HomeMy WebLinkAboutBEST BUY PUD - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2003-05-28PROJECT
City of Fort Collins
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: 6 May 92 DEPARTMENT.✓
ITEM: 29-92 BEST BUY PUD - Preliminary
Please respond to this project by Friday, May 15,1992
Planner: Steve Olt
No Problems
Problems or Concerns (see below)
Date: = Signature:
71
CHECK IF REVISIONS REQUIRED: ❑
13
El
PLAT
SITE
LANDSCAPE
UTILITY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT 281 NORTH COLLEGE P.O.BOX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580 (303)221-6750
June 2, 1992
Best Buy P.U.D. - Preliminary
Page 2 of 2
Item 12
A utility easement and access easement thirty (30) foot
wide matching both Market Place and Fountainhead access
easements has been provided. The existing gas line has been
shown on the utility plans.
Item 15
City water/wastewater comments have been received and
the requested changes have been made to the utility plans.
Item 16
A set of preliminary plans was forwarded to Warren Jones
for his review and comment. We are awaiting his comments.
Item 18
Access easements matching both Market Place and
Fountainhead access easements have been shown on the plat.
Items 22
Stormwater utility comments have been received and the
requested changes have been made to the utility report and
plans.
These changes were made to the preliminary utility drawings and were submitted to
Kerrie Ashbeck on June 3, 1992. Please feel free to contact me should you have additional
questions.
Sin er I
ff Couc P.E.
JWC/gbl
cc: Frank Vaught, Vaught Frye Architects
Kerrie Ashbeck, City of Fort Collins
George Holter, Holter Realty
PROJECT
City of�,„�o�„ , COMMENT SHEET
DATE: 2 June 9.2 DEPARTMENT:
RTMENT:
ITEM: 2.-87G BEST BUY PUD - Final
Please respond to this project by Friday, June 12, 1992
Planner: Steve Olt
No Problems
Problems or Concerns (see below)
rY
r�¢E�s shau=
1 f
YNCz vvUAG5L4.- is i r)
Date: (-,�/Z /21 Signature: �,llva
CHECK IF REVISIONS REQUIRED: ❑ PLAT
❑ SITE
❑ LANDSCAPE /
❑ UTILITY
PLANNINC DEPARTMENT 281 NORTH COLLEGE P.O.BOX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580 (303)221-6750
42:7
F
;7 ILI
PROJECT
„fw�Col-1,,COMMENT SHEETCity
DATE: 2 June 92 DEPARTMENT: 467J>
ITEM: 2-87G BEST BUY PUD - Final
Please respond to this project by Friday, June 12, 1992
Planner: Steve Olt
No Problems
Problems or Concerns (see below)
50�
Date: Signature:
CHECK IF REVISIONS REQUIRED: ❑
El
El
! _ OL/uz-
PLAT
SITE
LANDSCAPE
UTILITY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT 281 NORTH COLLEGE P.O.BOX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580 (303)221-6750
PROJECT
ofCollinsCOMMENT SHEET
City Fort
DATE: 2 ,June 92 DEPARTMENT:
ITEM: 2.-87G BEST BUY PUD - Final
Please respond to this project by Friday, June 12, 1992
Planner: Ste`Ve Olt
i� No Problems
Problems or Concerns (see below)
Date: 67_ 41_ l,� Signature: ee_,,____
CHECK IF REVISIONS REQUIRED: ❑ PLAT
❑ SITE
❑ LANDSCAPE
❑ UTILITY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT 281 NORTH COLLEGE P.O.BOX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580 (303)221-6750
Commu- ''v Plannino, and Environmental -,,.vices
Planning uepartment
City of Fort Collins
June 19, 1992
Frank Vaught
Vaught -Frye Architects
1113 Stoney Hill Drive
Fort Collins, CO. 80525
Dear Frank,
Staff has reviewed your planning request submittal for the Best Buy
P.U.D., iimTT-, and has the following comments to offer:
r-i,v\,AA
1. Subdivision plat related comments:
a. The control monuments are not described.
b. The outer boundary monuments are not described.
C. Some of the bearings & distances with "cross hatching"
covering them may be hard to reproduce.
d. Unless there are 5 other sheets to the plat, sheet no. 2
of 6 is not acceptable. The plat has apparently been
submitted as part of the utility plans. The plat must
stand on its own, numerically, for recording purposes.
e. There is no way to field -locate some of the easements as
they are shown on the plat.
f. The bearing on the legal does not match the calls on the
map.
g. The subtitle of the plat should read "A portion of which
is a replat of a portion of Lot 18, Observatory Heights,
located in the .....
2. There are extensive Stormwater utility comments (please see
attached).
3. The sidewalk should continue attached around the return at the
driveway with Phar-Mor to provide better pedestrian crossing.
Transition the 7' sidewalk on South College Avenue into the 5'
sidewalk at the north property line.
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80-522-0580 • (303) 221-6750
4. It is being suggested that the throat for the existing
driveway be widened to provide better access for trucks. A
problem now exists and the property owner is responsible for
the repairs . The existing pork chop can be removed entirely now
that the median in South College is in. Also, a sidewalk along
the main drive in front of the parking stalls is being
recommended. This will enable a safer handicapped access
crossing of the driveway, being straight across instead of the
diagonal route through intersection as presently available.
5. The fire service water line for the fire sprinkler system must
be shown. on the plans.
6. If storage in the in-store racks exceeds 12' in height then
special fire protection features may be required. Please
contact the Poudre Fire Authority with questions related to
this issue.
7. The planting of trees needs to be coordinated with Public
Service. No trees may be planted closer than 4' to any buried
natural gas line.
8. A fescue sod is being recommended for reduced water
consumption.
9. All landscaping is to be maintained by the property owner,
including that in the street right-of-way(s).
10. The east elevation of the building should be buffered with
pines or spruce trees. The 10 junipers as shown will not
provide enough screening to soften the 27' -30' height and 200'
building length.
11. A sidewalk along the north side of the access driveway should
be provided, with handicapped ramps. Also, keep the trees and
landscaping in this area. The handicapped ramps on the
sidewalks should lined up with the ramps in the existing "pork
chop".
12. Berming should be provided along the South College Avenue
frontage to help screen the parking lot.
13. The motorcycle and bicycle parking locations on the Site Plan
and the :Landscape Plan do not match.
14. The handicapped parking spaces. in the north tier of spaces
should be moved down next to the two across the entry to bring
them closer to the doors.
15. The "potential future connection" to JFK Parkway should be
shown as just a "future connection". A future pedestrian
access between the Best Buy and Phar-Mor buildings should be
shown.
16. Buffering/landscaping must be provided along the service
area/loading dock and the northeast corner of the property.
17. The monument sign on the South College Avenue frontage should
be kept at a maximum height of 101.
18. More information is needed on the on -site lighting being
proposed, especially related to the type of fixtures to be
included on the building exterior.
This completes the review comments at this time. Additional
comments may be forthcoming as the various departments and
reviewing agencies continue to review this request. Please be aware
of the following dates and deadlines to assure your ability to stay
on the agenda for the July 27, 1992 Planning and Zoning Board
hearing:
Plan revisions are due July 1, 1992 by 12:00 noon. Please contact
me for the number of revisions required for each document.
PMT's, renderings, and 10 copies of final revisions (for the
Planning and Zoning Board packets) are due July 20, 1992.
Final documents (including the signed- development agreement,
applicable mylars and utility plans) are due July 23, 1992 by 12:00
noon.
Please contact me at 221-6750 if you
related to these comments. I would like
you as soon as possible, if necessary,
lie ely,
O
Project Planner
xc: Kerrie Ashbeck
Sherry Albertson -Clark
Stormwatter Utility
Transportation
file/Project Planner
Parsons & Associates
Jim Sell Design
have questions or concerns
to schedule a meeting with
to discuss these comments.
