HomeMy WebLinkAboutOTTER BOX CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS (209 S. MELDRUM ST.) - PDP - 35-09 - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT (3)Otter Box Corporate Headquarters (209 S Meldrum Street), PDP, #35-09
REVISED FINDINGS OF FACT/CONCLUSION
January 21, 2010 P & Z Meeting
Page 4
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the two (2) Modification of Standard Requests to Section
4.9(E)(1)(d) and (g) of the Land Use Code.
Staff recommends approval of the Otter Box Corporate Headquarters PDP, #35-09.
14
Otter Box Corporate Headquarters (209 S Meldrum Street), PDP, #35-09
REVISED FINDINGS OF FACT/CONCLUSION
January 21, 2010 P & Z Meeting
Page 3
than commercial. Specifically,.a number of ordinances
were adopted between 1993 and 1996 for the purpose of
implementing the East Side Neighborhood Plan and the
West Side Neighborhood Plan for properties in the NCL,
NCM and NCB zones. Potential design standards were
discussed with residents of the neighborhoods at
numerous public open house meetings. The standards
that were eventually adopted as a result of those meetings
(and which were subsequently rolled over intact into the
LUC in 1997) were intended to maintain the character of
the neighborhood, and they focused on residential
construction. The residents' only concern with regard to
commercial construction was for proposed conversions of
existing residential structures to commercial use, where
the goal and purpose of the design standard was, and is,
to ensure that a residential structure should retain its
residential image.
• The proposal as submitted will promote the general
purpose of the standard for which the modification is
requested equally well or better than would a proposal
which complies with the standard for which the
modification is requested.
■ The reason that the proposal promotes the general
purpose of the standard for which the modification is
requested equally well or better than would a proposal
which complies is because:
➢ The existing building and many others in the
neighborhood have flat roofs and the proposed
expansion will go well with the architectural context of
the area. Examples of other buildings in the area with
flat roofs include:
- The Fort Collins Chamber of Commerce,
- The Federal Post Office,
Key Bank, and
- The Rocky Mountain Office Building.
N
Otter Box Corporate Headquarters (209 S Meldrum Street), PDP, #35-09
REVISED FINDINGS OF FACT/CONCLUSION
January 21, 2010 P & Z Meeting
Page 2
commercial construction was for proposed conversions of
existing residential structures to commercial use, where
the goal and purpose of the design standard was, and is,
to ensure that a residential structure should retain its
residential image.
■ The proposal as submitted will promote the general
purpose of the standard for which the modification is
requested equally well or better than would a proposal
which complies with the standard for which the
modification is requested.
■ The reason that the proposal promotes the general
purpose of the standard for which the modification is
requested equally well or better than would a proposal
which complies is because the cantilevered section of the
building over the parking and drive aisle:
➢ provides for better traffic flow through the site,
alleviating traffic congestion in the alley for residents to
the west; and
➢ provides for more parking, but less than the maximum.
And
• The granting of the modification would, without impairing
the intent and purpose of the Land Use Code alleviate an
existing, defined and described problem of City-wide
concern because the plan supports:
➢ City Plan Policy ECON 1.1 Balance of Employment
Opportunities; and
➢ City Plan Policy GM 8.1 Targeted Redevelopment/Infill.
o Section 4.9(E)(1)(g) Minimum Roof Pitch
- The criteria of Section 2.8.2(H)(1) is met because:
• The granting of the modification of standard would not be
detrimental to the public good.
■ The general purpose of the standard for which the
modification is requested is for residential building rather
ti
OtterBox Corporate Headquarters PDP, #35-09
REVISED FINDINGS OF FACT/CONCLUSION
All changes are in Bold.
6. Findings of Fact/Conclusion
In evaluating the PDP, Staff makes the following findings of fact:
A. The proposed land use is permitted in the NCB, Neighborhood Conservation
Buffer zone district.
B. The Project Development Plan complies with the applicable standards in
Article 3 — General Development Standards of the Land Use Code.
C. The Project Development Plan complies with the applicable standards
Division 4.9 Neighborhood Conservation, Buffer District (NCB), with the
exception of:
o Section 4.9(E)(1)(d) A second floor shall not overhang the lower front
or side exterior walls of a new or existing building; and
o Section 4.9(E)(1)(g) The minimum pitch of the roof of any building
shall be 2:12 and the maximum pitch of the roof of any building shall
be 12:12.
D. Staff supports the requested Modification of Standard Requests as follows:
o Section 4.9(E)(1)(d) Second Floor Overhang
- The criteria of Section 2.8.2(H)(1) and (2) is met because:
■ The granting of the modification of standard would not be
detrimental to the public good.
■ The general purpose of the standard for which the
modification is requested is for residential building rather
than commercial. Specifically, a number of ordinances
were adopted between 1993 and 1996 for the purpose of
implementing the East Side Neighborhood Plan and the
West Side Neighborhood Plan for properties in the NCL,
NCM and NCB zones. Potential design standards were
discussed with residents of the neighborhoods at
numerous public open house meetings. The standards
that were eventually adopted as a result of those meetings
(and which were subsequently rolled over intact into the
LUC in 1997) were intended to maintain the. character of
the neighborhood, and they focused on residential
construction. The residents' only concern with regard to
City of
F6rt Collins
u M u0C_\FOB
TO: Planning & Zoning Board
FROM: Emma McArdle, City Planner
DATE: January 15, 2010
Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750
970.224.6134 - fax
fcgov.com/Currentp/anning
RE: Otter Box Corporate Headquarters, PDP #35-09 - Revised Findings of
Fact/Conclusion and Recommendation
Following research into the purpose and intent of Sections 4.9(E)(1)(d) and (g) of the
Land Use Code, Staff has determined that these standards do not apply to the above
referenced Project Development Plan.
Section 4.9(E)(1)(d) A second floor shall not overhang the lower front or side
exterior walls of a new or existing building.
Section 4.9(E)(1)(g) The minimum pitch of the roof of any building shall be 2:12
and the maximum pitch of the roof of any building shall be 12:12, except that
new, detached accessory buildings and additions to existing dwelling units may
be constructed with a pitch that matches any roof pitch of the existing dwelling
unit.
These sections of the LUC were adopted as a result of various neighborhood meetings
about design standards for residential and converted residential buildings in the
neighborhoods addressed in the East Side Neighborhood Plan and West Side
Neighborhood Plan. The Building Design section of the NCL, NCM and NCB zone
districts were eventually adopted as a result of those meetings, and were rolled over
intact into the LUC, in 1997. These standards were intended to maintain the character
of the neighborhood, focusing on residential construction. The only concern residents
had with regard to commercial construction was proposed conversions of existing
residential structures to commercial uses, where the goal and purpose of the design
standard was, and is, to ensure that a residential structure retain its residential image.
The existing structure on this site is not and has never been a residence, therefore,
these standards do not apply and the Modification of Standard Requests are not
necessary.
Please see the REVISED FINDINGS OF FACT/CONCLUSION AND
RECOMMENDATION reflecting these changes.