Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCAMERON PARK REPLAT LOT 7 - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2004-07-22;9�02214159 # 2/ 2 g. 3-O%: I I-SBAM:IIOPTNERNENG DRAKE JOHNSON ADMITTED IN COLORADO AND WYOMING JOHNSON & JOHNSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW 215 West Magnolia, Suite 200 Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 LETTER OF INTENT •JAMES P. JOHNSON MEMBER OF CONGRESS 1973-1981 •of o=C1 Office (970) 484-3467 Fax (970) 484.2117 June 3, 2002 Be it known that 1, Drake Johnson, Attorney at Law have been contacted by Kim Walsh of Northern Engineering and retained for the purpose of generating a temporary access easement for the following parties on the following general terms. The Cornerstone Family Church (hereinafter "Grantor") and The City of Fort Collins (hereinafter "Grantee") by and through their designated agents, intend to enter into a legal and binding easement agreement wherein, Grantor shall convey to Grantee a temporary access easement. This temporary access easement shall be for the purposes allowing Grantee, it's agents, employees, contractor's and other entities designated in writing by Grantee, the ability to cross Grantor's property as a convenience for building, construction and all related purposes thereto. This temporary access easement shall terminate upon the earlier of the 1) end of construction; or 2) June 1, 2003. The easement's exact legal location shall be identified by a licensed Colorado Surveyor. If I can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Drake Johnson Attorney at Law 54 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Sheet 6/7: Fill out project info on the bottom - designer, checked by, print date, etc. and correct overlapping detail. 55 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Site Plan: Show all ROW, easements, property lines & setbacks. 56 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Site Plan: Coordinate this sheet with the Utility plans to reflect the changes requested. 57 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Landscape Plan: Coordinate this sheet with the Utility plans to reflect the changes requested. 61 Issue Contact., Susan Joy Cover Sheet: The project title should match the plat, landscape plans, etc. Should read "Spanjer Office Building". 66 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Cover Sheet: Provide an area of 4"x6" on each sheet for the Local Entity to place a stamp of approval, all sheets. 72 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Site Plan: This sheet needs to match the utility plans. Sidewalk shown should be detached. Show how it ties into existing. r b Slgnata e Iare � I , CHECK HERE IF-YOUWISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat 'Site - Drainage Report Other - - -A- Utility �' Redline Utility X Landscape 6 of 5/8"x 2'd'x 4'6" RAISED PATTERN NON- SKID, GALVANIZED STEEL PLATE (AASHTO M-111) SEE DETAIL "A" B A 406a MIN. 10'0° SECTION\ ` (� r—. xx�� /yt , x x x l lilay.}•�iRST SCREWxxx L2�AFRC x xx IE RONT EDGEx x xxx B_ �'.'4' .:�: - moo_ ..q._ ".e: ;:I) _�,�. .'e; .•a. ._ ".:q. __ A -mo-J PLAN VIEW r 4'6" SLOPE PLATE TO MATCH SIDEWALK 2'0" 6" "' 0 N FLOWUNE (AS SHOWN ON PLANS) SECTION A -A 2, 0 3" I _ _9' r 2:1 SLOPE — �---- 30" 2:1 SLOPE 5' 6" SECTION B-B 3/d' BRASS SCREW-18"QC. W/COUNTERSUNK HEAD FLUSH W/PLATE, 3'a2"x3/8" :e" '3;•... ` _ _ "" GALVANIZED 4NGLE. - 'o NO.3 REBAfj ANCHOR - I8'O.C. DETAIL 'A" NOTE: WHEN THE CURB IS SEPARATED FROM THE SIDEWALK THE STEEL PLATE SHALL BE PLACED 5V THE SIDEWALK AND THE CONCRETE CHANNEL (WITH THICK WALLS ON EACH SIDE) CONTINUED INTO THE CURB AND GUTTER. METAL SIDEWALK CULVERT FOR VERTICAL CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO ENGINEERING SERVICES UNIT APPROVED BY: DATE: 3//_ /VA D-10 Street Cut Note Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards. s, ... IM STAFF PROJECT REVIEW Land Images Date: 1/24/2002 c/o Trista Sigler 215 W. Magnolia, Suite 202 Fort Collins, CO. 80521 Staff has reviewed your resubmittal documentation, with revisions, for the SPANJER OFFICE BUILDING, #25-01, and we offer the following comments: 155UE5: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt 76 Len Hilderbrand of Excel Energy (Public Service) indicated that no trees may be planted within 4' of gas lines. To be addressed by others 89 Some of Current Planning's comments are on red -lined plans that are being forwarded to the applicant. Appropriate revisions were made Comments from all city departments and outside reviewing agencies numbered 91 and above in this comment letter are Round 2 review comments. Department: Engineering Topic: General Issue Contact: Susan Joy 1 Repeat. Provide TIS. Needs to include the Redtail development to the north and west. This project is currently under review and will be submitting a TIS as well. The ADTs of your traffic study will also determine the parking space setback from Cameron Drive. As per Matt Delich, the impact of this site is so minimal that a T15 is not required. Page 1 104 Show ALL easements, building envelopes, property lines, ROW, etc, all sheets (Landscape/Utility/Site/Plat). See Checklist E-4. All easements, envelopes, property lines and ROWS are shown in the Utility Plans. 106 Need to submit a variance request for the combined Ped Access/Utility easement. A Variance Repuest has been submitted. 107 The building envelope is overlapping the utility/drainage easements on the Site plan and is not allowed by code. Please correct and coordinate between the Plat/Landscape/Utility/Site plan sheets. The conflict has been cleared, plans are coordinated. Topic: Landscape Plan To be addressed by others 57 Landscape Plan: Coordinate this sheet with the Utility plans to reflect the changes requested. Topic: Plat To be addressed by others 103 Incorrectly submitted. Must be resubmitted for review. Needs to show the building envelopes, the language needs to be updated (see attached), Notice of Other Doc's missing, Attorney's Cert missing, benchmark missing, and all additional easements requested by Light and Power are missing. More comments to follow when correctly submitted. 