The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About4366 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE NEXTEL - Filed T-TELECOMMUNICATION PLANS - 2003-09-05Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Comm n= Due By.j� City of For Collins Zoning Department Mit or a �cndt � m= � - Oyl I�1 1 291 N- College Ave PO Box. 580 �r Fort Colin CO 80522 Ef e �x liat - -iry of F�lins L (9?O) 416 2711 1 (9 i 0) 2-24-6124 endment Application Form Date Submitted: t:5 \,E � QJ Project Name: N E%« 1 WB'zrZEtJ LA l; G iENINr> T.3 11 4XX Minor Amendment Fee: $192.00 Project Location (Street Address): 3 � Lt'y � HC -6 F IQVr Legal Description: A 'Ln ';�'''ccEz �—6 +('01(irls 6wkr Ptt D General Information: List all propci t.V owners h,ing o legaZ/equitable interest in the property (Attach separate sheets rf necessary). Owner's Name (s): C`U -a `Di�j l-1 onS t>_.C."'tVEN ClV✓-1 VF"L) a�lL S City/State/Zip T�nn� Street Address: aDWGO �b ate„-.m�Nie ra�-.o ,2NG TO�J EYt ownl EE.: SPecTtc F157"rE Telephone: Fax: �yNC. S �T 9 46ie,1 1� Q3JSUt-.'S1�NT: .Applicant's onsultant'sName: �rr,,,,vle4t-,�+•IName offirm: i-'-'fe T2AZEQ)A Street Address: , ,a cc S Cit}''State/Zip: =t,u_, es.v C ��_�]� V�_� Telephone:,j� �I'�1 !_j0'7�Fax: Email: S �121C>< nlFl c�-�t�l SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: l ) Six (6) copies of RECORDED plan (i.e. site, landscape, elevation, etc. - whichever is being altered) on 24" x 36" size (usually available at the Technical Services Department at 281 N. College) - RED -LINE THE CHANGES ON the six plans or provide six copies of revised drawings showing the changes in addition to the six originals; 2) Completed and signed application form; and 3) Application fee of $192.00. MINOR AMENDMENT Detailed description of the change and reason(s) for the request: 7n E-KTIM n -i'JW Ere--W5MaL-L 1 Z NEl A N� i1 r4 Ny INPJloe.-,. Y�,T S#i>`"1'E� A— - CERTIFICATION I ce; iN the information and e>:hibits submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I ain acting with the knowledge, conseut, and authority of the owners of the property (including all owners having a legal or equitable interest in thereai property, as defined in Scctin 1-2 of the Cip Code; which s the sub, ect o` ems ' uion) w;thout whose consent and autno ;ry the requested action should not lawfully be accomplished. Pursuant to said authority, I hereb:i pernut City o`tic:als to enter upon *hc property for the purpose a- inspection. and if necessary, for posting a public notice on the nropc:. . Name (please PRINT): EPIC Address:. 7 Z' tJE- t ✓� �'»"Sl-1 �NIrI. La✓Y t C-O �Otl Telephone:__303 _ �� I - L'i O-7 (o signatureJ�� Approval Items for MA04091 Subdivision: FORT COLLINS RETAIL CENTER PUD Site Address: 4366 S COLLEGE AVE Department/Description Action Taken Entered By Comments (if any) CURRENT PLANNING 08/31/2004 CMNT TWILLIAM Previous comment still applies. The pole may only be extended the minimum height to provide seperation from existing antenna. The Current Planning Department will only support a ten foot extension. Any additional height must be justified through appropriate studies that demonstrate a 10 foot increase will not provide adequate seperation from existing antennas. 09/13/2004 CMNT Bob Barkeen the applicant is requesting an additional 20 feet to the existing pole height. The additional 20 feet is excessive. The pole height may only be extended the minimum amount to achieve minimum seperation from the adjacent antenna (estimated to be 10 feet). A revised Engineering letter stating the failure of the pole will need to be submitted. 12/14/2004 CMNT Bob Barkeen Previous comment still applies. The pole may only be extended the minimum height to provide seperation from existing antenna. The Current Planning Department will only support a ten foot extension. Any additional height must be justified through appropriate studies that demonstrate a 10 foot increase will not provide adequate seperation from existing antennas. 12/21/2004 OK Bob Barkeen The additional 20 feet in height has been approved based on information submitted by Nextel stating that minimum of 10 feet must be achieved from top of antenna to bottom of antenna to avoid interferance with ENGINEERING -DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 09/02/2004 HLD Susan Joy The plans are not clear and neither are the easements. Please redo the plans to incorporate your redlines and clearly label and dimension everything so that it is clear what you are proposing. 12/14/2004 OK Susan Joy ZONING 08/31/2004 HLD Jenny Nuckols On the red -lined enlarged site plan, it is unclear as to what is the new building wall, where the trees will be relocated to and what is curb. It appears that the trees are within the new wall and there is no new curb line being shown. All of the sheets submitted need to be red -lined showing changes. There was no elevation of the proposed new structure submitted. 12/20/2004 OK Jenny Nuckols Page 1 of 1 01/10/2005 1:28:37 PM Approval Items for MA04091 Subdivision: FORT COLLINS RETAIL CENTER P-B Site Address: 4366 S COLLEGE AVE Department/Description - Action Taken Entered By - CURRENT PLANNING 08/31/2004 MINT TWILLIAM 09/13/2004 CMNT Bob Barkeen ENGINEERING -DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 09/02/2004 HLD ZONING 08/31/2004 Page 1 of 1 11/26/2004 12:34.11 PM HLD Comments (if any) _. the applicant is requesting an additional 20 feet to the existing pole height. The additional 20 feet is excessive. The pole height may only be extended the minimum amount to achieve minimum separation from the adjacent antenna (estimated to be 10 feet). A revised Engineering letter stating the failure of the pole will need to be submitted. Susan Joy The plans are not clear and neither are the easements. Please redo the plans to incorporate your redlines and clearly label and dimension everything so that it is clear what you are proposing. Jenny Nuckols On the red -lined enlarged site plan, it is unclear as to what is the new building wall, where the trees will be relocated to and what is curb. It appears that the trees are within the new wall and there is no new curb line being shown. All of the sheets submitted need to be red -lined showing changes. There was no elevation of the proposed new structure submitted.