HomeMy WebLinkAboutCENTRE FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY PUD NINTH - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2003-07-07CITY OF FORT COLLINS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM: Mike Herzig, Develo-pment Coordinator
RE: Subdivision Utility Plans
DATE: February 8, 1988
Submitted for your review and comment are utility olans for:
Centre for Advanced Technology, Parcel J
Please respond by:
February 16, 1988
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING DIVISION
300 LaPorte Ave. • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 • (303) 221-6750
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, PLANNING DEPARTMENT
April 22, 1988
Mr. Tony Hughes
Vaught -Frye Architects and Planners
2900 South College Avenue
Fort Collins, CO. 80525
Dear Mr. Hughes:
Staff has reviewed the request for preliminary P.U.D. for Parcel Q of the
Centre for Advanced Technology and offers the folrlowing comments:
1. Eight foot minimum width utility easements must be dedicated adjoining
the easterly line of Worthington Drive and the northerly of Centre Avenue.
2. The parking note on the site plan is reversed. Short term stalls are not
allowed to be downsized but the long term stalls arc.
3. Please add the following two notes to the site plan:
4. All landscaping must be installed or secured with a letter of credit,
performance bond, or escrow account for 125% of the valuation prior to
issuance of certificate of occupancy.
5. All signs to comply with the Sign Code.
6. Please show concrete driveways all the way to the property line.
7. There is a discrepancy between the site plan and utility plan in that the
sidewalks do not match.
8. Both large buildings show a 6 inch fire line. If these buildings are
equipped with fire sprinkler systems, then there are no problems.
5,: - �Tv
-
OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES, PLANNING
300 LaPorte Ave. • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 • (303) 221-6750
Page
9. The pond between the buildings should be used for raw water irrigation.
This would save considerable expense on the utility bill.
10. It is our understanding that the City Stormwater Utility has completed an
analysis of the drainage improvements for the basin and the C.A.T. area.
With this study now complete, Staff would remind the applicants and
owners that the overall Traffic Impact Analysis is now ready to be
amended in light of the new information and assumptions. This update
will not be a requirement of Tract Q but is mentioned as a reminder of a
future obligation.
11. The drainage comments are being mailed to R.B.D. Inc. under separate
cover.
This concludes Staff comments at this time. Please note the following deadlines
for the May 23, 1988 Planning and Zoning Board hearing:
Plan revisions are due May 4,, 1988.
PMT's, 10 prints, and colored renderings are due May 16.
As always, please feel free to call to discuss these issues or to arrange a
meeting.
Sincerely,
Ted Shepard
City Planner
cc: Joe Frank, Assistant Planning Director
Mike Herzig, Development Engineer
DATE: sMay ee DEPARTMENT:
ITEM. 53-85R CENTRE FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY, 9th Filing, CENTRE VILLAGE
Phase 1 - FINAL
No Problems
Problems or Concerns (see below)
D/SG�5.5 w�
Date Signature
CITY OF FOIST COLLINS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
MA 1 I ! !968
GARY HUETT
PUBLIC SERVICE
TO:
FROM: Mike Herzig, Development Coordinator
RE: Subdivision Utility Plans
DATE: May 6, 1988
Submitted for your review and comment are utility plans for:
Centre Village, 9th Filing, Centre for Advanced Technology
Please respond by:
May 13, 1988
H11111111 I
1=
•y Ze �.iy [���-f r-�. L4.S
��f•'n :y'•r`�!'�'i�h•��:~ice
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING DIVISION
77
•✓M;=.-
300 LaPorte Ave. • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 `
(303) 221.6750
CITY OF FOIST COLLINS
OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, PLANNING DEPARTMENT
May 19, 1988
Mr. Tony Hughes
c/o Vaught - Frye Architects
2900 South College Avenue
Fort Collins, CO. 80525
Dcar Mr. Hughes:
Staff has reviewed the request for final P.U.D. for Centre Village, Phase One
and offers the following comments:
1. The Staff has no problem in taking the 120 bed facility to the P & Z
Board as a final but the future expansion area should be treated as a
preliminary only. Staff feels that given the level of neighborhood concern,
the future expansion should be reviewed as a final at the time of expan-
sion. Please add a note on the site plan indicating that the future
expansion area is for preliminary review only and subject to final P.U.D.
approval prior to expansion.