105 Title Block needs to go along the right hand margin. Topic: Site Plan To be addressed by others Page 2 55 Repeat: Show all ROW, easements, property lines & setback requirements. Remove all the unnecessary dimensioning - looks more like an architectural drawing than a site plan. 56 Repeat: Coordinate this sheet with the Utility plans to reflect the changes requested. 111 Repeat: Does not match the Utility Plans. Very hard to read! Too much dimensioning and only 2 line weights make it impossible to clearly define what's going on. Remove all the unnecessary dimensioning, add a legend, and coordinate with the Utility Sheet. I can provide good examples of what a site plan should look like if you need to see one. See redlines. 112 Building envelope shown in the drainage easement. Not allowed - please correct and coordinate with the Plat, Landscape and Utility Plans. Topic: Utility Plans 7 Repeat: Update the General Construction Notes. See Attached. The notes have been updated. 8 Repeat: Cover Sheet: Need the following statement annotated on the Cover Sheet: "I hereby affirm...". See LCUASS, section 3.3.1.F. The note15 annotated. 16 Repeat: Provide all existing and proposed ROW, property lines and easements with dimensions. See checklist E-4. Label on all sheets. All are shown with dimen5ion5. 30 Repeat: Show how the proposed sidewalk ties in to the existing sidewalk. Reference page 3- Overall Utility Plan. Page 3 39 Repeat: Provide detail, dimensions, label for the trench drain next to the trash enclosure. Has this been removed or accidentally left out from the first submittal? The trench drain has been removed from the plans. 40 Repeat: Add detail for the trash enclosure retaining wall. Make sure footer is inside the property line. Will you need a temporary construction easement to dig on the neighboring property? Please reference site plan to see trash enclosure detail. 49 Sheet 4/7: Show detail for the opening to drain ramp. The sump pit is to convey flows from the ramp and stairs to the WQCV to the east WQCV pond. The drain opening and other details will be designed by others, using our flow data. 66 Cover Sheet: Provide an area of 4"x6" on each sheet for the Local Entity to place a stamp of approval, all sheets. This was provided as requested but needs to be removed again. This is a mistake that will be corrected in the next version of the standards. Thanks and sorry! Removed as requested. 108 Please work on the line weights a little bit. Existing conditions are ghosted or dashed and proposed conditions are "normal". The plans have these line weights backwards in some cases. See redlines. Line weights have been corrected. 109 Eliminate the Existing Conditions sheet. It's really not necessary. The existing conditions sheet aids in the construction process, and will remain in the set. Page 4 110 Design and construct a median in Cameron Drive at the College Avenue intersection. The median should run from College to the first entrance of Lot 6 which is just south of your project. Address the sight distance issues in the median separating the frontage road and College Avenue, to the north of Cameron. See redlines. This is required by CDOT to minimize the traffic conflict along the frontage road. CDOT will require an Access Permit - we will start the application for you. The fee is paid at the time the actual permit is filed. The Redtail development will be required to participate in the design and construction of this median as well - whichever project goes first will initiate the design and construction and then be reimbursed by the other development. Both projects will address the costs associated with these requirements and who reimburses who in the Development Agreement. The Redtail development will design and construct the median, the development agreement contains the details of reimbursement. 113 Cover Sheet: Remove the word "Final" from the title. Removed. - - i�, Department: Light & Power issue Contact: Alan Rutz 93 Contact Light & Power with electric load requirements. To be addressed by others 94 Maintain 4' clearance between gas and electric line. Clearance is maintained 95 Transformer pad is 4' x 4'. Corrected. 96 Provide easement at southeast comer of property starting at the frontage road and extending west to include the electric vault (transformer). A Utility Easement has been provided Page 5 97 Locate electric line along entire north edge of property and provide easement for line. A Utility Easement has been provided Department: Natural Resources Issue Contact: Doug Moore Topic: Natural Resources 74 Trash Enclosure - Please include a detail of the trash enclosure with the next submittal. —REPEATED COMMENT 111612002 * Please reference site plan to see trash enclosure detail Department: PFA Issue Contact: Michael Chavez 58 Address Numerals - Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property, and posted with a minimum of 6-inch numerals on a contrasting background- 97 UFC 901.4.4 To be addressed by others. 59 Water Supply - No commercial building can be greater then 300 feet from a fire hydrant. Fire hydrants are required with a maximum spacing of 600 feet along an approved roadway. Each hydrant must be capable of delivering 1500 gallons of water per minute at a residual pressure of 20 psi. 97 UFC 901.2.2.2 There are two (2) fire hydrants located well within 300 feet of either building. One is located on the southwest corner of Coronado Court and the Frontage Road (Lot (5), the other is located across Cameron Drive on the vacant lot (Lot 5). These are shown on the utility plans. 92 Water Supply requirement still needs to be addressed. The location of the fire hydrant needs to be on the site plan. The hydrants are shown on all Utility Plans. Page 6 Department: Police Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom 90 The lighting plan needs to be reworked to provide greater security and less light spillage. Every lot has inadequate lighting with several also having excess. To be addressed by others. Department: Stormwater Utility Topic: Drainage Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque 98 Please provide documentation for the claim mentioned in the report that the City has provided a 60' drainage easement through the natural area. The reference drawings only show a Proposed easement. Please check that the easement includes drainage from this site. What are the flow restrictions through this easement? Documentation was been provided to Basil Hampden at Stormwater January 22, 2001 , easement agreement RCPTN# 99043010. 