The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutADVANCE AUTO PARTS - FDP - 26-07/A - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 -Number: 111 Created: 10/31 /2007 [10/31/07] Amount of quantity detention is now resolved after resubmittal of calculations via email on October 26th, 2007. Stormwater is ready for a hearing. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Water/Wastewater Number: 75 Created: 10/2/2007 [10/28/07] Delete notes P3 and P5. [10/2/07] Notes P3 and P5 on overall utility do not appear to apply to this project. Please remove. Corrected Number: 76 Created: 10/2/2007 [10/28/07] Minimum grade on a 4-inch sewer servic3e is 2%. Revise note P4. [10/2/07] Revise note P4 as shown on redlined plans. Acknowledged Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Peter Barnes Topic: Zoning Number: 5 Created: 8/17/2007 [10/29/07] Still need the foundation plantings. [9/26/07] Still need foundation plantings along south wall. [8/17/07] Need 3 to 4 trees in the 5' landscape strip along the south lot line (Section 3.2.1(E)(4). Need foundation plantings per Section 3.2.1(E)(2)(d) A variance request has been approved to allow for a widened sidewalk along the building's south elevation. Page 5 Number: 102 Created: 10/26/2007 [10/26/07] The variance request for the reduced width alley has been denied as submitted. Per my email to Lucy, the alley must be constructed to full standard width (20 feet) which will require tree removals and easements for off -site grading and construction on the west side. The variance will only be accepted if it clearly states that the reduced width alley is an acceptable access to the site when the long term access control plan is implemented. Resolved. The alley will be 20 feet wide. Number: 103 Created: 10/26/2007 [10/26/07] Alley design - the variance request has been denied as submitted. Vertical curves do not meet LCUASS standards for minimum length. See LCUASS 7-17 & 7-18. Please label and station in the profile what is being constructed with this project and what will be built by others. Resolved. The alley will be 20 feet wide and will meet the LCUASS standards. Number: 104 Created: 10/26/2007 [10/26/07] Please label the alley intersection to be constructed per LCUASS DWG 803 and 7-11 F. Please add both of these details to the detail sheets. Added Number: 105 Created: 10/26/2007 [10/26/07] See other minor comments on the redlines. Corrected Topic: Technical Services Number: 112 Created: 10/31 /2007 [10/31/07] Please define the alley and the access easement on the Plat. Defined Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann Topic: Fire Number: 109 Created: 10/30/2007 [10/30/07] PFA has no further comments or concerns at this time. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Stormwater Number: 101 Created: 10/25/2007 [10/25/07] A drainage easement is required for the limits of the detention pond including the portion of detention in the parking lot. Acknowledged Page 4 Number: 87 Created: 10/3/2007 [10/26/07] The handrail must be located on top of the retaining wall. If it is to located in the sidewalk per the detail, you will need to add 6 inches of width to the sidewalk (6.5 foot width sidewalk). See the detail and redlines for clarification [10/3/07] A handrail must be placed along the detention pond adjacent to the new sidewalk. Please show/call out the hand rail on the plans and provide a detail. The handrail will be located on top of the retaining wall. Number: 88 Created: 10/3/2007 [10/26/07] There are still some line types that are not copying well because they are too light. Please see the redlines for clarification. [10/3/07] Please use a darker line type for all new/proposed sidewalks and ramps in the ROW and label them as new or proposed. We have made the lines darker Number: 90 Created: 10/3/2007 [10/26/07] Please show the curb more clearly on the median planted island adjacent to the alley. The curb should be located just outside the alley R.O.W. Please also revise the cross section of the island to reflect curb on both sides. [10/3/07] The landscaped medians along the alley should have a barrier curb on both sides to prevent nuisance irrigation water from draining over the alley asphalt and degrading the edge of asphalt. Corrected Number: 91 Created: 10/3/2007 [10/26/07] It has come to my attention that there is a recently approved and constructed project just a little south of this proposed project. This approved project called THE HUMAN BEAN has been constructed and the engineer had provided a preliminary off -site street design for College Ave. extending to the north. Per LCUASS standards, you need to provide 1000 feet of off -site preliminary design for Advance Auto just as they did with the Human Bean project. Rather than going 1000 feet, please just show