HomeMy WebLinkAbout6227 SAKER CT - SPECIAL INSPECTIONS - 12/22/2015Foundation WaH `�raon/
Vold Waterproofing Observation
CLIENT: Toll Brothers, Inc.
10 Inverness ive Cast, Ste: 126
Ong-I9wood,-E6-80 112
Attir fa, man K-0-1
ADDRESS:
Z -7 SAKe2 eovb--
LOT 5 BLOCK (7 a
FILING NO. PROJECT NO. Fc_b7� % 900
Foundation Plan Foundation Wall Layout
BY Lri, • J I fOn4 CU 0 PLAN NO..dI`i ` 1,3 910 , 1). �
Foundation Type
❑ SPREAD FOOTINGS ❑ GRADE BEAMS AND PADS
❑ DRILLED FRICTION PIERS ❑ DRILLED PIERS INTO BEDROCK
FOOTING W/MINIMUM ❑ OTHER
DEADLOAD
CTLITHOMPSON PROJECT NO. COiy02005:V 12
❑ REQUIRED THICKNESS INCHES
❑ MEASURED THICKNESS INCHES
Foundation Wall Condition
❑ EXPOSED STEEL
❑ SURFACE PROBLEMS (HONEYCOMBING, ETC.)
(IF CHECKED, SHOW LOCATION ON SKETCH)
Recommended Drain Type
EXTERIOR! ❑ INTERIOR
FIG. 16
INSTALLED PIPE DIAMETER 4 INCHES
WALL HEIGHT INCHES
DEPTH -TO ROF WALL TO BOTTOM OFTRENCH
-L=L�J Z INCHES
SLAB ON GRADE ❑ STRUCTURAL FLOOR
19 PIPE INSTALLED
GRAVEL INSTALLED, GRAVEL SIZE
Type of Outlet
GRAVITY, BELOW SEWER XSUMP PIT
❑ UNDERDRAIN SERVICE CONNECTION VISIBLE (AT STUB)
❑ IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS
❑ REJECTED
Foundation Wall Drain:
KIN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS
❑ REJECTED
Foundation Waterproofing:
*N GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS
❑ REJECTED
I
I_
I
I I
I•'•1
�
I
I
IL
-iAF
I
I �
I II
-
I
II
'
I
I
r_J__�
-
SAUCEfZ Co(AK -
RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE PROCEDURE
A. g.
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE
i
MANUFACTURER REVIEWED BY /�/ ": iF{(� U V
HEIGHT _ FEET
DISTANCE BELOW FOUNDATION WALL FEET DATE OF OBSERVATION
I :.
Foundation Wafl
CYLITHOMPSON
Reinforcement Observation
CLIENT: Toll Brothers, Inc.
10 Inverness Drive East, Ste. 125
Englewood, CO 80112
�m Arlo
Foundation Plan
BY &A a�5
PLAN NO. �:)a9ioSSO, 666 DATE & 0, 1 1 T,
Foundation Plan
F1 SPREAD FOOTINGS
FOOTINGS WITH MINIMUM DEADLOAD
❑ GRADE BEAMS AND PADS
F1 DRILLED FRICTION PIERS
F-1 DRILLED PIERS INTO BEDROCK
[-] OTHER
CTLJTHOMPSON
PROJECT NO.'v_!'-I3_e�S DATED
WALL ALIGNMENT OFFSET < INCHES
Foundation Void
F] REQUIRED THICKNESS INCHES
F-1 NOT REQUIRED
Reinforcing Steel 0
GRADE /60 BAR SIZE 67
NO. OF BA!V
Top -j S' dq�,
BOTTOM 3; a'9'r,
VERTICAL 570-1 _Jq�' o7et
HORIZONTAL 4 -45 G, i � Pol �
COUNTERFORT ?k 'en'
�tructions to Contractor
N GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH PLAN
F] REJECTED
RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE PROCEDURE
ADDRESS:
LOT BLOCK
FILING NO.-- PROJECT NO. Rbi d4'�, 9QD
Foundation Wall Layout
l
1;11,
I it II i1i i III I
7-1
_7
al-
it
J.-IJ-111
-1-11,11,1_1 I
L! H.
it
L
1-4-
. ..... 44
_44
IM
UFER Ground 4-Location of UFER Ground
LOCATION APKI, m. &(;
F1 NOT INSTALLED A41-:tit
ClS
COMMENT:
FIELD REP-ReSf-
TAT[ E
REVIEWED-8Y
DATE dF OBSBAVATION
N11
L, t I ll lJ
I (L. nn
CLIENT: Toll Brothers, Inc.
10Jnvexness-Dsive Ea-s-t,-Ste, 125
Enalewood. CSZ$0112
Raccc-cm-nerni-ded Foundation Sys' m
CTLITHOMPSON PROJECT NO.
DATED
❑ SPREAD FOOTINGS
MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF PSF.
MINIMUM WIDTH INCHES
F FOOTINGS WITH MINIMUM DEADLOAD
MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF S�(f
MINIMUM DEADLOAD PRESSURE OF PSF.
PROVIDE A IN I
VOID BENEATH GRADE WAMS
MINIMUM WIDTH L- 29!! HES
❑ GRADE BEAMS AND PADS
MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF
MINIMUM DEADLOAD PRESSURE OF PSF.
PROVIDE A INCH VOID BENEATH GRADE BEAMS
MINIMUM WIDTH
INCHES
Fe"'u-nd2ddora PI -se
BY c-4--L- 9T�.1 --�' n%.-
PLAN NO. �i�� Il�� i2� U� � DATE
° WALL FOOTING WIDTH
4- 3� (INCHES) DEPTH _� (INCHES)
COLUMN PAD (INCHES) DEPTH (INCHES)
COLUMN PAD (INCHES) DEPTH (INCHES)
RCEMENT AS PER PLAN:
gREINF ❑ NO ❑ NONE REQUIRED
AT SITE ❑ INSTALLED
Sail Conditions At Footing Level
UPPER LEVEL C l"
LOWER LEVEL CA" /I
9Ura-did Wa«:er �;onditions
NE IN EXCAVATION
❑ NONE ENCOUNTERED IN BORING NO. TO FEET
ENCOUNTERED AT 1�, _ FEET IN BORING NO. bj -7
ii
FlDDRESli[:;
/-
y
C, 7-Z.' --
LOT BLOCK 7
FILING NO. PROJECT NO.
Foundation Layout
PSE
PSF.
0 INDICATES APPROXIMATE DEPTH/WIDTH MEASUREMENT LOCATION
l enr � ioers to Contractor
Fj FOOTING IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH PLAN
❑ F( ING REJECTED
CONDITIONS IN EXCAVATION AS ANTICIPATED
❑ CONDITIONS IN EXCAVATION NOT AS ANTICIPATED, CONTACT
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
iedtiIRE _
ce,
FAE�PRE;'SEN�I IpvM. D C e %�1e ry, ks
REVIEWED BY " '(i L'
✓ ti � .... �`J y�/lam_/�{'.��...i�::
DATE OF OBSERVATIONa::,-•.t-
0