HomeMy WebLinkAbout418 LINDEN ST - SPECIAL INSPECTIONS - 6/28/2011Analytical results for these materials indicate that there is no asbestos present in the plaster, and only
trace amounts (<1%) in the vermiculite insulation. Currently, the State of Colorado and the USEPA
define building components that contain more than 1% asbestos to be ACM. By definition, therefore,
the vermiculite is not considered to be ACM for the purposes of demolition and removal. However, in
order to comply with OSHA worker protection requirements, the vermiculite should be wetted during
removal. Wetting the material is necessary to prevent airborne vermiculite that could be ingested by
demolition workers (other engineering controls to prevent the ingestion of airborne vermiculite can be
used, however, wetting is typically the most cost effective and expedient way to limit worker exposure).
The demolition contractor should be provided with this information prior to removal and should keep a
record that this protocol was followed.
LTE has attached a copy of the analytical results for Aggregate Industries records. Please contact myself
or Susan Borden at 303-963-5493 if you have further questions regarding the removal of the
vermiculite.
Kay Vollmayer, P.E.
Project Engineer
LT Environmental, Inc.
4600 West 60th Avenue
Arvada, Colorado 80003
(303) 433-9788 office
(303) 962-5518 direct
(303) 483-5588 cell
(303) 433-1432 fax
www.ltenv.com
vollmaver(altenv.com
Compliance ® Engineering • Remediation
Check out our new website at www.Itenv.com!
tv��1 Linden St. Vermiculite Removal
Kay Vollmayer to: Douglas.Hess 06/28/2011 12:37 PM
History: This message has been replied to and forwarded. =
Mr. Hess:
On June 27, 2011, John Fodor, Certified Asbestos Building Inspector (CABI), with LTE returned to the
Aggregate Industries — Linden plant to confirm that the asbestos -containing materials (ACM) identified
in the suspect ACM survey completed on May 27, 2011 was removed, and verify that the rail car and
shed that were previously not accessible did not contain suspect ACM. The rail car and shed were
determined to not have any suspect ACM present and therefore no samples were taken from these
areas. Mr. Fodor determined that the ACM identified in the batch plant operations room (black mastic
that adhered the wood paneling to the drywall) and the drivers room (brown mastic on the ceiling tiles)
had been removed. However, as a result of construction activities Mr. Fodor was able to identify the
following suspect ACM, not previously identified: plaster on outside of cinder block buildings and
vermiculite insulation inside cinder blocks on all cinderblock buildings. Mr. Fodor sampled these
materials and submitted the samples to Reservoir Environmental, Inc. in Denver, Colorado for analysis.
r
INSPECTIONBUILDING
frr 3i �r
tA-
I
1'roject Number: CABI Number:
frirry .��..,r.^F
L ��x
�r�,,,
�r4�F
,xj.'vjj
L �.y, .'•,Y .,fir li �',;,R
}I, ���cy -
1rS /nAAyy� t'S, 1 1 'l
y ...Y 'F'
aS_ �. �eXn' ^.. i'�!`� ....r¢� 11t,'.ky-Y1`
Y�'T�Wyy�Ci
...
s•i•..,Fvs 4.F
Y� 1"tf'S'
'r•. t�
a .. ,: "1
rryy
`Y � 1
' •I 5. WS
.�'}r" �"f'N� �♦rF1't./.
4+.. i_' � ..a.hc
•L. i Y •' w0 t
r''S
t� 2 ':keP�,41 � ., r c1 �!C" .�r"�:i
`i..�.`
., i..
t;. V,.��'2�A"5"�vi.,i:.'
,p
}'.
raY I. '��.:��.:✓. �..., 7•: .7�'. `�'F,...
i
...`�'^
p('1l
{ t
`•1fy
l Z^is ,:,.Y .[:: ^...�...:....W
S _ I ,.iRr62� yw
nch�� i,["sue".tiwLS�
�,�.
Y ` y'y�\y. q-.3.n.:1ay.Y
,��v 4.0 rf.. M: 1•.A�1 F.i'.el:'!jYl ��.+Nv `�1$,r ��l ^.YVI�v �CYik".YI: �.
L®
®s
mom==
COMPLIANCE/ENGINEERING/ REMEDIATION
June 2, 2011
Mr. Doug Hess
Environmental Advisor
Aggregate Industries US, Western Region
707 Cole Boulevard, Suite 100
Denver, Colorado 80401
RE: Suspect Asbestos Containing Material Survey
Linden Ready Mix
418 Linden Street
Fort Collins, Colorado
Dear Mr. Hess:
LT Environmental, Inc.
'600 West 601h Avenue
Arvada, Colorado 80003
T 303.433.9788/F 303.433.1432
LT Environmental, Inc. (LTE) was retained by Aggregate Industries US (Aggregate Industries)
to conduct a survey -of suspect asbestos containing,material '(ACM). The ACM survey. was
conducted at the non -operational Linden Ready Mix concrete batch plant located at 418 Linden
Street, Fort Collins, Colorado (Site), on May 27, 2011. LTE understands the batch plant. is
.scheduled for demolition pending approval by the City of Fort Collins.
This report summarizes the independent conclusions representing" LTE's professional judgment
based on information and data available to LTE during the course of the survey. Factual
information regarding planned demolition activities at the Site provided by Aggregate Industries
has been assumed to be correct and complete. Additionally, the conclusions presented'herein are
based on the conditions that existed and samples analyzed on the date of the survey. _
This report is exclusively for the use and benefit of Aggregate Industries and is not for the use or.
benefit of any person or entity, nor -may any other person or entity rely upon this report without
the express written consent of LTE.
ACM SURVEY ACTIVITIES
The survey was conducted by Mr. Daniel R. Moir, Certified Asbestos Building Inspector (State
of Colorado Certification No.. 13237), utilizing methods and procedures consistent with good
commercial and customary practice designed to conform to acceptable industry standards.
The survey was solely intended to assess the potential asbestos content of those buildings
planned -for demolition (Attachment 1 Photographic Log) including:
• A sheet -metal batch plant with a boiler and a hopper with conveyor belts (Photograph 1);
• A wood -framed batch plant operations room (Photograph 2);
• A cinder block and wood -framed drivers room (Photograph 3)
• A cinder block mechanical room (Photograph 4); and
Hess, D
Page 2
i
I
A rail car with an associated wood -framed shed (Photograph 5).
Below are descriptions of the fifteen samples of suspect ACMs collected from materials for the
suspect ACM survey The Photographic Log is included as Attachment 1. and the Building
Inspection Forms are included as Attachment 2.