99 Please revise the grading along the north central part of the site to reflect proposed basin delineation. See sheet 5. Grading has been revised. 100 Please provide complete calculations for the northern swale and both spillways. The spillway should pass the 100-year flow and the sidewalk chases need to only pass the 10-year flow. Calculations are not necessary for the sidewalk chases due to the small flows. Calculations are included in the Drainage Report. 101 Please check / provide riprap and calculations where needed (WQ pond B?). Riprap is not required according to the calculations, but a G'xG' patch of Type L riprap is proposed at the 2' curb opening at WQ Pond B to ensure that erosion does not occur. Topic: Erosion/Sediment Control 102 Page 7 PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of foil Collins Current Planninz DATE: July 1_6, 2001 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT: #25-01 Spanjer Office Building - Project Development Plan - Type 11(LUC) All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: August 15, 2001 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference /ilo Co r.11 � Ri ch1 Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS __Plat Site _Drainage Report _Other Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins 1. The WQ ponds A & B should have gravel outlet filters installed so the ponds can act as sediment traps during construction. Outlet Filters for the ponds have been added. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols 83 Label building envelope, footprint, dimensions and distance to property lines. Items are labeled, please reference site plan for more detailed building - related dimensions. 12-26-01... Please see the redlines on the site plan. There are 2 building envelopes noted for each building. The heavier dashed lines appear to be the correct envelopes. Please review and clarify. To be addressed by others. 87 Is there going to be a sidewalk along the frontage rd Yes 12-26-01 ... On the site plan, the sidewalk along the frontage road is being referred as 5 wide and 6' wide. Please clarify. I also don't see the 6' walk being called out on the landscape plan. There is a proposed six-foot wide sidewalk along the Frontage Road. One foot of that width is located in the Right -of -Way, the remaining five feet lie within the five-foot Pedestrian Access easement. 91 Plant Note V. This site is too small for phasing. If the buildings are going to be constructed at the same time, the landscaping should be all done at the same time. If construction will be in two phases, please show phase lines on both site and landscape plans. To be addressed by others. The following comments were expressed at Staff Review on 1/16/02: Page 8 Stormwater: There are overlapping drainage and utility easements being shown that could present a problem. Most of the previous Stormwater comments have been adequately addressed. The easements no longer overlap. Water/Wastewater: 1. This site is in an area that is serviced by the Fort Collins -Loveland Water and South Fort Collins Sanitation Districts. You should contact them directly regarding their requirements. The comments from the Fort Collins -Loveland Water and South Fort Collins Sanitation Districts have been addressed and appropriate changes have been made. Engineering: There now is a replat of the property that was not part of the original submittal. Copies of the plat were included in utility plan sets without making City staff aware that a plat was being submitted. The plat will be submitted correctly this time, the required number of copies will be folded and submitted separately from the Utility drawings, a copy of the Plat will be included in the Utility drawings for reference. The utility plans do not show building envelopes and some portions of the proposed buildings do encroach into drainage easements. Building envelopes are shown, easements no longer overlap. Handicapped parking spaces need to be 13' wide, unobstructed. The ramp has been moved , the space is unobstructed. There are still discrepancies between the Site Plan and the utility plans. Plans have been coordinated. Additional Light & Power easements are needed on -site. Easements have been provided Page 9 Planning: A driveway connection between the parking lot/drive on this site and the parking lot on the property to the north may be desirable. This would create only one access point onto the frontage road and enable this developer to eliminate the 20' wide fire access lane (and a significant amount of pavement). The developer did not find it desirable. The 8' wide handicapped parking space may not be sufficient, even with the 5' wide pedestrian walk and ramp. The handicapped ramp may impede access to and from a vehicle for a handicapped person trying to enter or exit the vehicle. Section 3.2.2(K)(5)(a) of the Land Use Code must be met. The space is now 1 3' wide, unobstructed. There is a lot of information on the Site Plan and the lack of differentiation in line weights makes the plan very difficult to follow and read. To be addressed by others The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) has indicated that a center median is needed in Cameron Drive at the intersection with South College Avenue. This is to help control traffic on the frontage road. CDOT has said that the next development in this business park will be responsible for the design and construction of the median, which could be the Spanjer Office project. There is the possibility that a repay agreement could be negotiated with the proposed Redtail project, to the west and north. The Redtail development will design and construct the median, the development agreement contains the details of reimbursement. Please see the red -lined Landscape Plan for comments regarding lot line and parking lot perimeter landscaping. To be addressed by others. Comments numbered 91 and above in this comment letter (from all departments and outside reviewing agencies) are Round 2 review comments. There was a subdivision plat submitted with this second round of review. However, City staff was not aware that a plat had been included in the utility plan sets until the reviewing engineer noticed it. The required number of "folded" plats must be submitted separate from the utility plans so that they can be routed to the appropriate City departments and outside reviewing agencies. Page 10 Project Comments Sheet La 1` Selected Departments 1 Department: Engineering Date: January 24, 2002 Project: SPANJER OFFICE BUILDING, #25-01 All comments must be received by STEVE OLT in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: January 16, 2002 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General 104 Show ALL easements, building envelopes, property lines, ROW, utilities, etc, all sheets (Landscape/Utility/Site/Plat). See Checklist E-4. 