Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGREENBRIAR - Filed GC-GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE - 2004-08-06JUL 2-- Ma I Empire Laboratories, Inc. MATERIALS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERS 214 No. Ho,,es fort Collins, Colorado 80522 P.O. Box 429 (303) 484-0359 June 30, 1980 Mr. Charles Mayhugh CRM Architecture 4836 South College Avenue Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 e: Greenbriar Condominimums Dear Chuck: Ranch Oifica, 1242 B,a—,.Od Pbca Lonamonl, Colo.ado 80501 P O. Box 1135 1303) 776 3921 3151 Nation Way Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 P.O. Box 10076 (307) 6329224 A site inspection made by our firm recently at the above -referenced project indicates the site is suitable for the proposed construction. Preliminary soil tests have been made in the area and it is emphasized that dewatering systems should be installed as recommended. After the areas have been dewatered, all organic material and topsoil should be removed from the site and filled with a granular -type material. The excavation of all fill should be verified and inspected and field density tests taken under the direct supervision of a geotechnical engineer. The upper four (4) feet of fill placed at the site should ted +n ,+7naci n nA v_ 1vo narcPnt. 95 O —Stan0dra Proctor Density ASTM D ,7.9. In addition, t e s1 e s ou a graded to provide posi inage outside the area. We recommend that a comprehensive soil study be made for the proposed building site after all fill placement has been made. It would appear that the site would require several feet of granular imported material to bring building pads and parking areas to grade. In view of this, we see no problems with construction in the area. However, all foundation, street sections, and parking areas should be designed for the specific subsurface conditions after fill placement. If you have any questions regarding these recommendations or if we can be of any further assistance, please contact us. Very truly yours, EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. Chester C. Smith, P.E. President cic cc: Hvolvoll-Johnson James H. Stewart and Associates, Inc. - Jack Blake MEMBER OF CONSULTING ENGINEERS COUNCIL CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATE: October 12, 1978 TO: Roy Bingman, Director of Public Works THRU: Donald M. Parsons, City Engineer FROM: Bob Smith, Drainage EngineerA RE: Off -site drainage for Greenbriar P.U.D. As the City approaches a limit in its ability to provide adequate Public service for its urban area, the frequency of new development occurring adjacent to existing subdivisions increases. Often, such existing sub- divisions were designed and constructed in accordance with standards and specifications less stringent than those presently in use. This is true in the case of urban storm drainage, particularly as it relates to surface runoff. At its August 24th meeting, the Storm Drainage Board discussed an example of the problems associated with this type of situation. The Second Filing of Evergreen Park Subdivision, which is presently under construction, was designed to handle its own runoff, assuming that upstream historical runoff would flow around Evergreen Park to the east. Greenbriar P.U.D., a proposed development directly north of Evergreen Park 2nd, has discovered in the course of a preliminary drainage analysis that routing their drainage around rather than through Evergreen Park 2nd will require extensive additional design as well as increasing the cost of developing their site. Part of the problem at this point is determing the most economical engineering solution, but the main issue is to determine an equitable distribution of the financial responsibilities associated with these solutions. To date, the City has required development to pay its own way, relieving the City of any substantial responsibility. There are basically three alternatives in dealing with these situations: (1) Require the developer to pay for the complete drainage system which will channel his storm runoff to a suitable outlet. Depending on the location of the development, such an outlet may be either on- or off -site. (2) Require the City to participate directly in the costs of these drainage systems. (3) Establish a fee based upon the estimated costs of construction which allows those costs to be distributed among the affected properties. RE: Off -site drainage for Creenbriar P.U.D. Page 2 A combination of the second and third alternatives seems to be the most equitable and feasible. Preliminary cost estimates for the Creenbriar drainage system range between $48,000 and $98,000 depending upon which design solution is finally accepted. The fees for this system could be assigned in conjunction with the subdivision improvement agreements for the developments within the area. Due to the time constraints associated with this development, it is recommended that. the City take immediate action to retain a consultant to prepare a design for this drainage system. The expense of the consultant will be distributed within the fees for the project. Aez#Ad t �;d. �'EEN4�'iP/AIL sa,3bl l5IDN G� C.1.�1T!✓"� !D /� G'01i/'cQC7'1GJstd !!,"�fC^�ltG� G'=i� de�'-dam iil'✓i/I /°"i /I�d✓i��� ,,`�': Ao G!t ✓�j'iK(•/L/( fit".�1..P /,�..G�dp /.:11 � ��'Zs+/h{Cj' (/ - CG� ,, �4/�� 'Q �J1 /,1/e.2a/ �s,�!•✓+.I r�Cd ;=-�d ,E;,v.�!GtC<'.u"y'%'c� U �f CD�';.t��✓�(!�'�'s[S. � %+�/-2 � C,O'G74�0 1���'�aY /��•.(OQi{:^�I� /✓c/N.d:+„+P o -Ile yPd aip zw i,'t G UGC , % ✓ GtJ--✓7�G t�' f / is ,%c1 arc JG:s sIle .,..r /arf /t w (al a zetle •',..�.�".���^Ct / f ,14 / c ,4 , / 6? 3« / �� a •deceur�.