Three drywall samples (DWO1, DW02, and DW03) from behind the wood, paneling on
three walls of .the batch plant operations room (Photograph 6) including the paper
covering. Drywall sample DW03 included a black mastic that adhered the wood paneling
to the drywall;
Three ceiling tile samples (CTO1, CT02, and CT03) from the ceiling of the batch plant
operations room (Photograph 7) including white and brown mastic on the backing of the
tiles;
• Three drywall samples (DW04, DW05, and DW06) from the ceiling of the drivers room
(Photograph 8). The visible drywall did not contain mud or tape;
• Three ceiling tile samples (CT04, CT05, and CT06) from the ceiling of the drivers room
(Photograph 8) including.brown mastic on the back of the tiles. The tiles.are adhered to
the drywall on the ceiling; and
• .Three gasket seal samples (GS01, GS02, and GS03) from the boiler in the mechanical
room (Photograph 9). The gasket seal is a rope -like -seal around a steel plate on the
northwest side of the boiler.
The rail car and shed were inaccessible at the time of the suspect ACM survey. As a result, the
CABI could -not sample suspect materials to confine the presence or absence of asbestos in the
rail car and shed.
The CABI observed asphalt shingles on the roof of -the -batch plant, the batch plant operations
room, and the drivers room at the Site. The roofing material appears to be in good to poor
condition. LTE did not collect samples of the asphalt shingles as it is an industry practice to
assume the shingles contain asbestos.
Two boilers were identified at the Site. One boiler was observed in the mechanical room
(Photograph 10, Attachment 1) and one boiler was observed in the batch plant (Photograph 11,
Attachment 1). The CABI was not able to open either boiler and assess whether the boilers were
lined with ACM or not. As a result, no samples of insulating materials from .the boilers were
collected.
Prior to sampling, the accessibility, location, and friability of the sample locations were recorded.
This information was used to assess the potential hazard of the ACM, if found to be present, and
to prioritize response action recommendations. Each suspect ACM sample was obtained after
wetting the area to be sampled. A small section of the suspect material from the sample location
was carved using a clean stainless steel knife and then placed into a sealable bag. The bags were
sealed, labeled, and. transported to the -analytical laboratory for testing using polarized light
Hess, D
Page 3
microscopy (PLM). Suspect ACM with duplicate samples were analyzed on a positive -stop
basis, which ceased testing of remaining duplicate samples with the first detection of asbestos.
The samples were transported to FRS Geotech, Inc., an independent laboratory in Denver,
Colorado, which is accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) and
successfully participates in the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP).
ACM SURVEY RESULTS
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) defines ACM as those materials that
contain greater than 1 percent (%) asbestos. Friable materials are defined as those materials that
can be crumbled or reduced to powder by hand pressure. The latest revision of the National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) stipulates that any friable material
identified as containing asbestos in any concentration must be considered asbestos -containing.
The laboratory analytical results indicate the black mastic that adheres the wood paneling tothe
drywall in the batch *plant operations room contains asbestosat a concentration of 4%. In
addition, the laboratory analytical results indicate the brown mastic on the ceiling tiles in the
drivers room contains asbestos at a concentration of 3%. The laboratory analytical report is
included as Attachment 3.
CONCLUSIONS
The black mastic that adheres the wood paneling to the drywall in the batch plant operations
room is considered an ACBM. The mastic is on the backing of the wood paneling, which covers
approximately 512.square feet (W) of wall space.
..The brown mastic on the ceiling tiles- in the drivers- room is considered an asbestos containing
building material (ACBM). The mastic is on the back of the, ceiling tiles, which covers
approximately 270.ft2
.
The asphalt shingles on the roofs of the batch .plant, the batch plant operations room, and the
drivers room at the Site are presumed contain asbestos. The. roofing material appears to be in
good to poor condition.
Two boilers were identified at the Site. One boiler was observed in the mechanical room and one
boiler was observed in the batch plant. Boilers tend to be insulated with asbestos. As a result, the
two boilers.are presumed to contain ACM.
The rail. car and shed were inaccessible and were not -inspected during the suspect ACM
sampling survey. The rail car and shed have the potential to contain ACM.
Hess, D
Page 4
RECOiVIiVIENDATION
Prior to demolition of the buildings located at the Site, LTE recommends that all ACMs be
removed in accordance with state and federal regulations. In addition, LTE recommends
sampling the rail car and shed prior to demolition to confirm the presence or absence of ACM:
LTE appreciates the opportunity to have provided this survey. If you have any questions, please
contact our office at (303) 433-9788.
Sincerely,
LT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Daniel R. Moir, P.G.
Project Geologist
Attachments
n
r
Susan Borden
Senior Geologist
r
I. PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
SUSPECT ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL SURVEY
LINDEN READY MIX
418 LINDEN STREET
FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
Photo,
room.
� �
��
to ti� �l� �
r_
..���1�;.
I i
®:
t
�
t ! -
� �'
5��
? _ � ,� i
1ppi�
1
]i.
____ _
F __ _t
_ ?���,_-tea � ��y
�
_
`�
�.. !C-
T �3. r• t
_. -�'�
vi ,.� �f�y� ,,,
I.
� --
� �.-
-r
I' - �
����,
i��F_
�
u�
�, -+:_
� ;.�
� IMF
a �If irr
i -
- F 'k
_ r
__-
��
-- -
� -
11-
- �C.. ��
-- -d
_ __
,� _
- �l �
f�
' ��' -__ _ - ,-
� F
� F1 -
17 '1
-11
�.`
�_,�� '..r'_.
-1
l ' _ . �
�'
)v r
.`
.I� ` {�
( � •-
.I � i Y
� I.w � � u
:. 1 � .
�. ��na. T ' 1 �.tT 7
�'.: e�
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG (CONTLNUED)
Photograph 9 —
nechanical room.
Photograph 10 — Boiler in the mechanical room.
This message is privileged, confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. Any review,
retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited The comments and
opinions expressed here in are those of the author of this message. If you are not the intended
recipient, you have received this in error. Please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all
copies of the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is
KR
connected Thank you. 215466-1.pdf
A
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG (CONTINUED)
Photo
plant.
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
SUSPECT ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL SURVEY
LINDEN READY MIX
418 LINDEN STREET
FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
Photograph 1— Batch plant.
Photograph 2 — Batch plant operations room.
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG (CONTINUED)
Photograph 3 — Drivers room.
Photograph 4 — Mechanical room.
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG (CONTINUED)
Photograph 5 — Rail car and shed.
