The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTIMBERLINE OFFICE PARK - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2004-09-03n City of Fort Collins Current PlanninE PROJECT COMMENT SHEET DATE: October 1, 2003 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT: #7-82T COLLINDALE BUSINESS PARK, TIMBERLINE OFFICE PARK PDP - TYPE I (LUC) All comments must be received by Bob Barkeen no later than the staff review meeting: October 22, 2003 Note - PLEASE identify your redlines for future reference / Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other Utility RedlincUtility Landscape cttVofFort Collins PROJECT COMMENT SHEET Current Planning DATE: October 1, 2003 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #7-82T COLLINDALE BUSINESS PARK, TIMBERLINE OFFICE PARK PDP - TYPE I (LUC) All comments must be received by Bob Barkeen no later than the staff review meeting: Occtober 22, 2003 , Note - PLEASE identify your redlines for future reference (�\/«u � Z h�eTC' � V4(-,47a, /�iTc E/�SC'h/GrNi TJ4-7- k�z: o_j 71 L %!—t is Yci4T C /�+�c`.;.� .i A T Lv.:✓�%//'N�c�/i cis /7^,� C 2 , 3c 7'/ /`I i3 k:r/2 c / �/ L� N e � �A 1� ( US �• f C I�JC f�Crmc ✓c" i /7C "SNi4 J/n J c r TNT 3c " it ¢ lJ (T 1,01c� Nc� SC,aN `J 7-/-/cr SC C'r�L> 61,),2i �fi/C--/2C:IYj 7(4c j,.— ALI 0C' ti%12v4CT AGCi 4N//-' S A,/S G1 ^o C'Jrn i /S /I�ECC'SI^I/1'. (2. A(�O//Jl Name (please/ print) �/ Tc-9N �T r (�oc.', T,`fc �I-9 �cei� 5/-ic/��,J Cam-.% 7 CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS %I-{e / �,a%T1'® ,),�—lat _Site _Drainage Report _Other EJ /4 / V _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape city of..� Project Comments Sheet rt Collins Selected Departments Department: Date: October 22, 2003 Project: COLLINDALE BUSINESS PARK, TIMBERLINE OFFICE PARK PDP - TYPE II (LUC) All comments must be received by Bob Barkeen in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: October 22, 2003 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: General Number: 2 Created: 10/15/2003 In meetings prior to official submittal of this project, the design of the pond adjacent to Timberline ROW was discussed multiple times. My notes from the last meeting indicate that the City stated that the grading for the pond should not extend into the ROW, either existing or proposed, and that the grading for the pond should fall off from the back of walk location when the ultimate sidewalk is constructed (the edge of the proposed ROW). This grading should allow for a 2- foot wide nearly -flat slope on each side of the future sidewalk, with steeper slopes beginning after that 2-foot buffer. The submittal received in October does not reflect these requirements. Number: 3 Created: 10/15/2003 In previous discussions about the placement of the stormpipe under the future sidewalk, the issue of manholes was not raised. Manhole covers need to be located outside of the future sidewalk. Number: 5 Created: 10/15/2003 Because the traffic numbers for this project are high enough, the radius -style driveway cuts may be used. The driveways may also be left as currently designed. Number: 10 Created: 10/15/2003 Please show all existing features in ghosted or alternate -weight linetypes. Number: 19 Created: 10/15/2003 The curves In the fire lane need to have a 25' Interior radius and a 50' exterior radius measured from the same centerpoint. There should be no obstructions within the easement such as curb and gutter, and these curves should match what is shown on the plat. Number: 20 Created: 10/15/2003 Please dedicate ROW at street corners according to LCUASS. (not 90-degree angles) Signature /D o3 Date HECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _I Site Drainage Report Other Utility V Redline Utility 17 Landscape Page 1 Topic: Landscaping Number: 21 Created: 10/15/2003 It looks as though there are multiple locations where the utility separation distances are not being met. Please revise. Number: 22 Created: 10/15/2003 Please show the location of the ultimate sidewalk on Timberline and dimension the existing and ultimate sidewalk widths. Number: 23 Created: 10/15/2003 Please clearly label the ROW, and label Timberline and Caribou. Topic: Plat Number: 15 Created: 10/15/2003 Please rearrange the text as redlined and correct typos as reclined. Number: 