106 Need to submit a variance request for the combined Ped Access/Utility easement. 107 The building envelope is overlapping the utility/drainage easements on the Site plan and is not allowed by code. Please correct and coordinate between the Plat/Landscape/Utility/Site plan sheets Topic: Landscape Plan 57 Landscape Plan: Coordinate this sheet with the Utility plans to reflect the changes requested. 122 Repeat: Show and label all utilities, easements, ROW, etc. Show and label the utility easement and ped access easement separately. Label Fire Access Easement. The fire lane requires a 13.5' vertical clearance over the driveway. The trees on NE corner of the access drive will have to be kept trimmed back or pruned properly as they mature to keep the lower canopy open. 123 Are you meeting the requirements in Note 8? 124 Can you enlarge the plan a little - it's hard to tell if the trees and the utilities have the minimum separation requirements. CI{EC F.R IF YOU WISH To RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site _ I Drainage Report _J___ Other _2� Utility AtA� Redline Utility Landscape Pa1"e I 125 Show the sidewalk on the east side of the property. 126 Trim or remove existing trees and shrubbery in the College Avenue median to correct sight distance problem. Coordinate with the utility plans to determine the extent. Topic: Plat 103 Incorrectly submitted. Must be resubmitted for review. Needs to show the building envelopes, the language needs to be updated (see attached), Notice of Other Doc's missing, Attorney's Cert missing, benchmark missing, and all additional easements requested by Light and Power are missing. More comments to follow when correctly submitted. 105 Title Block needs to go along the right hand margin. 118 Provide 1 tie to a section corner. Topic: Site Plan 21 Repeat: Show general location of signs. 55 Repeat: Show all ROW, easements, property lines & setback requirements. Remove all the unnecessary dimensioning - looks more like an architectural drawing than a site plan. 56 Repeat: Coordinate this sheet with the Utility plans to reflect the changes requested. 111 Repeat: Still does not match the Utility Plans. Very hard to read! Too much dimensioning and only 2 line weights make it impossible to clearly define what's going on. Remove all the unnecessary dimensioning, add a legend, and coordinate with the Utility Sheet. I can provide good examples of what a site plan should look like if you need to see one. See redlines. 112 Building envelope shown in the drainage easement. Not allowed - please correct and coordinate with the Plat, Landscape and Utility Plans. 127 Suggest combining the driveway and sharing the eastern access point with the neighbor to the north. Have one point of access instead of two. 128 Correct the 5' Ped (sidewalk) access easement label to read "Pedestrian Access Easement". Topic: Utility Plans 7 Repeat: Update the General Construction Notes. See redlines. 8 Repeat: Cover Sheet: Need the following statement annotated on the Cover Sheet: "I hereby affirm...... See LCUASS, section 3.3.1.F. Page 2 16 Repeat: Provide all existing and proposed ROW, property lines and easements with dimensions. See checklist E-4 Label on all sheets. 30 Repeat: Show how the proposed sidewalk ties in to the existing sidewalk. Provide spot elevations, show removals, etc. 32 Repeat: Proposed 2' concrete sidewalk culvert does not meet LCUASS, see page 7-19, section 7.7.4. See detail 7-31. Show removals, existing and proposed spot elevations, continuation of sidewalk and how it ties into the existing sidewalk. 34 Repeat: Label & dimension all crosspans and reference appropriate detail 35 Repeat: Label, dimension various objects - see redlines. Should reference detail sheet where appropriate. Still need to reference details. 37 Repeat: Show details, dimensions for the retaining wall & access ramps on the south and west sides of the building. 39 Repeat: Provide detail, dimensions, label for the trench drain next to the trash enclosure. Has this been removed or accidentally left out from the first submittal? 40 Repeat: Add detail for the trash enclosure retaining wall. Make sure Tooter is inside the property line. Will you need a temporary construction easement to dig on the neighboring property? 49 Repeat: Show detail for the opening to drain ramp. 50 Repeat: Update all details to current LCUASS. See Appendix A. See redlines. Add the words "On -Site" to the on -site curb details - see redlines. Provide details 7-31, 7-20a, 7-20b, 16-1, and any other detail as required by the plans. 66 Cover Sheet: Provide an area of 4" x6" on each sheet for the Local Entity to place a stamp of approval, all sheets. This was provided as requested but needs to be removed again. This requirement is a mistake that will be corrected in the next version of the standards. Thanks and sorry! 108 Please work on the line weights a little bit. Existing conditions are ghosted or dashed and proposed conditions are "normal". The plans have these line weights backwards in some cases. See redlines. 109 Eliminate the Existing Conditions sheet. It's really not necessary. Page 3 110 CDOT has indicated that a traffic study and a median in Cameron Drive at the College Avenue intersection is required. CDOT will also need the sight distance problem corrected in the median separating the frontage road and College Avenue. See redlines. 