Photograph 6 — Drywall samples behind wood paneling.
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG (CONTINUED)
Photograph 7 — Ceiling tile samples in the batch plant operations room.
Photograph 8 — Drywall and ceiling tiles in the drivers room.
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG (CONTINUED)
Photograph 9 — Gasket seal on the boiler in the mechanical room.
Photograph 10 — Boiler in the mechanical room.
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG (CONTINUED)
Photo„
plant.
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG (CONTINUED)
Photograph 11— Boiler in the batch plant.
ATTACHMENT 2
BUILDL 1G L TSPECTION FORM
W
ATTACHMENT 3
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
p E-� Reservoirs Environmental, Inc.
T
June 28, 2011 Laboratory Code: RES
Subcontract Number: NA
Laboratory Report: RES 2164664
Project # / P.O. # None Given
Project Description: 418 Linden St.
LT Environmental, Inc.
4600 W. 60th Ave.
Arvada CO 80003
Dear Customer,
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. is an analytical laboratory accredited for the analysis of Industrial Hygiene
and Environmental matrices by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP), Lab
Code 101896-0 for Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM)
analysis and the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA), Lab ID 101533 - Accreditation Certificate
#480 for Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) analysis. This laboratory is currently proficient in both
Proficiency Testing and PAT programs respectively.
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. has analyzed the following samples for asbestos content as per your
request. The analysis has been completed in general accordance with the appropriate methodology as
stated in the attached analysis table. The results have been submitted to your office. ,
RES 215466-1 is the job number assigned to this study. This report is considered highly confidential
and the sole property of the customer. Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. will not discuss any part of this study
with personnel other than those of the client. The results described in this report only apply to the samples
analyzed. This report must not be used to claim endorsement of products or analytical results by NVLAP or
any agency of the U.S. Government. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written
approval from Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Samples will be disposed of after sixty days unless longer
storage is requested. If you have any questions about this report, please feel free to call 303-964-1986.
Sincerely,
Jeanne Spencer Orr
President
Analyst(s):
Paul D. LoScalzo
Michael Scales
Anita Grigg
Bethany Nichols
Wenlong Liu
Adam Humphreys
Robert R. Workman Jr.
P: 303-964-1986 5801 Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, -CO 80216 1-866-RESI-ENV
F: 303-477-4275 www.reilab.com
Page 1 of 2
FRS Geotech, Inc. .
1441 W. 46th Ave, Ste. 14
Denver, CO 80211-2338
May 27, 2011
Mr. Dan Moir
LT Environmental, Inc.
4600 W. 60th Ave.
Arvada, CO 80003
Re: Project: Agg Industries Linden Plant
FRS Lab Number 116307
Dear Mr. Dan Moir:
Phone: (303) 477-2559
(800)386-3136
FAX: (303) 477-2580
e-mail: frsgeo@ix.netcom.com
The bulk samples submitted to FRS Geotech, Inc. have been analyzed by polarized light microscopy (PLM),:
the EPA -recommended method for determination of fibrous constituents in building materials. The percent of
asbestos contained in the samples is a visual estimation based upon comparisons with published charts. The
results of these analyses are summarized in the enclosed table. This report relates only to the items received
and tested by our laboratory: According to requirements set by the National Institute of Standards and
Technology/NVLAP, this report must not be used to claim endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the US
Government. Also, NVLAP guidelines specify that this report should not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written approval of FRS.
A copy of your Chain of Custody is attached for your convenience. This report is considered; highly
confidential. Results will not be discussed with any person not associated with you.
Please call if you have any questions about this work.
Sincerely,
v17� id A. Schroeder, Ph.D.
Data Controller
Enclosures
NVLAP Accredited Lab #102078-0
AIHA Accredited Lab #101557
FRS GEOTECH, INC. Phone: (303) 477-2559
1441. W. 46th Avenue, Ste. 14
RESULTS OF BULK ASBESTOS SAMPLE ANALYSIS (800) 396-3136
Denver, CO 80211-2338 BY POLARIZED LIGHT. MICROSCOPY (PLM) EPA-600/R-93/116 Fax: (ix.n tcom.c so
e-mail: frsgeoQaix.netwm.com
Client: LT Environmental, Inc. Lab No.: 116307
Project: Agg Industries Linden Plant Page 1 of 5
Sample No. [layer]
Sample
Nonasbestos
Asbestos
Description Volume (%)
Date
Fibrous Material (%)
Minerals (%)
Summary (%)
DWol 100e/0
0527/ll
Fiberglass
Amoshe
Total Asbestos: None Detected
Cellulose
Anthoohyliite'
Drywall, white w/paper from batch operations room
Synthetics
Chrvsotlle
Other Fibrous Material 6
Others s
Crocldolhe
TremJAcL
Nonfibrous Material 94
DW02 100%
0527/11
Fiberglass
Amoshe
Total Asbestos: None Detected
Cellulose _$
Anthoohyl0te
Drywall, white w/paper from batch operations room
-SIRUMOL
Chrysotlle
Other Fibrous Material 8
Others .
Croeldolke
TremJAcL
Nonfibrous Material 92
DW03• Composite (100.%)
05/27/11 -
Fiberolass
Amoske
Total Asbestos: Trace <1%
Cellulose —4
Anthophyllhe
Drywall, white w/paper from batch operations room, also includes black
Synthetics
Chrvsotile Trace <t%
Oar Fibrous Material 8
mastic [two layers]
Others .
Crocidolite
TremJAcL
NoaObroae Material 91
DW03U/ Layer vol. = 98%
0527/11
Fibemlass
Amoslte
Total Asbestos- NooeDetected
Cellulose _�
Anthoohyllita
[White drywall[
Synthetics
Chrysotlle
Other Fibrous Material 8
Others •
Crocldolits
' TremJAct.
NoMibrous Material 92
DW03 /Bl Layer vol. = 2%
0527/11
Fibemlass
Amosite
Total Asbestos:
Cellulose
Anthaphhyllite
[Black mastic)
�iyrltlla
Chrysotile 4
Other Fibrous Material —
9hers
Crocidolite
.
Trem./Act
Non(Mmas Material... 96. . .
'
DW04 100%
0527/11
Fibemlass
Amosite
Total Asbestos: Nose Detected
cslum
Anthoohyllite
Drywall, white w/paper from driver's room
Synthetics
Chrysotlle
Other Fibrous Material 8
Others .
Crocldollte
TremJAct-
Nonfibrous Material 92
*.Composite analysis (multilayered sale, see individual layer analyses).
