12/9/2003
[12/9/03] Please provide a detail for the proposed riprap at the outlet end of the
drain line.
RESPONSE: Proposed riprap has been eliminated from the design. Outlet velocities
from drainline are not considered erosive.
Topic: Drainage Letter
Number: 12
Created: 12/9/2003
[12/9/031 Please provide a letter stating what the impervious area added by thi s
project would be, justifying the fact that no drainage report or detention would be
required.
Page 3
RESPONSE: Letter has been submitted to Glen Schlueter requesting a variance for
the requirement of a drainage report.
Topic: Floodplain Administration Comments
Number: 8 Created: 12/9/2003
[12/9/03] Susan Hayes
1. Please add the FEMA floodplain/floodway limits to the plan. Use the floodplain
shown on the recently approved LOMR (approved Nov. 24, 2003). A copy of the
LOMR is available in our office.
RESPONSE: FEMA floodplain/floodway limits have been added to Utility Plans.
2. Add BFE's lines for both the City and FEMA floodplain.
RESPONSE. City and FEMA BFE's have been added to Utility Plan set.
3. Please add a note to Sheet 1: "All grading, landscaping, and utility work within
the 100-year floodplain requires an approved Floodplain Use Permit prior to start
of construction." (One permit can cover all work.)
RESPONSE: Note has been added.
4. Please add Benchmark and elevation to plans.
RESPONSE: Project benchmarks have been added to cover sheet and General
Notes sheet of Utility Plans.
5. Although the structure is out of the floodplain, the drainline does extend into the
floodplain. What measures ensure water would not back-up into the structure
during a flood?
RESPONSE: A check valve has been added to the drainline to prevent backflow.
Topic: Sediment and Erosion Control Comments
Number: 9 Created: 12/9/2003
[12/9/03] December 9, 2003 (Bob Zakely)
Plan looks OK.
Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols
Topic: Zoning
Number: 2 Created: 11 /28/2003
[11/28/03] Please show and label pumphouse dimensions on site plan.
RESPONSE: Done
Number: 3
Created: 11 /28/2003
[11/28/03] There is no landscaping shown anywhere around the building.
Landscape standards apply. Please provide foundation shrubs in accordance with
Section 3.2.1 of the Land Use Code for all but the west elevation.
RESPONSE: For security reasons the Utility Department does not wish to have
foundation planting. This has been discussed with the Parks Department and they
Page 4
agree that foundation planting is not needed. Per discussion with Ted Shepard, we
have provided an additional tree to offset the lack of foundation planting.
Please add the following standard General Notes to the site plan:
"The site is zoned P.O.L., Public Open Land.
Response: Done
Refer to the Utility Plan for information on water, electrical and drainage
information.
Response: Done
There will no new pole -mounted lighting. Any wall -mounted lighting shall be
sharp cut-off and down -directional.
Response. Done
Developer shall ensure that the landscape plan is coordinated with the plans
done by other consultants , so that the proposed grading storm drainage or other
construction does not conflict with nor preclude installation and maintenance of
landscape elements.
Response. Done
Developer is to coordinate electric service location, transformer location, meter
location and electrical development charges with Light and Power Department."
Response. Done
Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit.
Response: Redlined plans are included with the re -submittal.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this
project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750.
Sincerely:
Ted Shepard
Chief Planner
Page 5
; roject Comments Sher l
,, ;f rtCollit,s Selected Departments
Department: E
eerinf�,
Date: December 12, 2003
Pr41cct:
CITY OF FTC SOUTHWEST WATER PUMP STATION PDP - TYPE I
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than
the staff review meeting:
December 10, 2003
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Topic: General
Number: 13 Created: 12/9/2003
[12/9103] The plan sets have not been submitted in accordance with the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards
(LCUASS). Please see chapters 2, 3, and 7 for design requirements as well as Appendix E1, E2, and E4. Any items
not included in the next submittal will become a new outstanding item. The first round of comments are not all
inclusive.
Topic: Utility Plan
Number: 14 Created: 12/9/2003
[12/9/03] See attached appendix E4 for missing or incorrectly shown requirements not specifically addressed in this
comment letter. Any items unaddressed with the next submittal will become a new comment.
