Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDrainage Reports - 04/17/1997PROPUtTr FORT COLLMS OF 9911 port F final A d Report Final Drainage and Erosion Control Report for SWALLOW TOWNHOMES P.U.D. Fort Collins, Colorado Prepared for: ANCHOR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 1083 Wild Cherry Lane Ft. Collins, Colorado 80521 i " Prepared by: SHEAR ENGINEERING CORPORATION Project No: 1555-01-96 DATE: February, 1997 4836 S. College, Suite 12 Ft. Collins, CO 80525 (970) 226-5334 FAX (970) 282-031 1 !J • February 5, 1997 Project No: 1555-01-96 Basil Harridan / Matt Fater City of Ft. Collins Stormwater Utility P.O. Box 580 Ft. Collins, Colorado 80524 Re: Swallow Townhomes P.U.D.; Fort Collins, Colorado. Dear Dear Basil and Matt, SHEAR ENGINEERING CORPORATI N This is a response to your review comments concerning the final utility plans and Final Drainage and Erosion Control Report for Swallow Townhomes P.U.D. This response will also address general discussion items which may not specifically associate to the plan comments. GENERAL ITEMS: We are incorporating an EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN which identifies the existing conditions based on a survey by RJL Surveys; RJL Project No: 1061; survey dated 11/21/96. The existing conditions plan is for reference only and has been provided for clarity. This existing conditions plan defines the current water ponding potential. The property is currently in a retention condition. The storm sewer outfall is not exposed. The existing "strip" south of the Swallow Townhomes P.U.D. site is a 25' tract which was originally dedicated with the Wagon Wheel Filing No. 1 plat as a irrigation ditch right-of-way. This tract is owned by the City of Fort Collins. The plat does not incorporate this strip and it will not incorporate this strip. It is not a part of the P.U:D. A detailed storm sewer extension profile has been developed and added to the plans. The existing storm sewer line represented on the storm sewer profiles are based entirely on field data provided by RJL Surveys. The existing sewer line and water line represented on the storm sewer profiles are based in part on field data provided by RJL Surveys and in part on the West Swallow Road design profiles prepared by James H. Stewart Consulting Engineers for the Poudre R-1 School District on a design sheet titled "Plan and Profile of Water and Sewer Mains on South Shields Street and Swallow Road"; Stewart Project No: 1645; Plan Sheet dated 04/07/72. Attached is a copy of the storm sewer lateral design profile provided with the design drawings for the Shields Street Improvements which were prepared by the City of Fort Collins and dated 4-91. This profile indicates a 15" RCP, Class IV O 1.00%. Survey data provided by RJL Surveys indicates a 12" RCP. We had attempted to obtain a drainage report from your department for the Shields Street improvements. We were advised that a drainage report had not been done. Please note that a separate calculation has been provided which identifies the storage volume requirements for Swallow Townhomes P.U.D. only. The volume required for Swallow Townhomes P.U.D. is 0.25 acre feet compared to the overall 0.34 acre feet required considering offsite contribution. This is approximately 75% of the total required volume. 4836 S. College, Suite 12 Ft. Collins, CO 80525 (970) 226-5334 FAX (970) 282-0311 PAGE 2 February 5, 1997 Project No: 1555-01-96 Re: Swallow Townhomes P.U.D.; Fort Collins, Colorado GENERAL ITEMS: * We will provide easement dedication packages to Engineering and Stormwater Utility under separate cover for your review. An easement will be required for grading on the property to the west of Swallow Townhomes P.U.D. (Jon -El RUM.). Discussions with the owner have begun. An easement may be required for grading on the City of Fort Collins property south of Swallow Townhomes P.U.D. * A note identifying the lowest allowable building opening for Units 12-17 and 24 (units adjacent to the detention pond) has been provided on the Grading plan. FINAL PLAT: * The 25' "strip" south of Swallow Townhomes P.U.D. has been added to the plat for clarification. It is clearly labeled. The owner is the City of Fort Collins. UTILITY PLANS: * A date has not been added to the Cover Sheet. Engineering requires that the date be revised to the month of approval. This is when the date will be added. * The original location of the emergency access drive across the limits of the detention pond has been removed in is entirety. * The existing storm sewer stub to the property has been relabeled to reflect 12" RCP. If you have any questions or comments, please call Mark Oberschmidt or me at 226-5334. Sincerel