2. There is a major concern with the proximity of the curb cut for the future
senior service center to the intersection of the main access drive and
Shields Streeit. The distance of 140 feet from centerline to centerline is
unacceptable. Staff recommends that this curb cut be shifted to the cast
approximately 205 feet to align with curb cut on the north. The proposed
crosswalk and access ramps should also be shifted over to the new intersec-
tion.
3. Transfort has requested a bus bay and bus stop in the west Abound lane at
the northwest corner of the main access drive and the first curb cut as
described in the above comment. The bay length should be 40 feet and
the width should be 10 feet. Please refer to the enclosed detail.
4. Due to the potential for above average bus usage, Transfort has elected to
serve the property internally rather than on Shields. Internal service will
bring riders closer to the entrances of both the nursing home and the
OFFICE OF DLVELOPME%T
SERVICES, PLANNING
S ... : ..a ...., _..., .... .� r . t, _ter. 'd.� .. i.L il.. 'h.4aN{..✓ t.a .... a...,
300 LaPorte Ave. • PO Box 580 • Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 • (303) 221-6750
CAT 9th Comments
Page 2
future senior service center. To facilitate this service, it is recommended
that the bus stop include a shelter, bench, signage and convenient access to
the sidewalk., crosswalk, and ramp system serving both sides of the drive.
5. It should be stated on the site plan that future sidewalk improvements on
the north side of the access drive shall be constructed prior to building
permit issuance for the future expansion.
6. As discussed at preliminary, the keeping open of the Shire Court and
Shields intersection must be justified in a traffic impact analysis. This
intersection was originally planned to be closed with access provided to the
south and eventually to the controlled intersection at Sheilds Street. It is
suggested that Matt Dellich contact the Transportation Administrator for
details on the extent of the study.
7. At preliminary, the drainage plan showed an outlet on and across the
adjacent property to the north and east. This must be put into an ease-
ment with agreement from the property owner. Also, if the Sherwood
Ditch is impacted, permission from the owners must be on the utility
plans.
8. Sanitary sewer is
not
readily available. A sewer main must be extended
from the east. A
30
inch water main is available
in Shields Street and
may be used to serve
the development.
9. Since the parking
lot
configuration has changed from
preliminary, a new
fire hydrant must
be
added at the southeast corner
of the building. The
fire hydrant at the
senior service center should
stay in its proposed
location.
10. The applicant: is reminded that the sodded area between the sidewalk and
the curb must be maintained by the developer. The City will not maintain
this area. r,
11. Please indicate on the site and landscape plan where the sidewalk on
Sheilds is existing and where it is proposed.
12. If the developer is intent on keeping the access drive a private street, then
a sufficient area at the intersection must be dedicated as an easement for
traffic control devices. It was conditioned at preliminary that all the
issues related to a private street intersection with a public arterial should
be addressed at final.
13. Staff is concerned about the buffering of the parking lot along the north
property line and the impact on the existing townhomes. Since it is likely
that there will be three shifts, one shift will necessarily be sometime in
the evening when most townhome residents are at home. Staff recommends
that the landscape treatment along the north be placed in berms of suffi-
cient height to adequately screen car headlights. Berms will contribute to
reducing the land use conflict between the two different uses.
CAT 9th Comments
Page 3
14. Enclosed please find a copy of the conditions of approval that were
granted by the Planning and Zoning Board at the March 28, 1988 hearing.
Please be prepared to address each condition and how they will be
resolved either now or in the future.