� ? t 97f C''a� Sfe�. f Qdeaua�°2d couzv:axo 044, dAVe Ale Ma %d ee A -&(," ro ' ;a card ( flux ago .foe Caa `a, 4 /ix&WD wC 0 % Av Qd ,4kVW OW dial /? �e 22 ( ie) : k A H # 25)1 V/ pw`� 132- //4t 35-' CITY OF FOR] COFFINS P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 Telephone 303-484-4220 6666 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT January 3, 1979 James H. Stewart & Associates 214 N. Howes Fort Collins, CO 80521 RE: Greenbrier P.U.D. and Prospect --Timberline P.U.D. Gentlemen: Our survey crew, in accompanyment with the writer, visually checked the referenced subdivisions on Tuesday, January 2, 1979, for monwnentation of the exterior boundaries in accord- ance with CRS 38-51-101. We were unable to find permanent monuments in accordance with the statutes. Please advise this office when monumentation of the boundaries is completed so that we may sign the plats prior to recording. Sincerely, Maurice E. Rupel, P.E. & L.S. Development Engineer cc: Mrs. Molly Davis Mr. Donald Parsons Mr. Roy B_ingman Mr. Charles Mabry MR/eve 100% Recycled Bond CITY OF FUha OLLJNS- P.O. BOX 560, FJnT CO_LINS, COLD' ,JO ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT February 20, 1979 Mr. John Johnson Hvolboll-JOhnSJn P.O. Box 542 Solvang, California 93463 Dear Mr. Johnson, PH I30314c'44220 EX-, 305 First of all, let me apologize for the delay in forwarding the attached subdivision agreements for Gre.enbriar P.U.D. to you for your review. We have spent a considerable ai-Fount of time analyzing the appropriate phasing for the development in terms of the necessary drainage improvements. Hope- fiilly the terms outlined in this agreement will be satisfactory. Please type in the nacre of your partnership, corporation, or venture in the first paragraph of all three executory copies. If the agreement is acceptable, please affix your corporate seal and have an officer (president or vice-president) sign each copy. When you have returned the agreements I will obtain the necessary City signatures and a fully executed copy of the agreement will be forwarded to you when the final plat is filed by the City Clerk. If you have any questions regarding the agreement please feel free to contact me at the offices of the City Engineer (303-484-4220 EXT. 728). Sincerely, Marc- p�V� Marc Develo t Engineer ME/jc enclosure 100% Recycled Bond CI1Y OF I Of'] COLLINS WATER AND SEWER LII ILITIES Mr. Guy McCafx P_ 0. BOX 580, FORT COLLINS, COLORAD0 80522 PH (303) 484-4220 May 18, 1979 214 N r Stewart & A5socrates 214 Nortl_i Howes Port Collins, Colorado 80521 ZIL Dear Guy: b s we have prev s y is ed, the City has decided to install a 24-inch main n Greenbriar This letter. is to authorize you to proceed with s required on the utility drawings. The City will require multiple bids and will pay the developer his costs over the cost of the presently approved plans. We are currently ruruning soil tests in Greenbriar and anticipate requiri.nq polywrap or other corrosion protection measures on all water mains. We will confirm this as soon as test results are available. IE you have any questions please call. Very truly yoTS, James C. llibbard Systems Engineer J11/s1 Cc: Tccl Hays Curt Miller Maury Rupple ❑lYO1-IORI (_OI_LINS ENGINELRING DIVISION P.O. BOX 580, PORI (0I.I.INS, COI 0RADO80522 January 23, 1980 Janes H. Stewart & Associates Consulting Fhgineers 214 N. Haves Ft. Collins, CO 80521 RE: Greenbriar Subdivisio Dear Sirs: PII(303)-18444 20 EXT. 728 During construction of the 24" water main on the above referenced project, the contractor installing the utilities encountered a swampy, low-lying area. The area that I am concerned about is in the northwest sector of the sLiAivi.sion, under Willox Tame from approximately Station 22+00 to 28+00 (sheet 7 and 8 of 22 on the approved utility drawings). A test hole dug by the contractor on January 23, 1980 indicated a soil profile of: 0.0 to 1.5 ft. 1.5 to 6.5 ft. 6.5 to 7.5 ft. Belay 7.5 ft. Groundwater 4 ft. from surface Decoriposing organic material Brown silt with some very fine sand Brown heavy clay White silt This soil profile is radically different from any boring logs in the soils report submitted for this project. A visual examination seems to indicate a rather poor soil for engineering purposos. Therefore, the City is asking that additional siLsurface soil investi- gations be carried out to classify the soil and deterrune the limits of this swampy area, including groundwater determination if measurable and, if necessary, a structural redesign of the collector and residential streets in this area should be submitted to this office for approval. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Hatt J. B cer Construction Inspector MJR:bso 108 CAMERON DRIVE FT COLLINS COLORADO 80525 :r, Joe Frank „ Pl al�Tiing Divis _on city o£ Fort Co_ ins P.o. Box 580 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 E RDi-NC 1' '♦B IFR CO �C T -IJMS Final Plan Submittal/Review CAMERON CREEK PLAZA 303'2264836 January 20, 1982 JAN 2 0 1S62 Dear Joe, Because of the limited time available for review of the final documents (plans, subdivision agreement, etc.) our clients have requested that final submittal of this project to Planning and Zoning Board be post- poned for one more month, until February 22. Prom our conversation yesterday with Chuck and Josh, IQ understand that on all problem areas have been resolved, with minor c:anEsrequire the engineering drawings. Also, we will submit in the near future: 1 set of mylar sepias with signed site plan, signed subdivision agreement, rendered site plan, color slide of rendered site plan, and mylar sepia of schematic building elevations. if additional items are required, please call as soon as possible. Best regards„ S David E. Knor, Project Architect CRM Architecture DEK:am cc: Evolboll-Johnson CORNt11 C0NSU1iiNCi COMPANY ixi 1x0.646 I010u0111%s (olouukl8(15%7 plKA1 (XW) l82-66 Or7 MANS(,( MI NJA N(,iNI I RING February 7, 1980 F.W. Michael Michael Leasing Inc. P.O. Box 1982 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 Dear Mr. Michael, Enclosed with this letter is a print of an alternate drainage plan for Puebla Vista Estates. This plan provides twice the detention volume of the original plan dated June 27, 1978, and has the added advantage of being located more closely to the natural low point than the original plan. The detention volume of over 1 ac-ft of water is well in excess of that required by either the City of County for this site. The majority of the discharge from the site results from passage of upstream Dater and not from development of this site. The culvert sizes shown have been adjusted to allow passage of the two year storm without street overtopping. If you have any further questions concerning drainage at