HomeMy WebLinkAboutCACHE LA POUDRE INDUSTRIAL PARK PUD - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2003-07-07PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning _
DATE: December 24, 1996 DEPT: Engineering
PROJECT: #19-85D Cache La Poudre Industrial Park,
Timberline Lake PUD - Preliminary
PLANNER: Steve Olt
A11 comments must be received by: Monday, January 13, 1997
Traffic Study:
• There are significant comments from Traffic Operations/Transportation Planning
• Since I am not sure what discussions the applicant has had with the Engineering
Department regarding Timberline Road, there may be comments which conflict
with things already discussed with the Engineering Project Management group
• Need to discuss the Hoffman Mill Road connection. As far as I know, the City is
still planning on having that street connect to Timberline Road to serve the
properties along Hoffman Mill Road that are on a long dead end unless the road
connects to Timberline Road.
• Timberline Road will have an access control plan - do the proposed access
points and the Hoffman Mill Road intersection fit with any proposed plans for
access control that the City is working on ?
• Are medians in Timberline Road needed with this project to restrict access
points? If so, does the developer need to dedicate additional r.o.w. at this time ?
Date: ` j /��-� Signature y��Ie �,V
CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE
COPIES OF REVISIONS
❑ PLAT
❑ SITE
❑ LANDSCAPE
❑ UTILITY
Commi 'ty Planning and Environmenta' ervices
Current Planning
Citv of Fort Collins
January 17, 1997
Eldon Ward
Cityscape Urban Design, Inc.
3555 Stanford Road, #105
Fort Collins, CO. 80525
Dear Eldon,
fl-i 4t.'
Staff has reviewed your documentation for the Timberline Lakes PUD - Preliminary
that were submitted to the City on December 23, 1996, and would like to offer the
following comments:
1. TCI of Fort Collins stated that they will need additional utility easements to
service all of the lots shown on the preliminary plat. At this time there would be
no way to provide service to Lots 4, 5, 9, 10, and 12 because they do not abut
the 15' drainage, utility, and slope easement.
2. U.S. West stated that they will require a utility coordination meeting to discuss
easements. Individual lot easements do not appear to be adequate. There is no
easement access to Lots 9, 10, and 12.
U.S. West will require a 20' x 20' pocket easement to accommodate a facilities
cabinet which will serve the area.
3. Gary Huett of Public Service Company offered the following comments:
a. The final plat must dedicate utility easements on both sides of Timberline
Road such that from rear edges of sidewalks to rear easement lines = 15
feet.
b. The final plat must also dedicate utility easements internal to the project
such that from rear edges of sidewalks/curbs adjoining or adjacent to
parking areas to rear easement lines = 15 feet.
C. The maximum slope in any utility easement = 4:1.
d. No trees may be planted within 4' of any gas line.
281 North College Avenue - P.O. Box 580 - Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 - (970) 221-6750
FAX (970) 221-6378 - TDD (970) 224-6002
e. The existing 8" HP gas line and existing overhead power line occupy
easements that predate the Timberline Road right-of-way. Costs of
relocation/adjustment of these lines as a result of conflicts with this project
will be chargeable to the developer.
Natural gas service to this project will not be provided from the 8" HP gas
line. There is an existing lower pressure gas line in timberline Road, but it
will have to be replaced with a larger line in order to supply this project.
4. The Zoning Department offered the following comments:
a. Show building envelopes dimensions and distances to the (at least) the
two closest lot lines.
b. The Context Diagram plan will not be recorded with the PUD documents.
C. It is being suggested that the building envelopes be large enough to allow
adjustments to building placements.
Please contact Gary Lopez, at 221-6760, if you have questions about these
comments.
5. Doug Martine of the Light & Power Department stated that tree locations (along
Timberline Road) need to be flexible to provide a minimum of 40' horizontal
clearance to streetlight locations.
6. The Traffic. Operations Department offered the following comments:
a. An analysis is needed at the Prospect/Riverside, Prospect/Summit View,
and Timberline/Drake street intersections.
b. At this time [of submittal] the Traffic Impact Analysis is not acceptable and
is being sent back. Because of this, the development request must be
continued to the March 24th (at the earliest) Planning and Zoning Board
public hearing.
Copies of a revised Traffic Impact Analysis (dated January 15, 1997) were
delivered to the Current Planning Department on January 17th.
C. A discussion on the required access permit must be held between the
developer and the City.
Please contact Eric Bracke, at 221-6062, if you have questions about these
comments.
7. Kathleen Reavis, the City's Transportation Planner, stated that sidewalks and
pedestrian crossings should be added at entrances/exits of parking garages for
the overall good of the internal pedestrian circulation system and access to trails.
A marked -up copy of the Site Plan is enclosed with the letter to Cityscape.
Please return this plan with your revisions.
8. Laurie D'Audney, the City's Water Conservation Specialist, stated that
landscape area breakdowns as required by the Water Conservation Standards
must be included on the final Landscape Plan.
9. A copy of the comments received from the Stormwater Utility is attached to this
letter.
10. A copy of the comments received from Kerrie Ashbeck of the Engineering
Department is attached to this letter.
