HomeMy WebLinkAboutGREENBRIAR VILLAGE PUD - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2004-08-09/9-93A G E,�aQr�e i�/LCNGL�- PRAEGM A�b FiAIAL
;, �/L57o ✓ �S/G AJ OF /�mo �4/�� IN/M✓M .D BAn LoAO GU 1ig� �8� Y
I,
7TA765 -AA O� �fB00wlsg PmSS/bLA
Notes P�2e4.2 2eA„✓�5 %tiEcomme yDE D Pty¢ d'
G/tira. PAN
,li �i�47 J/Qo%�cat�crt- 9c.ccPfance ��y err e{6nyr. Yb C�ryE../c2,
WNEP-E , 4-E FZANs � /'2ofILES ? �E7AILs ? X-sscrz�
�ioaM .�QArIvAUG �Pepo QT /Uh$ /N oDP �I LE.
CC�iJA?E2L 5.6GUER. - Ju3 .liRhruS - 5r?fE67- ZIAAnIA.I&
dU,BMrT TAL //JADEEQN/9TE
6. Public service Company of Colorado states that the developer's
architect had indicated in telephone conversations that there
would be an unobstructed 15' utility easement around the
outside perimeter of this project. The Site and Landscape
Plans indicate that in some cases building envelopes extend to
within 30' of the property boundary and that patios extend
even beyond the building envelopes. Proposed trees will also
obstruct, use of this space for multiple utility lines. Front
building setbacks from the rear of the sidewalks fail to meet
the 15' specification required to install both electric and
natural gas facilities behind sidewalks as is normally done.
Installation of electric and/or natural gas lines in paved
areas may be a required option. Utility easements as proposed
on the subdivision plat are inadequate.
7. City Light & Power states that the Site Plan shows the
location of a street light on the north side of Butch Cassidy
Court, just east of Building #6. The Landscape Plan shows a
couple of street trees that appear to be too close to the
light. Street trees must be a minimum of 401, horizontally,
from a light pole.
8. The Water/Wastewater Department states that a utility plan
must be submitted to and approved by the City.
9. The Poudre Fire Authority has the following comments:
a) The Phase One parking lot does not provide 20, inside and
40' outside turning radius.
b) Both sides of the Phase One parking lot, at the ends of the
center parking, must be signed "No Parking - Fire Lane"
with approved signs and the curbs painted red. An
unobstructed 20' wide drive lane must be provided.
c) The Phase One parking lot must be included in a public
access easement.
10. A copy of the stormwater Utility's comments is attached to
this letter. It appears that the drainage information
submitted is not sufficient for a combined Preliminary 8 Final
review.
11. Parkland fees of $625 per dwelling unit will apply for all
residential development and be collected at the time of
issuance of building permits.
12. There is an 18' drive width around the island in the cul-de-
sac at the end of Butch Cassidy Court. The City standard is a
28' width in this situation. The City is discouraging the use
of the center island.
13. Utility easements for this phase do not appear to be adequate,
and the subdivision plat does not provide for any public
access to the parking lots.
14. The City Transportation Division has not completed their
review of this request yet, due to the late submittal (April
15, 1993) of the traffic study. I have not yet received
comments from them but it is possible that it might be
necessary to connect Butch Cassidy Court to Greenbriar Circle
to the east. Questions pertaining to the traffic issues should
be directed to Rita Davis. She can be reached at 221-6608.
15. A copy of the Engineering Department's comments is attached to
this letter. The utility plans as submitted are not adequate
for a combined Preliminary 6 Final review. Staff feels that
this project can move ahead as a Preliminary review only, with
the Preliminary going to the Planning and Zoning Board on May
24, 1993.
16. Planning comments:
a) There is no fencing indicated on the Site Plan or the
Landscape Plan. Fencing is shown on the "Typical Planting
Detail". Will there be perimeter fencing or fencing around the
patios? If so, it should be identified.
b) Will the Garden Areas have access to water connections?
c) The sidewalk should be connected to the existing sidewalk
on the north side of Butch Cassidy Court.
d) Elevations for all four sides of the buildings is needed.