Puebla Vista Estates please contact our office. Sincerely, CORNELL CONSULTING COMPANY Bill Blackwell Senior Design Engineer Harry fornell President m - - _ � Q w Lo T l; Ir N j I I dl J J 1 it 5 i V _ 1 —I- Li a /Lij Q � J w _ � � I O O 4- cngirr�ring professionals Inc. February 14, 1980 Project No. 65-2-1 City of Fort Collins c/o Mir. Bob Smith P 0 Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 Dear Bob: At the drainage board meeting on January 23rd of this year, it was suggested that the outfall storm sewer system for the Greenbriar east detention pond be constructed through Evergreen Park Second Filing and through the property to the southeast of the Lake Canal, north of Alta Vista, and west of North Lemay Avenue. I have since made a preliminary evaluation of said alternative and find that it would not be advantageous from an economic standpoint for the following reasons: 1. Due to the 12" sanitary sewer along the north boundary of Evergreen Park Second Filing, the 27" City of Greeley water main in Foxtail Street, the 24" ELCO water main in Conifer Street„ and the Lake Canal, a minimum of 3 inverted siphons ,could be necessary. The inverted siphon below the 27" and 24" wai.er mains would be a minimum of 150' longer than with the alternatives presented at the meeting. 2. Conflicts with existing utilities would be increased compared to the alternatives presented at the drainage board meeting. Construction of the storm se,aer along the back lot lines of Lots 1'l through 18, Block 2 would conflict with the underground_ telephone and cable television cables. Construction along the front of said lots, in Coulter Street, would obviously conflict with water, sewer, gas, and electricity. 3. Whether the storm sewer were constructed in front of or in the back of the lots mentioned above, additional asphalt and curb and gutter would be removed and replaced compared to the alternatives presented at the drainage board meeting. 4. Due to the extent of residential development which has already taken place, additionalshrubs, fences, sod, and miscellaneous structures would be removed and replaced compared with the alternatives presented. 303/221-3760 • 2020 Airway Ave. 9 Fort Collins, CO 80524 2 5. The existing residences on the south side of the Lake Canal would undoubtedly create various obstructions which would conflict with the construction of the storm server system. 6. Land acquisition through Evergreen Park 2nd Filing and the developed lots just south of the Lake Canal would he more difficult and much more costly compared to the alternatives presented. 7. The came vertical limitations, if not more severe, would exist due to the flowline elevations of the Greenbriar and Evergreen Park ponds relative to the flowline elevations in Dry Creek. If I can he of assistance in further explaining any items mentioned in this letter, or if you have any questions or comments, please advise. Very truly yours, ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS, INC. wmLv Michael N. Schmid, P.E. MNS/1j ,JOHN E, KOCHENBURGER KELSEY J. SMITH J. CREIG COOGAN Mr. Robert Smith City Engineer's Office City of Fort Collins Fort Collins City Hall Fort Collins, CO 80521 Dear Bob: KOCHENBURGER & SMITH ATTORNEYS AT LAW 215 WEST OAK STREET, SUITE 2C4 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80521 February 13, 1980 TELEPHONE AREA CODE 303 4H2-44]] I am enclosing a letter and a xerox copy of a drainage plan for Puebla Vista Estates. This subdivision lies to the north of the Eaton Ditch in the Evergreen Park area and if my memory serves me correctly, is right in the area where you propose to flume the ditch. Inasmuch as this does influence and affect the drainage proposals that you have discussed with us, I am sending them to you for your consideration. We will not approve the alternative design until you have had an opportunity to review them and have talked with us about it. Again, we appreciate the efforts of the City of Fort Collins to work with us on this big ditch. In looking at the breach of the reservoir over in Weld County, in became apparent that the water flowing through the breach probably was only two or three times greater than the volume of water that would flow from the Eaton Ditch if there were a breach. Fortunately, the water coming out of the ditch would only last for approximately three hours from the time that we stop the flow of water at the head gate. Of course if there is a substantial amount of storm drainage coming on us from the north, it could last longer and it could increase the quantity and velocity of the water. We appreciate your foresight in trying to work with us in resolving the future problems. Very truly yours., John E. Kochenbu.rger JEK:ilc enc. cc: Tom Nix CITY OI- I OR I (.OI I.INS P.O. BOX ISO, h ORS COLI INS, (:OI ORADO SOS22 III ;303) 1S>-1220 ENGINLLRING DIVISION LXI. 778 February 21, 1980 Mr. Michael Schmid Engineering Professionals, Inc. 2020 Airway Avenue Fort Collins, Colorado Mike: Attached you will find correspondence from Mr. John E. Kochenburger, attorney for the Faton Ditch, on a matter related to the Greenbriar Outfall Study. Also at our next meeting I would like to address the letter from Mr. Ill-vey Johnson of the water Sunply & Storage Irrigation Coamany. i vx)nIA like to meet the week of the 25th regarding finalizing the Greenbri.ar Drainage Study. Please contact Marc or rm—elf to arrange a meeting and if you have any cpiestion-�, Sincerel�yj� Bob Sfiith Assistant City Engineer - Drainage Fnc. (J 'AAL HVOLBOLL-JOHNSON ('01Manies 545 Alisal Road, Suite 207 • Solvang, Ca. 93463 • 18051 688-5664 April 25, 1980 City of Ft. Collins Engineering Department P.O. Box 580 Ft. Collins, CO 80522 Attn: Marc Engemoen Re: Greenbriar Gentlemen: Hvolboll-Johnson Construction and Development Company, Inc., currently owns and is in the process of developing Greenbriar. Greenbriar is a planned unit development located in. the North 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 1, Township % North, Range 69 West of the Sixth P.M., City of Ft. Collins. On March 30, 1979, we entered into a Subdivision Agreement with the City of Ft. Collins, a portion of which restricts the issuance of building per- mits until certain