Number: 16 Created: 12/9/2003
[12/9/03] Gravel is not an acceptable surf- for the proposed driveway. Identify how you will handle the curb cut to
accommodate the proposed driveway. Sh., .v the approximate area of construction if getting into the existing parking lot
and add the street cut note:
Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All
repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards.
Number: 17 Created: 12/9/2003
[12/9/03] Provide a detail/cross section for the drainage swale including height, width, elevations, etc.
Number: 18 Created: 12/9/2003
[12/9/03] Show the limits of the existing pond.
Number: 19 Created: 12/9/2003
[12/9/03] Remove the SF line off the grading sheet and show it only on the drainage and erosion control sheet.
M2lPEIF
/ ja
Sr�manrre Dat
CHECK HOUWISH TO 7EDCEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat ! Site Drainage Report �_ Other"
ther
Utility \K Redline Utility _� Landscape
Page 1
Number: 20 Created: 12/9/2003
[12/9/03] Provide a legend, each sheet.
Number: 21 Created: 12/9/2003
[12/9/03] Show, label & dimension all property boundaries, utility easements, ROW, etc, each sheet.
Number: 22 Created: 12/9/2003
[12/9/03] Provide dimensions and radii for driveway or list all in a curve table so that it can be laid out in the field.
Page 2
i
mmmmmmllmmmmmmmlmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
> > > > > > > > > > > >I> > > > > > >
co lco � m CO Co co � �n m CO CD I� cg m co ID D D iO CO Coc D(2.(2.z D co cn
m Im o m m m m m m a� m m N'IN m m m m m m m o o m m m m
m I- m m m o- - m m m m m to m m C� 0.0
j D S 7 7 7 J J =� J J DID D D J J S' 3 J 3 m J m n J"
c z Co Co<o n eo c0 n nm Co ro i c c n�co<o� �o� � � Co cn
-0 T (n Cn G) Cn'Ir w+ D OD [n S -0 m g: G) O S m O (n 7J
o j30om�'�o aSv X-'a--
0Cn &; -=1_mS6mN aO FOO m(D 0 O <O< O3a= C (O 0CD . �QWO OCao CO O O
M O a) a v -o
OOOO 0
C
O J -O, N Q y O C N
a a-o �'. a) m iCo X y o 5 O m
a s o o v o o IO o a�-^'m
o O x m o ai N_ n m D x 0 0 <
O C CD
All vi N a N D y N
Q
<' N N O O
m CT w O
N N �' d -0 j
p - C
N •• J ✓ N N 3
o I' 0 3
9� O -
N
i
L
S r D Cp S>> o
W n 3 � .Co
- � � Z
y F = o y S 2 7
m
r0rz fn(n
O N'N F' CL
o f^= 3 3 a
F O F p�j u O (n O ai
O ( < O 3 c * "
O O C < O O
I ISO - O � ai Cr
,z O
o 11, 0 lom—a•
F,m —
mW o n o s ii
—mom
o O p C) ^' y a
oET 0
ID d S
o .< ti GJ
m s O n
J
N
CD a
c a
I (O
IX P
Ia '
I<
O
I IIP< I
T
N
cc
CD
<0II<�
O m 2 O 2
2 �
O C0 r
2 0 j
> > F
m D,Cp
n r < 0 r
r r r 2 r m r? r
F 2 D 2
am
mmmmlm
J D J DID
Cn Co co Co xo
m m m m m
mZ� -i cn3� G_>N F 3
DDO�DDD�zDOD
3,
3
m
O
o
a
0
F
dO N
N
n
N 0 (D
m a
O' F
(D
0
N
y d N p
J
O^
N-
N
(D Q
N O
O
N O
S-i
j
N
cn
C
O J
a
0
m
. <
Cn N
S
O
tf]
m
O
°
m 0�
�0
Im 0
—
m..,
a,<
a�
a
Fc
_
m 3
f.m
Oo
T.,
0
So
F
= 0
c
a
Cl
�I!
o M
N
m
m
N O
N
O f/i
O
0I
O
3
m
a
I I r
a
�
F
0
9
eIN
D
D
O
.�i n o
3 n ..
yK
M
Ni < -n
c CD �
F
'3o O o
O
7
. 3 H
O CD
7 M
IN
V
N
O
CD
A
N
W
N
IOJ
�l'TT,.T
W O� OD N
T
Nip
Cn
O
J
fA
n
NON
N
o
0 0 0'0
to
0
0
0
>
;010
>_'.�
0
a
0 0 0 •„
a a a a
3'33
T w'
Dim
D(o
co`=
MID==
-
�D0
-
D_
a
=O
o'o
�
,0
5,.ao o
S..OZ F
N
aoou
--
l0
n=
d
N
0
0
m
a
mlol3".
