Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDrainage Reports - 05/28/2014City of Ft: Collins rovl Plans Appioved By p58 =1.' FINAL DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL REPORT FEEDER SUPPLY PROJECT DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL REPORT FEEDER SUPPLY PROJECT Prepared for: Jon Prouty Lagunitas Fort Collins, CO 80216 Prepared by: North Star Design 700 Automation Drive, Unit I Windsor, Colorado 80550 (970)686-6939 April 1, 2014 Job Number 173-10 North Star �*am., design 700 Automation Drive, Unit I Windsor, CO 80550 Phone:970-686-6939 Fax:970-686-1188 April 1, 2014 Glen Schlueter City of Fort Collins Stormwater 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80522 RE: Drainage and Erosion Control Report for Feeder Supply Project Dear Glen, I am pleased to submit for your review and approval, this Drainage & Erosion Control Report for the Feeder Supply project. I certify that this report for the drainage design of the Feeder supply was prepared in accordance with the criteria in the City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage Manual. I appreciate your time and consideration in reviewing this submittal. Please call if you have any questions. Prepared by: 31306 Patricia Kroetch P.E. Project Manager "'�vZONA O TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLEOF CONTENTS............................................................................................................... iii 1. GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 1.1 Location...................................................................................................................1 1.2 Description of Property ............................................................................................1 1.3 Major Basin Description..........................................................................................2 1.4 Sub Basin Description.............................................................................................2 2. DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA 2.1 Regulations..............................................................................................................2 2.2 Development Criteria Reference and Constraints...................................................2 2.3 Hydrologic Criteria..................................................................................................3 2.4 Hydraulic Criteria....................................................................................................3 3. DRAINAGE FACILITY DESIGN 3.1 General Concept......................................................................................................3 3.2 Specific Flow Routing.............................................................................................3 3.3 Drainage Summary ..................................................................................................4 4. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT CONTROLS 4.1 Written Analysis.....................................................................................................4 4.2 SWMP contact information.....................................................................................5 4.3 Identification and location of all potential pollution sources..................................6 4.4 Best Management Practices (BMP's) for Stormwater Pollution Prevention ........... 6 4.5 BMP Implementation...............................................................................................9 5. CONCLUSIONS 5.1 Compliance with Standards..................................................................................12 5.2 Drainage Concept..................................................................................................12 6. REFERENCES..................................................................................................................13 APPENDICES A Vicinity Map B Hydrologic Computations C Hydraulic Computations D BMP Schedule & Cost Estimate iii 1. GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 1.1. Location The Feeder Supply redevelopment project, hereafter referred to as the Feeder Supply, is located at 359 Linden. The proposed project is located on a portion of Blocks 6 & 7, City of Fort Collins Old Town in the Northeast Quarter of Section 12, Township 7 North, Range 69 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, in the City of Fort Collins, Larimer County, Colorado. See the location map in Appendix A. This project is bounded on the northeast by Willow Street, on the southeast by Linden Street, on the northwest by Schrader Oil Company, and on the southwest by existing office and commercial development. 