113 Cover Sheet: Remove the word "Final' from the title. Center the date under the legal description. 115 Organize your details - put all the drainage details together, curb/gutter/sidewalk together, etc. 116 General notes - Need two benchmarks, line 40. Line 47 - Put NA if NA. Line 48 - list variances. 117 Grading - Incomplete finish grade elevations provided for all lot corners. 119 Sheet 3/8: Label the inner and outer turning radius on the emergency drive. Repeat note "concrete to ROW line" by NE corner entrance. Put the street cut note up in the drawings instead of in a note. Dimension off centerline: ROW, easements, etc. Correct line weights - all sheets, see redlines. Show removals - where and how the sidewalk ties into the existing on the west side of the property. See redlines for additional comments. 120 Sheet 4/8: Show concrete sidewalk all along the eastern property line. Provide existing and proposed spot elevations where the proposed sidewalk ties into the existing sidewalk on the west property line. Correct line weights. 121 All Sheets: Correct the line weights. Page 4 Landscape Architecture — Site Planning - Photography 215 W. Magnolia Street, Ste. 202 Fort Collins, CO. 80521 970.472,8954 March 26, 2002 Steve Olt Fort Collins Planning Department 281 North College Avenue Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 Ref.: Response to Preliminary Review Comments for Spanjer Office, Lot 7 Cameron Park Subdivision Dear Steve: We have reviewed the Staff comments and redlines, revised our plans and have summarized our responses below. ➢ Written comments included general coordination with other consultants and their revisions, which has been addressed. ➢ Red line comments from engineering: • Utility, drainage and access easements are shown as clearly as possible. See engineering plans for any clarification. • Scale of site is at 1" = 20'. Enlarging it to 1" = 10' would take up the whole sheet. It currently matched the rest of the sheets for this submittal. • All minimum utility separations are being met. • Comment concerning the condition of existing trees in the median is not addressed because we do not own, control or have responsibility in that area. ➢ Red line comments from current planning: • Shade trees can not be added to area south of parking due to a proposed electric line. • The spirea in the bed near the parking has been changed to a cotoneaster for winter density but height is not a factor since the wall is behind the bed and it is three feet higher (on average) than the parking lot adjacent to it. • The Broadmoore Juniper in the sidewalk has been removed. • Trees can not be planted on the north side of the property in the location requested due to an existing utility easement. There were no other comments regarding the landscape plan but other mior changes were made due to site changes. Northern Engineering Services or WJ Frick Design Group has addressed all other comments. Thank You, Trista Si ler �s-A Land Images, inc. Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments Department: Engineering Date: April 15, 2002 Project: SPANJER OFFICE BUILDING, #25-01 All comments must be received by STEVE OLT in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: January 16, 2002 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic• eneral Show ALL easements, building envelopes, property lines, ROW, utilities, etc, all sheets (Landscape/Utility/Site/Plat). See Checklist E-4. QL&4-ry(ff, DCA--r rKa�r�. ed to submit a variance request for the combined Ped Access/Utility easement. ur� a-cw rl")l U-MLen Eh 4 eekthec— C,0 I 0 J ycTi The building envelope is overlapping the utility/drainage easements on the Site plan and is not allowed by code. Please correct and coordinate between the Plat/Landscape/Utility/Site plan sheets. Top! Landscape Plan Landscape Plan: Coordinate this sheet with the Utility plans to reflect the changes requested. Repeat: Show and label all utilities, easements, ROW, etc. Show and label the N�t�iar� utility easement and ped access easement separately. Label Fire Access Easement. The fire lane requires a 13.5'vertical clearance over the driveway. L;t U LA" The trees on NE corner of the access drive will have to be kept trimmed back or f:A4r,'^"" `'— pruned properly as they mature to keep the lower canopy open. ►, r` *tM 13 Are you meeting the requirements in Note 8? v xe, , T 1 Can you enlarge the plan a little - it's hard to tell if the trees and the utilities have t)I the minimum separation requirements. Signature Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other Utility Redline Utilitv Landscape ppp Page I 1-25 Show the sidewalk on the east side of the property. 126 Trim or remove existing trees and shrubbery in the College Avenue median to correct sight distance problem. Coordinate with the utility plans to determine the extent. TolF�c: Plat '�%- 103,E Incorrectly submitted. Must be resubmitted for review. Needs to show the v ., T, building envelopes, the language needs to be updated (see attached), Notice of "="� Other Doc's missing, Attorney.'s_Certmissing., benchmark missing, and all additional easements requested by Light and Power are missing. More comments to follow when correctly submitted. OzsOr„: - ?W0?5Title Block needs to go along the right hand margin. k:E6A Provide 1 tie to a section corner. 4eA O �c ffi6 5-1 Top : Site Plan 'DIcw1'T (yEs 9%Ae V..'T+WS_ doGt 1L Nll," p�P�'� 21 Repeat: Show general location of signs. Repeat: Show all ROW, easements, property lines & setback requirements. Remove all the unnecessary dimensioning - looks more like an architectural drawing than a site plan. Repeat: Coordinate this sheet with the Utility plans to reflect the changes requested. 0 Repeat: Still does not match the Utility Plans. Very hard to read! Too much dimensioning and only 2 line weights make it impossible to clearly define what's going on. Remove all the unnecessary dimensioning, add a le e and coordinate with the Utility Sheet. I can provide good examples of what a site plan should look like if you need to see one. See redlines. %` Building envelope shown in the drainage easement. Not allowed - please correct and coordinate with the Plat, Landscape and Utility Plans. 