The elevations must identify the proposed height of the
buildings, the materials, colors, etc.
e) What will be the groundcover treatment on the "back" sides
of the buildings? The "Typical Planting Detail" should include
labeling of the plantings and treatment.
f) The Site Plan should identify when the phase with the
clubhouse will be built.
g) The materials and colors for the trash enclosure should be
included on the Site Plan. Also, a detail showing materials
and colors for the gazebo is needed.
h) More information on the berming is needed. Where will they
ba and how tall? 18" high berms will not screen the parking
areas.
i) The parking spaces backing into Butch Cassidy Court are not
recommended. The platting of the property seems strange. Lot
1 is left with essentially no parking and no way to get to the
units from the large parking area.
j) The SITE must be shown and identified on the Vicinity Map.
This completes the staff review comments at this time. Additional
comments may be forthcoming as the various departments and
reviewing agencies continue to review this request. Please be aware
of the following dates and deadlines to assure your ability to stay
on schedule for the May 24, 1993 Planning and Zoning Board hearing:
Plan revisions are due May 5, 1993 by 12:00 noon. Please contact me
for the number of folded revisions required for each document.
PMT's, renderings, and 8 folded copies of final revisions (for the
Planning and Zoning Board packets) are due May 17, 1993.
Final documents (including the signed development agreement,
applicable mylars and utility plans) are due May 20, 1993 by 12:00
noon.
Please contact me at 221-6750 if you have questions or concerns
related to these comments. I would like to schedule a meeting with
you as soon as possible, if necessary, to discuss these comments.
S' rely,
t v
Project Planner
xc: Kerrie Ashbeck
Sherry Albertson -Clark
Advance Planning
Stormwater Utility
Transportation
Jeff Laughren
Stewart & Associates
file/Project Planner
CommL
Planning Department
City of Fort Collins
May 25, 1993
Ed Zdenek
ZTI Group
1220 South College Avenue
Fort Collins, CO. 80524
Dear Ed,
and Environmental ervices
I would like to take this opportunity to express the concerns and
comments of City staff relating to the Greenbriar Village P.U.D. -
overall Development Plan and the Greenbriar Village P.U.D., First
Filing - Preliminary & Final that you are intending to take to the
Planning and Zoning Board on June 28, 1993 for a decision. As a
result of the decision by the Board on May 24th night to postpone
any action on the O.D.P. and the First Filing, Preliminary until
June 28th, and your intent to gain final approval from the City to
allow construction on this site, it is important to make you aware
of the critical dates in the City's review process and the concerns
that have to be addressed prior to submittal of revisions for this
development. Staff's comments are as follows:
Greenbriar Village P.U.D. - Overall Development Plan
1. The most recent O.D.P. in the City's file is dated May 17,
1993 and appears to be in good form.
2. The reference to an HB Zone north of Willox Lane is incorrect.
That zoning district does not exist in that area.
3. Reference to the zoning districts affected by this development
should be stated in the SITE STATISTICS. It is unclear what
districts some of the phases are in.
Greenbriar Village P.U.D., First Filing - Preliminary & Final
Site Plan
1. The title of this drawing should be "Preliminary & Final Site
Plan". The most recent site plan in the city's file is dated
May 17, 1993 and appears to be the most complete. It would
seem logical that revisions from this point forward be made to
this document.
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Bur S80 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (303) 221-6750
2. Note 12 must be eliminated, or it could be rewritten to say
that "The developer reserves the right to request minor
adjustments". The only "rights" are those provided in the
L.D.G.S., which requires City approval.
3. what is meant by Note 6? What kind of "outside storage", other
than what will be stored in the storage buildings, is being
proposed that would necessitate screening?
4. By virtue of the fact that this will now be a combined
Preliminary & Final the following two recommended conditions
of approval for the preliminary plan that was postponed by the
Planning and Zoning Board on May 24th must be addressed with
your revisions (re -submittal):
* The,cul-de-sac at the east end of Butch Cassidy Court
must conform to the City's street design standards or the
applicant must submit a variance request to the
Engineering Department with the Final P.U.D. submittal
clearly describing the function of the cul-de-sac and
showing proof of the ability for a narrow street width to
operate safely under all circumstances.
* The off-street parking provisions for both Phases One
and Two must meet the minimum off-street parking
requirements as set forth in the City Code or the
applicant must adjust the number of dwelling units to
enable c-::;;,pli.ance with City Code prior to gaining final
approval from the Planning and Zoning Board.
5. Note 9 references the RP and RAMP Zoning Districts. Please
enlighten me. What is the RAMP district and what is allowed?
6. what will be the building material and color of the trash
enclosures doors?