1.2. Description of Property The project consists of approximately 1.4 acres of land. There is currently one original historic building on site that has several additions which were added after the original building and gravel drives and parking. There is no existing vegetation on site. The original historic building will be preserved and the additions will be removed with this project. The original building will be expanded and an additional residential and retail building with parking on the main floor will be located northwest of the existing structure that will remain. Willow Street will be widened with this project and internal drives and parking will be paved with asphalt. All elevations given in this report and in the construction plans are based on the 1929 NGVD unadjusted datum. See the grading sheet for specific elevations on the site and elevation of the building at each entry point. Stormwater from the Cache La Poudre Drainage Basin is ultimately routed to the Poudre River in the existing streets and existing storm pipes in historic flow routes. Runoff from this site will flow to a storm pipe that will be relocated with this project. This storm system will convey the runoff to an existing manhole at the intersection of Willow and Linden. From this point the runoff will be routed through a Bay Saver water quality structure and into the Cache La Poudre River. Because of this, no on site detention is being provided. P Currently water quality and detention measures have not been provided for the existing development. With this project, it is proposed to construct approximately 22,000 sq.ft of additional roof area, 16,600 sq. ft. of additional asphalt pavement area and no additional concrete area. The original development (historic condition) had approximately 5230 square feet of roof area, 1760 square feet of concrete and no asphalt. The entire site (except for the building area that will remain) is expected to undergo clearing, excavating and grading. Since there additional impervious area being constructed, water quality and detention would normally be required for the new impervious area. With this project the City will allow the runoff from the site to enter the existing storm system without detention because of the proximity to the Poudre River. Even though the runoff from the site is directed through a Bay Saver water quality structure, additional water quality enhancement is proposed for site in the form of a water quality enhancement (L.I.D.) swale and approximately 3500 square feet of porous concrete. 1.3. Major Basin Description This site is located in the Cache La Poudre Drainage Basin and all runoff from the site will reach the Poudre River. The site is not located within the FEMA designated 100 year floodplain or the City designated flood plain. 1.4. Sub -basin Description The majority of the site will be collected in an onsite L.I.D. and storm system and conveyed to the existing inlet located at the intersection of Willow and Linden. A small portion of the entry drives will directly enter the adjacent streets and flow in the streets to the same storm system. See Section 3 of this report for specific details. 2. DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA 2.1. Regulations Drainage for this site has been designed to meet or exceed the "City of Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual' specifications, the City of Fort Collins Cache la Poudre Basin Master Plan and the update to Chapter 26 of the City Code. Where applicable, the criteria established in the "Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual' (UDFCD), 2001 has been used. 2 2.2. Development Criteria Reference and Constraints Stormwater runoff from this site has been routed to conform to the requirements of the City Stormwater Department. Detention would normally be required for this site but because the runoff will enter the storm system and be conveyed to the Poudre River, detention will not be provided. Water quality facilities are required for the improvements and are being provided by an existing off site Bay Saver water quality structure, 3500 square feet of porous concrete and a proposed water quality swale (LID) on the site. These water quality enhancement measures serve to meet the City criteria for new developed runoff. 2.3. Hydrologic Criteria Runoff computations were prepared for the 2 year and 10 year minor and 100 year major storm frequency utilizing the Rational Method. All hydrologic calculations associated with the basins are included in Appendix B of this report. 2.4. Hydraulic Criteria Hydraulic calculations for the onsite storm pipes are provided in the appendix and were prepared in accordance with the City of Fort Collins Drainage Criteria and the Urban Area Drainage Criteria Manual. 3. DRAINAGE FACILITY DESIGN 3.1. General Concept All of the runoff from this site historically sheet flows to the adjacent streets and is intercepted by the existing inlets located in Willow and Linden Streets. With the construction of these proposed improvements, onsite stormwater will be collected in an onsite storm and LID system and conveyed to the existing storm system in Willow Street. 3.2. Specific Flow Routing Basin 1 encompasses the entire site. This basin includes a majority of the asphalt drives on site and all of the buildings (existing and proposed) on site. Improvements proposed in the right of way for Willow or existing improvements along Linden are not included in this basin. Runoff from this basin will sheet flow to proposed 4' concrete pans on site and into a proposed L.I.D. swale or into a storm inlet. Roof runoff will be collected in an 3 offite storm system and piped to the relocated storm system in Willow. Water quality is provided for this basin by the L.I.D. swale, porous concrete and a downstream Bay Saver structure. 3.3. Drainage Summary Drainage for this site was designed to conform to the City of Fort Collins stormwater and water quality requirements. Water quality is provided for a majority of the site utilizing a water quality swale and porous concrete. Water quality for the site is also provided by routing runoff through a Bay Saver sediment trap downstream. 4. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CONTROLS 4.1 Written Analysis The soils on this site are classified by the USGS Soil Survey as Altvan-Santana Loams and are classified in the hydrologic group B. The soils are described as being well drained and having a moderately high to high ability to transmit water (0.6 to 2.0 inches per hour). The geotechnical report indicates that the soils on site have a porosity as high as 108 feet per day. The rainfall and wind erodibility is deemed to be moderate. The site is surrounded by developed sites including streets and paved areas. The construction shall utilize silt fence around the perimeter to control sediment transport from rainfall and from wind. The silt fence that is located in the proposed pavement areas will be removed prior to placing new pavement. Rock socks will be utilized in the existing curb to capture sediments that are not fully contained by the silt fence placement. The locations of the rock socks will be in the areas of concentrated flow such as the existing curb and on the existing concrete sidewalks. The site may also utilize a vehicle tracking control pad to minimize sediment from being tracked onto adjacent pavements. Sediment that is tracked will be removed and placed within the site or permanently disposed of offsite. A concrete washout will be used on site during the concrete placement. All hardened concrete will be disposed of offsite. These BMP's have not been located on the site map due to the fact that the site is very small and these BMP's will need to be placed by the contractor in locations that are most beneficial and will minimize disruption of adjacent traffic. 