Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDrainage Reports - 05/30/20191 May 10, 2018 1 1 1 1 I 1 u I 1 NORTHERN EfVGINEERING Mr. Was Lamarque City of Fort Collins 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 RE: Final Drainage Memorandum for 1st Stop Plaza Second Filing Fort Collins, Colorado Dear Wes: City of Ft Ctf Plans. Approved � Date S-3r� r.q Northern Engineering Services is pleased to submit this Final Drainage Memorandum for 1st Stop Plaza Second Filing. Asa result of the recent design improvements to the intersection of Sunige Drive and College Avenue, the driveway access for Lots 1 and 2 of 1st Stop Plaza will be relocated. The existing driveway is a full -service access from College Avenue. In conjunction with the improvements to Suniga Drive, the access on College Avenue will become right turn in and out only and relocated 60 feet north of the current location. A three-quarter access will be provided from Suniga Drive 390 feet east of College Avenue. A shared driveway will be constructed to allow vehicular movement between the two new access locations. As part of the improvements for Suniga Drive and College Avenue intersection, Interwest Consulting Group prepared a drainage memorandum to North East College Corridor Outfall (NECCO) Design Report dated August:13, 2018. tots 1 and 2 of 1st Stop Plaza Second Filing coincide with Basin B of the Interwest Drainage Memorandum. Interwest assumed an impervious area of 44.4% and a runoff coefficient of 0.53 for Lots 1 and 2 of 1st Stop Plaza. The impervious area with the, proposed. driveway improvements is 33% and, the runoff coefficient is 0.57. The proposed driveway improvements comply with assumptions. used in the Interwest Drainage: Memorandum for Suniga Drive. Detention for the site is part of the North East College Corridor Outfall (NECCO), but the project does not meet the City's water quality and LID requirements. Upon redevelopment of Lots 1 and 2 for l° Stop Minor Subdivision, the developer will need to provide the necessary water quality and LIDimprovements for that portion of the driveway, asphalt, parking lot, and concrete of this project that fails within their property. Table 1 below summarizes the required volumes necessary to satisfy the City's water quality requirements for this project Table 1: Required Water Quatil i Volume Description Water Quality Volume (ft3) Water Quality Volume (Acres) Lot 1 669 0.015 Lott 285 0.007 FORT COLLINS:301 North Howes Street, Suite 100, 80521 1 970.221.4158 GREELEY-820 8'" Street, 80631 1970.395.98801 WEB: www.northemengineering.com U 1 1 1 NORTHERN ENGINEERING Interest Consulting Group assumed the entire flow from this site will flow towards a CDOT Type-D inlet at the southeast comer of the project: Due to the necessary grading improvements to connect the proposed driveway into the Suniga Road Improvements, the site was divided into four basins: Basin B1, B2, OS1, and OS2. Basin B1 sheet flows from the northwest comer of the project site towards the southeast comer of the site per Interest Consulting GrouWs assumptions. The CDOT Type-D inlet will collect stonnwater from Basin B1 and discharge into the NECCO storm sewer