Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWATER'S EDGE @ RICHARD'S LAKE - FDP - 58-86K - CORRESPONDENCE - (6)Page 1 of 1 Steve Olt - Re: Water's Edge at Richard's Lake - Final Plans From: Wes Lamarque To: Steve Olt Date: 5/13/2010 3:08 PM Subject: Re: Water's Edge at Richard's Lake - Final Plans No comments from Stormwater. >>> Steve Olt 5/12/2010 10:31:02 AM >>> Re: Water's Edge @ Richard's Lake - Final Plans How's everyone doing on your review of this project? We talked about the project at staff review last Wednesday, May 5th. I see updated comments in DMS from Jeff County, Jen Petrik, and myself. We need to get our comments completed and a letter sent to the applicant/developer soon. Thanks, Steve file://CADocuments and Settings\solt\Local Settings\Temp\GW}000O1.HTM 5/13/2010 • 11 Number: 290 Created: 5/4/2010 [5/4/10] The Plat needs a note as to the restrictions in the oil well areas. Number: 291 Created: 5/4/2010 [5/4/10] Please define the use of all tracts. Number: 292 Created: 5/4/2010 [5/4/10] The Plat needs a note: Vacating existing easements affected by this plat, and re- dedicating as shown. Number: 293 Created: 5/4/2010 [5/4/10] The Plat needs a note: Existing rights -of -way affected by this plat have been vacated by separate document. Topic: Site Plan Number: 294 Created: 5/4/2010 [5/4/10] Please correct the misspelled word "alley" on sheet 4 of 17. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 296 Created: 5/4/2010 (5/4/10] We were not routed the Utility Plans. We will need to see them for the next review. Be sure and return all red -lined plans if/when you re -submit paper plans or with the mylars when submitted. Another round of paper plan review is not necessary. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at 221-6341. Yours Truly, Steve Olt City Planner cc: Susan Joy John Gooch, APEX Engineering Skyland Meadows Developments Planning & Zoning file #58-86K Page 5 0 9 Number: 308 Created: 5/17/2010 [5/17/10] Please see comments under "General". Topic: Site Plan Number: 267 Created: 10/25/2007 [5/17/10] [10/25/07] Please see comments under "General'. Number: 309 Created: 5/17/2010 [5/17/10] Please label phasing on sheets 3 through 6. Topic: Utility Plans - Detail Sheets Number: 284 Created: 10/26/2007 [5/17/10] Please provide 703, 704B, 705, 705A. Remove Interim details 1606a and 1607a and replace with the updated details 1606, 1606a, 1607. Please provide the entire 1608 detail. Sheet 606 - Please provide detail D10, D11, D12 or D13 as appropriate and remove or label the detail provide on the left bottom side of the sheet as "private". [10/26/07] Please provide details 705a, 707, 1603, and the complete 1608 (only partial shown). Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann Topic: Fire Number: 307 Created: 5/12/2010 1 was not routed a set of plans. However, after discussing the project with staff, I think all PFA concerns have been addressed. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Jennifer Petrik Topic: General Number: 297 Created: 5/5/2010 [5/5/10] Bicycle parking is required at the club house. Parking facilities should be in a well light area, on a hard surface, convenient to the entrance and out of the elements if possible. Number: 298 Created: 5/5/2010 [5/5/10] At roundabout, entrance and exit for bicycles to bypass roundabout along shared sidewalk section is required for all legs of intersection, including streets that do not have bike lanes. Department: Technical Services Issue Contact: Jeff County Topic: Landscape Plans Number: 295 Created: 5/4/2010 [5/4/10] Please correct the line over text & text over text issues on the Landscape Plans. Topic: Plat Number: 287 Created: 5/4/2010 [5/4/10] The boundary & legal close. Number: 288 Created: 5/4/2010 [5/4/10] Please correct "Heartfire PUD Filing One" to "Hearthfire PUD First Filing". Number: 289 Created: 5/4/2010 [5/4/10] All easements, both existing & proposed, must be locatable. Page 4 Number: 170 Created: 6/20/2007 [5/17/10] The wall heights do not match between the Site, Landscape and Utility Plans. Site plans say 1-2' and the Utility Plans are calling them out to be 4'? Please coordinate the plan sets so they are showing the same thing. [10/16/07] [6/20/07] Please show and label all retaining walls. Number: 254 Created: 10/16/2007 [5/17/10] Please adjust the phase lines at lots 262 and 263 so that the lots can pull building permits for Phase 1. Lots 297 and 298 can not pull building permits until Phase 2. Please place a note on the plan sets (site, utility, landscape) to reflect that and I'll put that in the DA too. A note on the overall phasing sheets is fine John. I think that will work. [10/16/07] Phase I at Companion at Brightwater exceeds the 660' dead end maximum and needs to be terminated in a temp turnaround (see PFA for possible sprinkler requirements) OR build Brightwater to connect to Morningstar and your problem is solved. Both street frontages must be complete in order to pull a building permit for lot 272. You can either split the phase between lot 271 and 272 OR build the street along the south side of 272 in Phase 2. (See landscape red -lines) Number: 311 Created: 5/19/2010 [5/19/10] Please show the previously dedicated ROW with Hearthfire and Richard's Lake on the Plat, Site, Landscape and the horizontal control sheet of the Utility Plans and place a note that says that the row has been vacated by Ordinance #. Then show the areas to be retained as the agreed upon easements on the same plan sets/sheets. Number: 312 Created: 5/19/2010 [5/19/10] Remove the revisions from the revision block on the Site and Landscape Plans before printing the mylars. Topic: Landscape Plans Number: 55 Created: 5/9/2006 [5/17/10] [10/16/07] [6/8/07] [12/26/06] [7/4/06] Final Compliance - Just keeping this comment alive until these conditions are included in the