7. A note must be added stating that all proposed project fencing
is shown on the Final Landscape Plan.
Landscape Plan
1. The title of this drawing should be "Preliminary & Final
Landscape Plan". The most recent landscape plan in the City's
file is dated May 17, 1993 and appears to be the most
complete. It would seem logical that revisions from this point
forward be made to this document.
2. Landscape Notes 8 and 15 are not consistent. Note 15 does not
allow any certificates of occupancy to be issued until all the
landscaping shown on the entire plan is installed. A single,
correct note should read ...
"All landscaping for each phase of the project will be
completed or secured with an irrevocable letter of
credit, escrow or performance bond for 125% of the
valuation as indicated on this plan prior to the issuance
of the first certificate of occupancy in that phase".
All of the street trees on both sides of Butch Cassidy Court
must be installed with Phase One.
3. The project phases, Phases One and Two, must be defined on
this plan. Will all the sidewalks (on both sides of the
street) be completed with Phase One?
4. Butch Cassidy Court must be identified on this plan.
5. Note 19 referring to the fencing is too ambiguous, open-ended
and is not acceptable. This note does not clearly define where
fencing can and will occur. The plan does define the areas to
be fenced but Note 19 then contradicts maybe even doing any
fencing. Also, Note 19 as written does not commit the
developer of Greenbriar Village P.U.D., First Filing to
construct the perimeter fencing as shown. The Neighborhood
Compatibility criteria in the All Development Chart of the
Land Development Guidance System (page 5) states that "When a
use is the first to develop on two adjacent vacant parcels,
the first use shall provide the necessary buffer to any
reasonable future use as determined by the City". The
Greenbriar Village P.U.D. - Overall Development Plan
identifies single family residential as the proposed use to
the north and east of the First Filing. It is the
responsibility of the more intensive use to provide adequate
buffering between the two different uses. The more intensive
use in this case is the multi -family residential in the First
Filing.
Buildina Elevations
1. The title of this sheet should be Greenbriar Village P.U.D.,
First Filing. We are reviewing this architectural drawing for
the entire First Filing that includes two phases. In order to
avoid any misunderstanding in the future it should be clear
that an approval would be for this one building type for all
10 buildings containing 40 dwelling units. Phase One could be
interpreted to be only buildings 1 through 6 as shown on the
Site Plan.
2. This drawing, for the architect's construction purposes, is
obviously part of a set of construction documents that
includes 6 drawings. For the City's purposes this is drawing
1 of 1 and should titled as such.
This completes the review comments at this time. This letter
reflects, essentially, the Planning Department's comments to make
the Site and Landscape Plans current. Please be aware of the
Engineering Department's comments and requirements that were
outlined at our meeting on May 25, 1993. You received the written
comments after that meeting. It is important to contact the
Stormwater Utility and get their current requirements. Additional
reviewing agencies continue to review this request. Please be aware
of the following dates and deadlines to assure your ability to stay
on schedule for the June 28, 1993 Planning and Zoning Board
hearing:
Plan revisions are due June 9, 1993 by 12:00 noon. Please contact
me for the number of folded revisions required for each document.
PMT's, renderings, and 8 folded copies of final revisions (for the
Planning and Zoning Board packets) are due June 21, 1993.
Final documents (including the signed development agreement,
applicable mylars and utility plans) are due June 24, 1993 by 12:00
noon.
Please contact me at 221-6750 if you have questions or concerns
related to these comments. I would like to schedule a meeting with
you as soon as possible, if necessary, to discuss these comments.
Aerely,
Olt
Project Planner
xc: Kerrie Ashbeck
Sherry Albertson -Clark
Advance Planning
Stormwater Utility
Transportation
Jeff Laughren
Stewart & Associated
file/Project Planner
Correspondence/Not( , %z5V3
111 yx %
(� //f��� 7�:orZ
a i c e�se� � �Ss/o�'/ er�isreel"
i
�7�4. perk
Cs-fd� r� zlS cxyri � corsisyG��li, easyrarer
® O1�P
Arrx;,WrN /� 64 Cl v 4
riz/ Q441- P L"�Zcaxoe
!/mac L 51 e L re1 easery�
I[I
C 1988 Priority Management Systems Inc.
r wespondence/Notes
C7}�LL�C � LZd cLd�
Cu 1je- saG - Gl '-1-- de 6?x�
�D �aee/4
�1G�uU�z%l�
jwws1` fade- 04�0 rrXefe eivw
CD r,/�14,7 a//i%G/lSGtvIC2
S'61{/qC °e- Shwa) lwellz- lfY egahc !