1, Suggest combining the driveway and sharing the eastern access point with the neighbor to the north. Have one point of access instead of two. Correct the 5' Ped (sidewalk) access easement label to read "Pedestrian Access Easement". To Utility Plans Repeat: Update the General Construction Notes. See redlines. Repeat: Cover Sheet: Need the following statement annotated on the Cover Sheet: "I hereby affirm...". See LCUASS, section 3.3.11. Page 2 ~lance �� �►�Goria���TTr �Tto�-4S 'PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current PlanninE DATE: July 16, 2001 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #25-01 Spanjer Office Building - Project Development Plan - Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: August 15, 2001 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference �JA Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other_ Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape (010092MM City of Fort Cohim h .'p 46� Repeat: Provide all existing and proposed ROW, property lines and easements with dimensions. See checklist E-4. Label on all sheets. 30 Repeat: Show how the proposed sidewalk ties in to the existing sidewalk. Provide spot elevations, show removals, etc. ,32' Repeat: Proposed 2' concrete sidewalk culvert does not meet LCUASS, see page 7-19, section 7.7.4. See detail 7-31. Show removals, existing and proposed spot elevations, continuation of sidewalk and how it ties into the existing sidewalk. Repeat: Label & dimension all crosspans and reference appropriate detail. Repeat: Label, dimension various objects - see redlines. Should reference detail sheet where appropriate. Still need to reference details. Repeat: Show details, dimensions for the retaining wall & access ramps on the south and west sides of the building. Repeat: Provide detail, dimensions, label for the trench drain next to the trash enclosure. Has this been removed or accidentally left out from the first submittal? Repeat: Add detail for the trash enclosure retaining wall. Make sure footer is J inside the property line. Will you need a temporary construction easement to dig on the neighboring property? I 49 Repeat: Show detail for the opening to drain ramp. 50 Repeat: Update all details to current LCUASS. See Appendix A. See redlines. Add the words "On -Site" to the on -site curb details - see redlines. Provide details 31, 7-20a, 7-20b,i16-1, and any other detail as required by the plans. 1�66 Cover Sheet: Provide an area of 4"x6" on each sheet for the Local Entity to place a stamp of approval, all sheets. This was provided as requested but needs to be removed again. This requirement is a mistake that will be corrected in the next version of the standards. Thanks and sorry! 'k7g Please work on the line weights a little bit. Existing conditions are ghosted or dashed and proposed conditions are "normal". The plans have these line weights backwards in some cases. See redlines. 149' Eliminate the Existing Conditions sheet. It's really not necessary. Page 3 110 CDOT has indicated that a traffic study and a median in Cameron Drive at the College Avenue intersection is required. CDOT will also need the sight distance problem corrected in the median separating the frontage road and College Avenue. See redlines. 1 I!3 Cover Sheet: Remove the word "Final' from the title. Center the date under the legal description. 115 Organize your details - put all the drainage details together, curb/gutter/sidewalk together, etc. 116 General notes - Need two benchmarks, line 40. Line 47 - Put NA if NA. Line 48 - list variances. 117 Grading - Incomplete finish grade elevations provided for all lot corners. 119 Sheet 3/8: Label the inner and outer turning radius on the emergency drive. Repeat note "concrete to ROW line" by NE corner entrance. Put the street cut note up in the drawings instead of in a note. Dimension off centerline: ROW, easements, etc. Correct line weights - all sheets, see redlines. Show removals - where and how the sidewalk ties into the existing on the west side of the property. See redlines for additional comments. 'far Sheet 4/8: Show concrete sidewalk all along the eastern property line. Provide C� existing and proposed spot elevations where the proposed sidewalk ties into the existing sidewalk on the west property line. Correct line weights. All Sheets: Correct the line weights. A 1� As per PFA, the addressing for this site shall be a College Avenue address. Page 4 Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments Department: Engineering Date: April 19, 2002 Project: SPANJER OFFICE BUILDING, #25-01 All comments must be received by STEVE OLT in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: April 17, 2002 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General 104 1/23/02: Show ALL easements, building envelopes, property lines, ROW, utilities, etc, all sheets (Landscape/Utility/Site/Plat). See Checklist E-4. 4/17/02: Plan types are missing some easements or they don't match. See redlines. 106 1/23/02: Need to submit a variance request for the combined Ped Access/Utility easement. 4/17/02: The variance request was routed to Light & Power, Stormwater, Water/Wastewater and mailed to to PSCO/Excel, Qwest, AT&T, and the FCLWD. Only two of the above had comments or concerns. The variance has been routed to Cam for his final approval. From Terry Farrill/FCLWD: There are District water meter pits located within the easement. The meter pits cannot be located under the sidewalk or within 10 feet of landscaping, such as trees. The relocation of the meter pits must be done in accordance with District requirements and standards. From Dennis Greenwalt/ATBT: AT&T has existing 2" PVC ducts along your proposed route which are empty. I spoke with Dennis on the phone and he said that you may relocate those lines and suggested putting them behind the telephone peds. We will be holding a Utility Coordination Meeting for your project prior to start of construction. All utility relocations will be at the owner/developer's expense. Date 1 CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat i Site Drainage Report `e Other T� 1X-;r0 Utility Redline Utility / Landscape Page I 135 Site/Landscape/Utility plans - Show concrete sidewalk along the east side of the property to the north property line. There is a section missing, see redlines. 