system. Basin B2 flows from the northwest comer of Lot 2 to Inlet B2 along the south side of the project. Inlet B2 will discharge into a 30" storm sewer provided as part of the Suniga Road Improvements, and as an extension of the NECCO storm sewer system. Basin OS1 will sheet flow into the curb and gutter provided by he.Suniga Road Improvements. The curb and gutter discharges into a storm inlet located on Suniga Road, provided by the Suniga Road Improvements, at. the upstream location of the same storm sewer collecting drainage from Basin B2. Basin OS2 follows historic patterns and discharges into the curb and gutter along. North College Avenue. Drainage from North College Road ultimately discharges into the same storm sewer inlet collecting drainage from Suniga Road and Basin OSl. ' We feel the current proposed drainage plan for 1st Stop Plaza Second Filing is in compliance with the concepts shown in the NECCO Design Report and the interwest'Drainage Memorandum for Suniga Drive and College Avenue. Upon redevelopment of Lots 1 and 2 of 15t Stop Minor Amendment, the developer will need to provide water quality and LID Improvements for that portion of the driveway improvements that fall within their property. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at;your earliest convenience. NORTHERN ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. _.wa000mms,._ 1 c 0�:� �•• �T��' Mtn ''� 45018 Q�'•. Frederick S. Wegert, PE Project Engineer FORT COLLINS:301 North Howes Street, Suite 100, 80521 1970.221.4158 GREELEY: 820 8" Street, 80631 l 970.395.9880 WEB: www riorthemengineering.com I 1 1 1 0 z V Fz v w �z o n a o 0 0 0 n E Ey vv N m o nr m m q N r A c �i �Oi q O II - ink a do Ems: o-.000 J q Mw0vv o0000 V � � a ti _ m _� q 00 rn a o l0 t0 W II .' E y 0 0000 c ti U UGG o nl 1•` O pq �N m C_ O n m ti a y OO�i Ov OOO 000 a 00i ¢ C y o 000 N N W E q N S 2 N u pi 0� Qi-+�-+N N N m q A ti 00000 v d y C d 0 0 0 0 0 060 666 Q v 0 0 0 0 0 n r W � a m O O a � a O 7 m y Y u � M 0N01 O O m2 U c ° 3 'S m ci n 0 0cM E m NOMN'2 C) O � N � 0 cp a W� m 0 Lli a ae O > h a N m n O N m .p O N V e "' V m y E a Cc o m j a m m j d 0 N g G u Q U C9 K a C N U O N m cn ` � 13p N m m mOOHp ¢ a I t 1 1 I I 1 1 1 Z 1 T N O Lo Lq 00 C p ~ Lci 01 00 — C u j, N 0) O N c p 'E O LO 00 00 O m 'a O E ow i. 'F °'�O-0 T N F- N N Lo O O r. N ti L� A U T udu m Q C ' 00 ¢ Q ¢ 00 O ; H E N Z Z Z N d 0 o � A � Z u i0 OV N o> L1' Z Z Z 4 c Q'D oom Q 3 ~ E z r . z 0 O Uy- V Z F t7 T 'o> O z z d > 1, n N O !Z - 00 N O ~ O F ON V c0 00 CO V~ N m,_, 00 N E ON V 00 00 W N O U. .� U 00 CD 00 1� C � O r O N in U O II O 10 0 O C _0 o T O Ol V O l0 t0 m 0o N C V D U L) V II O O O O O W m U C O V _ C m V T O V O A t0 p 'h W N V V U N p 0 0 0 0 C u \ CT C N m m O U N a CO O O II a C) 0 zZzzz 0 0 0 0 E > n H W v Q m N O A v MC) ~ 3 t0 } e .N.. ALo (n z- U W+ I O O H O N > > z a 1 1 1 I W�o — nm L D L o O 00, 000L V m Lo + w 0 0 0 N m N N O O V N --� T 0 2 C N n o d N V' N O O O O N m LZ 2 w7. W m N O Ln W 00 LO m 00 M O a o LLimr�oa�D U U n n m rn N-4 M � i N . Lo LO — to In I^ N N LO --� N co O u7 00 stONO O O 0 0 O m V Ot0O ap fL� 00 N V V' 0 0 0 0 0 c r� V ^ m 00O LOO K fh 00 N d -It Q O O O O O