6;,014e1vl
0 1988 Priority Management Systems Inc printed in US.A.
�N 441 Pl_ JJECT COMMENT &tEET
PROJECT NAME:
PLANNING AGENCY: C,
Public Service Company of Colorado has the following comments in
regard to the above named project recently sent to us for review by
the above named agency:
No Problems
Y I 1X�_ Problems, concerns, requirements as follows:
of-~--d 'the -
Z2s 72W3
DATE: D,S 2-6 93
TITLE: -�
C.C.
0�17S Z-S
6b-Pm.1e.92
PROJECT
City of Fort Collins COMMENT SHEET
DATE: DEPARTMENT: /� f
PROJECT: Greenbriar Village PUD -Prel. & Final
PLANNER: Steve Olt
Please respond to this project by Wednesday, April 14,1993.
No Problems
XProblems or concerns (see below)
'pk�.VO.� s AWA : t[cr HAD tN aizAtGv „N pRv*+G ZP*,W W"TW A T'MAT'
JLMjse-, w.wotr-o V-4V1 Ar•+ L*101 &f=X-V t5' Ulii"'nJ OWSENW%aT 490u"P TP)tm,
vtws por P* M@rVW- Orr- "ii pith . 7 fw P sv # L+vNDSGApG
F,vb*'j erv:cArs T-Avmr ;& Sor.ea c^,SM 13UM4h"" trri� �T�Io
Tp W rr*;Va It)' pp " fU;UP4W^=1 QNb J*AT QAMRoS f�XrE+ie7
E.►ow%j c"W— R,"uuv vis-40vapers . P�cpase-� 'Tn
ik nL�so eaPssS¢t�tT' use' °7� -jFF;a spnuk �_ �uur►p[tr
F:�U*•t Psutl.v:Ny sue- sm4Ls rr&~ aessarL W-F-
.,.gWwa.Ks fwi1- -Iv *Avwr TW 15 bye.. rtEevu�rev -re WSrAK
00TVI &i-escr► C. # NAlLht^t.. eftAs roAaL-i liss Fie k; SFYOWAucy As
l9 NOIt►N e" Powts- . N s �t.u.r+aw s)F E+-Or�f'1�i e. Aw%fo /&r- "ATVP^4-
hA'5 L.I ► l S i m pfaYQiv AAC945 Mf►k, A¢ A 1 &iWifte7b OP130" .
Ufi Li r1 VKSCrAVNM Pfz0r-%Mxw 004 PL Ar AM& 10ZJA050LjA7¢.
Date: 1 7 i3 Signature:-1
CHECK IF REVISIONS REQUIRED: PLAT
SITE
LANDSCAPE?
El UTILITY
DEVI,LOPMENT SERVICES 28I NORTH COLLEGE P.O.BO%580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580 (303)221-6750
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
! PLANS" UTILITY
City of FortCollins
DATE: DEPARTMENT: C, C
i�L�Nti�s E�NL"ACT
PROJECT:
/c
/P. / tL�-
Please review and return any comments and/or redlined plans to the Development
Review Center by: 6�/x/93
❑ No Problems
Problems or Concerns (see below)
Columbine Cablevision would like to work with Developers in wiring
these units in a Home -Run System.
We would also like to possibly go joint trench up to the buildings
with main lines.
Date: June 14, 1993 Signature' L��z��-��/--c-
Dennis Greenwalt, Construction Coordinato
CHECK IF YOU NEED TO SEE A REVISED UTILITY PLAINV ❑
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 281 NORTH COLLEGE P.O.ROX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580 (7031221-6750
PLANNING DEPARTVEN"r
60 UTILITY PLANS
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
DATE: (0 / 9-? DEPARTMENT:
PROJECT:
/L
Please review and return any comments and/or redlined plans to the Development
Review Center by:
XNo Problems
lProblems or Concerns (see below)
/U&Me t oeAw•Ns Sr/or,►N op" *#IF AWAP-* ARC
Dater Signature:
CIIECK IF YOU NEED TO SEE A REVISED UTILITY PLAN: ❑
1)EVE.LOPME.NT SERVICES 28I NORTH COLLEGE P.O.BOS 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580 (503)22I-6750
PLANNING DEPAR"fMENT
PROJECT
City of Fort Collins COMMENT SHEET
DATE: DEPARTMENT: �1 f �'f s-
PROJECT: Greenbriar Village PUD -Prel. & Final
PLANNER: Steve Olt
Please respond to this project by Wednesday, April 14,1993.