drainage facilities are designed, funded, and constructed. At present, construction of the off -sites is in progress with construction of the housing units to start imme- diately thereafter. We are very concerned about the progress of the drainage studies and implementation plans for the out -fall systems from the Greenbriar Development. It is our understanding that an engineering study has been completed for the east side out -fall only, however, it has neither been approved by the City nor has a means of funding been established. In accordance with the Sub- division Agreement, we are limited to 22 permits within the easterly drainage shed and 2 permits within the westerly drainage shed until suitable drainage facilities are in- stalled. Such facilities are related to the impacts of area -wide developments and are not solely the responsibility of the Greenbriar Subdivision. We are, however, agreeable to contribute a reasonable share of the expense associated with the drainage facilities. HVOLBOLL-JOHNSON Congpanies 545 Alisal Road, Suite 207 • Solvang, Ca. 93463 • 18051 688-5664 City of Ft. Collins -2- April 25, 1980 At the time the Subdivision Agreement was executed, it was our understanding that the required drainage studies would be completed without delay and that the limitations imposed on the issuance of building permits would not threaten t'lle viability of the Greenbriar Development. It now appears that we may be placed in a position of having expended a large amount of funds to install off -site im- provements, in accordance with the Subdivision Agreement, and unable to recoup these expenses due to a limited supply of building permits. Furthermore, we have recently sub- mitted an application for 240 condominiums on the west side of Greenbriar and find that a drainage study has not even been initiated and may not be for at least another year. I would appreciate a detailed analysis of the progress to date and planned schedule for completing the drainage studies, funding procedure, and construction of the east and west basins. If there are specific reasons for the lack of progress please identify. It is in the best interests of the City of Ft. Collins and future residents of this development that arrangements be made to expedite the completion of the drainage systems. I urge you to take all necessary action to comply with the arrangements agreed to on Page 5, Item f. of the Subdivision Agreement. Very truly yours, Sid Goldstien Project Manager SG:mmd r CIIY OII OR I COI.I.INS ENGINLERING DIVISION P.O. BOX SSQ 1 OR I col l INS, COLOR NIDO 80�22 January 23, 1980 James H. Stewart & Associates Consulting Engineers 214 N. Hcxaes Ft. Collins, 0D 80521 RE: Greenbriar Subdivision Dear Sirs: I'll (.M) - S IO220 LXT. 728 During construction of the 24'' water main on the above referenced project, the contractor- installing the utilities encountered a swampy, low-lying area. The area that I am concerned about is in the northwest sector of the suixlivision, (eider Willox Iane from approximately Station 22+00 to 28+00 (sheet 7 and 8 of 22 on the approved utility drawings). A test hole dug by the contractor on January 23, 1980 indicated a soil profile of: 0.0 to 1.5 ft. 1.5 to 6.5 ft. 6.5 to 7.5 ft. Below 7.5 ft. Groundwater 4 ft. from surface Decomposing organic material Brown silt with some very fine sand Brown heavy clay White silt 'Phis soil profile is radically different from any boring logs in the soils report submitted for this project. A visua'_ examination seems to indicate a rather poor soil for engineering purposes. Therefore, the City is asking that additional subsurface soil investi- gations be carried out to classify the soil and determine the limits of this swampy area, including groundwater determination if measurable and, if necessary, a structural redesign of the collector and residential streets in this area should be submitted to this office for approval. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, l Matt J. BB,cer Construction Inspector MJH:hso ( II1 OI 1 UI21 (()I l IAti P.O Box 580, Fort Collin,Colorado 80522 Ph(303) 484-4220 Ext. 728 ENGINEERING DIVISION November 20, 1980 Mr. Richard i3ath Bath Excavating 1937 N. College Ft. Collins, Colorado Re: Greenbriar P.U.D. Dear Richard:: This is to inform you that the crater, sanitary sewer and storm sewer lines :installed to -date by your crews in Greenbriar have been inspected and approved for maintenance by the City, pending normal contractor guarantee periods. Sincerely yours, Craig Farver Construction Inspector cc: Jim Troup - First National Bank CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE EXT. 700 March 24, 1982 Timothy W. Hasler, Esq. Hasler and Fonfara P.O. Box 2023 Fort Collins, CO 80522 RE: Green Briar Condominium Development Agreement Dear Tim: Attached please find a draft of the Green Briar Condominium Development Agreement which I have drafted pursuant to our meeting of March 23, 1982. Please give special attention to paragraph 2. C. of the agreement which contains the sub- stantial revisions which we discussed. If you have any suggestions as to alternate language for this paragraph, please do not hesitate to contact me. S'n erely, 1 W. Paul Eckman Assistant City Attorney WPE:se Attachment cc: Charles R. Mayhugh Dennis Braiden Mauri Rupel Josh Richardson i Bob Smith (I IN UI IU 121 (()I I Iti5 P.O Box 580, Fort Collins Colorado 80522 P1003) 484-4220 Ext. 728 ENGINEERING DIVISION December 5, 1.980 Mr. Richard Bath Bath Excavating 1937 N. College Ft. Collins, Colorado Re: Greenbriar Subdivision Dear Richard: This is to inform you on Thursday, December 4, 1980 your superintendent, Jim Walters, and I checked all manhole rims and valve box elevations in the (,reenbriar Subdivision. These measurements were made with a four (4) foot carpenters level and a tape measure. These elevations were verified by checking the engineer's (Stewart Engineering) grade stakes to the rim elevations at each manhole and valve box location. At this time all elevations were found to be within 0.05+ feet. It should also be noted that at this time I found all manhole rings and covers and water valve boxes to be in goad repair. Very truly yours, Craig Farver Construction Inspector