16 Created: 10/15/2003 Who owns and maintains Tract A? Number: 17 Created: 10/15/2003 Please label the existing ROW widths and state how they were dedicated for all streets. Number: 18 Created: 10/15/2003 No easements should be dedicated over top of the ROW - the 30' utility and drainage easement should not overlap the ROW for Timberline and Lowe. Topic: Site Plan Number: 25 Created: 10/15/2003 Please label parking space dimensions and drive aisle dimensions. Number: 26 Created: 10/15/2003 Please label the existing ROW and the dimension of the proposed ROW on the site plan. Topic: Utility Plan Number: 6 Created: 10/15/2003 For street cuts, please show the approximate limits of all street cuts and add the note: Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the fleld by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards. Number: 7 Created: 10/15/2003 Please label and dimension the new and existing ROW. Number: 8 Created: 10/15/2003 Please label the new, existing, and future sidewalks and include their dimensions. Number: 9 Created: 10/15/2003 Please label the driveway widths at the ROW. Number: 11 Created: 10/15/2003 The fire hydrant at the southeast corner of the site needs to be separated from the sidewalk a minimum of 2 feet. Number: 12 Created: 10/15/2003 Please use the general notes from the current version of LCUASS. I can email them to you or they are available online. Number: 13 Created: 10/15/2003 Please show the location of the street proposed by Caribou Apts on the south side of Caribou Drive. Will the driveway - Intersection separation requirement of 175' be met' Number: 14 Created: 10/15/2003 if the street cross-section details shown on sheet 1 I do not reflect what is currently existing/going to be existing when this project is built, then please provide cross -sections reflecting this. Also, please retain figure 7-1 f since it shows what Timberline is planned to ultimately look like. Page 2 (nim STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins Response to Comments LAND IMAGES INC. Date: 11/7/2003 MICHAEL CHALONA 1136 E. STUART ST. #2040 FT. COLLINS, CO 80521 Staff has reviewed your submittal for COLLINDALE BUSINESS PARK, TIMBERLINE OFFICE PARK PDP - TYPE II (LUC), and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Bob Barkeen Topic: General Number: 48 Created: 10/28/2003 [10/28/03] Building 4 does not meet the connecting walkway standards. An entry for the building will need be located along Caribou Drive. Has been added to plans. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: General Number: 2 Created: 10/15/2003 In meetings prior to official submittal of this project, the design of the pond adjacent to Timberline ROW was discussed multiple times. My notes, from the last meeting indicate that the City stated that the grading for the pond should not extend into the ROW, either existing or proposed, and that the grading for the pond should fall off from the back of walk location when the ultimate sidewalk is constructed (the edge of the proposed ROW). This grading should allow for a 2- foot wide nearly -flat slope on each side of the future sidewalk, with steeper slopes beginning after that 2-foot buffer. The submittal received in October does not reflect these requirements. Number: 3 Created: 10/15/2003 In previous discussions about the placement of the stormpipe under the future sidewalk, the issue of manholes was not raised. Manhole covers need to be located outside of the future sidewalk. Number: 5 Created: 10/15/2003 Because the traffic numbers for this project are high enough, the radius -style driveway cuts may be used. The driveways may also be left as currently designed. Number: 10 Created: 10/15/2003 Please show all existing features in ghosted or alternate -weight Iinetypes. Done, see plans Number: 19 Created: 10/15/2003 The curves in the fire lane need to have a 25' interior radius and a 50' exterior radius measured from the same centerpoint. There should be no obstructions within the easement such as curb and gutter, and these curves should match what is shown on the plat. Used FC turning radius template, has been approved by Michael Chavez (PFA). See attach. Number: 20 Created: 10/15/2003 Please dedicate ROW at street corners according to LCUASS. (not 90-degree angles) Done, see