/// i
Analyst(s):
Completed: '05rz7/20ti
FRS GEOTECH, INC. Phone: (303) 477-2559
144E W. 46dt Avenue, Ste. 14
RESULTS .OF BULK ASBESTOS SAMPLE ANALYSIS (800) 386.3136
Denver, co sozl i-z33s 2590
BY POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY (PLM) EPA-600/R-93/116 Fax: (3.netco .com
e-mail: frsgeoQix.netrnm.com
Client: LT Environmental, Inc.
Lab No.: 116307
Project Agg Industries Linden Plant
Page 2 of 5
Sample No. [layer]
Sample
Nonasbestos Asbestos
Description Volume (%)
Date
Fibrous Material (%) Minerals (X)
Summary (X)
Iowa 100%
06a7/11
Fi�glass Amosite
Total Asbestos: Noae Detected
Cellulose 10 Anthoghyllee
Drywall, white w/paper from driver's room
Synthetcs Chrvsotile
d er Fibrous Material IO
.
Others Crocidolhe
Lr mJAcL
Nonfibrous Material 90
DW06 100%
05/27/11
Fiberglass Amosibe
TotalNone Detected
Cellulose. �_ Anthoo yllhe
Drywall, white w/paper from driver's room
S tm hetia Chrysotlle
Other Fibrous Material 4
Others . Crocldolke
TremJAcL
Monfibrous Material 96
Cf01• Composite (100%) 0527/11
F149111 o—
AmoaRa
Total Asbestos: None Detected
Cellulose 86
Anthophyllite
4"x4" ceiling tile w/white & brown mastic from batch operating room
Synthetics
Chrvsotlle
Other Fibrous Material 86
[two layers) -
Others,
Crocidolite
Tram4AeL
Nonfibrous rous Mateft 14
CTOI 1A Layer voL=96% 05=11
Fibemllass
Amoslts
Total Asbestos: None Detected
Cellulose 90
AnthopMllte
[Brown ceiling the with white face[
Synthetics
Chrvsotlle
Otter Fibrous Material 90
Others .
Crocldolits
'
TremJAcL
Nonfibrous Material 10
CT01IB! Layer vol. 4% 05=11
Fiberglass
Amosite
Total Asbestos: None Detected
Cellulose
Anthoohyllite
[Brown mastic)
Synl etics
Chrysotile
Other Fibrous Material —
Others
Crocidolhe-
Trem./AeL
NonObrous Material 100
f . Composite analysis (myltlayered sample, see individual layer analyses).
Analyst(s):ita �Completed: "0527/201 t
..,..,e..:ee.
FRS GEOTECH, INC. Phone: (303)477-2559
1441 W. 46th Avenue, Ste. 14
RESULTS OF BULK ASBESTOS SAMPLE ANALYSIS (800) 386-3136
Denver, CO 80211-2338 BY POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY (PLM) EPA-600/R-93/116 Fax: (303) com.co 0
e-mail: frsgeo(a)ix.netcom.com
Client: LT Environmental, Inc.
Lab No.: 116307
Project Agg Industries Linden Plant
Page 3 of 5
Sample No. [layer]
Sample
Nonasbestos
Asbestos
Description
Volume (%)
Date
Fibrous Material (%)
Minerals (%)
Summary (%)
2'
Composite(100%)
0527/I1
Fiberglass
Amosite
Total Asbestos: Noue Detected.
Cellul_86
Anthoohyllite
4"x4" ceiling tile w/white & brown
mastic from batch operating room
Synthetics
Chrysotile
Other Fibrous Material 86
[two layers[
Others,
Crocidolke
Im A&
Nonfibrous Material 14
_r:T021A
Layer vat. 96%
0527/11
Fiberglass
A m osite
Total Asbestos: .None Detected
Cellulose 90
Anthoohvllite
[Brown ceiling the with white face[
synthetics
Chrysotile
Other Fibrous Material 90
Others .
Crocidolke
TremJACL
Nonfibrous Material 10
C7V2/Rl-
Layer voL-4%
0527/11
- Fibemlas3_
Amosite
Total Asbestos: None Detected
_ 11 1 Ae
Anthophyllhe
[Brown mastic[
Synthetics
Chrysolite
Other Fibrous Material —
Others,
Crocidolke
' TremJAat
Nonfibrous Material 100
'03• Composite (100%) 0527/11
Fiberglass
Amoslts
Total Asbestos: None Detected
Cellulose _�¢
Anthophyllite
4"x4" ceiling the whvhite & brown mastic from batch operating room
Synthetics
Chtysotile
Other Fibrous Material 86
[two layers[
Others
Crocidolbe
'
-
TremJACL
NorfibrousMaterial 14
_CT031A/ Layer vol. - 95% 0527/11
Fiberglass
Amosre
Total Asbestos: Nene Detected
Cellulose 90
Anthoohyllite
[Brown ceiling tile with white face[
Synthetics
Chrysotile
Other Fibrous Material 90
.0ftl$ -
Crocidolhe
Trem./Act
NontibrousMaterial 10
_C7031B/ Layer vol. = 5% 05/27/11 Fiberglass Amoslte Total Asbestos: None Detected
Cellulose Anthophylltte
[Brown mastic) Synthetics Chrysotile Other Fibrous Material —
Others, Crocidoltte
TremJAct. NoMibrous Material 100
• . Composite ai
Analyst(s):
Completed: 05127/2011
Phone: (303)471-2559
FRS GEOTECH,INC. RESULTS OF BULK ASBESTOS SAMPLE ANALYSIS (soo) 3E6 3136
1441 W. 46th Avenue, Ste. 14 - Fax:,(800) 477-2580_.
Denver, CO 80zn-2338 BY POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY (PLM) EPA-600/R-93/116 e-mail:. Gsgeo�303) 77-2 80
Client: LT Environmental, Inc.
Lab No.: 116307
Project: Agg Industries Linden Plant"
Page 4 of 5
Sample No. ]layer]
Sample
Nonasbestos '
Asbestos
Description
Volume (X)
Data
Fibrous Material (Y°►,
Minerals (°h)
Summary (X)
'0 ' -
Composite (100%)
05/27/11
Fiberglass
Amosito
Total Asbestos: F Trace <10/6.
Cellulose _a
Anthoohyllhe
4"xV ceiling the w/br iwn mastic from batch driver's room [two layers[.
Synthetics
Chrysotile Trace 0%
Other Fibrous Material 87
Others..
Crocidolite
-
TromJAet
Nonfibrous Material ' 12
CIN[Al
•
Layer voL=97!b'
0527/11.