4 Permanent erosion control consists of covering the soils with a building, concrete walks, concrete drives and sod. No soil will be left exposed to erosion after the construction is complete. Refer to the landscape plan for areas of and instructions for placement of sod and soil amendments required prior to placement of sod. Refer to Appendix D for the timing of the construction phases and the sequential installation of all BMP phasing for this site. Refer to Appendix D for the Erosion Control Surety calculations. 4.2 SWMP contact information Permit holder: Name: Address: Phone Number: Email Address: Appointed agent: Name: Address: Phone Number: Email Address: 5 4.3 Identification and location of all potential pollution sources Po nt�al Polldtant Sou>ce Aehvity p —Potential >_ PollutanEGenerated ' Applicable to= •thisproject Disturbed Areas Sediment X Soil stockpiles Sediment X Travel to adjacent public streets Tracked sediment X Contaminated soils Sediment, chemicals Loading and unloading chemicals Chemicals Outdoor storage of chemicals Chemicals On site equipment maintenance Oil, grease On site equipment fueling Diesel, gasoline X Dust generating activities Particulates, sediment X Use of fertilizer, pesticides, herbicides Fertilizer, pesticides Use of detergents, solvents, oils Detergents, solvents, oil X Waste dumpsters, waste piles Chemicals X Concrete washout Concrete, sediment X On site equipment washing Detergents, oil On site asphalt batch plant Asphaltic cement, sediment On site concrete batch plant Cement, sediment Portable toilets Domestic sewage X 4.4 Best Management Practices (BMP's) for Stormwater Pollution Prevention Structural Practices for Erosion and Sediment Control Structural practices for the site will consist mainly of silt fence and rock sock filters and are described in detail in the following paragraphs. These BMP's are expected to change as the construction progresses and it is the responsibility of the contractor to ensure appropriate BMP's are in place and/or removed at the appropriate time in the construction sequence. All temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control practices must be maintained and repaired as needed to assure continued performance of their intended function. Silt fence and rock sock filters shall be in place prior to commencement of construction activities. During demolition, clearing and grubbing necessary for silt fence installation, all cleared material shall be placed on the uphill side so that if erosion occurs from the cleared 6 material, the sediment will be trapped and not transported downstream. Rock socks shall be implemented in the existing curb line of Linden Street as shown on the Drainage & Erosion Control Plan. Inlet Protection shall be located around the existing curb inlet in Linden. Once construction of Willow is complete, rock socks will be placed in the curb line and inlet protection will be placed around the existing inlet. All BMP's shall be installed per the details shown on the construction plan set. Temporary & Permanent Structural BMP's: Structural BIviP Approximate location on site Applicable fo this ' ' Protect Silt Fence Site perimeter, refer to site map X Straw bale dams Rock Socks At existing curb, refer to site map X Earthen diversion dams Vegetated swales Sediment trap/pond Pipe slope drains Geogrid Inlet/outlet protection Existing inlet, refer to site map X Culverts Riprap Erosion control mats Inlet protection At inlets, refer to site map X Non -Structural Practices for Erosion and Sediment Control: Soils exposed during the earthwork phase and landscape prep phase shall be kept in a roughened condition by ripping or disking along land contours until mulch, vegetation, or other permanent erosion control is installed. No large amount of soils (in excess of 15 yards) will be allowed to be stock piled on site. Overburden from the utility pipe trenching will be piled adjacent to trenches upstream of sediment controls and will be replaced in the trenches within 72 hours. Excess excavated materials from the demolition and grading