This concludes Staff comments at this time. In order to stay on schedule for
the June 27th P & Z hearing, please note the following deadlines:
Plan revisions are due June 8, 1988
PNIT's, colored renderings, and 10 prints are due June 20, 1988
Final documents and slides are due June 23, 1988
I suggest we meet to discuss these items at your earliest convenience. As
always, please call if there are any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Tcd Shepard
City Planner
cc: Mike Herzing, Development Engineer
Joe Frank, Assistant Planning Director
File
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
Bob Snow
Mountain Bell -Engineering
124 W. Magnolia
TO: Fort Collins, CO 80521
FROM: Mike Herzig, Development Coordinator
RE: Subdivision Utility Plans
DATE: February 8, 1988
Submitted for your review and comment are utility plans for:
Centre for Advanced Technology, Parcel J
Please respond by:
February 16, 1988
I w
pa _ca-88
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING DIVISION
". I., I'llu r VC. . r.v. rsox JdU • Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 • (303) 221-6750
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM: Mike Herzig, Development Coordinator
RE: Subdivision Utility Plans
DATE: February 8, 1988
Submitted for your review and comment are utility Dlans for:
Centre for Advanced Technology, Parcel i
Please reSDOnd by:
February 16, 1988
f7
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING DIVISION
/C
300 LaPor.e Ave. * P.O. Box 580 - Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 e (303) 221-6750
DATE: aFeb eB DEPARTMENT: c r,
ITEM. 53-85L CAT,, Parcel J - Lifecare Preliminary
No Problems
Problems or Concerns (see below)
Date Signature
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, PLANNING DEPARTMENT
February 19, 1988
Mr. Frank Vaught and Mr. Tony Hughs
Vaught - Frye Architects
2900 South College Avenue
Fort Collins, CO. 80525
Dear Mr. Vaught and Mr. Frye:
Staff has reviewed the preliminary P.U.D. for Lifecare Center on Parcel J of
the Centre for Advanced Technology and offers the following comments:
1. The Light and Power Department will require an 8'-10' wide easement
through the parcel from Shields Street east to Centre Avenue. This will
facilitate a 3 phase loop feed for the nursing home and the retirement
center.
2. The existing sanitary sewers in Hill Pond do not have the capacity needed
to serve the proposed development on this site. The existing sewer on the
cast edge of the property must be extended.
3. It is the preference of the Water and Sewer Department that untreated water
from the Larimer County Canal Number 2 be used to irrigate the landscap-
ing.
4. The final
plat
will need to dedicate
15 feet minimum width utility easement
adjoining
the
easterly right-of-way
line of Shields Street. The
final plat
will also
need
to dedicate a utility
easement for a proposed gas
line from
Shields Street
through this project
to the east to eventually tie
to Centre
Avenue.
The
developer should contact
Public Service Company
to coordi-
nate the
location
of this easement.
5. The fire hydrant at the senior service center must be relocated approxi-
mately 200 feet cast to be accessible directly from the main access drive.
6. The nursing center must be equipped with fire sprinkler system. Show the
fire service main on the utility plan.
OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES, PLANNING
J 4
�...stuuil;,J
300 LaPorte Ave. P O Box 580 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 (303) 221 6750
7. The senior service center exceeds the 150 foot fire access requirement and
must be equipped with a fire sprinkler system.
8. The retirement center must be designed and constructed in accordance with
the local building code amendments and water supply capacities. Fire
sprinkler coverage may be required. If building is three stories or less,
special residential type sprinkler design may be used. For further details,
please contact the Poudre Fire Authority.
9. All buildings must be shown on the site plan within a building envelope.
Please include covered .entries and covered parking areas.
10. The final site plan should include easements.
11. The size for a handicapped parking stall is 12 x 19 if next to a ramp, or 13
x 19 if not next to a ramp.
12. Please describe any fencing that may occur on the site. Details would
include location, type of materials, and height.
13. Please eliminate the townhome area from all the site plans. Just leave this
area blank and call it a future phase. Since this area is not being
reviewed, including it would add confusion.