Fiberglass
AmosKe
Total Asbestos: None Detected
Cellulose 9
Anthoohylllte
[Brown ceiling the with whiteface[
Synthetics
Chrysotile
Other Fibrous Material 90
.
Others,
Crocidollte
TrmnJAct. -
Nonfibrous Material 10 "
CT04
Layer voL-3%
05=11
Fiberalass
Amosite
'AnthopWilte
Total Asbestos -
Cellulose
[Brown mastic[
Synthetics
Chrvsotile 3
Other Fibrous Material —
Others .
Croeldolite
Nonfibrous Materlal 97
OSf27/11
- Fiberglass
Amoelte
Total Asbestos:. notanalyzed
Cellulose
Anthophyllite
4110^ceiling tile w/brown mastic from batch driver's room [Not analyzed,
Synthetics
ChrvsoOle
Other Fibrous Material —
group method]
Others,
Croddolite
-
TremJAeL
Nonfibrous Material. _
t�O6 — 0527/11
Fibemlass
AmosRe
Total Asbestos:" noranalyred
Cellulose
Antho hy(L illts
4"x4" ceiling the w/brown mastic from batch itriver's room [Not analyzed,
Synthetics
Chrysotile
Other Fibrous Material —
group method]
Qthers.
Crocidol te"
TromJAct
- Nonfibrous Material _
GS01 100% OSa7/11 -
Eftralass _�t�
Amoske
Total Asbestos: None Detcctcd'
II f g�
pnthoohyllke
Gasket onboiler in mechanical room [gray]
Synthetics
_ . Cho sotile
Other Fibrous Material 100
Others •.
Croeidolits
• -
'TremJAet
Nonfibrous Material —
° Composite analysis (myltilayered sample, see individual layer analyses). . .1 . . .
Analyst(s):
Mark. oogemder COmpleted:05/27/201t •
FRS GEOTECH, INC. RESULTS OF BULK ASBESTOS SAMPLE ANALYSIS Phone: (303)477-2559
1441 W. 46th Avenue, Ste. 14 - (800) 386.3136
Denver, CO 80211-2338 BY POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY (PLM) EPA-600/R-93/116 Fax: yixnet om.co o
e-mail: frsgeoQixnetoom.com
Client: LT Environmental, Inc.
Lab No.: 116307
Project: Agg Industries Linden Plant
Page 5 of 5
Sample No. [layer]
Sample
Nonasbestos Asbestos
Description Volume (%)
Data
Fibrous Material (%) Minerals (%)
Summary
GS002 1000/s
05/27/11
Fiberglass 100 Amaefte
Total Asbestos: Noae Detected
Cellulose Anthoohyllite
Gasket on boiler in mechanical room [brown]
Synthetics Chrysotile
Other Fibrous Material 100
Others, Crocidolhe
TremJAcL
Nonfibrous Material
GS03 100%
05/27/11
Fiberglass 100 Amoske
Total Asbestos: fNonc Detected
Cellulose AnthopJtyllhe
Gasket on boiler in mechanical room [brown[
$Mhetics Chrysotile
Other Fibrous Material 100
Others , Croeldolhe
Nmdnaous Material _
.: . •, Composite analysis (multilayeredfample, see individual layer analyses). .. _ ,
Analyst(s): V //(it &t -Z&A& 1I Completed: 05/27/2011
FRS Geotech, Inc
1441 West 46th Ave., Suite 14
Denver CO 80211 2338
1-303477-2559
1-806-386=3136
1-303=477-2580 FAX
ftsgeo@lx.netcom.com
This reportis concerned only with results of tests.perfomied on samples submitted to and tested by FRS Geotech, Inc.
Bulk Sample Analytical Procedures
Bulk samples of construction materials are analyzed according to the Methodfor the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk
ButldingMafertals (EPA/600/R-93/116) which the EPA recommends as the "preferred substitute" to the old Interim Method. In
areas where t ertew" Method is silent, FRS follows the "old" Interim Method and/or specific rulings issued by the various
regulatory agencies.
Each separable layer or portion of the sample is individually analyzed and reported, along with each layer's volume percent
as a part of the total sample. Additionally, an arithmetic composite for the total sample, as received by the lab, is reported for layered'
samples. Information on the nature and quantity of materials at the sampling site, which is unavailable to FRS, must be used by the'
client to determine whether or notthis arithmetic composite of the sample is representative of the materials, as they exist in place.
This same information must be used by the client to determine whether or not any layered material, as it exists in place, should be
treated as several different materials or as a composite material.
Each sample layer is prepared and analyzed in refractive index oils that are certified by the manufacturer, Cargille '
Laboratories. Refractive indices are measured by the Dispersion Staining, Becke Line, or Oblique Illumination methods, according
to which method is most applicable to the sample material. Asbestos content is reported as a percent of the sample, and is a visual
estimation based upon gross sample examination and comparisons with published calibration charts during PLM analysis.
Sample Ashine
Ashing is a preparatory procedure carried out to eliminate many interferents and asbestos "look-alikes." A portion of the
sample is placed in a fiance at 500 degrees Celsius for between I and 4 hours; the actual time varies according to sample type. The
amount of asbestos present in the original sample is calculated, based upon the weight loss due to aching. If the sample had a 50%
weight loss, and the visual estimation of asbestos present was 20%, the amount of asbestos reported would be 10%. All ashed
samples are so noted on the Final Report.
Non-Asbestiform Amoblbole Minerals
Particles of NON-ASBESTIIrORM anthophyllite, tremolite; and actinolite with length to width ratios equal to or
exceeding 3:1 and overall lengths greater than 5 microns are occasionally detected in some bulk samples. While such particles do
meet the "old" legal definition of fibers, they do not meet the classical definition of asbestos because they do not occur as bundles of
parallel fibers (often exhibiting splayed ends), matted masses of individual fibers, or long, flexible, and/or curved individual fibers.
The majoiity of mineral fibers in a sample must display these characteristics as well as exhibit a length to width ratio of at least 20:1
for the mineral to be designated "asbestos." These guidelines are specified in the "New" Method: EPA/600/R-93/116. Our Final
Report refers to:non-asbestiform anthophyllite; tremolite,-and actinolite as either "Non-asbest. trem./actin.", or'Non-asbest.
anthophyl.", whichever is appropriate.
A /OC Procedures and the Uncertainty of Analyses
All laboratory tests are performed according to rigid QA/QC guidelines, and analytical results are traceable to known
reference standards and procedures. In addition to the legal requirement that 10% of all samples received be re -analyzed, FRS
Geotech re -analyzes all samples for which a trace to 3% asbestos is reported.