W h 0 O O co co o a A C � 0 CD 00 N .r �.. U N m o 0 N LO N N oc L V N O O O M M �x a W c y Y N A 0 H y r m ^ N a �' mmoo'cn N (n VJ .a. o _ m N � = c rNij (mil �JI 'gyp d 2] O 010 ."0 Or' y K 2 I 1 1 1 11 1 7 1 1 50% On -Site Treatment by LID Requirement New Impervious Area 0.187 Ac. Paver Area 0.048 Ac. Traditional Pavement Area 0139 At. Other Impervious Surfaces (Roofs, Concrete Walks, etc.) 0.000 Ac. Required Minimum Impervious Area to be Treated 0.094 Ac. Paver LID Treatment Paver area 0.048 Ac. Run-on area for Pavers (parking area) 0.125 Ac. Run-on area for Pavers (other - concrete walks, etc.) 0.000 Ac. Impervious Area Treated by LID Pavers 6.173 Ac. Rain. Garden -Treatment Rain Garden Area 0.000 Ac. Run-on area for Rain Garden 0.000 Ac. Impervious Area Treated by Rain Gardens 0.000 Ac. Total Impervlous Area Treated 0.173 Ac. Percent of Impervious Area Treated 92.38 % 25% Permeable_ Pavement.Requlre merit_ New Pavement Area 8,165 .S . Ft. Required Minimum Area of Permeable Pavement 2,041 Sq. Ft. Total Permeable Pavement Area 2,099 Sq. Ft. Actual % of Permeable Pavement Provided 25.7 % I � ! {\\ <�� /\� a / }\ § �j7/ cz a :3 \E ±J \�/� omu= za&§ � � �E - !; � 4 !! �k 16 ® § !! (|; }k � }9 � 22( !; o .. ®k§§ || § �\ §■a;�, � e&; }))§ | ))!; \ , l�2; u § ) _ 7\ ƒ{\ _/ ; ) \\ [ k [ § I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 i 1 i i 1 1 Area Inlet Performance Curve: Existing Inlet at Basin B1 Governing Equations: At low flow depths, the inlet will act like a weir governed by the following equation: ' where P = 3.1416'Dia. of grate • where H corresponds to the depth of water above the flowline Q = 3.0P H's At higher flow depths, the inlet will act like an orifice governed by the following equation: ^ = 0.67 A G g'H ) 115 QJ ` where A equals the open area of the inlet grate • where H corresponds to the depth of water above the centroid of the cross -sectional area (A) The exact depth at which the inlet ceases to act like a weir, and begins to act like an orifice is unknown. However, what is known, is that the stage -discharge curves of the weir equation and the orifice equation will cross at a certain flow depth. The two curves can be found below: Stage - Discharge Curves 90.00 80.00 70.00 +Weir Flow mF--.-•Orifice Flow -- - 60.00 50.00 m 40.00 u 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.0o 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.8o 1,00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 Stage (ft) If H > 1.792 (A/P), then the grate operates like an orifice; otherwise it operates like a weir. Input Parameters: Type of Grate: MOT Ty Diameter of Grate (ft): 3.8 Open Area of Grate (ft2): 24.70 Rim Elevation 1 4966.430 Reduction Factor: 50% vs. Flow: Shallow Orifice Actual Elevation Weir Flow Flow Flow Depth Above Inlet (ft) (ft) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 0.00 4966.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 4966.63 1.60 29.68 1.60 0.40 4966.83 4.53 41.98 4.53 0.53 4966.96 6.83 48.14 6.83 0.60 4967.03 8.32 51.41 8.32 0.80 4967.23 12.81 59.36 12.81 1.00 4967.43 17.91 66.37 17.91 1.20 4967.63 23.54 72.71 23.54 1.40 4967.83 29.66 78.53 29.66 1.60 4968.03 36.24 83.95 36.24 1.80 4968.23 43.24 89.05 43.24 100-Year Design Flow = 6.86 cfs 10-Year Design Flow = 2.69 cfs C' N N N SU oU �(J L � S r = � 0 O s .