Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout638 EBON PICA ST - SPECIAL INSPECTIONS - 7/2/2009Reinforcing Steel Quality Assurance Observation C T `, I T H ®M P $ ® N Per the client's request, a representative of CTL Thompson has visually observed the reinforcement within the formwork under construction at the site referenced below. The following summarizes our observations and opinions at the time of our visit. Client: Anc DI'V1144 '14 Site Address: F6o.6 & 1338 CaTa�oc 1-f lrlli2s. CD Job #: S E 13 ,.ao�` ` Lot: -33-1-7 Block: Filing: Date: 77/7 I _ Contact: u 5 U/jff� Subdivision: RQyrn Ll,>,. mol , Lf Reinforcing Plan Information Plan By: CTL Date: 3 �ol, . Job#: �4747 76,oa Reinforcing Type(s): ❑ footing )a foundation wall O grade beam ❑ pier cap ❑ structural slab ❑ slab -on -grade ❑ column ❑ other Wall / Grade Beam Reinforcing Steel Grade Horizontal Vert./Ties 1 Q OP 91dYlt .6 ow,'. *q 3 v "o.c lktiQ to.t 4 Pier Cap] Slab Reinforcing Steel Grade Longitudinal Lateral A B C D UFER Ground ;. Installed — Location ❑ Not Observed Max/Min wall height observed: Summary of Opinions k7, It is our opinion that the reinforcing steel observed was in general conformance with the plan. ❑ It is our opinion that the reinforcing steel observed was not in general conformance with the plan. (2rid observation required). Deficiencies noted: If void forms are required, are they installed as rj recommended? Pyes Ono Required thickness: in. Field 1 resentAtv"e Date oa0 L/f ,- Concrete on -site? ❑ yes A no (% poured c Weather: Sgfiy If 7# •' �Ts „moo._ O �P -Z — �d,Jer TT Notes:�-� {ln /-1 Of � ' 411 •}G 5-1 I � � Af n AOC,�aCln r ., wins - rA P OL. AID CnArrrir. nne S14'e- R sewed By ;'�"r Date CTL I Thompson, Inc. 1 351 Linden Street, Suite 140, Ft. Collins, CO 80524 Drilled Pier Ouality Assurance Observation Per the client's request, a representative of CTL has visually observed the drilling of the piers at the site referenced below. The following summarizes our observations and opinions at the time of our visit. Job #: S Fd 1'374, �e-,� Date: VA' 10 i —Contact: Site Address: 54re4z Lot:33-37 Block: Filing: Subdivision: Rgvcn U',:,. Installation Contractor: Weather:5-7f - Foundation Plan: 02- "t,,,..,.._,.., Date:- 31gmi: Job: `iF�>r 371;.a� Soil Report: H eY A4 E: ;, "k �:. �_ •., Job #: OV-a -24r -2 Date: Drilled Pier Specifications Reinforcing Steel: .3 --#r Cyr Pier Diameter 10" Min. Pier Length: 16' Z2' Min. Penetration tz` Planned Support Stratum: C 14 < t ,I . Other: Description, E=Elevation of top pier, D=Pier Diameter, L=Total Pier Length, P=Penetration, H2O=Depth to Water Pier E D L P H2O 1 Cf 4o�r �S /I 2 0 (C 3 O /o" ,L'� 4 0- 5 0- 6 in jar 7 D 1011 8 9 D 11,t Subsurface Conditions observed during drillingC,6 u Installation Methods Used ❑ Pumping ❑ Casing 4 Drill & Pour ❑ Tremy Summary of opinions: JR It is our opinion that the drilled piers observed were in general conformance with plans and specifications. ❑ It is our opinion that the drilled piers were not in general conformance with plans and specifications. Corrective Pier E D L P H2O 11 In 'L �� t ,-7 12 0 'ov 1.3' 13 Q Wo„ 13 i 14 I©rr f b'� ' f3 15 C0;, ;gOA`b Is 16 0 to"I I� 13" (�r 17 (] to !L'-o" i3 t — 18 0 loI I b , 3 " 13' — 19 O 011 1('0' 11 % — 20LL 10 ff� Pam., 7 iJ.-�- :-E -fir - ;-1- a- • t� -I 1-;- - ��'�-��_l _l. . . - 1 i -;_ M- KN^✓d,_ Q t 1 4 a V..1 , pt T 41 Field Representative: Reviewed By: CTL I Thompson, Inc. 1 351 Linden Street, Suite 140, Ft. Collins, CO Perimeter Drain / Assurance Observation CTL I THO PSON (1 I Vw3ai'?e.^`-i...`"Taj: Per the client's request, a representative of CTL has visually observed the perimeter drain t the site referenced above. The following summarizes our observations and opinions at the time of our visit. Client: Afth ' 661014eld Site Address: Fclrl- (Odins, 0 Fa 1 Cofl,�s, 69 Job_ #: YFoi;76,6o.S Lot: 33-3) Block: Filing: Date: �12Y M Contact: A 4:ss . Wdfls Subdivision: R weo V c ✓ 5ti loc�,'v,;r/b�! Proiect Specifications Foundation Plan By: 4!