The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSOFT GOLD PARK - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2004-08-31PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW DATE: October 3, 2003 DEPT: Com Cast PROJECT: Soft Gold Neighborhood Park - �lc` Note this (utility plan review) will not be in DMS. �� 'L F All comments must be received by Sheri Wamhoff no later th`4l.. 10 October 17, 2003 N, Q No Problems ❑ Problemsor Concerns (see below or attached) Comments: Date: Signature: PLEASESEND 9 OF MARKED REVISIONS El Plat El Site ❑ Utility 0 Landscape ❑ Drainage Report 11 NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS MEETING DATE: February 4, 2002 ITEM: Soft Gold Park, 520 Hickory Street APPLICANT: City of Fort Collins Parks Planning Department c/o Hetty Bixby 215 North Mason Street Fort Collins, CO. 80524 LAND USE DATA: Request for a new 10-acre City public neighborhood park located on a property at 520 Hickory Street. The program elements may include a restroom, picnic shelter, playground, baseball, soccer, multi -use pod, small BMX track, dog park, and off- street parking. The property is on the north side of Hickory Street (at its dead- end), west of North College Avenue, and is in the POL - Public Open Lands Zoning District. COMMENTS: 1. Sheri M/amhoff of the Engineering Department offered the following comments: a. The standard utility plan submittal requirements will apply to this development request. -A;S i ] the Lrr L(Y P]A,-1 $ugn.t-trs}L_ b. Street oversizing fees will apply to the Project Development Plan (PDP) development request. The fees are based on vehicle trip generation for the proposed land use in the development plan. Please contact Matt Baker of Engineering (ext. 6108) for detailed information on the fees. City of Fort Collins PROJECT COMMENT SHEET BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW DATE: October 3, 2003 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: Soft Gold Neighborhood Park - Note this (utility plan review) will not be in DMS. All comments must be received by Sheri Wamhoff no later than: October 17, 2003 0 No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Comments: Soft Gold Park Engineering comments October 21, 2003 1. Modify general notes 47 and 48. 2. Add a note on tlhe street plans that the outfall may need to be redesigned or rebuilt when the roadway construction occurs. 3. Identify that there will be future inlets on the roadway. Date:; Sig e: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS 0 Plat ❑ Site 0 Utility 0 Landscape ❑ Drainage Report fLi•A". -07.9 City of Fort Collins PROJECT COMMENT SHEET BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW DATE: June 24, 2003 DEPT: Poudre Fire Authority PROJECT: Soft Gold Neighborhood Park - Note this (utility plan review) will not be in DMS. All comments must be received by Sheri Wamhoff no later than: ❑ No Problems ❑ Problens or Concerns (see below or attached) Comments: REQUIRED ACCESS: A fire lane is required. The fire lane shall be visible by painting and signage, and maintained unobstructed. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.1; 901.31901.4.21 902.2,1; FCLUC The criteria for a required fire lane contain several conditions that must be met. I . The minimum width shall be 20 feet. 2. Inside turning radius shall be 25 feet and outside turning radius shall be 50 feet. 3. Compacted road base shall be used during the construction phase only. The permanent fire lane shall consist of asphalt or concrete and shall be required to support 40 tons 4. The required fire lane shall be recorded on the final plat as an "Emergency Access Easement'. Will a maintenance road be utilized for access to the soccer field and baseball field? Date: � V7S, Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS 0 Plat ❑ Site 0 Utility ❑ Landscape 0 Drainage Report 0 NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW DATE: June 24, 2003 DEPT: Excel J ,m PROJECT: Soft Gold Neighborhood Park - Note this (utility plan review) will not be in DMS. All comments must be received by Sheri Wamhoff no later than. July 16, 2003 M<o Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Comments: �JUL 2 8 2003 Mailed on: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 Date you received these documents: Date: 71 Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS 0 Plat 0 Site ❑ Utility ❑ Landscape 0 Drainage Report 0 NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS City of Fort Collins PROJECT COMMENT SHEET BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW DATE: June 24, 2003 DEPT: Elco PROJECT: ::>oft Gold Neighborhood Park - Note this (utility plan review) will not be in DMS. All comments must be received by Sheri Wamhoff no later than. - July 16, 2003 No Problems ❑ Problems or Concems (see below or attached) Comments: THE PROPOSED SOFT GOLD PARK AND ASSOCIATED UTILITY WORK WILL NOT AFFECT ANY ELCO FACILITIES. RECF!