11. Randy Balok of the Park Planning Department stated that the connections to
the trail system, as shown, are very good.
12. Clark Mapes of the Advance Planning Department offered the following
comments:
a. This project would appear to meet/exceed the intent of the design
standards.
b. There are fundamental questions about the appropriate intensity for this
floodplain location with significant public interface and investment.
13. The Natural Resources Department offered the following comments:
a. Natural Resources will be anxious to stay in close contact with the
developer on the grading plans for the pond slopes. They want to discuss
installing riparian vegetation here. The "undisturbed areas" are of concern,
since they do not represent the natural landscape. These are going to be
patches of weedy growth unless treated with weed management and
reclamation techniques. Perhaps the "U" areas should be given "R"
designation.
b. There is question whether the project , as proposed, meets the intent of
several All Development Criteria of the LDGS, particularly Criteria A-2.3
and A-2.13. In particular, the project seems too intense for the site and
the design is not sensitive to the surrounding environmental context of the
Poudre River floodplain.
C. Natural Resources would generally like to see the ponds and their
shorelines treated more naturalistically, with native vegetation transition
areas between the developed portions of the site and the ponds. The
habitat character of the ponds and their shorelines should be enhanced
considerably. They generally look for a 100' transition area between
developed portions of the site and natural area portions. The "fisherman's
wharf' design approach is inconsistent with the type of character called for
in the above -cite criteria.
d. You will need to contact the U.S. Army Corps. Of Engineers to assure
that any filling of the existing pond surface area is allowable.
e. The trash enclosures should be designed to also accommodate collection
for recyclables.
Please contact Rob Wilkinson, at 221-6600, if you have questions about these
comments.
14. The Auto -Related and Roadside Commercial and Business Service Uses Point
Charts appear to be in good order, with the possible exception of this
development being part of a planned center. The test is being "contiguous to and
functionally, part of an office or industrial park.
15. General Note 12 on the Site Plan refers to the allowable uses as defined on the
Business Service Uses Point Chart. If there could be industrial, convenience
retail uses then we should probably review those respective points charts now.
16. The Planning Objectives state that residential uses may be included in this
development. If so, then the Residential Uses Density Chart should be reviewed
at this time.
17. The Special Height Review Variance plan is still being reviewed against the
applicable criteria.
This completes the staff comments at this time. Additional comments will be
forthcoming as they are received from City departments and outside reviewing
agencies. Please be aware of the following dates and deadlines (next page) to assure
your ability to stay on schedule for the February 24, 1997 Planning and Zoning Board
hearing:
Plan revisions are due no later than the end of the working day, February 5,
1997*. Please contact me for the number of folded revisions required for each
document.
NO REVISIONS WILL BE REVIEWED AFTER THE ABOVE DEADLINE. IF REVISIONS
ARE NOT RECEIVED BY THIS DATE, THE ITEM WILL EITHER GO TO THE
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD WITH A STAFF RECOMMENDATION BASED ON
THE ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS OR THE APPLICANT WILL HAVE THE
OPTION TO CONTINUE THE ITEM TO THE NEXT MONTHS BOARD AGENDA.
PMT's (photo reduction of Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Building Elevations to
8.5" x 11 "), rendering (one each colored full-size Site Plan and/or Landscape Plan
and Building Elevations), and 8 folded copies of the final full-size Site Plan,
Landscape Plan, and Building Elevations revisions ( for the Planning and Zoning
Board members packets) are due on February 18, 1997.
Please contact me at 221-6750 if you have questions or concerns regarding these
comments or if you would like to schedule a meeting to discuss the comments.
Sincerely,
Steve Olt
Project Planner
cc: Kerrie Ashbeck
Eric Bracke
Stormwater Utility
Natural Resources
TST, Inc
Site Plan/Utility Plans
• Did not receive sheets 3 and 5 of 5 of the site plan set so some comments may
not apply
• It would be helpful to see a context diagram for this area to show Prospect Road,
the Poudre River, the extension of Hoffman Mill Road to show the area served
by that roadway
• In some areas, the proposed parking lot layout and angled parking causes
vehicles to loop around and go out of their way to make a right hand or left hand
turn to go north/south out of the site. For example, area around Lots 1-3, 11,12,
and 13.
• Question the note regarding phasing on the site plan - as with any preliminary,
finals come in as "phases" or filings so what is this note saying ?
• There may be repays/reimbursements due to the City for the Timberline Road
project at the time of final development (including r.o.w. acquisition that would
normally be r.o.w. dedicated by the developer at the time of platting and
development.) Additional r.o.w. and/or improvements to Timberline Road may
be necessary due to this development and will be dedicated/designed/completed
at the developer's expense. Typically, traffic study updates are done as the
development builds out to identify improvements needed as the property
develops. Depending on the functional classification of Hoffman Mill Road, the
developer may or may not be eligible for street oversizing reimbursement.
7 MAY 85
--- - -
CACHE LA POUDRE INDUSTRIAL PARK - FINAL PLAT 19-85A
Oi�l?MENTS
�-n�-�-�--- µ'/,me �..s-�-��
74
-74)
.77