3
m
MM
m:C m.3
^'
0
0
m
-.0O
O T
im
<
0
0 diN
N
O
s
O
Rya
U O y
o
o
Imo'
to
m
N
c
0
3
0
0
O
N
N
a
w
m
T N
O 0
0
0
<
N
O N
N
j'
�Io
o 3
<m
0
3
0
0
m
- N
W
z0
N wu
0
O
N
C <
N
�
N
3
m
�
O
N
I
IN
I
n;
SIa)
I'n�
Co
S
O >
rlr
5,,3
r
�9:m
[o
m
a:
-
C) n
_ _ � �
31,E
CO'�,
�^Z
S
D,D
n n
x
x
2:
C)IC) o
D
r.
2 S
D
S S
a
0
N
I
i�.ia,.a
N j
aglall
all
to
as x==
io
O
7 S
x= �D-
0
am
O
0
�.
r.0
O N D
y
d
a
0
Q. I'�0
F
O
Jc 0 0
<
<
O
y
K
N I(D
Iw
C
O
i0
3 ZI
10
a'D,0
D'J a
00
a
0
?
(D
m
= 'm
61 K
So
5
IO
d'p� c
0
�Im
j
a
o m
Ila
QI-I,
o iN.�ln
c
In
g
0�
sj0l
m
alal
�'.I.o
rj
O
�
O O iI
O_
II D-
Sm
o
y
3 �w
3 N
w'n
I
�
o';
o
0
�
N
N
S
0
C
O
I
j
N
J
I
�
I
li
i
A
O.
3
L
0 9
.C. n o
C V
G 0
T
C N ;&
f
O p
d 3 7
.. 9 co
O �
7 .3.
N
V
N
O
A
charges, however, would apply to the Option Two site. Any system modification
would be at the developer's expense. For further information, please contact
Monica Moore at 221-6700. Response: Option One was chosen for the pump
station, and the existing three-phase transformer in Cottonwood Glen Park
will be upgraded for this project.
4. This site is in the Spring Creek drainage basin where the new development fee
($2,175/acre) is charged when there is an increase in imperviousness greater than
350 square feet. That is also the square footage that triggers the need for a
grading plan but as long as there is less than 1,000 square feet of new
imperviousness, a drainage report and detention are not required. The proposed
structure of 20'X20' may qualify for a variance for the fee and grading plan.
Option 1 is located in the Spring Creek floodplain/floodway where a floodplain
use permit is required and certification once it is built. Please contact Susan
Hayes (416-2233) for all the floodplain requirements. For other information
regarding stormwater issues, please contact Glen Schlueter, 221-6700. Response:
The proposed Southwest Pump Station building creates 750 square feet of
imperviousness. A grading plan is included in the application package. The
proposed building is now located outside of the floodplain/floodway.
5. The location of existing water and sewer lines should be verified and shown on
the Utility Plans. For further information, please contact Roger Buffington, 221-
6700. Response: Done
6. For the Option Two site, the Engineering Department would consider dedication
of right-of-way along the Horsetooth Road frontage. Or, dedication of right-of-
way may be considered at the time of the platting of Southwest Community Park.
Response: Not Applicable, Option One site used.
7. For the Option Two site, the location of the pump station driveway and
Horsetooth Road would have to be approved by the City's Traffic Engineer.
Please contact Mr. Eric Bracke, 221-6630, for further information. Response: Not
Applicable, Option One site used.
8. For both sites, please consider future potential alignments and construction of the
Overland Trail extension from Quail Hollow south to Horsetooth Road.
Construction of either pump station should not preclude such a connection.
Response: Approximate location of Overland Trail R.O.W. is shown on the
plans. The proposed structure is appropriately setback from the R.O.W.
9. For both sites, please contact Mr. Eric Bracke regarding the potential waiver of
the Transportation Impact Study. Response: Contacted Eric Bracke on
Septcmltier 17, 2003 and he said that a T.I.S. is not needed for this project.