phases of the project that cannot be reused on site will be exported as it is excavated. This includes any asphalt pavement from the existing site that is to be removed. A vehicle tracking pad will be installed at a location most beneficial to the site construction as determined by the contractor. Vehicles will not be permitted in the excavated area if soil is 7 muddy. Gravel sub base will be placed and compacted in the areas indicated for pavement following excavation. In the current pre construction state the site enables tracking of silt onto the adjacent streets during wet conditions. During construction activities the street will be monitored for foreign debris tracked out of the site and mechanical sweeping and clean up will be performed as needed. No area shall remain exposed by land disturbing activity for more than thirty (30) days before required temporary or permanent erosion control (e.g. seed/mulch, landscaping, etc.) is installed. Temporary & Permanent non-structural BMP's: Non Structural BMP Approximate location on site Applicable to this.. -. Project Surface roughening Entire site X Soil stockpile height limit (less than 10') Perimeter vegetative buffer Minimization of site disturbance Mulch Seed & mulch stockpiles after 30 days Stockpile toe protection (silt fence, wattles or ditch) Preservation & protection of existing vegetation & trees Good site housekeeping (routine Entire Site X cleanup of trash & constr debris) Heavy equip staged on site, properly maintained & inspected Staging area X daily (no onsite maintenance) 8 4.5 BMP Implementation 1) Phased BMW Implementation BMP's are expected to change as the construction progresses and it is the responsibility of the contractor to ensure appropriate BMP's are in place and/or removed at the appropriate time in the construction sequence. A construction sequence schedule has been included on the Drainage & Erosion Control Plan and included in the construction plans for this site. All BMP's shall be inspected and repaired or replaced as required to satisfy the conditions of the Stormwater Discharge Permit. All BMP's must be maintained and repaired as needed to assure continued performance of their intended function. Refer to Appendix D for BMP Implementation Schedule Refer to Appendix D for BMP Estimated Costs 9 2) Materials Handling and Snill Preventinn- Materials Handling & Spill Approximate location on site Applicable to this" Prevention BMP. Protect - . Portable toilets, _anchored & Refer to site map X located away from drainages Fuel storage located in bulk tanks with secondary containment & spill kit Mobile fueling performed at least 200 feet away from drainages & Refer to site map X fully attended Fertilizers, form oil, solvents, cleaners, detergent stored in 55 gal Refer to site map X or smaller containers, kept in storage units Dumpsters containing used chemicals containers & liquid Refer to site map X wastes kept covered Equipment cleaning (on site) uses no detergents & flows to onsite retention basin In case of a release of fuel or other chemicals, absorbent booms or earthen berms will be immediately Location of spill X constructed to contain the spill & prevent runoff to adjacent surface waters MSDS sheets for onsite chemicals will be kept at the construction Construction Trailer X trailer to facilitate spill response & cleanup 3) Dedicated Asphalt or Concrete Batch Plant: Not proposed with this development 4) Vehicle Tracking Pad: Vehicle tracking control pad shall be installed wherever construction vehicle access routes intersect paved public roads. Vehicle tracking control pads shall be installed to minimize the transport of sediment (mud) by runoff or vehicles tracking onto the paved surface. Any mud tracked to public roads shall be removed on a daily basis and after any significant storm that 10 causes sediment to be transported. It is unlawful to track sediment/mud onto public streets and may be enforced by the City of Fort Collins or by the State of Colorado. 5) Waste Management and Disposal: Portable toilets will be anchored & periodically maintained by waste management company. Dumpsters on site will be covered & periodically emptied by waste management company. Concrete waste will be allowed to harden and then will be removed from site. No washing activities will occur on site. Location of the concrete washout is shown on the site map. The washout will be sufficiently deep to accommodate all anticipated concrete truck wash water. Waste concrete will be allowed to harden and be removed from site periodically as the washout reaches 50% of its capacity. Truck wash water will not be allowed to reach the curb & gutter or any other water course. 6) Groundwater and Stonnwater Dewatering: No groundwater was encountered during soils exploration therefore ground water is not anticipated to be an issue. If groundwater is encountered a groundwater discharge permit shall be obtained and a detailed report shall be completed describing the location and the route of where pumped groundwater will be conveyed and the measures taken to prevent the transport of any pollutants to downstream waters. 7) Inspection & Maintenance: It is required that routine site inspections are performed to effectively address maintenance and repair of Best Management Practices (BMP's). The site inspections are to performed by the contractor or an inspector designated by the administrator at a minimum of once every fourteen (14) calendar days on active construction sites and after any significant storm event (an event causing runoff). As part of the site inspections the inspector is required to keep documentation of all inspections and BMP maintenance, including an updated Site Map indicating new BMP's or the removal of BMP's since the previous inspection. Any maintenance, repair, or necessary installation of BMP's that are noted during the inspection must be completed within seven (7) calendar days from the date of the inspection. 11 5: CONCLUSIONS 5.1. Compliance with Standards All computations that have been completed within this report will be in compliance with the City of Fort Collins Erosion Control Reference Manual for Construction Sites and the City of Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual. 5.2. Drainage Concept The proposed drainage concepts presented in this report, in the final drainage report and on the construction plans, will adequately provide for stormwater quality treatment for the proposed improvements. Conveyance elements have been designed to convey required flows to the proposed water quality Swale, on site storm system and ultimately to the Cache la Poudre River. If, at the time of construction, groundwater is encountered, a Colorado Department of Health Construction Dewatering Permit will be required. 12 6. REFERENCES 1. City of Fort Collins, "Storm Drainage Criteria Manual", (SDCM), dated March 1999. 2. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, "Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual", Volumes 1 and 2, dated June 2001, and Volume 3 dated September 2001. 13 APPENDIX A VICINITY MAP A mop,mmmommce--_ 0 o •• ` •' BIIIIIII j . o.. 0 � /� '. �eeeee_eeeeee �::.._----------- ____-=ease " '� _�_�•��:=eeee_5===see m =_=___ _ee-- APPENDIX B HYDROLOGIC COMPUTATIONS y O w W a 0 ca z Z W U Li- LL W O U LL LL O Z - z C 7 Q � c —'voi 0 ❑ o U _m w ow 00 O U O F U~ 7 j O L Q y z n 3 N J p O O p o O o Z 0 0 0 0 E S N Z W O U o c O o r a � U 0 LL Z LU U O 0 0 0 0 C U LL LL 0 Z W U Cl! (q n O 0 0 0 0 K LL LL Z W U N o r O O O O O N O a y a N o lh o N e t0 6 E N N 0) N W U� N Q N N C C Z 3 J H KO Q m LU W N O Q O O U J N O O S LL. V O O w y Q N O 0 Q w m O V N N O p' Q .hJ Y1 m Oi N 0 O N m r OQ V m O F Uci W : Cl 17 O Q O O Z N Q ; b a Q CD N O H pp ro. o m m N N co m 1 m L Z _O F z Z W U Z O U LL O W Y Q W C Q vi vi vi z o ^ N rn Ci n e7 x � Ily U Z y m J _ 3 1 C p N O V V LL J 2 d d 01 � � I� o 1-1- < z x U o 0 0 ix O N N N W `�-. d � ❑ LL LL LL � U H r, d b N b b H w J V C ..r E a t� Cl q (V N N b N W.. g b g o b p d O o o O 2 UJ `-' G o G G ry W r J J Q C = m b n m G b O O 0 b C d N F d (7 d O N m❑ � y C m C f _ d t N N vi m N o d d m L m c m m 2 q m O U' z a F a ❑ N L m m � d m U b N p N O O b" O O N 3 T N L N 2 d d 2 U' 9 N O j V x F b m c9 a ¢ m U ❑ W LL N m c C E N II E E C E LL LL 0 Z Y Q W IL o`a r W G J Q