& Ttto�T s „ Date 3 6 0l Job# YD137A,Wur Geotechnical Report By: F)EC Date 1'3a'L:Pff Job# Recommended Drain type? Q Exterior perimeter ❑ Interior ❑ other Observations Perimeter drain observed around: Basement ❑ Crawlspace ❑ Other: Where does the perimeter drain discharge? ❑ Daylight W Sump pit ❑ Subdivision drain Dampproofing observed around: ❑ Basement ❑ Crawlspace ❑ All backfill areas Comments 41r14 ofnls i�ar';cr�, ���hcd I a aed H" Itr Q( LW45 I4 h p 1. LZrauc nnu/ dild kR U ldd J2, 140+ an ii�,1 ti w 1 Sre c ( ccxct I � SiseCf-.faf �f4�p L1W��ipn$ i }( ;Indicates approximate drain'lpcation Surnmary of Opinions It is our opinion that the foundation drain atrdfer dampp;QG€iag observed generally conform with the project referenced above. ❑ It is our opinion that the foundation drain and/or dampproofing observed differs significantly from the project specifications (2nd observation required). Corrective Action: Field epresentative Date O O L 4c2, By Cj CTL I Thompson, Inc. 1 351 Linden Street, Suite 140, Ft. Collins, CO 80524 / Dampproofing Quality Assurance Observation Per the client's request, a representative of CCL has visually observed the perimeter drain and/or dampproofing at the site referenced above. The following summarizes our observations and opinions at the time of our visit. Client: Site Address: 61v-6yy Z.Z,. 'a, /,— / !.//;As �. GO Job#: sFoiJ7L.oa5 Lot: 3J-37Block: — Filing: — Date: o� ro ev Contact: / ".% 4,.//s Subdivision: A%,,,.., 0,,...., Project Specifications Foundation Plan By: GTL o so• �, Date a�� s /.,g Job# SFoi3�t . 04� Geotechnical Report By: Date oJed Job# oywi_ Fyn Recommended Drain type?,A ❑ Exterior perimeter ❑ Interior ❑ other Observations Perimeter drain observed around: JA ❑ Basement ❑ Crawlspace ❑ Other: Where does the perimeter drain discharge? /0 ❑ Daylight O Sump pit ❑ Subdivision drain Dampproofing observed around: gBasement ❑ Crawlspace O All backfill areas Comments Summary of Opinions it It is our opinion that the fQiguipti dampproofing observed generally conform with the project referenced above. O It is our opinion that the dampproofing observed differs significantly from the project specifications (2"d observation required). Corrective Action: .41",e .01-/"l/4 Field Representative Date as BOep•a .taw . O�a�� � p..•ev� �W e Re>4& Oa a • c P e.. a Date CTL 1 Thompson, Inc. I 1103 Old Town Lane, Suite 82009 u 4' CLEAN GRAVEL 4- CLEAN GRAVEL 4' CLEAN GRAVEL 4" CLEAN b fell' 1��Mf '\ �3 'IA EMENT W1 tkFNIS14EC) BASEMENT W1 LNIFINW44ED EASEMENT W/ U11FINISHISO BASEMENT UY U1,FNISHED BASEMENT W1 NE"!D OVER 4- CONIC. SLAB OVER 4" CONIC. SLAB OVER 4" CONC. SLAB OVER 4" CONIC. SLAB OVER !ICON SLAE65 ff4 1 4' CLEAN GRAVEL 4' CLEAN GRAVEL 4- CLEAN GRAVEL 4" CLEAN GRAVEL STEEL STEEL COL. /'—STEEL COL. STEEL STEEL COL. (COL. roL (D(7D OLL -0.. 14'-F 3'-1- W-0- 3--0- 3'-58'- 90- 7113-j" 3. DRILLED CAISSCN SPECIFICATIONS FOUNDATION FLAN FIER DIAMETER I FerwoRcEmENT I MR LENGTH MIN. PENETRATION SCAI F �,-. 1--o' 'Lj a4 6 6 RILL LENGTH It' IN NON-B"T OTHER 055ERV]ATIONSMAY U OBSERVATION BY ENGINEER 15 RECLIRED. CONTRACTOR To CALL FOR BE REQUIRED By THE CITY OBSERVATION MINIMUM 24 HR5 PRIOR TO START OF DRILLING. OR OTHER DONEEFS 2.) A MINIMUM Or 25% OF THE FIERS S40ULD BE OBSERVED. CC4PACI`ICN TESTING EEC WoWjr� ON THIS PROJECT. :2 01 0- 3.) WATER MAY BE ENCOUNTIEFED. IT 15 ANTICIPATED THAT A 'DRILL AND DRLLED PER OBSERVATION CTIL I THOMPSON POUR" METHOD MAY BE UTILIZED. - -ZATION REIM�ENT CTL I THOMPSON HOLDDOIN NO) SCHEDULE 4.) WHEN WATER 18 ENCOUNTERED P.MPING OF CONCRETE MAY BE f5u REQUIRED. PERIMETER DRAIN HD - MANJIF. /MODEL NOTES S) FIER CONCRETE SHOULD BE PLACED IMMEDIATELY A�71ER DRILLING. DAMP PROOFING D'S AS SWOW4 ARE IN APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS. FIELD LOCATE D tj b-) SEE GEC -TECHNICAL ENGINEERS REPORT rOR ADDITIONAL a E)ATE FINAL GRADING CERTFICATICN CTL I THOM� (D I SIMP504 STHD14RJ 14 'S AT CORNERS. EDGE OF OPENW.S ABOVE, OR EIZS OF ;%111�ATM6. MIRED SHEAR WALLS fSEE ARCH PLANS DiM---NSIONS) 114 r�nu I �n IAldd~ &IIIIII AIIIIC P1 II INI I / / TIMI PI /SKI