Brian W. Shear, P.E. Shear Engineering Corporation BWS / meo cc: Russ Wells; Anchor Development Corporation Linda Ripley; VF Ripley Associates Rick Lewis; RJL Surveys Kerrie Ashbeck; City of Fort Collins Engineering December 23, 1996 Project No: 1555-01-96 Basil Hamdan City of Ft. Collins Stormwater Utility P.O. Box 580 Ft. Collins, Colorado 80524 Re: Swallow Townhomes P.U.D.; Ft. Collins, Colorado Dear Basil, Enclosed, please find the Final Drainage and Erosion Control Report for the Swallow Townhomes P.U.D. project. The hydrology data and the hydraulic analysis presented in this report complies with the requirements of the City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, dated March, 1984, and the City of Fort Collins Erosion Control Reference Manual. If you have any questions or comments, please call Mark Oberschmidt or me at 226-5334. Sincerely, Brian W. Shear, P.E. Shear Engineering Corporation BWS / meo cc: Anchor Development Corporation; Russ Wells 4836 S. College, Suite 12 Ft. Collins, CO 80525 (970) 226-5334 FAX (970) 282-031 1 PAGE 1 Project No. 1555-01-96 Final Drainage and Erosion Control Report L GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION: A. Location 1. Swallow Townhomes P.U.D. is located in the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of Section 27, T7N, R69W of the 6th P.M., Ft. Collins, Colorado. 2. More specifically, Swallow Townhomes P.U.D. is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of West Swallow Road and South Shields Street (See Vicinity Map). 3. The site is bounded by West Swallow Road on the north, South Shields Street on the east, Wagon Wheel Subdivision Filing No. 1 on the south, and Jon -El P.U.D. on the west. 4. There is a detention pond to the south in Wagon Wheel Filing No. 1 which is owned and maintained by the City of Fort Collins. B. Description of Property 1. The site is currently undeveloped and open. Existing ground cover consists primarily of native dry land grasses. There are existing utilities around the perimeter of the site. 2. The site area is approximately 1.88 acres. 3. Development of the site will consist of 24 twnhomes (6-4 plexes) and the necessary utilities to service them. 4. There are no major drainage ways located on or within 150 feet of the project site. 5. There is a 25' tract which was originally platted as an irrigation ditch right-of-way with Wagon Wheel Filing No. 1 located along the common south property line of Swallow Townhomes P.U.D. and Wagon Wheel Filing No. 1. This right-of-way was vacated and purchased by the City of Fort Collins. H. DRAINAGE BASINS AND SUB -BASINS: A. Major Basin Description 1. The site is situated within the Spring Creek Drainage Basin as designated on the City of Fort Collins Stormwater Basin Map. a. The Basin Fee Rate for the Spring Creek Drainage Basin is $ 2,175 per gross acre according to the development fee section of the City of Fort Collins Development Manual. b. This fee may be reduced if detention is provided. PAGE 2 Project No. 1555-01-96 Final Drainage and Erosion Control Report H. DRAINAGE BASINS AND SUB -BASINS: B. Sub -Basin Description 1. The site is a low point which currently receives runoff from the following areas: a. the Swallow Townhomes PUD site (area = 1.88 acres), b. the southern (rear) portion of Jon -El P.U.D. ( area = 0.81 acres) c. the area on the north side of the berm which defines the north side of the Wagon Wheel Filing No. 1 detention pond ( area = 0.78 acres). d. Refer to the offsite drainage exhibit attached in Appendix I. 2. The site is divided into two (2) sub -basins designated la and lb on the Drainage and Erosion Control Plan. a. Sub -basin la contributes runoff to the pond and has a total area of 1.59 acres. b. Sub -basin lb contributes runoff to West Swallow Road and has a total area of 0.29 acres. III. DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL DESIGN CRITERIA: A. Regulations 1. All storm drainage design criteria from the City of Fort Collins Drainage Criteria Manual were considered. 2. All erosion control design criteria from the City of Fort Collins Erosion Control Reference Manual were considered. B. Development Criteria Reference and Constraints 1. The surrounding streets mentioned previously are built out to the curb and or sidewalk. All proposed grading along those streets will match the existing grades at the curb or sidewalk. 2. Detached sidewalk will be installed along West Swallow Road based on a typical street section for a collector street. 