\ E0 1vN n 2C33 El -Ca NjA`! c� U151RICT Mailed on: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 Date you received these documents: Date: " y S" ) 3 Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS 0 Plat ❑ Site ❑ Utility ❑ Landscape ❑ Drainage Report ❑ NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS PROJECT COMMENT SHEET BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW DATE: June 24, 2003 DEPT: Com Cast PROJECT: Soft Gold Neighborhood Park - Note this (utility plan review) will not be in DMS. All comments must be received by Sheri Wamhoff no later July 16, 2003 N No Problems ❑ Problems or Concems (see below or attached) Comments: Mailed on: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 Date you jjeceived these documents: 7�11n Date: % / L� Signature.A :: 0", �yC2o�L�2�i/ PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS ❑ Plat L}Sitc 11 Utility 0-Landscape 11 Drainage Report 0 NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS City of Fort Collins PROJECT COMMENT SHEET BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW DATE: June 24, 2003 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: Soft Gold Neighborhood Park - Note this (utility plan review) will not be in DMS. All comments must be received by Sheri Wamhoff no later than: July 16, 2003 ❑ No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) SofQWithfttk Engineering comments July 21, 2003 l . Modify general notes 47 and 48 and add the missing note. 2. The legal description says that this is lots I and 2, but the plans show the property as only a portion of lot 1. 3. Need to identify the finish floor elevation of any structures on the grading plan. 4. The outfall wall needs to be installed outside of the row or shown that it will not impact the future street. 5. Need to keep the grading work onsite. There is a small amount of grading being shown outside of lot 2. Either change the grading so off -site grading is not needed or provide an easement from the neighboring properly owner for this work. 6. There is also grading work on lot 1 that is shown outside of the property boundary that shown on your plans. I believe this is natural resources property, contact natural resources for the process on getting easements and whether you would need to do this. 7. Showing the erosion control fence going across the row. Not sure that this will be allowed. Will this block access to the neighboring and adjacent property owners? In order to do this will need to submit a traffic control plan to traffic and get approval from them before the row can be closed and/ or blocked off. (continued on next page) Date: lb Signature�< PLEASESENDCOPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS El/� Plat ,Site t)rUtility P,,Landscape 0 Drainage Report 0 NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS 8. The utility plan sheet, the light lines will probably not scan. Per the standards the minimum recommended gray scale is 252. If the sheet will not reproduce or scan well, they can be rejected by technical services. 9. Need to show the storm drain lines on the utility plans. 10. There is a symbol that runs around the property, but is not labeled anywhere. It looks like it might be a fence. What is this and is it existing or proposed. It is shown crossing the row. 11. The sewer line plan shows that there is an existing ADS pipe crossing the roadway. ADS pipe is not allowed within the row as well as this pipe will not be able to support the traffic loads at the shallow depth that it is. This pipe needs to be replaced within the row. The area outside of the row can remain ADS. 12. Add the following notes to the hickory road design. Preliminary — not for construction. An approved final design in accordance with current City standards including a drainage report is needed prior to construction of this roadway. 13. Provide curve information for the roadway. 14. Identify where future inlets will need to be located based on this design. The low spot at the west end of the property - I doubt this would be allowed to be here. Water from the street would not be allowed to drop directly into the channel and a low spot here may not allow enough cover for the pipe or structure needed for this channel. Move the low spot over. 15. Identify the existing grade of the Hickory road where these improvements would tie in. 16. What is the existing grade at the west end of the design? Is it the same as proposed grade, if so extend the existing contour line past the end of the design to show where it is. 17. The two vertical curves do not meet min curve requirements per tables 7-17 and 7-18. City of Fort Collins PROJECT COMMENT SHEET BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW DATE: June 24, 2003 DEPT: Building Inspection PROJECT: Soft Gold Neighborhood Park - Note this (utility plan review) will not be in DMS. All comments must be received by Sheri Wamhoff no later than: July 16, 2003 ❑ No Problems ❑ Problems or Concems (see below or attached) Comments: f-E5-rF-00rA s- FAJ0709-c WtL-r Cf,5sl bl1,17`f 5-rP �5 1`�q � P�•N•S•I , ua>>f- 1991 UF-L- P,S buiUr lEL� IrJ Date: __ Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS ❑ Plat 0 Site 0 Utility ❑ Landscape 0 Drainage Report 0 NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS