The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBEST BUY PUD REPLAT - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2003-05-28PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: January 27, 2000 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: #29-92B Best Buy — Major Amendment PLANNER: Ted Shepard ENGINEER: Marc Virata All comments must be received by: February 16, 2000 ❑ No Problems Q Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Comments: • A 15' utility easement along J.F.K. is required to meet current City street standards. (A variance request may be submitted and is required to allow only 8' of utility easement along J.F.K. Parkway. The City Engineer has the ability to approve the variance request — in other cases, the City Engineer has granted such a request, provided that no utility companies object to it.) • Because of the infill nature of the project and improvements (i.e. sidewalk, curb & gutter) already existing, and the unlikelihood that the street will be widened, the dedication of additional right-of- way along J.F.K. to meet current City street standards is not needed. Typically, redevelopment of a site requires improvements and right-of-way dedication to the present standard. This decision should not be viewed as precedent setting, as each site is individually evaluated, often with situations unique in nature. • Offsite grading and. construction easements appear to be required for the work shown outside of the property line. • Replace all occurrences of "Director of Engineer" with "City Engineer". Transportation Impact Study • The TIS doesn't seem to reflect that the proposed northern driveway is between two post office driveways across the street. We typically require driveways across a street without a median to line up or provide a sufficient offset. It appears that the submitted proposal creates offsetting left movement conflicts. Is this proper? Plat: • The plat should delineate the building envelope. It appears that the building will be situated partially over the blanket access, drainage and utility easement — buildings cannot be located atop easements. • Depending on Fire Lane designation requirements with Poudre Fire Authority, emergency access easements will need to be shown for areas designated as fire lanes. • The plat needs to have the standard plat language used with all lats approved in the City. This is Date: FebnM 23, - !00 Signature: PLEASE SEND CONIES OF MARKED REVISI Q Plat 0 Site 0 Utilit y 0 Landscape ❑ Drainage Report ❑ NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS attached. (An electronic format of this is available.) Site Plan: • The northern driveway out to J.F.K. Parkway needs to be aligned in a similar manner to the southern driveway. Driveways should intersect public streets at right angles [City Code 24-76(2)d]. The design of this northern driveway is more than ten degrees off from a right angle, which is cosidered substandard. • A sidewalk to be added is noted on the site plan off the entrance to College Avenue, but is not physically delineated on the plan. • Engineering would like to see turning templates for large vehicles on a plan (site or utility) to see how semi -trailer traffic is accommodated on the proposed plan. The appropriateness for a 45' radius along the north -south drive to the northern driveway out to J.F.K. is of question. Can this radius be reduced to create more of an "intersection" feel? Utility Plan: • Revise General Note #2 to read: No street work including the placement of curb, gutter, sidewalk, and pavement shall begin until the soils report and pavement design are approved by the City Engineer and meet the requirements stated in the "Design and Construction Criteria, Standards, and Specifications For Streets, Sidewalks, Alleys, and Other Public Ways" manual. • The benchmark shown on General Note #10 should have the identifier of E-322 in accordance with the City of Fort Collins Vertical Control. (See plans for additional comments) Development Review Comments — Page 2 TO: FROM: SUBJECT MEMORANDUM City of Fort Collins Robert W. Van Uffelen / Nolte Andrew Golland / MBH Response to City Comments 2/23/00 DATE: BEYOND ENGINEERING March 29, 2000 PROJ #: FC0114 / Nolte 19240 / MBH Engineering: A 15' utility easement along JFK is required...- A 15' utility easement is now indicated on the plat. Because of the infill nature of this project...- Comment understood. O.1,5ite grading and construction easements... - Coordination is in process to acquire the necessary easements. Replace all occurences of... - Revisions made on Cover Sheet. The TIS doesn't seern to reflect... - Addressed in the resubmittal by Matt Dellich, Traffic Engineer. The driveway locations were coordinated with Eric Bracke. The plat ,Should delineate the building envelope... - Building envelope added to the plat as requested. Easements revised accordingly. Depending on fire lane designation... - Access easements indicated on the plat. The plat needs to have the standard...- Plat language revised. The northern driveway, out to JFK... - Alignment of driveway revised. A sideii,alk to he added is noted... - Sidewalk added to Site Plan by MBH Architects Engineering ivould like to see turning templates... - A plan with this information is included. The 45' radius has been revised considering the new location/angle of the entrance drive. Revise General Note 42... - Note revised. The benchmark shown on... - Identifier E-322 added. n:Afc01 14\documents\word\memo ene 3-29-OO.doc PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: March 29, 2000 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: 92:9-92B Best Buy — Major Amendment (LUC) PLANNER: Ted Shepard ENGINEER: Marc Virata All comments must be received by: April 12, 2000 ❑ No Problems CAI Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Comments: • Letters of intent for the offsite grading and construction easements appear to be required for the work shown outside of the property line. Transportation Impact Study • The TIS doesn't seem to reflect that the proposed northern driveway is between two post office driveways across the street. We typically require driveways across a street without a median to line LIP or provide a sufficient offset. It appears that the submitted proposal creates offsetting left movement conflicts. Is this proper? (I did not receive a copy of the noted resubmittal by Matt Delich) Plat: • It appears with this replat that the boundaries of the original lots are no longer being used. Is there a reason for showing Lots 16, 18, and 19 in dark print? It appears that this should be shown in light print as these lots are not to be maintained on this plat. If these are desired to be shown and lots 16, 18, and 19 delineated on this plat, please show the pertinent lot lines between the respective lots. • I don't believe that the term "dedicated building envelope" is proper on the plat. It should be noted as building envelope, a tract, or a lot. • There is a drainage easement delineated on the southeast portion of this site but it is also shown as a blanket utility access and drainage easement referencing Note #3. Please clarify. • Replace all occurrences of Director of Engineering with City Engineer. • Update the updated plat language. (see enclosed) Utility Plan: • As a Development Agreement will not be required for this project, please revise the General Notes as following: 1. All street, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water line construction shall conform to The City of Fort Collins standards and specifications prior to the release of a certificate of occupancy Date: April 19, 2000 Signature: ' l� PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS 10 Plat 0 Site R1 Utility 2 Landscape ❑ Drainage Report Q TIS Update for this site. Any construction occurring three years after the approval of the Utility Plans shall require re-examination of the plans by the City Engineer who may require that they be made to conform to the standards and specifications current at that time. 11. Prior to final inspection and acceptance by The City of Fort Collins, certification of the drainage facilities, by a registered engineer, must be submitted to and approved by the Stormwater Utility Department. Certification shall be submitted to the Stormwater Utility Department prior to the release of a certificate of occupancy. (See plans for additional comments) Development Review Comments — Page 2 PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: March 29, 2000 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: #29-92B Best Buy — Major Amendment (LUC) PLANNER: Ted Shepard ENGINEER: Marc Virata. All comments must be received by: April 12, 2000 ❑ No Problems P Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Comments: • Letters of intent for the offsite grading and construction easements appear to be required for the work shown outside of the property line. Mylars will not be accepted without signed easements. Plat: • The Attorney's Certification is not per standard. Please use the enclosed. • The Planning Approval Certificate should be revised as redlined. • The plat is now showing the northern drive aisle area to be an emergency access easement only. This was previously shown as an emergency access, access, and utility easement. Is there a reason it is now only an emergency access easement? At the very least, this area should also be designated as an access easement, dus would otherwise imply that only emergency services has the right to enter the site. I would also assume that utility easement designation would also be beneficial. '- Utility Plan: • No comments, the utility plan is not being returned. QA = S �}T7-rf�fiE�+ cE7�� `Gor7 A/NOkFk/ GOLL/INO, MAr �., ��.vae, g�` PA�Ki�vG tors Aivo p2�vE �qfc�'S f}�� THEN 7H,= 10Q d d oft"4 RM O '-N i 0,'' PA,eK ��v� k o" o !3-' P'-Ox f4- S7rfjN0' HGoNE 1729e-, N0T R `IJ'i-,foPP/N'6 GE1V7W-It J �vD Wau�O 4E r/oN p F- THE L/IrvO Govt . Date: May 25, 2000 Signature: T�z G PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS 0 Plat 0 Site 0 Utility 21 Landscape 0 Drainage Report 0 TIS Update