Z 0 T co. z o° _ F d F U D U0F c m Q O O 0. U M y C p0 O o O 0 m N j w t ¢ a 0 Z n S N Y C LU W K u A U � u C J 9 FF N ul Cl? W N Q � o" UA lh N N d U b O cq W a W V W J c rn M O LL E ui ui ui LL O Z N (O r tp K O ¢ U r M 7 C G C Z c m � m ¢ m o mQ C C ~ m U C o N m q m C h N m m w m t z Q m ~ Z a c c w a o Q N m m w L Ql k d \ - 0F� _ )2§ \)S }0 k\0 0/) § £ /\ \ \ / : q ! ; - \ § § OR § E ) :: ; § [ J Cl § [ [ Ci / / }` mm <� S- §§ 0ca )j \ \ \ § LL LL O Z 7 a' Y Q w� a a o w O } 2 ' 0 uCD V J Q Z O p z 0 z°O 20 Yt0 Q N O N W C � O O u c .p U U u c J m G F r n .0 o O F " Q v m m o H n n N a N t7 01 - N 0 rn rn r ai a o v ° N o IL E u v u LL O 2 7 e N m n V U o o c c R' 0 o n m t0 0 0 Q a f m p v c c m O A N L m ' m a H _ZU' ? N U C C a ❑Lj— N m m L m 0 0 APPENDIX C HYDRAULIC COMPUTATIONS INLET IN A SUMP OR SAG LOCATION Project= Feeders Supply Inlet ID = Inlet 1 r Lo (C)- f H-Curb H-Vert w WP W Lo lG1 of Inlet Depression (additional to continuous gutter depression 'a' from'Q-Allovv') ier of Unit Inlets (Grate or Curb Opening) in of a Unit Grate h of a Unit Grate Opening Ratio for a Grate (typical values 0.15-0.90) ging Factor for a Single Grate (typical value 0.50 - 0.70) r Weir Coefficient (typical value 3.00) I Orifice Coefficient (typical value 0.67) Opening Information to of a Unit Curb Opening it of Vertical Curb Opening in Inches It of Curb Onfice Throat in Inches I of Throat (see USDCM Figure ST-5) Width for Depression Pan (typically the gutter width of 2 feet) ling Factor for a Single Curb Opening (typical value 0.10) Opening Weir Coefficient (typical value 2.3D-3.00) @ing Coefficient for Multiple Units Sing Factor for Multiple Units s as a Weir. The Controlling Factor Will Be. - Depth at Local Depression without Clogging (1.5 cis grate, 0 cis curb) Depth (Curb Opening Only) without Clogging (0 cis grate, 1.5 cis curb) Depth at Local Depression with Clogging (1.5 cis grate, 0 cis curb) Depth (Curb Opening Only) with Clogging (0 cis grate, 1.5 cis curb) I as an Orifice Depth at Local Depression without Clogging (1.5 cis grate, 0 Ms curb) Depth at Local Depression with Clogging (1.5 cfs grate, 0 cis curb) ling Coefficient for Multiple Units ling Factor for Multiple Units as a Weir, Grate as an Orifice Depth at Local Depression without Clogging (1.05 cis grate, 0.45 cfs curb) Depth at Local Depression with Clogging (0.85 cis grate, 0.65 cis curb) as an Orifice, Grate as an Orifice Depth at Local Depression without Clogging (1.5 cis grate, 0 cis curb) Depth at Local Depression with Clogging (1.5 cis grate, 0 cfs curb) Inlet Length Inlet Interception Capacity (Design Discharge from 0-Peak) Itant Gutter Flow Depth (based on sheet 0-Allow geometry) Itant Street Flow Spread (based on sheet O-Allow geometry) Itant Flow Depth at Street Crown MINOR MAJOR Type =1 CDOT/Denver 13 Combinati11001 ae.i= 1.00 inches No= 1 MINOR MAJOR L. (G) = 3.00 3.00 feel W. = 1.73 1.73 feet A.ro = 0.47 0.47 Dr (G) = 0.50 0.50 C. (G) = 3.00 3.00 C. (G) = 0.67 0.67 MINOR MAJOR L. (C) = 3.00 3.00 feet H.n= 5.50 5.50 inches He = 5.25 5.25 inches Theta= 0.0 0.0 degrees W,= 2.00 200 feet Ci (C) = 0.10 D.10 C.(C)= 2.30 2.30 C. (C) = 0.67 0.67 MINOR MAJOR Coef = 1.00 1.00 clog 0.50 0.50 Curb Opening as Weir Curb Opening As Vertical Orifice d" = d" = d = d,.ee = d., 3.77 5.27 2.58 4.34 5.05 7.41 2.fi5 5.70 MINOR inches inches inches inches MINOR MAJOR Coef= 1.001 1.00 Clog =1 0.101 0.10 MINOR MAJOR d, = 1.16 1.96 inches d"'= 1.60 2.69 inches da d. 0. d Irdet 1.tds, Inlet In Stapp 10712013. 2:47 PM Worksheet for Storm 1A .'�otecf,Descnption) Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Discharge Roughness Coefficient 0.010 Channel Slope 1.30 % Normal Depth 11.50 in Diameter 12 in Results3 � _-� Discharge 5.66 ft3/s Flow Area 0.77 ft' Wetted Perimeter 2.73 ft Hydraulic Radius 3.40 in Top Width 0.40 ft Critical Depth 0.94 ft Percent Full 95.8 % Critical Slope 0.01292 ft/ft Velocity 7.31 fits Velocity Head 0.83 ft Specific Energy 1.79 It Froude Number 0.93 Maximum Discharge 5.68 ft3/s Discharge Full 5.28 ft3/s Slope Full 0.01494 ft/ft Flow Type SubCritical �GVF Input;Data� �� Downstream Depth 0.00 in Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 