-,,,■1■---M -M„IV'■ M -�I-1.,---m --- mmmmm mmmm mmmm ---,,,EUM ---."„- .-.-."- _ -----'- ------m -_-_-_-_-_ ._-m ----- .-, ----. ,-, mmmmm lmm ci a ae (s{o) pioede� S e e e e e e e e e w I 0/ I I I I I I t I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I I I — I �♦ 00 I 1108 N. COLLEGE AVENUE ' 1180 N.COLLEGE AVENUE IMP AW WE , E _ WE AW r r --- / IF 1 l too I /' l ♦ I I I / Irl 1010 N. COLLEGE AWNUE ►I l i�ALM Apr 1 uiunaarra/ \\ '--� I FAIelffpHwwn—�j i \ / — - ,/A, ftft / / I fto �1 - / I 100E N. COLLEGE AVENUE 1 I I / Imnravwvai' --- I I I � � FAIMeEr�tun I 1 I ,-- / I I I � _ A / wxu 'Aa vAuareRx I «DCMarttE .�► MMEMrtFA.E.X, 1 w I _ YIYEY PNI� r ref etCP , 1 AA 1 --- sED utuTr EAnFAENr� -___ Y 1\/, I ICTOWN ATOL 1 M. FEsTOPD�� II —_� ---- - SUBDIVISION aNE 1 1 EDF SIDEWALK 1 EXISTING BUILDING 1" N. COLLEGE AVENUE MATCH ITSSITTING 1� VM FISTEDLIP �D,TER ses ONTRAM LOT 21 ST STOP PLAZA l O e 1 W CONCRETE SECOND FILINGVALL J _ 1 ��DVPµ ^gym LOT 1 1 SITO STOP PLAZA 1 QED OS2 Fm 1 ~ SECOND FILING 1 WIDE _ - 31FA9EIE r� ALKCOLNERT /� 1 wowsEONcrosRwx «caulwm*-1 1 SF IRE- t.wlac V E MOE2cr1 w A� o SET c a O ��.RS 1 ',rob 1 1 2MlF VNrbPM \ O _ z - ---- - w ,.► 1 . �/ PROPOSED MIN. vDEEP I °s FAR (AC(ACTUALDEPTH ES) RS EMERGENCY T SF .\ \ RwNE wITvetscesLaEs - I t cop') � - - - - - I� � W. W. ����,� � - If RS RS 1 1 I - KIM 1111L at \ I OW t - _ IP \\ I 1 `n - _ - - ISEEvuO :. sroRM awEnI EAwaxxTs - OStIII T \ I CGNSUtTm 1mLv UITUDY III i DRUVE IMPROVEMENTS PREPARED IIIINTERWE TxOGROUP I _ 1` ���- � � � �mow- -mp GONE BYa 1 IGHT", c PROPOSED STORM INLET I REINVEST w DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS PREPARED 1 ccxSULnUUIi4n CONSULTING IMPRUVEMENTS PREPARED By INTERWIST_ - %i.. tWP't GONwt GGROUPT - - - _ f .2 0 ■ 0 0 PenmFnsrwwMxNNUF R. NtERwE.T r NFEFF m SO LEGEND:Y DETETr6RGt .WAY -- EXISTNGEAeEIENTS -- — PROPOSEDNFRASTRUCTMEeIGTRMs PRO SEDSICAMMUMER E.OPoCEOMswcovN wn 5015 PROPOSED N.IORmNTow —eo-- wONSEDMINORCOxTdw —74 DESI N NONE A DRNGRAGEeNswlAea 2~ FEG DRuwSE tvvrnCEIDxRY PROADNED STORM SEWER PERMANENT BMPS TURTRUNINFORDEMENTMAT ® TEMPORARY BMPS qp NIETvrmTErnoN O y y eATPMCE O�w� DD�ww« so NOTES s. F.a..NNrs INNFONF. T PLAN wpPoSED.NO VACATED REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME OESUi, tPTION WATERODULDS VCl FI W=(WMITY VOL (ACRES) THIS PROJECT WES NOT MEET THE CTB LID REQUIREMENTS. UPON REDEVELOPMENT OF LOT$ t 83 FOR 1ST $TOP MINOR $UBONISION, THE DON OF PERTHE DRIVEWAY PROVIDE LID PARKING LOT, FOR THAT PoRTIFA OF IT DRIVEWAY, ASPHALT.PARKING LOT, AND CONCRETE THAT FALLS WITHIN THEIR PROPERTY. OFFSITE DRAINAGE FROM THE NORTH MUST BE MAINTgINED CONVEYED OR NE ROUTED TO FLOW INTO THE NORTH E0.ST COLLEGE CORRIDOR OUTALL STORM SEWER SYSTEM W(THINS EGA p= DI1wTILm XOIRCAATTIGN CENTER OF COLO KRow MVlS below. wWE ME xX. WINDrtymALL 7 ANNUAL AD, I MI��III City of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL ROSE BY, a r FEE or y BY: BT:arcma O— BY: BY: MIS Z LD s �z p. LIJ D =W �Z c) pp e ZW •YiBa !e Z J (L J ON LL Z 0 U Z 0 U) 0 w 06 w Q Z NQ LL Sheet C5.0 7 of 10