HomeMy WebLinkAboutTHE DISTRICT @ CAMPUS WEST PDP - APPEAL OF H.O. DECISION - PDP120003 - CORRESPONDENCE - CORRESPONDENCE-HEARINGPage 2 of 2
Importance: High
Ted, can we discuss this? I can step out of my meeting this morning, or talk between 11:45 and 12:30. I'll try to
work on some revised language ASAP.
Thx!
-C
Carrie Mineart Daggett
Deputy City Attorney f'
City of Fort Collins
(970)416-2463
(970) 219-6426 (cell)
From: Lucia A. Liley[ma ilto:Ili ley@Iileyrogersmartell.com]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 01:14 PM
To: Carrie Daggett
Cc: Janelle P. Kechter <jkechter@lileyrogersmartell.com>
Subject: District Conditions
Carrie,
1. A condition was offered at the Type 1 hearing in connection with Building 2 (the garage), but was not
made a condition by the Hearing Officer. The offer was to slope the roof on the north fa4ade of that
building from its tallest point of 48 feet in height on its east corner to a height of 37 feet, 6 inches on its
west corner. I believe there was a slide of this at both the Type 1 and the appeal hearings.
2. At the Type 1 hearing, the roof of Building 1 was already shown on the PDP as stepping down from 5
stories to 4 stories on its north side. However, another condition was offered in connection with this
building: that the roof be pitched, but again the HO did not make that a condition. Two new conditions
were agreed to at the appeal hearing in connection with Building Three: stepping down from 5 to 4
stories the same as was shown for Building One and pitching the roof. Linda Ripley has suggested that
the language for both Buildings 1 and 3 be as follows: "That the north thirty (30) feet of Buildings One
and Three, as shown in the PDP for Building One, must be reduced in height from five (5) to four (4)
stories, and that the fourth story must feature a pitched roof, so as to reduce the building height along
the north elevation of these buildings." Note that we don't think the term "on the perimeter of the PDP
site" should be used as it's too vague.
Let me know if we need to talk further about these.
Lucia
8/21 /2012
Page 1 of 2
Ted Shepard
From: Carrie Daggett
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 10:48 AM
To: Ted Shepard
Subject: Re: District Conditions
It's what I forwarded below.
Thx.
-C
Carrie Mineart Daggett
Deputy City Attorney
City of Fort Collins
(970)416-2463
(970) 219-6426 (cell)
From: Ted Shepard
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 10:46 AM
To: Carrie Daggett
Subject: RE: District Conditions
Carrie, yes I'm around and I have not seen Lucia's comments. Ted
From: Carrie Daggett
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 10:45 AM
To: Ted Shepard
Subject: Re: District Conditions
Thanks Ted.
I think we should also discuss the comments from Lucia.re the roofs. Are you around?
-C
Carrie Mineart Daggett
Deputy City Attorney
City of Fort Collins
(970) 416-2463
(970) 219-6426 (cell)
From: Ted Shepard
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 10:42 AM
To: Carrie Daggett
Subject: RE: District Conditions
Carrie, I don't think we need to change any language. Section 3.2.1(F) contains all the up -sizing
standards. The reference to the section is perhaps too obscure but in order to comply with Sec. 3.2.1(F)
all plant material must be up -sized. Otherwise, there would be failure of compliance. My Read Before will
explain that. Ted
From: Carrie Daggett
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 9:05 AM
To: Ted Shepard
Subject: Fw: District Conditions
8/21/2012