FVF Optggf Dafa) Y} Upstream Depth 0.00 in Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Average End Depth Over Rise 0.00 Normal Depth Over Rise 95.83 % Downstream Velocity Infinity fUs Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [08.11.00.03] 10f712013 3:05:43 PM 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203.755-1666 Page 1 of 2 Worksheet for Storm I �O-A Q`utput.Data� = Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 11.50 in Critical Depth 0.94 It Channel Slope 1.30 % Critical Slope 0.01292 ft/ft Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [08.11.00.03] 1ON12013 3:05:43 PM 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755.1666 Page 2 of 2 Worksheet for Storm 7 B W681 ti1k O'fon) Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Inp._. ut Data? . t .....:. ..> ., s Roughness Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 2.00 % Diameter 12 in Discharge 3.30 ft3/s Results, Normal Depth 7.08 in Flow Area 0.48 f:2 Wetted Perimeter 1.75 ft Hydraulic Radius 3.30 in Top Width 0.98 ft Critical Depth 0.78 ft Percent Full 59.0 % Critical Slope 0.00952 Wit Velocity 6.84 ft/s Velocity Head 0.73 ft Specific Energy 1.32 ft Froude Number 1.72 Maximum Discharge 5.42 W/a Discharge Full 5.04 fN/: Slope Full 0.00858 ft/ft Flow Type SuperCriticel ,G F nput'Data? Downstream Depth 0.00 in Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 PGVF Qutpuf•Qata� Upstream Depth 0.00 in Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Average End Depth Over Rise 0.00 Normal Depth Over Rise 59.02 Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [08.11.00.03] 10r7/2013 3:07:58 PM 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1.203-755.1666 Page 1 of 2 Worksheet for Storm 1 B IG_VF',Output?Data? � - Upstream Velocity Infinity ftls Normal Depth 7.08 in Critical Depth 0.78 ft Channel Slope 2.00 % Critical Slope 0.00952 ft/ft Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [08.11.00.03] 10/7/2013 3:07:58 PM 27 Slemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1.203-755.1666 Page 2 of 2 APPENDIX D BMP SCHEDULE & COST ESTIMATE u CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE FGRADINGFEEDERS SUPPLY DATE: 1/21/14 N PHASE (MONTH) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 LUDES OVERLOTN / WQ PONDS DRAINAGEWAYS, STREAMS PIPELINE INSTALLATION (INCLUDES OFFSITE WATER SAINITARY SEWER STORM SEWER CONCRETE INSTALLATION (INCLUDES OFFSITE AREA INLETS CURB INLETS POND OUTLET STRUCTURES CURB AND GUTTER PAVEMENT INSTALLTATION FINE GRADING BASE COURSE INSTALL PAVEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES STRUCTURAL SILT FENCE BARRIERS CONTOUR FURROWS (RIPPING/DISKING) SEDIMENT TRAP FILTER VEHICLE TRACKING PADS FLOW BARRIERS WATTLES, ETC) CONCRETE WASHOUT ROCK SOCKS BARE SOIL PREPARATION TERRACING RIPRAP VEGETATIVE TEMPORARY SEED PLANTING MULCHING SEALANT SEED PLANTING SOD INSTALLATION LPERMANENT NETTING/BLANKETS/MATS SEDIMENT/EROSION CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs) COST OPINION SPREADSHEET FEEDERS SUPPLY REDEVELOPMENT Item No. BMP ID Unit Installation Unit Cost Quantity Cost 1 Check Dam CDR LF $0.00 2 Check Dam (Reinforced) CDR LF $0.00 3 Concrete Washout Area CWA EA $1,200.00 1 $1,200.00 4 Construction Fence CF LF $0.00 5 Construction Markers CM LF $0.00 6 Culvert Inlet Filter CIF LF $0.00 7 Dewatering DW EA $0.00 8 Diversion Ditch (Unlined) DD LF $0.00 9 Diversion Ditch (ECM or plastic) DD LF $0.00 10 Sediment/Erosion Control Matting ECM SY $0.00 11 Inlet Protection IP LF $10.00 16 1 $160.00 12 Reinforced Rock Berm RRB LF $0.00 13 Sediment Basin(') SB LF $0.00 14 Sediment Control Log (Wattle) SCL LF $0.00 15 Seeding and Mulching SM AC $0.00 16 Silt Fence SF LF $3.00 625 $1,875.00 17 Rock Sock RS LF $10.00 35 $350.00 18 Stabilized Staging Area SSA SY $0.00 19 Surface Roughening SR I AC $0.00 20 Temporary Stream Crossing TSC EA $0.00 21 Topsoil (6-inch Lift) TSL AC $0.00 22 lVehicleTrackin Control(2) VTC EA $1,500.00 1 $1,500.00 Subtotal Maintenance & replacements (50%) #1 Erosion control amount #2 Reseeding 1.2 AC @ $1,200 per acre= Erosion control escrow (greater of #1 & #2) $5,085 $2,543 $7,628 $1,440 $8,798