The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutONE LIBRARY PARK (220 E. OLIVE ST.) - FDP - 34-07/A - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)Number: 48 Created: 6/24/2008 [6/24/08] Will fire line be DIP? PVC? If PVC, add Std Details for tracer wire and locator station. Number: 49 Created: 6/24/2008 [6/24/08] See red -lined plans for other comments. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Gary Lopez Topic: zoning Number: 44 Created: 6/19/2008 [6/19/08] No comments. Be sure and return all red -lined plans if/when you re -submit documents If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970)221-6750. Yours Truly, 4 �(e Steve Olt, City Planner for Ted Shepard, Chief Planner cc: Marc Virata Northern Engineering Current Planning file #27-07A Page 4 Number: 43 Created: 6/3/2008 [6/3/08] Light & Power Engineering will need an electrical 1-line diagram showing both the main building service and the fire sprinkler pump service. Also, will need a Commercial Service (C-1) form completed for each. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann Topic: Fire Number: 45 Created: 6/20/2008 [6/20/08] PFA has no further comments or concerns at this time. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Stormwater Number: 40 Created: 2/29/2008 [6/24/08] There is no discussion in the drainage report whether or not the proposed design is adequate in regard to the 100-year flows in the alley and along Olive Street. Only cross - sections with their proposed water surface elevations were included in the drainage report. The text in the Drainage Report needs to discuss this issue. The flows are very close to entering the underground parking garage in the 100-year storm as well as overtopping the stair landing and inundating the stair case along Olive Street. The text in the report needs to evaluate the proposed conditions and make a conclusion whether or not the design is providing a safe situation from flood waters. [2/29/08] Once the water surface elevation in the alley is determined due to the flows running down Olive Street, a discussion needs to take place to determine if the freeboard is adequate. In our criteria manual for conveyance elements, there needs to be a foot of. freeboard to any opening into a building or the conveyance element needs to handle 1.33 times the flow and not enter any opening into the building. With grades as proposed, the foot of free -board could not be met unless a floodgate was installed at the underground parking entrance. Cortina is an example of a project that installed a floodgate. An analysis of the flows in Olive Street with the additional 33% may prove to not enter the underground parking entrance, although a 1-foot tall floodgate would still be recommended. Number: 50 Created: 6/24/2008 [6/24/08] Please provide erosion control escrow calculations. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Water/Wastewater Number: 46 Created: 6/24/2008 [6/24/08] The water mains adjacent to this project do NOT have cathodic protection; therefore, Std Details 18 and 26 are not needed. Number: 47 Created: 6/24/2008 [6/24/08] Add Std Detail 11 - Typical Water Service. Page 3 Number: 52 Created: 6/24/2008 [6/24/08] The stairwell leading to the parking garage off the alley should incorporate a wall to provide separation and protection for vehicles/bikes/pedestrians traversing the alley. The wall should be located outside of public right-of-way. Topic: General Number: 2 Created: 11 / 16/2007 [6/24/08] The response letter indicated legal descriptions and exhibits have been added. I will need to follow-up with Ted, but they didn't appear with my submittal. [2/26/08] The revised design was viewed as being acceptable for City Transportation Staff to grant an encroachment permit. A legal description and exhibit should be prepared for the encroachments on Olive as well as Matthews. A draft of the, encroachment permit will then be prepared. [11/16/07] There's been some general discussion and concern regarding the use of the public space (right-of-way) for aspects the building. Fundamentally, the steps and railings along Matthews along with the planter and low seat wall along Olive are all obstructions of the right-of-way that would need to be approved via an encroachment permit. We're potentially open to the encroachment shown on the Matthews Street side, however we're concerned over the extent of the encroachment onto the public space on the Olive Street side. We're not inclined to introduce a meander in the sidewalk system along Olive Street and would rather just see the sidewalk maintain the consistent 10 foot separation from the curb and gutter. Why is the public space being encroached into? Interestingly, we note page 7 of the traffic impact study which shows perhaps an earlier iteration of the project and has the sidewalk along Olive Street maintain a consistent separation from the street. We would prefer this design over the present iteration and don't see a compelling reason to support the present design. Number: 6 Created: 11 /21 /2007 [6/24/08] The response letter indicates that the doors are not within right-of-way, though sheet H1 seems to show the doors in right-of-way. Please add after the label "proposed trash enclosure", "enclosure doors located outside of right-of-way". [2/26/08] Are the trash enclosure doors located within the right-of-way? If so, why can't these be outside of the right-of-way? [11/21/07] The proposed trash enclosure off of the alley cannot have doors which swing out into the alley right-of-way. Either sliding doors or further insetting the trash enclosure would need to be accomplished. Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine Topic: Light & Power Number: 42 Created: 6/3/2008 [6/3/08] The tentative location for the electric transformer shown at the S.E. comer of the site may or may not work. With the electric loads of the building, plus the load of the now planned fire sprinkler pump, a larger transformer MAY be needed than the proposed site can accommodate. Page 2 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW Cityof Fort Collins V.F. Ripley Associates Date: 6/27/2008 c/o Sandy McFeron 401 West Mountain Avenue, Suite 201 Fort Collins, CO 80521 Staff has reviewed your submittal for ONE LIBRARY PARK (220 EAST OLIVE STREET), FINAL PLANS - #27-07A, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt Topic: General Number: 54 Created: 6/27/2008 [6/27/08] The following comments were expressed at Staff Review on June 23, 2008: Stormwater/Glen Schlueter a, One (1) foot of freeboard is needed for the parking access. b. The drainage report needs to be modified and Stormwater needs 1 copy of the revised report. Light & Power/Rob Irish a. The transformer needs to be sized. b. The transformer pad is too small. Also, Light & Power needs 3 feet of perimeter clearance around the transformer. Engineering/Marc Virata a. The stairs to the parking garage along the alley need a wall or other substantial barrier for the stairwell. b. Remove the sliding gate as it encroaches into the right-of-way. Another "formal" round of review is not needed. Please submit 4 paper copies of the plans for review by City staff. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Construction Plans Number: 51 Created: 6/24/2008 [6/24/08] On Sheet H1 please remove references to the pavement subgrade details, the information seems to conflict with Note 3 on Sheet Gl. Page 1