The New Method (EPA/600/R-93/116) contains the following Suggested Acceptable Error Table for PLM analyses with
quantification by visual estimate over 100 fields.of view:
Areal PercenhAsbestos
Acceptable Range of Asbestos Reported
1%
>0%to 3%
5%
1%to 9%
10%
5% to 15%
20% (or more)
plus or minus 10%
June:7, 2011
City of Fort Collins
Planning, Development &,Transportation
28.1 North `College Ave, !
Fort Collins; CO 80524 ��'t�R : <. AT
i
RE: Aggregate Industries' Linden -Street. Ready Mix Batch Plant 1111DUSTRIES
.Enviroumental Survey'
To Whom It May Concern:
As requested by the'City of Fort Collins; Planning;'Development and Transportation•.Department; Aggregate
Industries hired LT Environmental, Inc to conduct a thorough analysis of the -potential existence of asbestosat the
Linden Ready. Mix Plant located at418 Linden'.Stieet; .Fort Collins 80524.,
Ifyou:recall from.the Environmental,Sur ey letter;dated March 13th, 201 I,; no other environmental hazard$'or
concerns were identified,duringahe environmental survey conducted,by Aggregate Industries on April -191", 2011.
Therefore Aggregate Industries hired:•LT. Environmental -to only focus on the;poiential asbestos issue. Included with
this letter'is their f►idings report.
Upon Demolition Permit approval; Aggregate Industries'- contractor, Divide Construction, will remove all asbestos
containing materials using Best Management Practices in accordance with state and federal, regulations and under the
Isupervisiorrof LT,Environniental. Prior to further deinolition, LT'Enviroiimental•will re=inspect:the plant to ensure
all asbestos containing materials have'been properly and.safely removed.
If you have:any questions or concernsregarding:tile. environmental' survey conducted on April 19th, 201 l.at:
Aggregate Industries' Linden; lteady:l4tix'Batch Plant; please do not hesitateto'contact me: Thank you for your
time.
Siftcerely,
-Doug Hess
Enviroonmental Ad"isor,' Western Region, Aggregate Industries.
!Doug Hessna aggregate=iis.coiii
303-716=5225
Cc:• Wes Stearns, Operations General Manager, W.estern'Region
Don Desch, Northern, Operations Manager,, Western Region
Je►ry Doherty, Divide Construction
Daniel R Moir, PG, LT`Environmental
Aggregate Industries.
West Ge`ntral,Reglon, tnc..
1707 Cole Blyd.,.Suite,100
Golden, CO B0401
Telephone: 303-985-1070 An Equal Opportunity Employer
ATTACHMENT 1
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
/.� BUILDING INSPECTION FORM
Project Name: rcr� Co� Ii�t S - l nQ2 h �a q i K CABI Name:
H
Project Number: CABI Number:
CABI Signature:.
Site Layout: CO„w2
�—
iN'mtibe
Da, _
m_ P..1
ocetSa _ escH ;- o
Con lion
(, , A Dj;
ype
(S
Frlabl
o - ri ble
C•
Gaon lain
yercen_
men . (cop _ ition o _, n _ or�q_ tyj
I
t �t
a� IhS�IwP
ca.�z C o.
(2viaa
/l�
lta�Cnol�r.
MSwh,�
�.C�HoU1K
� = no{- gn.w� �t )
2
S
��� t
lt �1`.vl>�
v �nu1 �Vi�\
!oo}
rs%
htl
li�aa �r
�j
t ceh
(H�(vtaw
(a1u s Q�f o)c `tG? f--F2
Est S.� 41
3
4
5
6
7
.
8
9
10
CABI Initial(dJKNw
RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
NVLAP Lab Code 101896-0
TDH Licensed Laboratory # 30-0136
TABLE PLM BULK ANALYSIS, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY VOLUME
RES Job Number:
Client:
Client Project Number / P.O
Client Project Description:
Date Samples Received:
Analysis Type:
Turnaround:
Date Analyzed:
RES 215466-1
LT Environmental, Inc.
None Given
418 Linden St.
June 27, 2011
PLM, Short Report
2 Hour
June 27, 2011
Page 2 of 2
Client
Sample
Number
a
ID Number
L
A Sub
Y Physical Part
E Description (%)
': ?AsbesCos ontt8nt'• t
Non
Asbestos
Fibrous
3omponents
on -
Fibrous
Components
(%)
Mineral I visual
1
R
I Estimate (a/a
%
MR-13I-1
EM 757253
A Gray/tan vermiculite 100
Trem-Act TR
0
100
DR-13I-2
EM 757254
A Gray/tan vermiculite 100
Trem-Act TR
0
100
MR-CBC-3
EM 757255
A White resinous plaster w/ white paint 20
ND
0
100
B Gray cinder plaster 80
ND
0
100
DR-CBC-4
EM 757256
A Tan resinous plaster 5
ND
0
100
B Gray cinder plaster 95
ND
0
100
ND—NonDiBilal"gn"e Detected � �� eycw
r/�1J e
TR=Trace, <1 %Visual Estimate - vDaiaanlno
Trem-Act--Tremolite-Actinolite oeas ao as•olr
Note: Further analysis by TEM is recommended for organically bound material (i.e. floor tile)
if PLM results are<I%. Data QA
BUILDING INSPECTION FORM
Site Layout: (j7p2 (,Soli
rr
I �
�� C I!\ �i n�2r. I
Project Name:, � � nS - end '� %t CABI Name:
p r
Project Number: CABI Number:
CABI Signature:
won lion
' a
le /
C
�L�gber;
Da_
e,__ 1 D
_ratio _seer __o
G,D S a,
o -Rriabe
Con ing
�ercenta -
Somme condiion,
I .