how your preliminary off -site design will tie into that done by the Human Bean project. I can help you obtain approved plans for the Human Bean if needed. This may be completed with final compliance review and does not need to be reviewed prior to a hearing. [10/3/07] The minimum flowline grade allowed is 0.5 percent. The College proposed flowline shown is 0.2 percent. See sheet C6 profile. We will submit the off -site street design next week as discussed in a telephone conversation with Randy Maizland. Page 3 Number: 108 Created: 10/29/2007 [11/2/07] The alternative compliance request will be supported in general, but the applicant must provide a stronger transition between the building wall and sidewalk in place of the foundation plantings. This could be achieved with a wider sidewalk, ivy (Englemann), or more architectural detailing along the south wall (for example recessed faux accent windows, decorative light fixtures etc.) along this wall in place of the required foundation plantings. [10/29/07] Zoning's comment from the last round still has not been addressed. Foundation planting beds at least 5 feet wide are required along 50% of high visibility walls. The south wall is highly visible and foundation plantings are required per code. A variance request was granted. We have widened the sidewalk to 7.5ft to create a better separation between the building and parking lot. Topic: Site Plan Number: 106 Created: 10/29/2007 [10/29/07] For clarity and filing purposes, please add the property's legal description to the site plan (Lot 1. of the Advance Auto Parts Subdivision...). Thanks! The legal description has been added to the site plan. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Randy Maizland Topic: Engineering Number: 50 Created: 8/29/2007 [10/26/07] Same comment. [10/3/07] No application has been submitted to CDOT as of 10-2-07. [8/29/07] An access permit is required from CDOT. You may submit an application to CDOT concurrently with the City review and the City will coordinate with CDOT such that the access permit can be issued when the plans are approved. We have a permit approved by CDOT. Number: 51 Created: 8/29/2007 [10/26/07] Same comment. See the Landscape Plan. Need to show dimensions for tree planting on College. They look like they are centered in the parkway strip. [10/3/07] Street trees must be located such that they will not need to be removed when College is widened. Please consult with Planning and locate the trees as close to the sidewalk as possible. [8/29/07] Please show the street tree locations on College on the Utility Plans. The location of street trees on College is important such that the trees will not need to be removed or relocated when College is widened. Please space the the trees with respect to the ultimate sidewalk location rather than centering them in the parkway between the sidewalk and curb. Corrected Page 2 Lucy Dinneen/Kay Stallworthy Date: 12/19/2007 Cadence Development LLC 8480 E. Orchard Rd. Ste#6900 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 ISSUES: Department: Advance Planning Issue Contact: Clark Mapes Topic: Architectural Elevations Number: 114 Created: 11/5/2007 [11/5/07] At the front, taller module of the building, a sill or course should be provided where the brick meets the block. Also, can a special course be provided immediately below the shaped cap? Either a soldier course or square course - maybe ground face block? These details can be part of final plans. Approved at the Administrative Hearing without architectural conditions. Topic: General Number: 113 Created: 11 /5/2007 [11/5/07] The scale is off on elevations and the landscape plan. Not a big deal, could be labeled NTS, or go ahead and make the elevations 1 "=10' and the landscape plan 1"=15'. (Unusual scales, but would be helpful to design ideas). Noted and corrected Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Shelby Sommer Topic: General Number: 110 Created: 10/30/2007 [10/30/07] Comcast (Don Kapperman): If Comcast facilities need to be relocated or under -grounded in the alley then the owner of this project will need to pay to have it moved or under -grounded. Please see the attached document for the location of the Comcast facilities in the alley. Please contact Don at (970) 484-7166 or don_kapperman@cable.comcast.com. Left several voicemail messages, trying to resolve Topic: Landscape Plan Number: 107 Created: 10/29/2007 [10/29/07] Please see redlines. One of the selected street trees is not on the list of approved street trees. Discuss street tree selections with City Forester, Tim Buchanan. Also, tree sizes specified are unrealistic - 6 foot caliper! Do you mean inches? Or 6 foot high coniferous trees? See the Land Use Code for minimum sizing requirements and correct plan. Corrected and changed Page 1