Comma 'tv Planning and Fnvironrnental--rvices
Planning Department
of Fort Collins
July 8, 1992
Frank Vaught
Vaught -Frye Architects
1113 Stoney Hill Drive
Fort Collins, CO.80525
Dear Frank,
City staff has reviewed your revisions for the Best Buy P.U.D. -
Final, and would like to offer the following comments:
1. The monument sign, being approximately 30 square feet per face
in size, must be set back at least 5' from the street right-
of-way l: ne on South College Avenue (please see the attachment
from City Code). The Site Plan should be revised to reflect
this requirement.
2. This note on signage should replace General Note 11 on the
Site Plan:
"All signage on this P.U.D. is restricted to the number, type,
location, and size as specifically noted on this P.U.D. Any
changes or deviations shall be reviewed, in advance, by the
City of Fort Collins by the Administrative Review procedure,
including at the Planning Director's discretion , referral to
the Planning and Zoning Board."
3. The information about lighting (Item 18) provided in your
letter dated July 1, 1992 should be included on the Site Plan
as a General Note. The wall -mounted exterior light fixtures on
all sides of the building should be shrouded to reduce glare.
4. There is a fabric awning shown above the front entry to the
building on the west elevation. Will there be any back
lighting associated with this awning?
5. The parking stalls along the south side of the parking lot,
adjacent to the entry drive, are not deep enough for standard
size cars unless the intent is to allow overhang into the
turfgrass/landscaped area. It may be beneficial or necessary
to assign them as compact car spaces. The parking stalls at
the north side of the parking lot, adjacent to the retail
shops in the Fountainhead P.U.D., must be signed as compact
car spaces since they are only 17' in depth and are contiguous
to a sidewalk, therefore not allowing for overhang.
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Bov 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80322-0580 • (303) 221-6 0
6. The City strongly feels that a safe area for pedestrians
should be included at the northwest corner of the intersection
of the shared drive and the entries into Best Buy and Phar-
Mor. It is understood that there is an existing sidewalk on
the south side of the drive, on the vacant pad in the
Marketplace P.U.D.; however, the diagonal movement pedestrians
would have to make as shown on the Best Buy Site Plan would be
potentially dangerous. At the expense of some of the
landscaping proposed, it is being recommended that a concrete
pad with handicapped ramp and painted crosswalks
perpendicular to the drives (on the west and north sides of
the intersection) be included. The loss would be one crabapple
tree and 6-7 potentilla shrubs, unless they could be
relocated.
7. The proposed landscaping on the drawing of the north and east
elevations would be helpful to the Planning and Zoning Board.
8. There are significant discrepancies between the landscape
drawing and the plant list. There is a disclaimer note below
the plant list but will it be followed by the landscape
contractor to assure all plants will be installed as shown?
9. Your letter of 7/l/92 stated that a note about all
landscaping, including that in the street right-of-way, will
be maintained by the property owner was added to the landscape
Plan. I do not see that note on the revised plan dated 7/1/92.
10. The asphalt as shown at the northeast corner of the property
must be constructed to the property line to provide a turn out
for cars parked in the end spaces in that area.
Please contact me at 221-6750 if you have any questions or concerns
about these comments.
*S'nely,anner
xc: Transportation
Stormwater Utility
Kerrie Ashbeck
Sherry Albertson -Clark
Jim Sell Design
file/Project Planner
PROJECT
City o«�Col�� COMMENT SHEET
.- - _r-fo
DATE. 6 May 92 -DEPARTMENT: t� �
ITEM: 29-92 BEST BUY PUD - Preliminary
Please respond to this project by Friday, May 15, 1992
Planner: Steve Olt
X No Problems
Problems or Concerns (see below)
Review of these plans should not be construed as a commitment
that telephone facilities sufficient to serve this project are
presently available. U S WEST will provide telephone service in
accordance with the -rates and tariffs on file with the Colorado
Public Utilities Commission.
