HomeMy WebLinkAboutT-MOBILE CEDARWOOD WTF -PDP - 38-06 - CORRESPONDENCE - (16)Your next step will be to schedule your public hearing with me. Give me a call when you are
ready to schedule. I need a minimum of 2 weeks plus one day to arrange the hearing. For
the hearing, your plans will need to reflect changes based on the couple of comments that
are in bold above. I will need two hard copies for the hearing. The rest of the comments
can be addressed at the time of final plan submittal.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project,
please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6206.
Sincerely,
4A ne H. As en
P
City Planner
Page 3
Topic: Title Page
Number: 19 Created: 2/26/2007
[2/26/07] Please add signature blocks for the Director of Current Planning, the City Engineer
and leave space for the City Clerk's stamp. If you need, copies of these forms, please
contact me and Randy and we can email to you.
Topic: Site Plan
Number: 20 Created: 2/26/2007
[2/26/07] Site plan still calls out a 4-foot fence. Fence is not called out on Elevations sheet
either.
Number: 23 Created: 3/7/2007
[3/7/07] 1 visited the site and agree that landscaping is unnecessary to screen the facility,
given the context and the walls and fences that exist. You will not need to install any
landscaping with this project.
Department: Engineering
Topic: Engineering
Number: 13
[2/15/07] No comments.
Issue Contact: Randy Maizland
Created: 2/15/2007
Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Alan Rutz
Topic: General
Number: 22 Created: 2/27/2007
[2/27/07] Contact Light and Power with power requirements. System modifications will be
required to provide a source of power for this project. Contact Alan Rutz 224-6153
Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carle Dann
Topic: Fire
Number: 21 Created: 2/27/2007
[2/27/07] PFA has no comments or concerns at this time.
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington
Topic: Water/Wastewater
Number: 4 Created: 12/26/2006
[2/27/07] (Repeat comment) Field locate the fire service line, domestic water service
and stormwater detention pond easement and show on the plans. Clearly label these
lines and for the detention easement, clearly indicate which side of the lines is the
detention. These lines could necessitate moving the building and tower.
[12/26/06] Show existing City water/sewer mains (and easements) and the fire line service
and domestic water service extending to the King Soopers building to determine if there are
any conflicts.
Page 2
�v�
'a STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
City of Fort Collins
T-MOBILE/CHRIS STRYKER Date: 03/07/2007
STRYKER SITE SERVICES, LLCpa�cw/��o,%
9643 TIMBER HAWK CIRCLE #26
LITTLETON, CO 80126
Staff has reviewed your submittal for KING SOOPERS (CEDARWOOD PLAZA) WIRELESS
TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY - TYPE I, and we offer the following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Anne Aspen
Topic: General
Number: 12 Created: 1 /8/2007
[2/26/07]
[1/8/07] Please keep in mind that while 11x17" sets are acceptable at this time, final plans
must be produced on mylar at 24x36".
Number: 14 Created: 2/26/2007
[2/26/07] The following departments and agencies have no further comments: Natural
Resources, Xcel Energy.
Number: 15 Created: 2/26/2007
[2/26/07] Carol Tunner from Advance Planning's Historic Preservation department provided
a letter, attached to this stating that there are no buildings or structures within 250 feet that
are historically significant per a Section 106 review.
Number: 16 Created: 2/26/2007
[2/26/07] The Building Inspection department comments as follows:
"Licensed Structural Engineer's review required for monopole design."
Number: 17 Created: 2/26/2007
[2/26/07] Please direct any future correspondence.to me, not my colleague Ted Shepard.
Ted filled in for me at your conceptual review because I was out of the office, but I am the
official project planner on your project. Addressing correspondence to me will ensure that it
gets to me in a timely manner. Also, please respond to the current staff review comment
letter not the conceptual review letter. In this case the comment letter was dated 1/8/07,
sent via email to you. When you submit again, either another pre -hearing round or at the
time of Final Plan review, please respond to this letter.
Number: 18 Created: 2/26/2007
[2/26/07] For the record, I met with you at our counter a couple of weeks ago and we spoke
about the Verizon request to co -locate. We agreed that your submittal would be
modified before the hearing to include the provision of a 40-foot monopole which can
accommodate an additional 10-foot section of pole for use by Verizon or another
provider. This project will locate on the 40-foot pole and will not be subject to the special
height review or neighborhood meeting. At such time as Verizon or another provider co -
locates, they would add the additional 10-foot section of pole and be subject to both
neighborhood meeting and special height review requirements for a 50-foot tall monopole.
Page 1