17INAL PLAN
Atff
ire REVISION
City of Font Collins, COMMENT SHEET
Current PlanninE
DATE: March 31, 2004 TO: Engineering — Susan Joy
PROJECT: #40-03 City of Ft. Collins Southwest Water Pump
Station - Final Plan
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff
review meeting:
April 14, 2004
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
1
Name (please print)
CHECK I IERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _
--Plat Site _Drainage Report Other
Utility Redline Utility Landscape City of Fort Collins
Project Comments Sheet
Selected Departments
Citvof Fort Collins
Department: Stormwater Utility
Date: April 19, 2004
Project:
CITY OF FTC SOUTHWEST WATER PUMP STATION PDP - TYPE I AND
FINAL PLAN
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than
the staff review meeting:
April 14, 2004
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
Issue Contact: Basil Harridan
Topic: Grading Plan
Number: 10 Created: 12/9/2003
[4/13/041
Plans look good. OK to submit mylars.
4
Date
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat Site Drainage Report Other_
Utility Redline Utility Landscape
Page 1
10. For either site, a Utility Plan will be needed. For further information, please
contact Marc Virata, 221-6605. Response: A Utility Plan is included in the
application package.
11. Both sites must be accessible by the Poudre Fire Authority. Any alternative
surface material for the access road must be capable of supporting emergency fire
equipment. Both sites must be served by an adequate water supply and by a fire
hydrant within 300 feet. For further information, please contact Mr. Ron
Gonzales, 221-6570. Response: A proposed 12 foot wide gravel driveway is
shown on the plan for access to the pump station.
12. For Cottonwood Glen, please contact Mr. Craig Foreman and Mr. Bob Zakely
regarding a recent survey for Preble's Jumping Mouse. If it is determined that a
new survey is needed, then trapping should begin immediately as trapping is not
considered valid after a certain date in late summer/early fall. Please verify with
Doug Moore or Bob Zakely as to this date. Response: The most recent mouse
survev for Cottonwood Glen Park was conducted during the summer 1999.
However, as per a discussion with Bob Zakely on November 17, 2003, the
Pump Station site does not appear to be in an area conducive to Preble's
Mouse habitat and a new survey would not be required.
13. For either site, if prairie dogs are present and interfere with construction, then
they must be eradicated in a humane manner. Response: No evidence of Prairie
Dogs was observed on the proposed site. The proposed pump station is
located in within the existing irrigated park area.
14. Both sites are in close proximity to Spring Creek and Pine Ridge Natural Area.
Please note that Land Use Code Section 3.4.1(1) (1 and 2) require that the design
and aesthetics of the new building and access drive complement, not detract, the
visual context and character of the natural habitat. Be sure that scenic views are
not obstructed. The building materials and color should be as naturalistic as
possible. One possible material for the access drive would be a product that
allows plant material to grow and yet provide strength for fire equipment. For
further information regarding natural resource and habitat protection issues,
please contact Doug Moore, 2241-6143. Response: The proposed pump station
building; will match the colors, materials and design character of the existing
irrigation pump house in order to blend with the site context. The new
building; is also located within close proximity to the existing pump house to
reduce the impact on the scenic views. A gravel driveway is proposed for
access, and will be visible for fire access purposes.
15. For Option One (Cottonwood Glen Park), the Parks and Recreation Department
would be willing to share the sanitary sewer service that presently serves the
parks's restrooms. Any disturbance to ground cover and irrigation system would
have to be re -seeded. An access agreement must be executed between Parks and
Recreation and Utilities. Be sure to coordinate with Parks maintenance staff on
all issues and potential impacts relating to park improvements. Response:
Sharing of sanitary sewer is not necessary with the proposed plan. Seeded
areas and irrigation system disturbed by construction activities will be
repaired) and re -seeded. Representatives from the Utilities Department will
coordinate the shared access agreement with the Park and Recreation
Department.
16. For Option One, please consider moving the proposed building behind the
existing pump station for the park. This may help minimize the impact on the
views to the west. Response: The proposed pump station building is located in
close proximity to the existing irrigation pump house, but was shifted slightly
to the south to allow access to both structures.