IT" 'or . J 1 C)" I 1 f>I I INS P.O. BOX 580, FOR I COLT INS, C:OLORADO 80;22 r;03) 484-4220 VKING and Di VF l OPMFN I DEP:AR TMENT EXT. 652 February 23, 1984 Mr. Ted Rose 1060 Sailors Reef Fort Collins, CO 80525 Dear Ted: Curt and I discussed the improvements to Lemay Avenue that would be required as a result of -improvements to lots abutting Lemay Avenue in the Greenbrier P.U.D. As you are aware the developer is expected to improve a street to its ultimate design (as indicated on the Master Street Plan) at the time he improves the property abutting that street. His responsibility is for a local street standard with provision for his receiving reimbursement for oversizing that street to collector or arterial standards. Often times a developer desires to develop property at the far end of his property first, as opposed to developing property adjacent to existing im- provements; this is the situation you have proposed. You propose to sell, for development, only two such lots and it would appear ridiculous to require improving Lemay Avenue all the way back to Lincoln for just two houses. However, if we allowed every developer to ignore these requirements we would soon have whole developments creating traffic problems on undersized streets (as we now have in many instances). Therefore, we attempt to write an agree- ment with the prospective developer that allows him to proceed while at the same time assuring the City that the street will be built with the developer assuming his share of that street and not causing a burden on the City as a whole. We would suggest, therefore, that an escrow account be established which would amount to 150 percent of the cost of one-half of a local street (includ- ing c0rb, gutter, and four foot wide sidewalk) for the length of the lots and access abutting Lemay Avenue (190 l.f.). The costs should be determined from a written estimate prepared by a contractor specializing in such work and should be based on assuming that a reasonable length of the street would be done at a given time, not just the 190 feet. If you have any questions on this or if we can be of further help, Ted, please call. Yours very truly, MaMce E. Rupel Development Center Director Page 2 Mr. Ted Rose bcc: Curt Smith Linda Hopkins Pete Barnes IN TRAY r80 Start of Item 60. Me.,..age. Subject: Gleason Pound II Sender: John ARNOLD / CFC/01 Part 1. T0: Linda HOPKINS / CFC/01 Dated 08/07/85 at 1435. Contents: 4. Part 2. uara's round nd TI from John K. re Tom Gleason: The question 1 ^.a 4e 15 about theuti+"lities. If they are ours, .hen we can ci ose on tra sale before they are relocated, right? if they aren't urs then o ue may have another problem. pl let ^' knew asap, exactly what is going on, who needs what" lease I what's where, and the estimated schedule to get :t all don_. need that by bled or thurs at the latest. Thanks Jea•\ Press '.RETURN; to continue i> tailing Calendar Leave Pending W°rk S44 3'0 List HPDESb, In Tray Out .Tray Tray Area Area Cabinet / Diary Please let me know asap, exactly what is going on, who needs What,' what's where, anJ the estimated schedule to get it all done. I need that by Wed or thurs at the latest. Thanks jea.`• Part 3. TO: John ARNOLD / CFC/01 Part 4. Needless to say, my answer was not welcomed with open arms. Apparently, the bank wants to close on the sale to the City on August I5th. This allows them to save carrying charges for another month and get on with the formation of an SID. When the bank does a title search, the utility easements show up on the property description. I don't know if the utilities are ours, Mountain Bells, or PSCos; but TJG wants to close on 3/1S. Bill Brown is his attorney working on the problem. Can we work with Bill to put a package together? End of Item 30 IN TRAY > Pi 1 inn Calendar i Iz L James, H. Stewart and Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers and Surveyors 214 North Howes Street P.O. Box 429 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 (303) 482 9331 February 18, 1987 Mr. Tom Gathmann Storm Drainage Department City of Fort Collins P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 Dear Tom: Laboratory: 301 Lincoln Court P.O. Box 429 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 (303) 484-6309 On behalf of Mr. Tom Dougherty and Greenbriar Inc., I am requesting that they be allowed to fill in a small portion of the East detention pond at Greenbriar. The portion they want to fill in is the narrow finger running North between Lots 67 thru 70 and Lemay Avenue. It is a rather deep narrow channel which will be hard to maintain. The volume of detention lost is 0.25 acre feet. As you know, the runoff to the detention pond was reduced when the City bought the 21 acre park site and Greenbriar was replatted. The pond is existing and so was not reduced at the time of the r2platting. It seems this revision of the pond is justified for asthetic and mainte- nance reasons since the required detention was reduced. The original drainage report was done by Resource Consultants and is prob- ably in your files. The nronosed channe is shorm on the enclosed Sheet 14 of 22 Sheets of the o ri-1 -I Greenbriar utility plans. If you have any questions regarding this request, please call. Sincerely, JAMES H. STEWART AND ASSOCIATES, INC. �- a. - Richard A. Rutherford, P.E. & L.S. President yI1 CIS enclosure SIh �n5 6 �� Ca�aGi novJ �o. ,g ��� vG�1ilr ) Ck9(&6��'�} Matt Baker S.I.D. Coordinator As per your request, Dave Stringer and Rodney Albers made a visual walk --through inspection on August 25, 1987 of the Greenbriar S.I.D. improvements. The following lists the deficiencies, and or repairs that should he required of the District prior to final acceptance of this project. 1) Complete the construction of Willox from the BE PC of Agape Way WNW to the project limits (relocation of power pole) 2) Adju.=_st. H2O bon at Willow and Agape Way 3) Back:fil.l inlet and COG at W end of Willox -- N side 4) Adjust H2O box in Willox at Bramblebush 5) Back::fill behind curb on Willow at Bramblebush -- W side 6) FH--W side of Willom - S of Bramblebush needs to be turned to face Willow - approx. 20 degrees. 