DA. [5/9/06] Landscaping in the median will not be maintained by the City nor will any damage to the road caused by the irrigation system. All landscaping/road damage must be maintained by the development and the future HOA and language as such will be included in the Development Agreement. Landscape medians must include drainage facilities to handle sprinkler runoff and nuisance flows. Refer to Appendix C for all other requirements. Number: 266 Created: 10/25/2007 [5/17/10] [10/25/07] Please see comments under "General". Number: 310 Created: 5/17/2010 [5/17/10] Please label phasing on sheets 8 through 11. Topic: Plat Number: 118 Created: 7/4/2006 [5/17/10] Boxelder has included easement language on the plat so they will need to sign the plat in addition to any other easement holder. [10/16/07] A maintenance table was provided however, it also needs to say who owns it. [6/21/07] [12/26/06] [7/4/06] Provide a tract table (who owns and maintains each tract). Page 3 r Topic: Site Plan Number: 299 Created: 5/7/2010 [5/7/10] Tract designations have disappeared off of Sheets 1, 2, and 3 of the Site Plan. They must be added in the appropriate locations. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 305 Created: 5/12/2010 [5/12/10] Dennis Harmon of the Water Supply & Storage Company sent an e-mail on May 4th stating: As we discussed, the Water Supply & Storage Company owns and operates Richards Lake. We received on April 26th a copy of the Final utility plans for the Water's Edge development. This plan includes provisions to discharge stormwater into Richards Lake. Our consulting engineer, John Andrews, has been and is out of the country. Accordingly, I would like to request additional time to review these plans so that he can have an opportunity to review them and advise us as to any potential concerns he may have with the design. As of May 19th City staff is still awaiting comments from Water Supply & Storage. The applicant should contact Dennis directly at: 482-3433 (work), 443-1855 (mobile), or dharmon@frii.com (e-mail) to determine the status of WS&S's review and see if they still have concerns. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General Number: 42 Created: 5/9/2006 [5/17/10] The developer has chosen to vacate the right-of-way (ROW) and the vacated ROW must be shown on the plat with a note saying that "ROW vacated by ordinance XX". [10/16/07] Only a driveway is shown on the plan sets, please show all proposed landscaping (this area needs to be seeded at the minimum). As stated previously, this development will be responsible for the landscaping and maintenance of this area unless you process a ROW vacation and notify the other HOA that they are taking over the maintenance. The City will need to reserve an access easement for the portion of the sidewalk that falls off -site. [6/8/07] The ROW for the existing street stub needs to be landscaped and maintained by this development (unless you wish to pursue the vacation process as discussed previously). Please update the landscape plans to reflect that and make the appropriate notes on the plan set. The DA will have language regarding this as well. [12/26/06] [7/4/06] Repeat. Final Compliance. The developer has two choices for the street stub's existing ROW. First choice is to research who would receive the ROW (neighbor to north? Or the other site's HOA?) and then work out an access easement to connect your sidewalk through there OR leave the ROW as is and then agree to maintain the area with this development's HOA. If this is the option you would prefer, then the sidewalk could be repositioned away from the lot to the south and the area could be landscaped as more of an entry feature to your development. [5/9/06] Need to show the existing rights -of -way and what you are planning to have vacated. Will need legals and exhibits for each proposed vacation along with an $800 filing fee for each vacation. Larimer County Filing Fees also apply but those will be determined at a later time. Page 2 i STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins VIGNETTE STUDIOS Date: 5/19/2010 c/o Terence Hoaglund P.O. Box 1889 Fort Collins, CO 80522-1889 Staff has reviewed your submittal for WATER'S EDGE AT RICHARD'S LAKE - FINAL PLANS, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt Topic: Building Elevations Number: 303 Created: 5/7/2010 (5/7/10] Still hard to tell how the Building Elevations match up to the layout of the pool and clubhouse on the Site Plan. Is this a neighborhood center or a rec. center, or both? Number: 306 Created: 5/12/2010 [5/12/10] Still need labels for several fagade materials on the Building Elevations, sheets 14 - 17. Please see red -lined plans. Topic: General Number: 286 Created: 3/29/2010 [5/5/10] The PDP was submitted on April 19, 2006 and approved by the Planning &_Zoning Board on January 18, 2007. Final Plans were submitted on May 9, 2007. A request for a 6- month extension to July 18, 2010 was approved by the Director on January 6, 2010. This recent re -submittal on April 21, 2010 is the third round of Final Plan review. Topic: Landscape Plans Number: 300 Created: 5/7/2010 [5/7/10] There do not appear to be any phase lines between the various phases on Sheet 7 of 17 - Overall Landscape Plan. Number: 301 Created: 5/7/2010 [5/7/10] The LMN Adjusted Zoning Boundary and cross -hatched area does not need to be shown on Sheet 10 of 17 of the Landscape Plan. Number: 302 Created: 5/7/2010 [5/7110] There is overlapping information in the PLANT LEGEND and PLANTING NOTES on Sheet 12 of 17 of the Landscape Plan. Topic: Plat Number: 304 Created: 5/10/2010 [5/10/10] Don Kapperman of Comcast Cable has indicated that they need 6' wide utility easements on Lots 61 - 96 on both sides of Jib Lane and Lateen Lane in case Comcast has to put their facilities along these alleys or private drives. Page 1