The owner is responsible for provision of all conduit for
telephone facilities within the project, and the owner provides
terminal room space and power for the main terminal at the site.
The owner's vendor provides all facilities beyond the main
terminal.
Any relocation of existing telephone facilities required by these
plans will be ;paid for by the developer.
12
Date: ��p �9� Signature: ,,{^
CHECK IF REVISIONS REQUIRED: ❑ PLAT
❑ SITE
❑ LANDSCAPE
❑ UTILITY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT 281 NORTH COLLEGE P.O.BOX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580 (303)221-6750
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
P.O. Box 850
Greeley, Colorado 80632--0850
(303) 353-1232
May 8, 1992
Mr. Steve Olt, Planner
Planning Department
City of Fort Collins
P.O. Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
Dear Mr. Olt:
5TATE OF COLORADO
Eo- `tli�� 4i
ao �
Larimer Co., S.N. 287
Best Buy PUD
NE Corner S.H. 287 and
Marketplace Access
We have reviewer. the Best Buy PUD and we have the following comments:
Projected traffic on S.H. 287 indicates the need for a 140 foot total right
of way, 70 feet each side of the highway. centerline. Since the existing
width along this property appears to be 53.7 feet east of the centerline,
additional widt" to meet the projected need should be protected by reservation
or, preferably, dedication, as permitted by City regulations.
Consideration should be given to the construction of the full length deceleration
lane for the Fountainhead property as noted in the Traffic Study prepared
by Mr. Matt Delich, see pages 2 and 3. It is felt that the completion
of the deceleration lane and taper, to the length indicated in the State
Highway Access Code, would be beneficial to the safety and welfare of the
traveling public:. Plans for this construction must be reviewed and approved
by this office prior to the actual construction. An access permit would
be necessary for, this construction work within the right of way.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this proposal. Please contact
me at 350-2163 if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
2
Evan A. Hoo r,L-Fr.
Development/Access Coordinator
EAH/cm
cc: L. D. Yost
J. F. Sprirger
_—_--�ile
Coimmu. � Planning and Environmental .-vices
Planning Department
Citv of Fort Collins
May 21, 1992
Frank Vaught
Vaught -Frye Architects
1113 Stoney Hill Drive
-Fort Collins, CO. 80525
Dear Frank,
Staff has reviewed your submittal for the Best Buy P.U.D. -
Preliminary and has the following comments to offer:
1. The building envelope as shown on the Site Plan must be
dimensioned from the north and south property lines, similar
to the dimensions to South College Avenue and the east
property :Line.
2. _The flushwall sign on the front of the building, being the
sales tag cabinet sign, cannot project above the roof line
(shown as the 34'-8" Above Finish Floor elevation).
3. The signs as shown will not meet the City sign code allowance.
This use is allowed a maximum of 400 square feet of signage,
including the freestanding project I.D. sign.
4. The number of parking spaces as shown on the Site Plan is
excessive for the apparent use, creating a mass of asphalt
without much to soften and mitigate the amount of hard surface
on site._ The 179 spaces as requested would equate to 112
parking spaces for customers (based on 4 spaces/1000 square
feet of general retail floor area) and 67 parking spaces for
100 employees (based on 2 parking spaces for each 3 employees
on the major shift of a commercial use, as per City Code) .
There are two - comparisons of existing on -going businesses
with the same product line. The Fred Schmid building is
slightly :Larger in size and the site has a total of 46 parking
spaces. The SoundTrack building is slightly smaller in size
and the site has a total of 42 parking spaces. The
indiscrepancy of on -site parking between this use and those
other two is not understood or acceptable. As a minimum, the
parking bays along South College Avenue and the south side of
the Best Buy building should be eliminated.