7) R&<R both radii at Peregrine Run - W end 8) R&R section of radius at Peregrine - E end 9) Clean streets, curbs, gutters and walk entire project 10) Patch loader teeth marks on Peregrin - lot 89 11) Crack seal Peregrine - lots 87 and 89 12) Adjust H2O box in Willow at E Peregrine 13) R&R 2 radii and section of ;-pan W Grouse at Willow 14) Adjust H2O box in Willom at Shortl.eaf 15) R&R 2 radii at Willow and Shortleaf 16) R&R section of radius - W end Ouail Run at Willox 17) ROR sections of both radii E end Duail Run at Willox 18) Adjust H2O box in Willox - E end Grouse Circle 19) Crack seal Willox - S side at 900 Grouse Cir 20) Need Engineering certification of detention pond, ie capacity, seeding, landscaping 27.) Adjust MH at Pica Run and Briarcliff 22> Adjust H20 box in Willox at Briarcliff 23> R&R NW radius at Willox and Ptarigan Ct. 24) Repair surface damage of HBP in Willox bet" Briarcliff and Lemay 25) C&R CG&W both SW and NW radii at Willox and Lemay - POOR WORKMANSHIP ! 26) R&R section of 6" vert. COG on Lemay S of Willox approx. 50` 27> Replace rip -rap at S end of COG on Lemay with City Standard 28) Irrigation structure grate at S end of Lemay is not per plan 29) Irrigation Structure rip -rap is not City Standard as required on plan 0) Raise FM ME corner of Willox and Briarcliff 31> Adjust GV at Pica Run and Briarcliff 72} Briarcliff - MH-3 - Asphalt is low at ring � cover = 8ramblebush/Rriarclif< - NE side (MH-3 to 5) - Asphalt pavement is cracked and rutted 54) Bramblebush - Asphalt is lower than the lip of the COG at lots 17 & 10 33> Pave Sandcreek Drive 36> Construct temp. turn around at N end of Sandcreek. 37) Adjust H20 box at Bramblebvsh and Sandcreek 38) ROR skim patches with City Standard patches along COG on Grouse Cir. (900) - Skim patches NG 39) Crack seal Grouse Circle 40} Rackfill inlet on S side of Grouse 41> H&R R/O COG on Grouse - W end 3 side 42) Grouse Circle pavement surface is open textured, skim patched, and generally terrible in appearance 43) Raise H20 GV in Lemay (line comes from rtarigan Ct. to Lemay) Note: all concrete repair areas have been marked with nrange paint for repair limits. If you have any qoestions or if Uave and l can be of any further assistance, please let Us know. (this memo is stored on Rod's disc} agle Plastics, Inc. P.O. ilex 229 • Has NIC. hWiH 1 -02 29 • 402-4G1-3040 12/11/87 Mr. Jeff Siekmeier CPS Distributors 405 S. Link Ln 24 Ft. Collins CO 80Qof.1 �alleb_oly Flex RE: Approx.,10 Q00 of 1' Eu le Poly Flex Installed b Hend -` SprinkiiiZ�t"Gr' 6i ri Dear Jeff, ;M� ;;:'r,:is ;:f . As per our Conversation of 12/7/87, 1 hearby authorize you to extend our general warranty on Eagle Poly Flex (EPF) from 1 year to 2 years on all EPF installed at the Green Briar sub -division by Hendricks Sprinkler. As one of our largest distributors of EPF, ,you know well of your own record of success, I'd like to take this opportunity to fill you in on our company -wide record of success with Eagle Poly Flex products. Since we began producing Eagle poly Flex Products, We have produced well over 15,000,000' of this product. And since that time we have had not ONE failure. NOT ONE! As you might guess, we are very proud of this product. Although there are no ASTM Specs written for this product, we use ASTM D2239 dimensional and pressure specs as a guide in production of EPF products. ASTM D2239 requires 80 psi Poly pipe to Quick -Burst (in GO - 70 seconds) between 252 psi - 320 psi. From our own in-house quality control tests, Eagle I" Poly Flex 80 will burst: at between 280psi-320psi. We take great pride in every product we produce at Eagle Plastics. And as you well know Jeff, We stand behind firmly behind all of our products and will continue to do so. I am confident that the City of Ft. Collins will have a reliable and economical water distribution system. Thank you for all of your support. Eagle Plastics Inc. Committed to Quality (ja S. L,, David P. Schnase CITY OF FORT COLLINS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION February 6, 1985 Ms. Lucia Liley March, Myatt, Korb, Carroll & Brandes 110 East Oak Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 Dear Lucia: The final approval of the Greenbriar Condominiums PUD was due to expire on October 26, 19134• In recentconversations wt you, I described certain utility and sille plan revisions which were necessary before any further extensions to the PUD could be granted. Staff has been very flexible in allowing an extra three months beyond the normal expiration date to complete these revisions. However, there has been no response by your planners and engineers to make the necessary revisions. I am sorry to inform you that if the necessary revisions are not approved by City Staff by Tuesday, February 19, 1985, the staff will have to consider the final plan of Greenbriar Condominiums expired. If you require additional information, please contact myself or Bonnie Tripoli at 221-6750. Sincerely, Joe Fkank Sgnio, City Planner cc: Bonnie Tripoli, Development Coordinator Sam Mutch, Planning Director OFFICE OF COMMUNITY 300 LaPorte Ave. • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 • (303)221-6750 DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING DIVISION O O O O O HENDRICKS' SPRINKLER SYSTEMS P.O. Box 1907 • Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 • 303-482-3310 Dec. 15, 1O67 Tom Dougherty Construot.ion 220 Z. Nulberry i,'t. Collins, Co. b'25"'i Dear D.r. Dougherty, i',e;arding the chan,;e:� reei;e:;t�<: i:; :hc .,it; cui1inr; concerning the :roject i;reenbriar (plcnse refer to t1:(,, Iettor d,1t,J I1j;;�'/ frow Vi.r��il Yaylo^, City of Pt. Collins) the foilowin;,, Item 1 will be completed, weather per;rittin;;. :ten 2 will be adjusted in the sl;rin of 1,)6. Item j will also be completed, weather Ier.nil.Lin;=. Item 4: All poly wlq¢ rfWWvwMft lateral line.