f
5
A
Am ZY,P'-t
JJD
��L1��I
GSo2
G4s (_
/�
�(J
2 3¢ia?c 6 kqe,
Z
fSt
hi�-1ir„�G
No
Z'c`II
G� 3
�.91r�i St, l ov
G
3 4 3
lrox
4
I s_1n�bti. i15'��
VN
,�A
'-`
o'vikwwk,
I
PKs �
j�•
11 I
C p+ld ria� � �" Lw (.y �o
5
I UL/ 1� on �^+
oW✓1
UhKnGw,.•�
caC
6
7
8
9
10
CAB[ 1 ' ials
BUILDING INSPECTION FORM
Project Name: CABI Name:
Project. Number: CABI Number:
CABI Signature:
Site Layout:
Le 0Le 44 ro
ro
O
on
on fining
11MIRIM-91
Comments an
I
17 wall WK 61,i
4iUs 4kveL4
�Jo
2
S-121111
C)
WVZa-C +; 1A '� Q) Ue..L
G—S-D
J-
U
DX
z 3 'Z -7a 42-
.3
'Dwo te
T)l Y W4J' t-A J 4�c�
t. 4�U%
C
K��,-IFOA-LA
4
0 ZO
'2� 4e(o�,ox
I
4
To
Mr, !�h,.-
—rrAec
143 Zeuw,\ AA4s4,c- 06r�-6tis
5
Aw;Kc-
Ak
e-A 3 .3
6
1
Ce
wH
6, — sb
-A)4
AJJ+� QK"�(J
7
8
pf" 5u M4
OALftwx
Zoo �Fz
<�.M�lj
10
CABI lnitialsC
BUILDING INSPECTION FORM
Site Layout:F'"
Project Name: '4•l `OI�I�S—L.nh IcsQ�yl"ix Q.
I CABI Name: I� '"\o��
!
Project Number: CABI Number:
Al q
CABI Signature:
�t Q 4- 5 Kot vn
6 v�
03
on itio
pe
b! /
u_ be
t
ai D
--
Loca_on/l)escr do
— - — -
C+ D
S )
Non- xtab
tainin
erceata a
omments
�Z'illl
(
l7 wa t� Guo.
3
11
good
�ISC.
-jj
/'.'t"�a
JD.
a�
I' 4 J ^ k Z
�piu - .> (2 �}
1�l�r�r?C
I
Ka�0'1•. i'+al\S.
512-7111
wo^�
6cO
N-u�4 ,
J
I
Y
2
3 c Jal
�sc
q?'/ `
�
. fG2
v'�w o�l Li2�i•� Wl+.�
A
/^
1� �
/KfN �'
�t'S '
ra c<
�
''34 7' e '�Prd}-
3
uLll e 3Wa(ls-f/6
1�+�%
�f
IZlI11
CIa
SY
/S
,-�Yw�l,
Io-23 �qi��r= "�7.0 �T' 1y¢ &
4
to,44f rta� fA454 �
r-
zz l
CF 62
(Le , �i U w/
L4k %roa 1144-srr
%
`�� S(�
w/
( s
`
:"�'V
d
�i�
2 .� 31
Z
5
n -
c
iivts a rc
S�rj�Il
�T03
6
Wk (iry r, M4°n�.
g
e s+t ui
9
10•
CABI Initi :�'r�'rY•
Due Date: Co ' Z 7' {
Due Time: tv e S
ReT R�servairs �o;rvii-onm��s�[al,. /r>rc_
5801 Logan St. Deriver, Lb 80216 • Ph: 303 e64•1988 • Fax 303.4774278 • TOO Free:88a RESFENV
Pager: 303•M09.2098
RES 215466
VVU ff
Page, 1 of+_
C0"va"y0 LT Environmental
Addr.aa: 4600 West 60th Ave.
Arvada, CO 80003
nvvwt"o w: pr utrreltCNl
company:
Heart: Phone:
°re
F,x:
CONTACT INFORMATION:
°'° John Fodor
Phone:
Fax:
Protest Number eadbf P.O,e
catrro.°Ot'
303-829-8344
caryPwar
Final
Data
Delivamble Email Ie,a x,
odor Ltenv com
L ewv. Ca
Prdtaet DeeMptlon4,00etiam G I t1 y
Z) r� 1
)3ES�T0$L'-ABOftStTO - ;.OE1R5 I eek4a 9.._Fam7 tm-�,4,�;:-;.- �luF.P,.F,?•='i ,
PL MlTFJN RUSH (same Day) PRIORITY (Next Day) --STANDARD
(Rush PCM = 2hr, TEM = 8hr)
:
`
E
$
=,
J
a
o
ytit
o
b
' n
g d
6
g
�.-
> '
yW-rd
.+:.•
n
O
a
a
.,REOl1E$RkD
- m
'
K
-
—
S
H
a'
..
S
tK
sF
6
s
o:
V
es
...
O
ro
u
m
z
1�
o
..
ANALI SIS *tWIa
A
€
S
W
5 o
`+n U y
= 9 s y
b IC i
E g $
w w Y w V5 r
MICROBIOLOGY
F
O
1 t:. VAtID`N1gTit) COPES; L
Alr=A Bulk=B
s? gB NpTEB ;;*;._:
QI.1ElVjt 1FLABORRTORY•f1QWRS fNBefideys 82rit=$ m� :t'- pwv�kit�;� hD ;
Metals) I Dust _ RUSH _ 24 hr. _3-5 Day
RCRA 81 Metals B Welding ""Prior notlncatlon is
Fume Sean I TCLP _RUSH_5 day_70day required for RUSH
tumarounda.""
Organics _ 24 hr _ 3 day5 Day
Dust = D
Paint = P
Soll = S
Wi e = w
Swab =SW
F=Food
Drinking Water It DW
Waste Water -WW
O =Other
AfItC}OSfOGOGY'EAQbR1�7QRY5iOt1R§Wekrta's: 8$m6 tna,�U�x,
E,coll 0187 H7 Colifonns, Saureus 24 hr. _2 Day 3 5 Day
Salmonella, Listeria, E.coll, APC 48 hr, 3-5 Day
Yeast Mold 3.5 Day 7 Day
uOinh upQ�?gs taep4hg�ahoralory_Priarityhfl+k
Y.t x° ., 4 banrCaisnpE�g ale Cee laa ItioPatraea
'u`.t"/-t.94- :is '•ise•-"rPPrY�°i�l,�ir�ioeia"'taf i7tl andppo1jE'aye nw £ #K�Sa iY{'i '�..:
A - "`}s. i..,..-. .- *}?y,`§ i tJ`..t+
Special instructions -
Cit fitsse"ln 1&ID tiUMbet x ` .r
.Q :�„-„�c< Sam" fa[4a-mtss'�. rGli tie �SF,d> �. >f 'a t•
P Q a'y"u� t
1 ,- Q e••r _ I
'"ASTM E1792 approved type is only""
q�
?
m
�F
N ....
m
tT
`G
Ln
tg
i[
Date
Collected
mm'aSNY
Time
Collected
hhhnm efP
creme
sSf MNu�it�"beh-°-on
+
¢"ll-eG67�tp`r'�t BN�f`}'A+I
-rute'4't S ,: r,C�'dnS.