❑ No Problems
❑ Problems or concerns (see below)
Date:/�V—fSignature:
CHECK IF REVISIONS RE ❑ PLAY
QUIRED: ❑ SITE
❑ LANDSCAPE
❑ UTILITY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 281 NORTH COLLEGE P.O.BOX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORAD) 80522-0580 (303)22I-675(
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PROJECT
6N w �iii
ii�,.',' �', COMMENT SHEET
DATE: DEPARTMENT: C r- �Fv
PROJECT: Greenbriar Village PUD -Prel. & Final
PLANNER: Steve Olt
Please respond to this project by Wednesday, April 14,1993.
No Problems
RY. Problems or concerns (see below)
Columbine CableVision would like to work with Developers in wiring
these units in a Home -Run System.
We would also like to possibly go joint trench up to the buildings
with main lines.
Date: April 13, 1993 Sibnature: i (_ ,—
Dennis Greenwalt, Construction Coord
CHECK IF REVISIONS REQLIiRED: ❑ PLAT
❑ SITE
El LANDSCAPE
❑ UTILITY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 281 NORTH COLLEGE P.O.DOX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO R0522-0590 (303)221-6750
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: DEPARTMENT:
PROJECT: Greenbriar Village PUD -Pre[. & Final
PLANNER: Steve Olt
Please respond to this project by Wednesday, April 14,1993.
No Problems
Problems or concerns (see below)
of,- 14
o-rN GoNTl20 I\J U M G N-rl
�E �cSC1zkr31=1�-
�j( (�UTI'iZ BUVN�AK� rY10NUM NTi
1::>`SCr< tr3I;z-L
W
Date:
Signature:
CHECK IF REVISIONS REQUIRED:
S-HawPJ rnvsT
MU,�'T %
❑ PLAT
❑ SITE
❑ LANDSCAPE
❑ UTILITY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 281 NORTH COLLEGE P.O.ROX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580(303)221-6750
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
DATE: DEPARTMENT:
PROJECT: Greenbriar Village PUD -Pre[. & Final
PLANNER: Steve Olt
Please respond to this project by Wednesday, April 14,1993.
No Problems
Problems or concerns (see below)
IPrre h h0 UA�l(4-y rk, y�bvniMeel hhev l a k�� a e��; � ►red 7 av nez+ -to e BCC
m'�`,
Je7/reel
!�{ZY11 j�a C 1 4,
{� r� rvU ed, k rYw t� deh��n2ol noo
et
Date: l 23 �� Signature: •mil
11 PLAT
CHECK IF REVISIONS REQUIRED: ❑ SITE
❑ LANDSCAPE
❑ UTILITY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 281 NORTH COLLEGE P.O.ROX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580 (303)221-6750
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Commu.uty Planning and Environmental services
Planning Department
City of Fort Collins
April 21, 1993
Ed Zdenek
ZTI Group
1220 South College Avenue
Fort Collins, CO. 80524
Dear Ed,
Staff has reviewed the submittals for the Greenbrier Village P.D.D.
- Overall Development Plan and Greenbrier Village P.U.D., First
Filing - Preliminary/Final, and would like to offer the following
comments:
Greenbriar Village P.U.D. - O.D.P.
1. The Greenbriar project is being reviewed as a P.U.D. and the
plans should reflect this.
2. The property is in the RP and the RMP zoning districts. The
portion south of the existing Sundance Hills P.U.D., Second
Filing is zoned RMP.
3. It is being recommended that the Development Phasing Plan
schedule submitted as a separate document be added to the
O.D.P. for Greenbriar Village P.U.D.
4. The phase lines are unclear on the O.D.P. Phase 2 is actually
comprised of what area? What is the status/intent/proposed use
of the parcel at the northeast corner of the O.D.P., at the
intersection of Willox Lane and Redwood Street?