139 Please see redlines for further comments. Topic: Landscape Plan 122 Repeat: Show and label all utilities, easements, ROW, etc. Show and label the utility easement and ped access easement separately. Label Fire Access Easement. The fire lane requires a 13.5' vertical clearance over the driveway. The trees on NE corner of the access drive will have to be kept trimmed back or pruned properly as they mature to keep the lower canopy open. 4117/02: Missing a 5' utility easement along the north property line and a drainage easement in the SE corner. 138 Project title does not match the Utility Plans. Please add the word "Building" after "Spanjer Office". Topic: Plat 103 1/23/02: Incorrectly submitted. Must be resubmitted for review. Needs to show the building envelopes, the language needs to be updated (see attached), Notice of Other Doc's missing, Attorney's Cert missing, benchmark missing, and all additional easements requested by Light and Power are missing. More comments to follow when correctly submitted. 4/17/02: The plat language needs to be updated in a couple areas, please see redlines. Needs one tie to a section corner, Date under the Legal Description, the Notice of Other Doc's needs to be shown correctly, and the easements don't appear to match the utility plans. Please see the attached Plat Language handout or call if you have questions (221-6605). 105 1/23/02: Title Block needs to go along the right hand margin. 4/17/02: Repeat. 118 1/23/02: Provide 1 tie to a section corner. 4117/02: Repeat. 133 Remove the shed from the plat. See redlines. 136 Is the utility easement in the SE corner an exclusive easement? If so, it needs to be labeled as such and who it belongs to. 137 Please see redlines for other comments and questions. Topic: Site Plan 21 Repeat: Show general location of signs. 4/17/02: Repeat. 55 Repeat: Show all ROW, easements, property lines & setback requirements. Remove all the unnecessary dimensioning - looks more like an architectural drawing than a site plan. Page 2 work showing that addition. The plat is dedicating this additional 4' so you only need to show as a 10' utility easement the whole way. 141 Please contact Mike Chavez with PFA at 416-2869 for their requirements on bollards in the emergency fire access road. Page 4 REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: May 7, 2002 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #25-01 Spanjer Office Building PDP— Type 1 (LUC) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: May 29, 2002 — ElNo Comment 1-1 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) **PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** /, LOSES. n Tr-lE /� (JT�c•T� ESiri C /�-loaTH Si OZE Z07- / S -")4 ZC 7 /U � /> GC%Ocl�o %sue /S�,-TTe`Iz / F /'�/ �Zc7- 7 (Z- 0-�.s D:9R: WI IF YOU WISH TO RFCIIVE C0P1ES OF REVIS[ONllignature:_ �_ Plat _Site _ Dra Wage Report _ ofher Utility _ Redline Utility Landscape Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments Cityot Port Collins Department: Engineering Date: May 30, 2002 Project: SPANJER OFFICE BUILDING, #25-01 e All comments must be received by STEVE OLT in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: May 29, 2002 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: Plat 143 It is not necessary to show the temporary easements, however, if it is preferred that it remain, the owner of lot 6 will have to sign off on the plat. Please provide the temp easement by separate document or, at the very least, a letter of intent prior to the hearing - see attached. Topic: Landscape, Site, Utility Plans 141 4/19/02: Please contact Mike Chavez with PFA at 416-2869 for their requirements on bollards in the emergency fire access. 5/28/02: Please see attached specifications for the bollards required by PFA. Please change the Landscape, Site, and Utility plans from the chains/bollards to one of the two systems spec'd. Date CHECK HERE IF -VOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ Utility Redline Utility Landscape 4xz/�Lf6' V Page 1 Citv of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: July 16, 2001 i PROJECT COMMENT SHEET TO: Street Oversizing PROJECT: #25-01 Spanjer Office Building - Project Development Plan - Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: August 15, 2001 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference c C/6 l/� Pic Name (please pr CHECK HER9IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other — _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments Citv of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: August 21, 2001 PROJECT: SPANJER OFFICE BUILDING, #25-01 All comments must be received by BRIAN GRUBB in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: August 15, 2001 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Dept: Engineering 1 Provide TIS. Issue Contact: Susan Joy 2 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Provide a Striping Plan sheet showing striping, signage, etc., or show on overall utility sheet. 3 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Label and dimension all setbacks. 4 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Complete and submit the Checklist in Appendix E-4. 5 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Cover Sheet: Add preamble title of "Utility Plans for...... See LCUASS, section 3.3.1.G 6 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Cover Sheet: Minimum size for the Vicinity Map is 10" x 10" and to a scale of 1"=1000-1500'. See LCUASS, section 3.3.1.C.1&2 1 of 6 7 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Cover Sheet: Update the General Construction Notes. See Attached. 8 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Cover Sheet: Need the following statement annotated on the Cover Sheet: "I hereby affirm...". See LCUASS, section 3.3.1.F. 9 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Cover Sheet: Provide the names, addresses, phone numbers for the Developer(s)/or & Owners(s). 