3. There is an existing 15' type R storm sewer inlet located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Shields Street and West Swallow Road. There is a 12" RCP storm sewer stubbed into the northeast corner of the site. This is according to survey information provided by RJL surveys. The plans for the intersection improvements by the City of Fort Collins specified a 15" RCP to be stubbed into the site. The northeast corner of the site is the logical location for the outlet from the detention pond because of the existing storm sewer stub from the inlet on the south side of West Swallow Road. PAGE 3 Project No. 1555-01-96 Final Drainage and Erosion Control Report III. DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL DESIGN CRITERIA: B. Development Criteria Reference and Constraints 4. There are existing underground utilities along the north property line of the site. This limits the design of the detention pond which will outlet to the existing storm sewer in West Swallow Road. 5. Jon -El P.U.D. is built io the west. The rear portion of Jon -El P.U.D. contributes runoff to the site. Some grading on the Jon -El site will be required to ensure that the historic drainage patterns are not disturbed. a. We have used this area as part of the historic contributing area for the purpose of determining the required detention volume. b. We have assumed pre -developed conditions for historic conditions. c. We have taken into account one half of the roof area of the two buildings in determining peak developed flows to the site. d. A temporary construction easement will be dedicated by separate document for all offsite grading. e. A drainage and utility easement will be dedicated by separate document for that portion of the detention pond which is located outside of the limits of West Swallow Townhomes P.U.D. site. 6. There is an existing detention pond to the south in Wagon Wheel Filing No. 1. The center of the berm is approximately 45 feet south of the Swallow Townhomes P.U.D. south boundary. The area between the berm and the common property line is currently owned by the City of Fort Collins. This area contributes runoff to the Swallow Townhomes P.U.D. site. a. This area has been utilized as part of the historic contributing area for the purpose of determining the required detention volume. C. Hydrological Criteria 1. The Rational Method (Q = CIA) was used to determine the historic and developed peak flows for the 2, 10 and 100-year storm events at critical points. 2. The detention pond is designed to store the difference in the volume generated by the historic 2-year storm and the developed 100-year storm. a. The pond is sized based on the total contributing area to the site (3.47 acres). Refer to pages 7 and 8 in the drainage calculations located in Appendix I. PAGE 4 Project No. 1555-01-96 Final Drainage and Erosion Control Report M. DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL DESIGN CRYI'ERIA: C. Hydrological Criteria b. Developed conditions include the rear 1/2 of the roofs of the 2 southernmost buildings built with Jon -El PUD (0.10 acres) along with the developed Swallow Townhomes P.U.D. site. The remainder of the offsite area is grassed (1.49 acres). 3. The maximum allowable release rate from the pond is based on the historic peak flow for the 2-year storm for Swallow Townhomes P.U.D. and the offsite areas which contribute runoff to the site. Historic conditions are defined as follows; a. Swallow Townhomes - undeveloped b. Offsite areas - undeveloped D. Hydraulic Criteria 1. Orifice and weir equations and coefficients suggested by the City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage Criteria Manual were utilized. 2. Storm sewer and drainage channel capacities were based on the Mannings Equation. The Mannings coefficients are as suggested by the City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage Criteria Manual. W. DRAINAGE FACILITY DESIGN: A. General Concept 1. Stormwater will be conveyed to the detention pond located in the eastern portion of the site by overland and gutter flow. 2. Valley pans are provided in all swales and the detention pond where slopes are less than 2.0% (0.02 ft/ft). 3. Existing grade conditions will require that a certain amount of fill placement and general regrading occur within the limits of the Swallow Townhomes P.U.D. site, the eastern portion of the Jon -El P.U.D. site and the 25' tract south of Swallow Townhomes P.U.D., currently owned by the City of Fort Collins. PAGE 5 Project No. 1555-01-96 Final Drainage and Erosion Control Report IV. DRAINAGE FACILITY DESIGN: B. Specific Details 1. Detention is required and will be provided. A 12" storm sewer stub is available for the pond release at the northeast corner of Swallow Townhomes P.U.D. The existing invert of the storm sewer stub dictates the bottom of detention pond elevation. The existing grades along the perimeter of the