14. The internal access road does not flow well. It appears to be too convo-
luted. Curves are preferred to tangents. There are an excessive amount of
intersections. Three of the intersections are not at 90 degrees. Also, there
are areas of pavement which do not appear to contribute to the function of
the street. Please examine the design and function of the internal access
road to promote efficiency and safety.
15. The Department of Natural Resources is encouraging the use of backyard
wildlife habitats. With open areas and the two ditches, the site lends itself
well to promoting a wildlife habitat. Such treatment would be considered
an asset for the residents. Please consult the Department of Natural
Resources for details and participation in this program.
16. The loop drive in front of the 149 bed retirement center should be given a
sidewalk to connect to the sidewalk on the internal access drive. This
sidewalk should be on both sides of the loop drive.
17. Staff is very concerned about preserving existing trees along the ditch.
Please explain why the existing trees would only be saved "if possible" as
stated on the site plan.
18. Please be advised that the City has not committed to participation in the
proposed Senior Service Center. It is our understanding that discussions
have taken place between the applicants and City officials but no commit-
ments have been made as of this writing.
19. Will there be any description of the covered parking structures? Please
address the architectural characteristics of these structures.
20. Staff has made it clear to all applicants within the Centre for Advanced
Technology that the bicycle; pedestrian paths are a critical component. Since
the overall Tract J site would be developed in two or more phases, please
be prepared to address the timing of the design and construction of the
bike path.
21. There are two sidewalks leading from the nursing center and senior service
center which connect to the sidewalk on Shields. These two side -walks
should connect to Shields closer to the intersection. This will bring
pedestrians to the signalized crosswalk which is safer than crossing an
arterial at the middle of the block.
22. Stormwater Utility comments.
Please note the following deadlines for the March 28 Planning and Zoning
Board hearing:
Plan revisions are due March 2, 1988 (3 copies)
PMT's, colored renderings, 10 prints are due March 21, 1988
If there are any questions or concerns, or if you would like to set up a meeting
to discuss these comments, please feel free to call.
Sincerely,
Ted Shepard .�
Project Planner
cc: Joe Frank, Assistant Planning Director
Mike Herzig, Development Engineer
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, PLANNING DEPARTMENT
February 23, 1988
W. Tony Hughs
c/o Vaught - Frve Architects
2900 South College Avenue
Fort Collins, CO. 80525
Dear Tony:
As we discussed, the storm drainage comments were omitted from the comment
letter for Life Care Center on Tract_ J of the Centre for Advanced Technology.
These storm drainage comments are as follows:
1. There is a problem in coordinating the construction of storm drainage
facilities in the C.A.T. It is our best understanding that the "proposed
regional detention pond" (on CSURF property in the northeast vicinity) is
not to be built in the near future. In addition, the Stormwater Utility will
not be constructing an enlarged culvert crossing in the railroad embankment
until 1989. Because of the timing of these improvements, temporary deten-
tion will be required on the Lifecare site.
2. Before crossing the Sherwood ditch, permission must be obtained from the
ditch company.
3. Please clarify the new channel alignment on the vacant parcel to the east.
Does this conform to an approved plan or will it be temporary and there-
fore moveable?
4. The drainage report should address offsite flows.
5. The final drainage report and grading plan must break the site into smaller
basins in order to size the facilities on the site.
6. Please provide layout schematic for SWMM run. Evaluation is difficult
without this information.
44r@
.__. ... .�.._,. .,.�.._r... us .-. v. ...�.. � ..ul• _, �'L.. _� ,'Sw'rG._....e: rYy. _ter. �............. .,.. ya..x.. ... _._..-,_.._, ._.... .....�., .,x.,.un.d. a. __.. ..was wv. ,.,......s _.a_
OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT 300 LaPorte Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 (303) 221-6750
SERVICES, PLANNING
This concludes the storm drainage comments for the Lifecare Center at the
Centre for Advanced Technology.
Sincerely,
Ted Shepard
Project Planner
cc: Susan Hayes, Storm Drainage - Civil Engineer II
-Mike Herzig, Development Coordinator .:i