-, will be Guaranteed against any and all breakage or leakaCe for a period of five year;;, cooU:iencini; December 1987 and ending December 51, 1992. Items 5 and 6 have been resolved. Item 7: Any head that requires reusing or lowering or repaired during a five year period will be converted to swing pipe. item 6 has been discussed with Chucl- Ai31B40rU1 and Cound to be acceptable. Item 9 will be adjusted in the spring of 1IMH . Item 10 has been resolved. Items 11 and 12 have been completed. item 13 will be adjusted in the spring of I9Wi. Items 14 and 15 have been completed. Sincerely, Stan Hendricks 71endrick:3' Sprinklers T rn Dougherty Construction, Inc:. Mr. Virgil Taylor Superintendent of Parks Parks & Recreation Dept. City of Ft. Collins 413 S. Bryan Ft. Collins, CO 80521 December 16, 1987 Dear Mr. Taylor, I am in receipt of your November 3 letter regarding the automatic irrigation system at "Replat of Greenbriar Subdivision." After lengthy discussion with Ft. Collins Nursery and Stan Hendricks, (the contractor responsible to me for installation of the irrigation at Greenbriar), and after discussions between Ft. Collins Nursery, Stan Hendricks and Parks & Recreation representative Chuck Ainsworth, I would propose the following per your November 3 letter listed items. Item 1 Correct per city specifications. Item 2 Correct per city specifications. Item 3 Correct per city specifications. Item 4 Leave in place subject to attached warranty from Hendrick's sprinkler systems and Eagle Plastics, Inc. Item 5 Correct per city specifications. Item 6 Correct per city specifications. Item 7 Leave in place subject to attached Hendricks Sprinkler Systems warranty. Item 8 Accepted per Stan Hendricks and Chuck Ainsworth Item 9 Correct per city specifications. Item 10 Correct per city specifications. Item 11 Correct per city specifications. Item 12 Correct per city specifications. Item 13 Correct per city specifications. Item 14 This item will be complied with in any way possible retrospectively and will certainly be fully complied with in future similar projects. Item 15 Correct per city specifications. 220 E. Mulberry, Ft. Collins, CO 80524 303-493-4980 Please note that several items have been corrected at this date. Additional corrections required will be completed in the spring of 1988 and in no case later than July 1, 1988. I appreciate your help and concern in this matter and hope we have presented a viable proposal for its resolution. Sincere Tom Dou hOrty-; President Tom Dougherty Construction, Inc. TDCTAY.ly Enclosures ce:Stan Hendricks, Gary Kershaw, Chuck Ainsworth HENDRICKS'SPRINKLER SYSTEMS P.O. Box 1907 0 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 0 303-482-3310 11' r, i, j ;,, i, ; -,, - t, L, rj P 1, I ( ) , I - ; j L , 1'.Y , ot, c c ry) , 'MdfLC'. p cn t w i L I 4 L i,n r'C V i d j �I U:�) t ademiate int. riL" j I 'c e bI owir mo, t j r) I t�le ,.r Additionally, during this period, any 1804 head that is on a nipple riser will be changed to swing pipe riser in the event of failure of the -nipple type riser. ,wn, r- cm -,r ii ul-,- :pain ' -:ter I Cr teTIJS Tom Dougherty Construction, Inc. Mr. Virgil Taylor Superintendent of Parks Parks & Recreation Dept. City of Ft. Collins 413 S. Bryan Ft. Collins, CO 80521 May 2, 1988 Dear Mr. Taylor: Reference your letter of November 3, 1987, calling for corrections to the irrigation system at Greenbriar Subdivision, all items have been complied with per my letter of December 16, 1987. Please find attached warranties from Hendrick's Sprinkler Systems regarding items $4 and V . Thank you for your cooperation in this matter and please contact me if further information is needed. Sincerely, (7 Tom Dougherty; —President Tom Dougherty Construction, Inc. TD/kr Enclosures 220 E. Mulberry, Ft. Collins, CO 80524 303-493-4980 CITY OF FORT COLLINS PARKS & RECREATION May 5, 1988 j Tom Dougherty Tom Dougherty Construction, Inc. 220 East Mulberry Fort Collins, CO 80524 Dear Mr. Dougherty: The warranties and corrections made to the Greenbriar Subdivision irrigation system are acceptable to the City of Fort Collins. The warranties as stated in the letter of March 8, 1988, from Hendricks Sprinkler Systems and your assurance of completion of other items will initiate your minimum two year warranty and maintenance period. Tentatively we will take over maintenance in the spring of 1990. We ask that a walk through be done at that time to assure that all systems are operational and that all plant materials are viable. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Virgil Taylor Superintendent of Parks VT: an cc: Chuck Ainsworth Fort Collins Nursery Hendricks Sprinkler Systems Mike Herzig George K. Noe PARKS PLANNING & 413 South Bry/arl Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 (303) 221-6660 OPEN SPACE STEWART&\SSOCIATES Consulting Engineers and Surveyors June 3, 1988 Mr. Robert Smith Storm Drainage Utility Director City of Fort Collins P 0 Box 580 Fort Collins, Co. 80522 Dear Bob: This is to certify to the City of Fort Collins that a survey was made of the "As Built" Greenbriar Detention Pond at Lernay Avenue and Willox Lane on May 27, 1988. The "As Built" elevations are shown on the enclosed sheet 14 of 22 of the original utility plans for Greenbriar. The pond was built substantially as designed and has the capacity as designed. The Easterly 150 feet of the trickle pan has not been constructed at this date. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call. Sincerely, Richard A. Rutherford, P.E. & L.S. President James H. Stewart and Associates, Inc. 214 N. Howes Street PO Box 429 1-1 CollinsCO80522 303/482-9331 CITY OF FORT COLLINS DEVELOPMENT SE=RVICES — ENGINEERING June 30, 1988 First Interstate Bank Attn: Dee Weaver 205 West Oak Fort Collins, CO 80521 Re: Greenbriar P.U.D. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: It is standard policy for the City of Fort Collins to accept for perpetual maintenance those public right�ef-way constructions which have been approved by the City and which have passed all required guarantee periods. This includes the water main, sanitary sewer mains, storm sewer lines and facilities, street pavements, street lights, and street signs. Yours truly, David Stringer Chief Construction Inspector DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 300 La Forte Ave. • PO. Box 580 • Fort Collins. Colorado 80522 (303) 221-6605 ENGINEERING >. REGEtvED ARTHL•R E. MARCH,JR. RAMSEY D. MYATT MARfi L. KORB JOSEFH T. CARROLL, JR. ROBERT W. BRANDES,JR. RICHARD 5. GAST LUCIA A. ULEY J.BRADFORO MARCH MARCH, MYATT, KORB, CARROLL & BRANDES ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW ROBERTSON BUILDING 110 EAST OAK STREET FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80524 (303) 482-4322 Mr. Joe Frank City Planning Office City of Fort Collins 300 LaPorte Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80521 Re: Greenbriar P.U.D. Dear Joe: February 21, 1985 ;DEB 22 11055 PLILN di! "IS '+y'471k.