plans Topic: Landscaping Number: 21 Created: 10/15/2003 It looks as though there are multiple locations where the utility separation distances are not being met. Please revise. Done, See Plans, PC, r16nacce,cv� �a kl (tif� C/try, Number: 22 Cted: 10/15/2003 Please show the location of the ultimate sidewalk on Timberline and dimension the existing and ultimate sidewalk widths Done, See Plans Page 1 Number: 23 Created: 10/15/2003 Please clearly label the ROW, and label Timberline and Caribou. Done, See Plans Topic: Plat Number: 15 Created: 10/15/2003 Please rearrange the text as redlined and correct typos as redlined. Number: 16 Created: 10/15/2003 Who owns and maintains Tract A? Number: 17 Created: 10/15/2003 Please label the existing ROW widths and state how they were dedicated for all streets. Number: 18 Created: 10/15/2003 No easements should be dedicated over top of the ROW - the 30' utility and drainage easement should not overlap the ROW for Timberline and Lowe. Number: 31 Created: 10/22/2003 [10/22/031 The following comments were received from Technical Services regarding the plat: 1. Boundary closes -legal does not match plat (several calls) 2. Note #4 vacates a ditch easement; is there a ditch company that needs to sign this plat? 3. Does the new ROW at LoweTmbedine and CadbouTmberline need radius? 4. Please remove the shading of the 30' U&D esmt. It will not scan. 5. The 30' U&D esmt overlays the new ROW. This is not necessary. Also, all of tract A is an A, EA, D&U easement (outside building) so no separate easements are necessary except that the emergency access should not be a part of the blanket easement and should be called out separately. 6. Adjoining property is mis-labeled. 7. Does the emergency access shown on the site plan fit the platted easement? 8. Some text is too small to scan. Topic: Site Plan Number: 25 Created: 10/15/2003 Please label parking space dimensions and drive aisle dimensions. Done, See Plans Number: 26 Created: 10/15/2003 Please label the existing ROW and the dimension of the proposed ROW on the site plan. Done, See Plans Topic: Utility Plan Number: 6 Created: 10/15/2003 For street cuts, please show the approximate limits of all street cuts and add the note: Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards. Number: 7 Created: 10/15/2003 Please label and dimension the new and existing ROW. Number: 8 Created: 10/15/2003 Please label the new, existing, and future sidewalks and include their dimensions. Number: 9 Please label the driveway widths at the ROW. Created: 10/15/2003 Number: 11 Created: 10/15/2003 The fire hydrant at the southeast comer of the site needs to be separated from the sidewalk a minimum of 2 feet Number: 12 Created: 10/15/2003 Please use the general notes from the current version of LCUASS. I can email them to you or they are available online. Page 2 Number: 13 Created: 10/15/2003 Please show the location of the street proposed by Caribou Apts on the south side of Caribou Drive. Will the driveway - intersection separation requirement of 175' be met? Code req. 175' min. between high vol. drive and intersections, min. req. dist between driveway edges = 30',See 9.3.2.A LCUASS & Table 7-3. Number: 14 Created: 10/15/2003 If the street cross-section details shown on sheet 11 do not reflect what is currently existing/going to be existing when this project is built, then please provide cross -sections reflecting this. Also, please retain figure 7-1f since it shows what Timberline is planned to ultimately look like. Department: Natural Resources Issue Contact: Doug Moore Topic: Landscaping Number: 32 Created: 10123/2003 [10/23/03] Great Landscape Design, I can't wait to see it built. No Issues with this project at this time. Department: Police Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom Topic: General Number: 29 Created: 10/2212003 Lighting/Landscaping: Lighting in parking lot does not meet city code (3.2.4). Further, plant materials and location further reduce effective lighting levels. Trash enclosures should have not less than 0.5fc surrounding location. Plant selections near buildings will negatively affect surveillance of parking lot from buildings. Some plant selections are poorly located (ex., pinyon/edulis in a three foot planting area: Bldg 7). Revised lighting plan, plant