17. For Option Two, please note that Southwest Community Park has not yet been
designed. Parks and Recreation would be very concerned that building location
be carefully considered in order to not preclude construction of improvements
typically associated with a community -scaled park. An easement would be
needed from Parks and Recreation for the pump station. For further information
regarding impacts on either site, please contact Craig Foreman. Response: Not
Applicable, Option One site used.
18. As an administrative review, a neighborhood information meeting is not required.
It may be a good idea, however, to erect a project information sign for neighbors
and park users so that the scope of the project is clearly explained. This sign
could be posted at the same time as the Planning Department sign that is posted
for the administrative hearing. This will also save time on phone calls coming
into our offices after the project starts. Please note that there is a $50.00 sign
posting fee due to the Current Planning Department. Response: A public
information sign will be posted by November 21, 2003.
19. At the time of submittal, a mailing list of the affected property owners must be
provided. Please contact the Current Planning Department for the map that
describes the mailing area. Please note that there is a mailing fee of .50 cents per
name. Response: Ted Sheppard provided the notification map and .50 cents
per name is included in the application filing fee.
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
Ci`v of Fort Collins
C irrent PlanninE
DATE: November 18, 2003 TO: Technical Services
REM
?ROJECT: #40-03 CITY OF FT. COLLINS SOUTHWEST WATER
PUMP STATIC`r" PDP — TYPE I (LUC)
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff
re-. iew meeting:
December 10, 2003
Note - PI,EASL identify your redlines for future reference
Name (please print)
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat _Site _Drainage Report Other
_Utility _Redline Utility Landscape
a
PROJECT
6
COMMENT SHEET
City of Furl COMAS
Current Plannine
DATE: November 18, 2003 TO: Engineering
PROJECT: #40-03 CITY OF FT. COLLINS SOUTHWEST WATER
PUMP STATION PDP — TYPE I (LUC)
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff
review meeting:
December 10, 2003
Note - PLEASE identify your redlines for future reference
Name (please print)
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat Site Drainage Report Other
Utility Redline Utility Landscape ctty of Fort coutns
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
Current Plannine
REC.D
DATE: November 18, 2003 TO: Engineering Pavement
PROJECT: #40-03 CITY OF FT. COLLINS SOUTHWEST WATER
PUMP STATION PJP TYPE I (LUC)
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff
review meeting:
December 10, 2003
Note - PIEASE identify your redlines for future reference
G�,7��
Name (please print)
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other
Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape
Project Comments Sheet
Selected Departments
Citvof Fort Collins
��-_�
Depa!:ment: Transportation Planning
Date: December 9, 2003
Project:
CITY OF FTC SOUTHWEST WATER PUMP STATION PDP -TYPE I
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than
the staff review meeting:
December 30, 1899
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
Issue Contact: Tom Reiff
Topic: General
Number: 15
No comments.
Signature
Created: 12/9/2003
Date
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat Site Drainage Report Other_
Utilitv Redline Utility Landscape
Page 1
Project Comments Sheet
Selected Departments
Department: Stormwater Utility
Date: December 9, 2003
Project:
CITY OF FTC SOUTHWEST WATER PUMP STATION PDP - TYPE I
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than
the staff review meeting:
December 30, 1899
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
Issue Contact: Basil Harridan
Topic: Grading Plan
Number: 10
112/9/03]
Please add a legend to the plan.
Created: 12/9/2003
Provide a proposed finished floor elevation for the building, and call out spot elevation along the access road.
Please add a proposed cross-section for the Swale.
Topic: Utility Plan
Number: 11 Created: 12/9/2003
[12/9/03] Please provide a detail for the proposed riprap at the outlet end of the drain line.
Topic: Drainage Letter
Number: 12 Created: 12/9/2003
[12/9/031 Please provide a letter stating what the impervious area added by thi s project would be, justifying the fact
that no drainage report or detention would be required.
Topic: Floodplain Administration Comments
Number: 8 Created: 12/9/2003
[12/9/03] Susan Hayes
1. Please add the IT -MA floodplain/floodway limits to the plan.
on the recently approved LOMR (approved Nov. 24, 2003).
available in our office.
2. Add BFE's lines for both the City and FEMA floodplain.
Signature
Use the floodplain shown
A copy of the LOMR is
.Z- i9i �u'3
Date
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Piat Site Drainage Report Other_
Utility _ 'Redline Utility Landscape
Page I