HomeMy WebLinkAboutCHESTNUT VILLAGE AT CUNNINGHAM CORNER - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2003-07-31I
DATPARNI, EN E E
pt I Al
rg
ITETVI: ollt-, IV41 F 6;,-J7-
COMAMENTS
�t /a-d /Y 3
M,
JEPARTT
�- c
ITENR ovt-j � ,urn r ///L� 19 6 x: -- o(�,un�f,v
pyj
1
COMMENTS
O
Sept 9, 1983
E7DATE
RECEIVED
ITEM: 54-83 Sutherland Lumber Expansion
P 2 0 1
'F-W
/7A,5
A 'f'JVbhC"A?74�,J1 WIL�-
�;O)Yt, i Oak-, -Tr-��%(TAP
I
PLANNING
DEPARTMENT
I
CITY OF FORE COLLINS P.O. BOX 580, FOR t COLLINS, COLORADO 80522 (Mj 484-4220
=�.�iYYAh�P4YM\iRh'J9�1�77✓a•y{l:!R:\YP.%'kh'@i?NAI�'"�"1M Yr.. FC'
DEVELOPMENT CENTER EXT. 655
September 20, 1983
Frank Vaught
ZVFK Architects/Planners
218 West Mountain
Fort Collins, CO 80521
Dear Frank:
The staff has reviewed the application for Final PUD approval of Chestnut
Village at Cunningham Corners and would offer the following comments:
1. Where parking overhangs the sidewalks, the minimum width of the sidewalks
should be six feet. Please revise.
2. The location of the ramps at the handicapped parking spaces are poorly
located. Please revise.
3. The trash area in the southeastern portion of the property will present
sight distance problems. Please relocate.
4. It would appear that building envelopes J and H are in a utility ease-
ment. Some of the building envelopes do not appear to match the "typi-
cals". Where the envelopes deviate, these should be specifically dimen-
sioned.
5. Building Envelope S needs to be revised to reflect change in easement
line.
6. Existing easements and street R-O-W not needed for this project should
be vacated. A legal description of these vacations should be submitted
as soon as possible for Council review.
7. There does not appear to be sufficient room behind the sidewalks for
installation of all utilities. Please clarify intent.
8. Additional easement dedications in Tract D will be required to accommo-
date existing sewer and proposed water line from Sundisk Village.
9. Repayment is due on the waterline in Horsetooth Road; approximately
$12.41 per front foot is required if paid by September. A repayment
is due for a portion of the sewer installed by Sundisk Village unless
arrangements have been made between developers.
Frank Vaught
Page, 2
September 20, 1983
10. All building envelopes should be dimensioned from at least two platted
property lines. Buildings B, P, Q, P,, S, T, M, J, and E do not have
sufficient dimensions.
11. A more precise building height should be indicated on the site plan.
12. The staff questions whether the energy savings indicated on the site
plan and Density Chart will be achieved. The preliminary plan indicated
R-19 wall insulation and improved efficiency furnace system. Please
clarify.
13. The staff questions the points you have taken on the Density Chart.
We should meet to discuss this item.
14. A portion of Tract D must be dedicated as R-044 for Windmill Drive.
This dedication would be shown on the subdivision plat.
15. Additional landscaping will be required along Horsetooth Road and Wiind-
mill Drive as per approved preliminary plan. The landscape plan should
indicate landscaping adjacent to building envelopes per approved prelim-
inary plan„ Also the parking islands should include low-lying vegetation
in addition to trees, per approved preliminary plan. The preliminary
plan indicated berming along Horsetooth Road. Please revise. The island
in the parking north of Buildings S and B should be landscaped per pre-
liminary plan. Additional landscape comments are forthcoming.
16. The site plan should be revised in terms ofproviding a sidewalk connec-
tion between the residential phase and the future recreation and office
area. Also a sidewalk should be provided along the parking lot between
Buildings R and Q.
17. The staff questions the location of the mailboxes at the entrance to
the project.
18. The total area of the site plan has been increased from 8.6 acres to
9.7 acres but yet the tennis/pool area does not appear to be a part
of the plan. There also appears to be some dramatic changes in the
site statistics. Please explain.
19. The note concerning signs should exclude statement concerning PUD admin-
istrative change.
20. Bicycle parking should be provided for Buildings N, A, and S.
21. The site plan should indicate that northern curbcut to Windmill Drive
will align with previously approved curbcut in Sundisk Village.
22. The landscape plan should note that balance of landscaping on Tract
D will be installed according to a specific phase (preferably with instal
lation of '4indmill Drive) rather than with Phases A, B, and C.
Frank Vaught
Page 3
Septenber 20, 1983
23. Building elevations should indicate exterior Materials and colors.
24. On Monday, October 17, signed mylars of the site plan, landscape plan,
building elevations, and plat, in addition to a signed copy of the Site
and Landscape Covenants, should be delivered to this office.
25. applicants should provide further definition of "one -bedroom plus den"
units. How will this affect parking if it is used as a bedroom?
I would recommend we meet as soon as possible to discuss the above comments.
Revisions to the plans should be submitted no later than Wednesday, October
5. Also, on Monday, October 17, 821" x 11': reductions and colored renderings
should be submitted. If you should have any questions please feel free to
call.
Sincerely,
I
Joe F ank
Projje t Planner
i
JF/gla
cc: Bonnie Tripoli