5. Submittal requirements for O.D.P.'s state that the area shown
on the plan must extend beyond the property lines of the
proposal to include a survey of the area within 150 feet of
the proposal and should include:
a) Land uses, location of principal structures and major
existing landscape features;
b) Densities of residential uses;
c) Traffic circulation system;
d) Natural features of the landscape; and
e) General topographical mapping at same scale as the O.D.P.
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Bov �;80. • Fort Collins, CO 80a22-0;80 • M3) 221-67�;0
6. A legend should be added to the O.D.P. indicating, as a
minimum, the significance of the arrows (presumably drainage
patterns) and conceptual pedestrian connections both on- and
off -site.
7. Note 3 should indicate that Any part of an exterior building
wall will be located within 150 feet of an access for fire and
emergency equipment.
8. Note 6 should indicate that all signs will comply to City of
Fort Collins standards and will be restricted to signage as
9. Note 7 must be eliminated from the plan. This statement is too
open-ended and could potentially create future misconceptions
and misunderstandings about what is allowed to occur on the
property.
10. The SITE for this development proposal must be shown and
identified on the Vicinity Map.
11. The Residential Uses Density Point Chart does not relate to
the O.D.P. It must be attached to the Greenbriar Village
P.U.D., First Filing (and subsequent filings) plan.
12. Public Service Company of Colorado has stated that dedication
of adequate utility easements must be provided by individual
plats (filings).
13. The developer needs to be aware of the City ordinance that
requires the undergrounding of existing overhead utilities
prior to issuance of building permits. In this case, the
ordinance will apply to lots in the southerly part of "Phase
4 - Single Family" and lots adjacent to Redwood Street in
"Phase 2 - Single Family/Duplex". It will also apply to any
development along the south side of Willox Lane. Please
contact Doug Martine of City Light 6 Power with questions
pertaining to these comments. He can be reached at 221-6700.
14. The City Water/Wastewater Department has stated that a Master
Utility Plan must be submitted and approved prior to the
approval of construction plans for any portion of the
Greenbriar Village P.U.D. Please contact Mark Taylor with
questions pertaining to water and sanitary sewer services. He
can be reached at 221-6681.
15. Timing for construction of Redwood Street and its relationship
to the proposed phasing of this development is critical.
Sufficient secondary points of emergency access for any phase
is required. Please contact Warren Jones of the Poudre Fire
Authority with questions pertaining to emergency access
requirements. He can be reached at 221-6570.
16. The O.D.P. indicates a general pattern for drainage. It
appears that someone has thought it through but there is no
narrative or indication of the method of conveyance (i.e.,
ditch, street, pipe, etc.). An overall drainage plan, reviewed
and signed by an engineer, should be submitted. The plan does
not need calculations unless the design engineer thinks there
is reason to check flows to see if what is proposed is really
feasible. Some sub -basin delineations may be needed just to be
able to describe each area and how it is planned to drain.
Please contact Glen Schlueter of the City Stormwater Utility
with questions pertaining to storm drainage. He can be reached
at 221-6589.
17. Blue Spruce Drive should be labeled on the plan.
18. Pedestrian connections should be indicated from Phase 1 to
Greenbriar Circle.
19. The Solar Orientation Ordinance will apply to the Phase 2 -
Single Family/Duplex portion of the development. This must be
addressed with the Preliminary P.U.D. plans.
20. The Engineering Department is suggesting shifting the
alignment of Sundance Circle and the intersection of Sundance
Circle and Greenbriar Circle further to the south, creating
more separation from Willox Lane. What is the circle on
Sundance Circle?
Greenbriar Village P.U.D., First Filing - Preliminary/Final
1. The plans should represent the fact that this is a P.U.D.
2. The Site Plan, and Building Envelope Plan detail, should
identify that all buildings contain 4 dwelling units each.
This is unclear with the information provided.
3. Both control monuments shown on the subdivision plat must be
described. All outer boundary monuments must be described.
4. The Residential Uses Density Point Chart submitted on April 5,
1993 is claiming base credit for being within 3,000 feet of a
major employment center and bonus credit for a commitment to
developing low income housing. What is the major employment
center that is being used for credit? This will need to be
substantiated in writing to the City. Your commitment to low
income housing must be presented in the Planning Objectives or
in some other form of writing submitted to the City and
included on the Site Plan.
5. Columbine Cablevision would like to work with the developers
in wiring the units in a home -run system. They would also like
to possibly go joint trench up to the buildings with main
lines. Your contact person at CCTV is Dennis Greenwalt.