10 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Cover Sheet: Update the signature block. See attached. 11 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Grading Sheet: Need the contours extended a minimum of 50' offsite and tied into existing contours. 12 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Grading Sheet: Add the statement: "The top of foundation elevations shown...". See the Checklist in Appendix E-4. 13 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Grading Sheet: Provide drainage arrows and show positive drainage to streets or to an approved drainage facility. 15 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Overall Utility Plans: Add "Print Date" - all sheets. 16 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Overall Utility Plans: Provide all existing and proposed ROW, property lines and easements with dimensions. Label on all sheets. 17 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Overall Utility Plans: Provide a sidewalk along the frontage road according to current LCUASS. This will require additional ROW and easements to be dedicated. Show how the proposed work ties into the existing. Note: Adding the sidewalk will change your drainage plan. 18 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Overall Utility Plans: Dimension all sidewalks. 2 of 19 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Overall Utility Plans: Show existing driveway locations, labeled & dimensioned. There are minimum distances between driveways required per LCUASS - please refer to the standards. 20 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Overall Utility Plans: Show existing features adjacent to this development in a ghosted or alternate line weight. There are a bunch of utilities on the corner off of Cameron with an unusual sidewalk ::onfiguration wrapping around them. Will the utilities stay there? Could work if you detach the sidewalk. 21 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Overall Utility Plans: Show general location of signs. 24 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Overall Utility Plans: Show all existing features for a minimum of 150' beyond the project limits. 25 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Overall Utility Plans: Provide access ramps and crosswalks. Include and reference current detail. 26 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Overall Utility Plans: Not enough spot elevations called out. See detail 7-32B. 27 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Overall Utility Plans: Provide station, critical elevation, and dimension of all existing and proposed utility and/or drainage structures. Include spot elevations per LCUASS. 29 30 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Sheet 2/7: 6' Utility easement unacceptable, code requires a minimum of 9'. Will need to dedicate additional utility easement. Issue Contact: Susan Joy Sheet 3/7: Show how the proposed sidewalk ties in to the existing sidewalk. (Show all existing features for a minimum of 150' beyond project limits). The porposed sidewalk does not match what's shown on the site and landscape plans. These sheets need to be coordinated. 3 of 6 31 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Sheet 3/7: You can not use the high vclume driveway entrances with radius curb cuts as shown. Both driveway approaches do not meet current LCUASS. See detail 7-29A. 32 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Sheet 3/7: Proposed 2' concrete sidewalk culvert does not meet LCUASS, see page 7-19, section 7.7.4. See detail D-10 of Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual. Show continuation of sidewalk and how it ties into the existing sidewalk. 33 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Sheet 3/7: Reference detail for both asphalt patches and add note: Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards. 34 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Sheet 3/7: Label & dimension all crosspans and reference appropriate detail. 35 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Sheet 3/7: Label, dimension various objects - see redlines. Should reference detail sheet where appropriate. 36 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Sheet 3/7: Dimension G and E lines - where are these located? 37 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Sheet 3/7: Show details, dimensions for the retaining wall & access ramps on the south and west sides of the building. 38 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Sheet 3/7: Show, label, dimension the structure(?) next to the trash enclosure. 39 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Sheet 3/7: Provide detail, dimensions, label for the trench drain next to the trash enclosure. 4 of 40 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Sheet 3/7: Add detail for the trash enclosure retaining wall. Make sure footer is inside the property line. Will you need a temporary construction easement to dig on the neighboring property? 42 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Sheet 3/7: Show centerline of all streets, drives, etc., on all sheets. 43 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Sheet 3/7: Show, dimension and label all access ramps. Provide detail per LCUASS. 44 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Sheet 3/7: Show all existing driveways for the neighboring properties. Do you have the proper separation distances required by code? 47 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Sheet 4/7: Where is the "Swale Section" noted in the Legend? 48 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Sheet 4/7: Carry over all corrections from previous pages. 49 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Sheet 4/7: Show detail for the opening to drain ramp. 50 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Sheet 6/7: Update all details to current LCUASS. See Appendix A. 51 Sheet 6/7: Add sidewalk detail per LCUASS. Issue Contact: Susan Joy 52 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Sheet 6/7: Cover Sheet has page 6 labeled as "Drainage Details". Please correct one or the other. 53 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Sheet 6/7: Where is the Cold Joint Detail being used? 5 of 6