The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutGABLES AT SILVERPLUME - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2004-08-04Item ;a as-r�■ 7X.LL lip Comments '<: � .✓�E� ✓.4cA�"io�/ ��sc.¢�,priv,✓�. �.¢ .� /��1Tie.c/ ®� '°" ,4, J/TTO Fm2 S/GUF4PCa�iE �x.YUAa-£- /Al S/GUEQ�[y 7iIT/G1,77.�S . r= OF ��„ f�za /N,A,n, /n, bE vx,9aM--- /¢✓Nounrr �' q �2-n�2nii��l ilia.� W'4S Yu7 /N �y ��velep.2 Fx,sriA.0C, SaAv. SE1k),E.2. STUF35 mf� fA.rn,9aL- WILL NAuETo P4.u44en ai- �'laru /c Ne,- sk F SysTEM is 74eE Thyj �F19SE- %o IV411' 4bJAcz.� SLl1AlLOW ziu 7 ��"VVAL Or- Eyv5,7-i,V4 (v" fg. VALVr,— )AJ Sw-ALLO ru Gu ,GL Sp)v/-A�vu n Cyr 's cagu,r PWb C'coss cabea.uMT,eJ �4/TE �,e- ��T�nJrro-J tin/ ioo h`lic�. ■ ',:'' �nxQEasE llezaf76 P� {On,%>j E/�C/CE !��(EBS� P�47L_" C r Q 9 IG 645 Or-- /S �5�1� J4�bL. �NS�ntG W S W ,LL 4 /D pkj/#Afc� /11�� Fez W,trT2x oc/ �ruorE�v _.e /Sf�' <S �veeyC� •�E be /,,W 6e zoo') CITY OiIOR I COLLIN', I'.O BOX sbo, 101: r COLLINS, COL ORYACO 80522 PI (30J) 1O4=4220 DEVELOPMENT CENTER EXT. 655 March 1, 1983 Mr. Carr Sieker ZVFK Architects/Planners 218 W. Mountain Fort Collins, CO 80521 Dear Carr: Staff has reviewed the Amended Silverplume PUD application and has the following comments to offer: 1. Utility easements should be shown on the site plan. 2. Land use data (i.e., density, coverage, parking, etc.) must be provided for the area actually proposed for amendment, as well as for the entire PUD. Ideally, this data should be placed on Sheet 2. If Sheet 1 is to be filed, a note should be placed on it indicating that no changes are being made on that portion of the development with this amendment. 3. The applicant should be aware that several 10-plex structures do not meet the 150-ft fire requirement and would therefore have to be sprinkled, based on the site plan note. In several instances, garages may be interfering with the turning radii needed for fire equipment. 4. Tandem spaces behind garages need to be "all or nothing" (i.e., 19-ft in length or 1-2 ft long) to prevent cars overhanging into the street. Several spaces appear to be in the 5--ft length range. 5. The applicant should consider the need for overflow or guest parking. Parking regulations are barely met, leaving few extra spaces. The two spaces adjacent to the pool area are unusable, as designed. 6. Typical compact stall dimensions need to be shown. 7. What type of outdoor "private spaces" are being provided? 8. References on the subdivision plat and the landscape plan are for "The Mansions PUD." Will the name of the project change? 9. Will the carriage house in the southeast corner of the site include garages? An indication of the elevations of the free-standing garages (i.e., 5-unit garages) should be provided. Mr. Carr Bicker 7_VFK Architects/Pla -rs March 1, 1983 Page 2 10. Several open parking areas shown on the site plan are not shown the same on the landscaping plan (i.e., vegetation placed in parking stalls, different types/sizes of stalls). The sight distance at Swallow and Dunbar may be affected by placement of evergreens at this corner. 11. Garage envelope dimensions need to be clearly shown. Evelopes need to be dimensioned to at least two property lines. 12. Gazebos and trellises must be within building envelopes, with dimensions shown. 13. The tennis court should be in an envelope with dimensions. The height of the fence surrounding the court should be given. 14. The standard parking stall typical is given at 19-ft long, yet some stalls are 17-ft with 2-ft overhang. Another typical should be given and over- hang areas should be indicated. 15. Vacations need to be done for a portion of Haywood Place in Cedar Village Fifth and for Silverplume Square. Legal descriptions for these areas to be vacated are needed. 16. Existing sanitary sewer stubs off Dunbar will need to be plugged at the main, if not used. Redesign of the sewer system is necessary to connect this phase into the main adjacent to Sr-alloei, rather than Dunbar. Removal of the existing 6-inch valve in Swallow will require shut -down of the 12- inch main in Swallow (requiring City's crews and close coordination). There is an existing repay for the water main in Dunbar. 17. The release rate for detention ponds is too high. The volume of the ponds can be increased, thus reducing the release rate. 18. A variance to permit the west entrance on Swallow less than 200-ft centerline - to -centerline of Silverplume Drive is necessary. 19. Additional buffering along the Dunbar edge of the site is needed. The south edge of the site •+ill be very "tight," in terms of utilizing 2-ft overhang stalls adjacent to landscaped areas, some barely 8-ft in width. 20. Staff questions the placement of two units with six garages, all of which would not be assigned to the two units above. Will there be direct access between garages and units"? Will additional soundproofing be provided? 21. A pedestrian link from the site toward the park to the south should be considered. Mr. Carr Bicker ZVFK Architects/Plai r•s March 1, 1983 Page 3 Five copies of the revised site plan reflecting these comments should be submitted to this office by Monday, March 14, 1983. By Monday, March 21, 1923 a colored site plan and 8-1/2"xll" reductions must be submitted. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely yours, Sherry Albertson -Clark City Planner SAW cc: Mauri Rupel, Development Center Director Bonnie Tripoli, Engineering Analysts �