Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFEEDER SUPPLY - PDP - PDP130012 - CORRESPONDENCE - (4)Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221-6854, rbuffington@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/29/2013 04/29/2013: A 1.5" water services is not adequate for 52 dwelling units. Provide water service/meter sizing calculations. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: Show curb stop and meter pit on the existing 3/4" water service. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 07/16/2013 07/16/2013: Show/label curb stops on the_1.5" and 2" water services. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 01/16/2013 07/16/2013: The fire line connections will be made as wet taps using tapping saddles. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 07/16/2013 07/16/2013: Show the sewer service to the existing building. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 07/16/2013 07/16/2013: The existing sewer in Willow is a 24". Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 07/16/2013 07/16/2013: Is the north building mixed -use or all residential? If mixed -use, provide separate water/sewer services for the commercial portion. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 07/16/2013 07/16/2013: See redlined utility plans for other comments. Department: Zoning Contact: Peter Barnes, 970-416-2355, pbarnes@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/16/2013 07/08/2013: Still need the trees at 40' intervals. 04/16/2013: 6% of the interior of the surface parking lot needs to be in landscape islands per Sec. 3.2.1(E)(5). The modification request needs to include the Code section reference. Each island must have at least one decidious tree. Trees need to be planted at 40' intervals in the permiter landscape stips of the surface parking lot per Sec. 3.2.1(E)(4) Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/16/2013 07/08/2013: The surface handicap parking space has to be 19' in depth, or 17' if overhanging a 6' wide sidewalk or landscape strip. The stall depth scales to 15', which is the depth for a compact space. The dimensions for a handicap space can't be those of a compact space. Since there's a transformer directly in front of the designated space, there is no opportunity to make the depth of the space compliant unless the transformer is relocated. 04/16/2013: Show parking stall dimensions of the surface spaces on site plan. Show drive aisle width of the parking aisles. Clearly label building footprint/envelope of the apartment building. Topic: General Comment Number: 11 07/11/2013: This comment has not been addressed. 05/01/2013: Does this property need to be replatted? Comment Number: 12 07/11/2013: Shadow Analysis: No comments. Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 Comment Originated: 07/11/2013 Comment Number: 13 ' Comment Originated: 07/11/2013 07/11/2013: Visual Analysis: Please correct the spelling of Linden. See redlines. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/29/2013 07/11/2013: This comment has not been addressed. 04/29/2013: There are line over text issues on sheet 1. There are lines generally following the southerly boundary, that could be removed if they are not lighting related. This would clean up the line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/29/2013 07/11/2013: This comment has not been addressed. 04/29/2013: Please sharpen up the detail/data sheets on sheet 1. The text is hard to read. See redlines. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 07/11/2013: This comment has not been addressed. 05/01/2013: What are the dots shown at the corners of the property? Please add the symbols & description to the legend. See redlines. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 07/11/2013: This comment has not been addressed. 05/01/2013: How was the boundary of this property determined? Using the legal descriptions provided, there is curve data that is not included that is needed to lay out the boundary. From the limited research done, there appear to be errors in the legal descriptions. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Ward Stanford, 970-221-6820, wstanford@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 07/15/2013: Please provide a signing/striping plan for the revised parking stalls (handicapped and regular) on Linden. 05/01/2013: Will the existing diagonal parking on the west side of Linden be altered by the project's access drive? If yes, please provide a striping plan of the changes. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 07/15/2013: Striping not revised. Continue comment. 05/01/2013: Parking stall striping carries across the access drive onto Linden. Please revise plan (and Landscape plan). fire lanes shall be designated and EAE's noted on the plans. 'i ws shall include the fire apparatus turn around on the SW portion of the site which must also be designated and clearly labeled on the plans. Please contact me if further clarification is required. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq-ftand in a sensitive area, therefore Erosion and Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted for FDP. The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted does not meet requirements. Please submit; Erosion Control Plan, Erosion Control Report, and an Escrow / Security Calculation. If you need clarification concerning this section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamargue@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: This development is required to meet the LID regulations which require 25% of private parking and drive aisles to be porous. Porous pavers are suggested for the private drive between the two buildings. This would allow for the removal of the small bio-swale. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: Please document the total amount of new impervious area for the site in the text of the report. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: The City has preferred details for water quality bio-swales. Please add these details to the utility plans. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: The City is determining if the new storm sewer should be upsized to the master plan design storm sewer. The City would contribute funds for the difference of the cost between the proposed storm sewer and the master plan storm sewer. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-658% icounty@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/29/2013 07/11/2013: This has been corrected, but there are line over text issues in the cross section. See redlines. 04/29/2013: Please sharpen up the Willow Street cross section on sheet 1. See redlines. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/29/2013 07/11/2013: There are still line over text issues (some new) on sheets 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7. See redlines. 04/29/2013: There are line over text issues on sheets 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7. See redlines. consulted with, to t, isure that the building will still meet its criteria for continued designation on these registries, and that the proposed new construction will not adversely impact the District. For additional information on the Colorado Historical Society's process, please contact Anne McCleave at anne.mccleave@state.co.us, or the Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation, 1300 Broadway, Denver 80203, http://www.coloradohistory-oahp.org/index.html. 7/16/2013 - Awaiting comments from OAHP. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 07/17/2013 7/16/2013: Mill Bldg. Additions: A draft of the Historic Structure Assessment suggests that the additions proposed to be removed are not critical to the Mill's significance. The CDNS Director and LPC Chair will need to make a formal finding regarding the removal of these additions, but it is likely that they will concur with this report. OAHP has not yet had the opportunity to comment on the findings of the draft report on the additions, and may concur or find differently. Department: Light And Power Contact: Doug Martine, 970-224-6152, dmartine@fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/19/2013 04/19/2013: The existing light south of the apartment building is the property of Fort Collins Light & Power. It can be removed by Light & Power on request. This light has underground power to it. Any overhead lines attached to the pole are telephone and/or CAN. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/19/2013 04/19/2013: The developer will need to coordinate power requirements, locations, and electric development charges with Light & Power Engineering. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/19/2013 04/19/2013: The residential units must be individually metered, with the meters outdoors. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/19/2013 04/19/2013:' Light & Power Engineering will need a copy of the subdivision plat showing the perimeter and total area edimensions. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/19/2013 04/19/2013: After the plan is final, an AutoCad drawing (version 2008) of the utility site plan will need to be sent to Terry Cox at TCOX@ FCGOV.COM. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 07/09/2013 07/09/2013: The transformer will be substantially larger than shown on latest utility plan (S. of the courtyard). Until the electric load information is known, the dimensions of the transformer cannot be confirmed. However, it will not be any smaller than 6'-7" wide by 4'-8" deep. In addition, a minimum of 3' unobstructed clearance is required on the back and two sides of the transformer, and 8' unobstructed in front. The transformer cannot be located within 20' of a fire escape door. Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, iynxwiler@poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 03 Comment Originated: 07/11/2013 07/11/2013: EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENTS I'm noting that the required fire lanes have not been fully identified and labeled on the plans. All Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 07/16/2013 07/16/2013: Fenestration: staff is still waiting for official State comments but expects the State to recommend omitting new windows being cut into the front portion of the southwest elevation (titled "West Elevation" on the drawing, showing the partial front portion of that elevation.) Omitting all of the windows would fix the problem of the title having the word "Existing" on the elevation drawing, which shows proposed alterations with the additions of three windows. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 07/16/2013 07/16/2013: Cornices and lintels on the new building on Linden: What materials do these consist of? Labels are needed. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 07/16/2013 07/16/2013: Apt. Bldg: the central tower component of the Willow Street elevation should be recessed by several feet; this would place the emphasis on the two brick building masses as two separate masses proportioned to be compatible with the historic district, and emphasizes the masonry over the contemporary glass component. Omission of the peaked roof and angled windows would further enhance the compatibility and fit of the building into the district as a place, whereas the peak and angled windows stand out and grab attention. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 07/16/2013 07/16/2013: Apt. Bldg: the red sandstone.courses are a high quality, compatible material that staff understands would add distinction, however staff would like to suggest that brick coursing should be considered for these building elements given that red sandstone is not found and did not occur historically in Fort Collins. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 07/16/2013 07/16/2013: Apt. Bldg: Cornices, sills and lintels should be labeled -what do these consist of? Brick coursing would be ideal for compatibility and quality. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 07/16/2013 07/16/2013: On all elevation drawings, PLEASE use the actual direction, e.g., "Southeast" instead of south or east. In would also help to add the streets in the titles as follows: Linden; Willow; "Jefferson Side"; and "College Side". The northeast elevation should clearly call out proposed changes, and the label "Existing Mill Building" should be revised to avoid the impression that the elevation shows the existing building as -is. Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 Historic Preservation staff is pleased with the direction the plans are taking, and anticipate that this will become an award -winning project when fully developed. The applicant has made many improvements to the project, based upon comments he has received from complimentary reviews with city staff, History Colorado, and the Landmark Preservation Commission. The City and applicant have received a Historic Structure Assessment grant from History Colorado, which should help to resolve remaining questions about the treatment of the historic mill building and the appropriate characteristics of the proposed apartment building. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013, 7/16/2013: As this property is designated on the National and State Registers as part of the Old Town National Register District, Land Use Code Section 3.4.7, Historic and Cultural Resources, will apply to the review of this project. Additionally, the Colorado Historical Society will be Department: Historical Preservation Contact: Karen McWilliams, 970-224-6078, kmcwilliams@fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 3 05/01/2013, 7/16/2013: Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 Topics that still need to be discussed on the historic mill building include the proposed addition of windows on the 2nd story, and the proposed addition of the three season patio enclosure on the Willow elevation. Also needing review will be the new doors and window on the Willow Street elevation, and the proposed removal of the two rear historic additions. Additional discussion with Anne McCleave and City Historic Preservation staff will be ongoing. 7/16/2013 Setting the patio back from Linden Street and designing the patio to appear more open is a definite improvement. Have not yet received comments from OAHP regarding the addition of a patio or these changes in particular. Comment Number: 4 05/01/2013, 7/16/2013: Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 The massing, set back, and height of the mill building addition appear to be appropriate, meeting the Secretary of the Interior Standards. 7/16/2013' Architectural detailing, including materials and stylistic elements, need further revision to be compatible with the era of the Old Town Historic District and the River District, but distinct from the historic mill to avoid diluting the emphasis on it. In general, the fenestration needs further revision. Per comments from LPC Complimentary Review on June 26, 2013, the segmental arches should be omitted - a segmental arch in a wall that isn't masonry is not typical and appears "jarring." Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 7/16/2013: Continuing the fenestration comments, which reflect LPC review, the ganged casement windows should be omitted in favor of storefront windows; the ganged windows lend a suburban style. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013, 7/16/2013: As currently proposed, staff has concerns about the height, setback and step -back of the apartment building relative to the Mill. Staff strongly recommends that the applicant take further advantage of the design and land planning expertise of the Landmark Preservation Commission through the Commission's Design Review Subcommittee and through Complimentary Reviews before the entire Commission. It is likely that other configurations for the apartment building could be developed that will address the concerns ofheight, set -back, etc., to create a better relationship between the two buildings. 7/16/2013 Breaking the apartment building into two masses is an excellent way to reduce the perceived mass. However, to accomplish this feeling of reduced mass, the tower element needs to be recessed. If it is on the same plane of the building, or projecting forward, it adds to the very long building mass, rather than breaks it up, and is not compatible with the historic character of the National Register District. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 07/16/2013 07/16/2013: Fenestration: the previous comment about the windows is related to a suggestion that the door could be centered in its portion of the elevation and flanked by storefront windows to further reflect traditional patterns and proportions. mitigation woulo ue required for removal of same. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/02/2013 05/02/2013: Please label the existing street trees along Linden to SAVE AND PROTECT. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/02/2013 05/02/2013: Species selected for the sidewalk cut-outs should be changed to Skyline honeylocust. Please list their calipers at 2.5 inches to insure a large enough tree to allow for adequate initial function and survival as a sidewalk tree. Comment Number: 4 05/02/2013: Comment Originated: 05/02/2013 Direct label all the trees and shrubs on the plan as to species or cultivar to improve readability of the landscape plan. Some of the currently used symbols may not be shown in the plant key. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/02/2013 05/02/2013: If it doesn't already occur on the plan documents then describe clearly on the landscape plan that tree grates shall be installed around all of the sidewalk trees meeting City requirements of the Engineering Department. Comment Number: 6 05/02/2013: Comment Originated: 05/02/2013 Review LUC 3.2.1 E 4 parking lot perimeter landscaping for required trees in these zones and incorporate trees as needed. Comment Number: 7 05/02/2013: Comment Originated: 05/02/2013 In landscape note 23 add the word significant to read..... Healthy mature significant trees Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/02/2013 05/02/2013: Please add this landscape note: City street trees shall be maintained following City of Fort Collins Forestry Division practices or policies. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 07/16/2013 07/16/2013: The bike racks that are shown in the right-of-way need to be removed or a note added to the plans that states: Bike rack locations are not approved and will be determined by the City of Fort Collins. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 07/16/2013 07/16/2013: Please remove the line work at the drive approach locations off of Willow St and Linden St. These will be typical drive approaches that match others in the area. Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 07/16/2013 07/16/2013: Please remove the concrete pans that extend into the right of way at the drive approach locations. For the pan at the Linden St approach, end pan and let sheet flow across the drive approach. For the pan at the Willow St approach, shown to extend into right-of-way, please remove. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-224-6143, lex@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/22/2013 05/22/2013: No comments, as the site is more than 500' from a natural habitat or feature. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tuchanan@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/02/2013 05/02/2013: The existing Siberian elms have the following diameters that should be placed on the plan. Also please confirm the accuracy on the plan of the locations of the existing Siberian elms. Siberian elm that is the east most tree at the corner of building is 36 inch DBH Siberian elm just to the west of the above tree is 28 inch DBH Siberian elm that is furthest the west has two major stems that are 12 inch DBH and 14 inch DBH. Siberian elm that is furthest to the north is less than 11 inches DBH. All existing trees are Siberian Elm and were rated as being in poor condition and of volunteer origin. Siberian Elm are exempt from mitigation if they are less than 11 inches DBH, determined to be in poor condition, or of volunteer origin, such as those that have sprouted from seed along fence lines, near structures or in other unsuitable locations. The statement from the applicant numbered 6.1, and at another place in the document, reflecting the on -site meeting with the City Forester, could be more accurately stated..... are in poor condition, less than the minimum mitigation size of 11 inches DBH, of wild origin and/or growing in unsuitable locations immediately adjacent to buildings or fences, and therefore no be needed with t, ie costs associated paid for by the project. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 07/16/2013: Please label the 30ft and 28ft drives that are emergency/public access and utility easements on the utility plans 04/30/2013: It is not clear if the easements needed for the project currently exist. Please provide documentation if easements do exist on the site. If not, access, utility, drainage and fire access easements will need to be dedicated by separate document. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 07/16/2013: With the revision the reverse in the flow line has been pushed towards the handicap ramp. It may be that the existing curb needs to be removed and replaced to get positive drainage to the inlet. 04/30/2013: On the Grading plan (sheet 5) there is a reverse in the flowline grade design from the existing curb/gutter FL spot elevation to where the proposed FL ties into the inlet. On the preliminary Willow Street design (Sheet7) flowline grade shows positive drainage to the inlet. Please revise Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: Further evaluation of the streetscape finishes along Willow St is needed to ensure that what is built with this project is consistent with the River District Plan and the completed streetscape finishes adjacent to the project. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: There is a repay amount of $29,172 due to the city for the completed developers local street portion costs for the Linden St improvements along the frontage of the property. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: For Final: More information on the design of the perforated storm drain is needed. It is possible that a clay wall will need to be included in the design for the drain behind the mill. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: For Final: 500ft of additional off -site design of Willow St will be needed for final submittal. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 07/16/2013:For Final: Design of the east flow line (ultimate location) along Willow St will be needed for final submittal. 04/30/2013: For Final: Design of the north flow line on Willow St and cross -sections of the road every 50ft is needed for final submittal. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: Preliminary layout of the Willow St cross section has been completed. for the Willow/Linden intersection north. A copy of the concept plan is included with my redlines. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 07/16/2013 07/16/2013: For Final: Profile of the storm main down Willow St is needed for final submittal. Please note that the minimum cover over utilities in the road is 3ft. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 07/16/2013 07/16/2013: Are clean outs needed for the proposed sanitary sewer service off of Willow St? Please add and label if needed City of Fort Collins /0"� - July 17, 2013 Jon Prouty 1001 E. Harmony Rd. #510 Fort Collins, CO 80525 RE: Feeder Supply, PDP130012, Round Number 2 Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov. com/developmentre view Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Ted Shepard, at 970-221-6343 or tshepard@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Current Planning Contact: Clark Mapes, 970-221-6225, cmapes@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/16/2013 07/16/2013: 1 have just one minor comment, re: Kinnickinnick, which is prominently featured. This is a somewhat insignificant small ground cover marginally tough in urban settings, and is probably not available in 5-gallon size. It's shown equal to the Arrowood Viburnum for size, and this is not likely to ever occur. Especially on the northwest side of the apt. building, a larger screening shrub should be used - more Arrowwod Viburnum? Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970-221-6573, slangenberger@fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 05/01/2013 05/01/2013: The project owes an additional $801.13 for the PDP TDRF. Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970-221-6501, tiegmund@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/30/2013 04/30/2013: There is an existing light pole, decorative fencing, and a tree that are conflicting with the proposed 30ft access off of Linden St. Further coordination to relocate the conflicts will