5. The distance between the center of the parking aisles should
be 621, not 60' as shown on the Site Plan.
�_'S 1 \ orth Colle,e :Avenue • P.O. U,,» 550 • Fort Collin<, CO 1 i0;22-07�So • (303) 221-6_1 _-.1
6. All easements will need to be shown on the subdivision plat
with dimensions locating them on the lot.
7. The development as planned proliferates the use of JFK Parkway
as an "arterial alley" behind the centers in this area. Other
building locations might be considered that would allow
internal :parking on this site, opening up the opportunity for
the Petersen property to the east to develop a unified plan
with this use that could provide shared parking, pedestrian
interface between -uses, better internal circulation on this
site, and good access to JFK Parkway. The vehicular connection
to the Fountainhead P.U.D. to the north looks awkward.
8. Dedication -of 60' of street right-of-way from the section line
on South College Avenue or 16' from the flowline of the curb
& gutter on the east side, whichever is greater, will be
required with this request. A 15' utility easement outside of
the street right-of-way must be dedicated. Sidewalk easements
must be dedicated -wherever the sidewalk falls outside of the
street right-of-way. This information is required on the
subdivision plat.
9. The drive in front of the building should be 28' or 30' wide
instead of the 24' width as shown to accommodate the movement
of delivery vehicles, especially if a car is parked along the
curb in front of the building. The drive at the northwest
corner of the building, adjacent to the landscape island, must
be kept at a constant width.
10. The deceleration lane taper conforming to the findings of the
traffic study should be added to the Utility Plans.
11. There is an inconsistency between the Site Plan and the
Utility Drawings as to the alignment of the sidewalk along
South College Avenue. There must be a 9.5'-10' separation
between the back of curb and the sidewalk with a smooth
transiticn into the existing sidewalk on the Fountainhead
P.U.D. to the north.
12. Public Service has a 2" steel gas main in the Fountainhead
P.U.D., Phase 3 that is located 3' in from the west line of a
30' wide easement. This main presently stops 1' north of the
north line of this property. Public Service is requesting that
the access and utility easement as shown be widened to 30'
throughout to allow room for their gas main.
13. Public Service is requesting that the gas meter be located on
the north. wall of the building if possible.
14. A copy of the comments from U.S. West is attached.
15. City Water/Wastewater comments have been returned to Parson's
& Associates on the Preliminary Utility Plans.
16. Water lines and fire hydrants must be provided with the
appropriate connections to existing water lines. Please
contact Poudre Fire Authority for their design information.
17. This building will very likely require fire sprinkler
protection. Poudre Fire Authority has not received information
on the proposed building contents so that they are able to
determine the specific fire protection requirements, if
needed.
18. Vehicular access connections to the adjacent developments must
be provided with appropriate easements.
19. There are at least two street trees shown in the parkway along
- South College Avenue that will have to be relocated to comply
with the City's tree/street light standard (please see
dttachment).
20. A fescue blend sod for the turfgrass areas is being
recommended to allow for reduced water consumption.
21. Does the Preliminary Landscape Plan show all the existing
trees on this site? If not, please provide that information.
22. The Stormwater Utility's comments are attached.
23. The City's parking ordinance requires bicycle and motorcycle
parking for uses that provide more than six parking spaces or
1,800 square feet of parking area. Bicycle parking has been
identified on the Site Plan but where is the motorcycle
parking intended to be?
24. A survey of the area within 150' of the proposal, exclusive of
public right-of-way, is to be shown on the Site Plan as per
the submittal requirements. No information for the properties
west of South College Avenue has been provided. Also, the
Vicinity Map should show the area surrounding the site within
a distance of at least one mile. This map covers a distance of
about 1,0001, and that only in the southerly direction.
25. How does the amount of open space compare with the adjacent
developments? It appears that this site contains a lot of hard
surface area. The 18% open space as indicated on the Site Plan
seems somewhat high.