°STM.CNT A R TH UTt E. MARCH 1909-1901 MAILING ADDRESS: R. O. BOX 469 FORT COLLINS,CO 60522 I am in receipt of your letter informing us of the pending expiration of the Greenbriar P.U.D. I have been in contact with the owner of the property about this expiration and have been informed that they do not desire to proceed with an extension of the existing P.U.D. On behalf' of our clients and our firm, we want to thank you and the other members of the Planning and Engineering Departments who have helped us with this extension request. We appreciate the time and effort that you have put into it, even though we do not desire to proceed with the extension. Sincerely, MARCH, MYATT, KORB, CARROLL & BRANDES i B y : / Uu is A. Lilep LAL/sms CITY OF FORT COLLINS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION February 21, 19B5 Ms. Lucia Liley March, Myatt, Korb, Carroll & Brandes 110 East Oak Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 Dear Lucia, Please be informed that the final approval of the Greenbriar Condominums PUD has expired. Any future development of the property must fo ow e same review and public hearing process required for approval of preliminary plans. If you should have any further questions on this matter, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, Sam Mutch Planning Difector CC: Joe Frank, Senior City Planner Bonnie Tripoli, Development Coordinator OFFICE OF COMMUNITY 19 300 LaPorte Ave. • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 • (303)221-6750 DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF FORT COLLINS Lu' WWWANIMINd DATE: October 10, 1978 TO: Roy Bingman, Director of Public Work/s� THRU: Donald M. Parsons, City Engineer %,_/,/ FROM: Bob Smith, Drainage Engineer �_ RE: Off -site drainage for Greenbriar P.U.D. As the City approaches a limit in its ability to provide adequate public service for its urban area, the frequency of new development occurring adjacent to existing subdivisions increases. Often, such existing sub- divisions were designed and constructed in accordance with standards and specifications less stringent than those presently in use. This is true in the case of urban storm drainage, particularly as it relates to surface runoff. At its August 24th meeting, the Storm Drainage Board discussed an example of the problems associated with this type of situation. The Second Filing of Evergreen Park Subdivision, which is presently under construction, was apparently approved without requiring that adequate provisions be made to allow for the passage of historical drainage through the site. Such provisions have become critical in view of the City's present policy of directing storm runoff toward natural drainageways. Greenbriar P.U.D., a proposed development directly north of Evergreen Park 2nd, has discovered in the course of a preliminary drainage analysis that this presents a serious problem with regard to the discharge of its storm runoff. The direction of the historical drainage for this area is generally southerly, through both Greenbriar and Evergreen Park toward Dry Creek. The development of Evergreen Park 2nd has essentially blocked the natural flow of surface runoff. This problem may be corrected by means of a number of engineering solutions. The real issue is to determine an equitable distribution of the financial responsibilities associated with these solutions. To date, the City has required development to pay its own clay, relieving the City of any sub- stantial responsibility. There are basically three alternatives in dealing with these situations: (1) Require the developer to pay for the complete drainage system which will channel his storm runoff to a suitable outlet. Depending on the location of the development, such an outlet may be either on- or off -site. (2) Require the City to participate directly in the costs of these drainage systems. RE: Off -site drainage for Greenbriar P.U.D. Page 2 (3) Establish a fee based upon the estimated costs of construction which allows those costs to be_distributed among the affected properties. The third alternative appears to be the most equitable and feasible. Preliminary cost estimates for the Greenbriar drainage system range between $48,000 and $98,000 depending upon which design solution is finally accepted. The fees for this system could be assigned in con- junction with the subdivision improvement agreements for the developments within the area. Due to the time constraints associated with this develoianent, it is recommended that the City take inniediate action to retain a consultant to prepare a design for this drainage system. The expense of the consultant will be distributed within the fees for the project. C I T Y O F F O R T C O L L I N S MEMORANDUM DATE: October 11, 1978 TO: John Arnold, City Manager FROM: Roy A. Bingman, Director of Public Works RE: Storm Drainage - Greenbriar PUD Attached is a memorandum from the Engineering Office regarding a storm drainage situation which has evolved in the northTast part of the City between the Evergreen Park area and the new Greenbriar PUD. The problem is to find an equitable way to distribute the cost of storm drainage improvements to two or more developing sub- divisions. The most reasonable solution is to establish a storm drainage fee, as we indicated in our "Storm Drainage Program and Financing Plan". Because of the amount of storm drainage analysis required, we do not have sufficient staff time to complete the studies we need. Because of this, we are recommending the use of a consulting engineer to complete this study. The cost is estimated to be less than $10,000, which could be includa3 in the final fee and for the most part recovered as development occurs. The Storm Drainage Board has considered this question and recommends use of a consulting engineer to complete the design analysis and recommendations for a drainage fee. Attachments RAB/eve