types and plant locations. See Plans Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Drainage Number: 40 Created: 10/24/2003 At conceptual review, a comment was given stating that on -site quantity detention would be required for the difference in run-off between the old and present rainfall criteria, as well as water quality detention. There is no quantity detention proposed for this site with this submittal. An analysis is required to compare the flow rate for this site from the original Collindale Overall Drainage Plan to the flow rate generated with the present rainfall. Detaining the difference is required while having the release rate for the site match what was originally proposed in the overall drainage plan. Please also discuss this analysis in the text, as well as the original drainage study completed by Stewart & Associates. Number: 41 Created: 10/24/2003 The swale/water quality pond can not be located in part in the proposed right-of-way where modifications to Timberline Road in the future could reduce volume or capacity in swale. Please have the entire swale, to the top of bank, outside of the right-of-way. Number: 42 Created: 10124/2003 Please revise the water quality outlet structure's orifices to have the lowest hole of the column at the pond invert. See reclined comment on detail sheet. Number: 43 Created: 10/24/2003 Please label on the drainage plan where the capacity cross -sections (I -I, II -II, III -III) are located. Number: 44 Created: 10/24/2003 Please provide swale capacity calculations for the swales routing flows from the sub -basins to the water quality pond. These need to be for the 100-year storm and not include the volume under the water quality elevation. Only the riprap calculations for these swales were submitted. Number: 45 Created: 10/24/2003 Please see comment on landscape plan regarding shrubs in and around the water quality outlet structure. There should only be grass (native or sod) in front of the outlet structure or a pan. Done, See Plans Number: 46 Created: 10/24/2003 A suggestion would be to provide details on the various storm sewer connections. These are more custom type connections, but may be helpful to ensure quality. Page 3 Number: 47 Please see other minor redlined comments in the report and plans. Department: Transfort Topic: General Number: 1 No Comments Department: Transportation Planning Topic: General Number: 30 (10/22/03] No comments Created: 10/24/2003 Issue Contact: Garold Smith Created: 10/10/2003 Issue Contact: Tom Reiff Created: 10/22/2003 Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill Topic: Landscaping Number: 33 Created: 10/23/2003 [10/23/031 Maintain the require landscape/utility separation distances on the landscape plans. Revised plant locations, see plans. Topic: Utility Plan Number: 34 Created: 10/23/2003 [10/23/03] Show and label all locations of curb stops and meter pits. Number: 35 Created: 10/23/2003 (10/23/031 Show and label all fittings, valves and thrust blocks on the water mains. List all lengths of pipe on water mains between all fittings and valves. Number: 36 Created: 10/23/2003 [10/23/031 Look at realigning sewer main along the west side of this development to avoid crossing under landscape islands. Place fire hydrants adjacent to the water mains when possible. Number. 37 Created: 10/23/2003 110/23/03] Does the existing fire hydrant at the southwest comer of the intersection of Lowe and Timberline need to be relocated to avoid conflict with the proposed sidewalk? - Number: 38 Created: 10/23/2003 [10/23/03] Maintain 10 feet of separation between the water quality structure and the existing sanitary sewer main. Number: 39 Created: 10/23/2003 [10/23/03] Provide all appropriate details and correct those details indicated on the detail sheets. See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Gary Lopez Topic: Landscaping Number: 27 Created: 10/16/2003 Complete landscaping general notes numbering... stops at " 8." though more text follows. Done, see landscape notes. Number: 28 Created: 10/16/2003 Show dimensions of each building on site plan. Done, see plans Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Page 4 Yours Truly, Bob Barkeen City Planner Forestry Department Comment: -Notes have been added, see notes 12 and 21 on Sheet L-2. Page 5