26. The pedestrian connections to South College Avenue and other
adjoining developments/properties is weak. The developer needs
to consider this project as being part of a larger "shopping
area" and provide the opportunity for customers to walk,
rather than drive, from development to development. What will
make the "'possible sidewalk connection" to Phar-Mor a reality?
27. The Market Place and Fountainhead P.U.D.'s incorporate very
similar architectural elements, especially in the form of
building materials and color. The Best Buy building, as shown
on the preliminary elevations, is larger in scale than
anything in either of the two adjacent developments and does
not attempt to carry through any of the architectural elements
of those developments. The Business Service Uses Point Chart
that was submitted is taking 6 points for being part of a
center, yet the site and building designs make this plan
strongly appear to be a freestanding use, with little -
consideration for continuity to adjacent centers to the north
and south.
28. The Best Buy building itself needs more horizontal relief,
possibly in the form of material or color bands.- - -
29. The width of the landscaped area along South College Avenue is
25-30 feet wide, compared to 35-40 feet in the Market Place
P.U.D. T:Zis buffer needs to be increased. Generally, the
landscapE! plan is weak, with specific areas of concern being
the South College treatment, expansive parking without
landscape breaks, and lack of good foundation plantings &
bufferincc on the south and east sides of the building. Berming
and good selection of plant materials will help the South
College Avenue frontage. Who will be responsible for the
"selective removal of existing trees" on the site?
30. The lighting on this site will be very critical to the overall
developmE!nt of the area. The parking lot standards as shown
are about 33' in height. Do they match the existing standards
in the Market Place? The proposed height seems excessive. The
building elevations reflect a lot of exterior wall mounted
lighting. More information is needed to evaluate the
intensity, coverage, and spillage of these lights.
31. The points earned on the Business Service Uses Point Chart
included in the submittal appear to be acceptable. The earned
points are for being on a transit route, part of a center,
being two acres or more, utilizing joint parking, and
contiguity to existing urban development. The total is 32 of
54 maximum applicable points = 59%.
This conclude: staff's comments at this time. Additional comments
may be forwarded to you as City departments and outside reviewing
agencies continue to review this request. Please be aware of the
following deadlines to enable you to stay on schedule for the June
22, 1992 Planning and Zoning Board hearing:
Plan revisions; due June 3, 1992 by 12:00 noon. Please contact me
for the number of each document to submit.
PMT's, renderings, revisions due June 15, 1992.
Final documents due June 18, 1992 by 12:00 noon.
I would like to meet with you as soon as possible to discuss these
comments. Please call me at 221-6750 to schedule a time that is
convenient for you.
S' erely,
I &
S e e Olt
Project Planner
xc : Ker'kie Ashbeck
_Sherry.Albertson-Clark
Stormwate.r Utility
Transportation -
file
fj3 PARSON; &
In ASSOCIATES
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
June 2, 1992
Mr. Steve Olt
Planning Department
City of Fort Collins
281 North College Avenue
Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-0580
RE: Best Buy P.U.D. - Preliminary
Our Project Number: 92.10 BUY
Dear Steve:
We have made changes to the engineering drawings to address the concerns outlined
in your May 21, 1992 letter. They are as follows:
Items 6 & 8
We have provided an eighteen (18) foot additional right-
of-way dedication for South College Avenue. This matches the
dedication provided to the north as part of Fountainhead Phase
III. A fifteen (15) foot utility and sidewalk easement has been
provi,ded as well. Interior lot easements have also been revised
on the plat.
Item 10
A 140' deceleration lane taper has been added to the
South college Avenue curb line. This ties the existing curbs
together in conformance with the traffic study completed for
Fountainhead Phase III.
Item 11
The utility drawings have been changed to reflect the
alignment of the sidewalk shown on the site plan.
432 Link Lane Plaza - Ft. Collins, Colorado 80524 13031 221-2400