1
3
tt
Y
�...: ,c. -
_;�.
+..
..
,;.,
mt
t•7 - _ t- sy y .: -
�.:: 4
bs� .
,
;:
- z-
,t', =
Eut�
. F a : ;
sx �?r�q � F6�,a , S '�r-.#+ ' -'t-r, r q-a#4'uc'.: a"tc F;m tr •:rime{ g '. t t �u F:'r w4 `
.. �_ t •[ , .� Y « u. _ fit. � �_. % ki- E�
..-�. Si r14T9'f4„ _. s t"'.=r n d = -$-,'_t$._�3"•"r„„.�...'14_a5 <
t'.
T4
't-q
k�k;-R'rt,Mh
: �
.tj
� �t
r4rs
.. t'
£.F: 1�
-`�fx
tiv
F,•},'r`P
1�:i:}'3 s:Pp SY<
$�H-isv''r"Fyx.AIG.I.,"y�3EF �'iiiY-Y alr5r5Y';t�`'.}^. C-"
8
eL�b'a..,
ry::
'x U S
t
.S yx.
✓. t
._YTS,:,.::
2.L-ii`
c
.� C
_
--.P�.`ii.�.}
:x'r, f
.rim
w
v,
tC- -f t4 'ire
At' hJR Fa i.,¢i
n..
rM1}; '.`i 51.t ��"IT {"S PI_��:..aa t-,. �.�..:i xt to
Number of samples received. fAddttional samnlna ehnll hn befne ,.,.
1
n4f.
:x ,�T�k3,-rj
h..w I.....
4�
T+�
F i :i'y.
:i .:.'
N �l
x
Y.'�{il�,
k.:
ryi leAr
_]T'!- .
R} i�
L .' •:
-nt Tip } 'tr .
i"'.' ti
nUra: riff Wlu aneryza Inomnsn9a ad epenLlfOrmetim racehttl end WaryasraPonsmle w errs oromtsslonsfnulatadoni Muting from the inscomicy orod may data.e s n ceanVsem analysis as IDI do this Chem of ody shoe wnnaula an anagdcat $ervkes agreemm-1 Mirth Payment terms fNFT 3a days f au t this 9 y 4 n0 NnY mWaentadve sprees met submission rMlta fasoMing sampbs for requested
pfY Payment (tors may lna 1.5%ngMley Werest 4umgags.
Iln uished By: 4
Dateftne:
6, f ? 17 f It S y
� Sam Ie Conddion:
3oratory Use Only[
g'�
P On Ice Sealed ct
eived a : (ilit—.�� �, LI • DatelTm s:
(o' L7 •I1 Carder:
Temp. (F°) _� Yes / No Yes / No s I No
ults: CtmtacL, Page hoe Email Fax' Date i1I Time
Initials Confact
Page Phone Email Fax
Date
Contact Page Phone Email Fax Date Time
Initials Contact _
Page Phone Entail Fax
Time Irddals
net., r__ .... .
10-2010 version 1
LA R.I.% I L R
CUv'y
K I 'Y
SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT.'
NON -FRIABLE ASBESTOS DISPOSAL' MANIFESTt:
RgU"jLV,T,Vj I I I gem LORM TQ U E C P [.t T B L I KAT0R
T
r. n", 7-teN.,. yi
3
.,%I)D WSS: F4)c.f- U%OLJ..)
BUSINLSS , I . ___ - - J. .. , ,V
cile State
k
ADDRESS OF SHIPMENI%ORIGIN
City State
NTACT
AUH 1ORIZED C0
EMERGENCY PHONE r 7C)
AMOUNT OF NON -FRIABLE ASBESTOS -CONTAINING MATERIALL
O'I'l 117 R MATERIAL
I hereby cerlitylliat the above xNastes are non -friable asbestos -co
Carrier named below.
Date
Title1� le
I hereby certify that the above wastes were consigned to nie by the
waste is incompliance with all waste acceptance policies of Larime'r,
above waste does not meet current Larinier County standard6, or is trot Cansisi
s
am and all clean-up and removal costJmqioQlkik
this manifest, I agree to pay
any I-Illes, attorneys orney's fees. disposal fees, testing Ices, or any other
Hauler Signature Company It
, 00604
4
Re,:cived b� Larimer COUIM'Lan Ill D- to
Gate Attendant G 1fBA
the
' r
r 1
r ` LARfMER-COUNTY LANDFILL
GATEHOUSE
5887 S. Taft Hil Rd.
Fort Collins, CO 80526,�
Weighed: Kyle ,
Deposit: Nancy
BILL TO: 0
1 CASH:
Vehicle'ID: A95 „
Reference.
Origin:, LARIMER COUNTY
DATE .I N: ..07/Q 1 /2011,.....T I ME, -I N;.. 16;10: 03
DATE. OUT.: 07/01/2011 TIME OUT: 16:32:37
INBOUND''TICKET Number: 05-00095813
SCALE 1 GROSS WT. 5700 LB
'SCALE 3 TARE-WT. 4,160 LB
NET WEIGHT 1540 LB
Oty ' Description Amount
2.000 Commercial,Non-Fri" `10,50 ,
State Surc 0-.78
DEPOSIT RECEIVED: 11.28
NET CASH AMOUNT: 11.28.
DUE NOW: 0.00
r r
X
1
BUILDING INSPECTION FORM
'rt,,+ l IAS - AA CAB[ Name: 1�1 Ll vv�
Project Name: oIl
Project Number: CABI Number:
CABI Signature: 132-377
0
T
i(y
7
A)rv-Tf.'Q
2-7 LX Cus 4AW A,
...... I,—
10
C,�),,tfr
C, —s -D
2 -7 c:�
2
YJ 71111
-5v ,.,L
0Z
.2
3
3
y7
",J
pe
elit
7
40',t-
5SUM
9
v
Project Name:
PruJect Number:
BUILDING INSPECTION FORM
CABI Name: I '' •¢.
CABI Number:
CABI Signature: 323 -7
5121111
17wo I
Role-,
7t,.1o3
PIA ��� t(si �l.
Go-� J
-s s
,kt-�A
�t S
a
7 it
+ T D
t. FAA
C"(b Z
Ltt�� f 1.t c_Lr�
/
jM/
,� .y
�
4
Atts C
it p
1
A,
F-
9
i
io
Site Layout:"'
i
`4/_
`4/_
v
(J
I •� 3 4 �t � s
auo �"x y a s
1
S a ro
Qlr
ti O +C
Z
CAI?I