site and the existing storm sewer outfall invert both combine to limit the detention volume availability for the site. 2. The following table summarizes the detention pond design parameters. * Bottom of pond elevation = 5065.27 feet * Top of pond elevation = 5067.50 feet * Detention Volume Provided = 0.36 ac-ft = 15,565 cf. * Detention Volume Required = 0.34 ac-ft = 14,950 cf. * Actual 100 year WSE in pond = 67.44 feet * Actual freeboard available = 0.06 feet * Total Contributing Area to Pond = 3.47 acres * Maximum Allowable 100 year release rate (Historic Q2) = 0.83 cfs 2. A Type 2 outlet structure will be installed in the northeast corner of the pond with a four inch (4") orifice on the upstream side. The outlet will consist of the existing 12" RCP storm pipe. The stage, elevation and release rate for the pond are summarized in the table below. Release Stage Elevation Rate (ft.) (ft.) (cfs) 0.73 5066.00 0.26 1.73 5067.00 0.52 2.23 5067.50 1.59 1.90 5067.46 1.06 1.93 5067.40 0.59 1.97 5067.44 0.83 Note Top of pond Required 100-year W.S.EI. Top of outlet structure Actual 100-year W.S.EI. PAGE 6 Project No. 1555-01-96 Final Drainage and Erosion Control Report IV. DRAINAGE FACILITY DESIGN: B. Specific Details 3. The table below summarizes the stage -storage relationship for the detention pond. Elevation Stage Storage (cf.) 5065.27 0 0 5066.00 0.73 416 5067.00 1.73 8,069 5067.50 2.23 15,565 4. The existing 12" RCP outlet pipe from the outlet structure will convey water from the pond to an existing 15' type R inlet at the southwest corner of the intersection of South Shields Street and West Swallow Road. The stub will be extended beyond the existing water and sewer lines to the outlet structure. a. Slope = 0.01 ft/ft based on the design slope for the West Swallow Road storm sewer. The actual slope of the pipe could not be determined because stub is buried. b. Mannings n = 0.013 c. Capacity (HW/D = 1.0) = 6.41 cfs V. EROSION CONTROL: A. General Concept 1. Erosion control measures will be as identified on the Drainage and Erosion Control Plan. 2. An erosion control security deposit is required in accordance with City of Fort Collins policy (Chapter 7, Section C: SECURITY; page 7.23 of the City of Fort Collins Development Manual). In no instance shall the amount of the security be less than $1,000.00. 3. According to current City of Fort Collins policy, the erosion control security deposit is figured based on the larger amount of 1.5 times the estimated cost of installing the approved erosion control measures or 1.5 times the cost to re -vegetate the anticipated area to be disturbed by construction activity. PAGE 7 Project No. 1555-01-96 Final Drainage and Erosion Control Report V. EROSION CONTROL: A. General Concept 4. The erosion control security deposit amount required for Swallow Townhomes P.U.D. will be provided prior to the commencement of construction. An erosion control cost estimate has been prepared for Swallow Townhomes P.U.D. and is included in Appendix H. See the Erosion Control Security Deposit Requirements document also located in Appendix II. 5. The erosion control security deposit is reimbursable. VI. VARIANCE REQUEST: A. Variance from City of Fort Collins Requirements 1. With this report, the developer is formally requesting a variance from: a. the requirement that one (Y) foot of freeboard be provided. 2. The constraints on the grading caused by the surrounding topography do not allow us to provide the required freeboard. 3. Detention volumes have been provided for some ' offsite areas which contribute undetairied flows to the site and to the South Shields Street storm sewer. B. Approval of this report indicates the approval of this variance request by the City of Fort Collins. VIL CONCLUSIONS• A. Compliance with Standards 1. All drainage analysis has been performed according to the requirements of the City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage Criteria manual and City of Fort Collins policy. 2. All Erosion Control design complies with the City of Fort Collins Erosion Control Reference manual and generally accepted practices. B. Drainage Concept 1. The drainage design for Swallow Townhomes P.U.D. is in accordance with City of Fort Collins requirements. 2. There will be no adverse downstream effects due to the development of the site. PAGE 8 Project No. 1555-01-96 Final Drainage and Erosion Control Report VM. REFERENCES: 1. City of Fort Collins "Storm Drainage Design Criteria and Construction Standards"; May, 1984 2. City of Fort Collins "Erosion Control Reference Manual"; January, 1991 3. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Drainage Criteria manual 4. Drainage Report for Jon -El P.U.D.; Stewart and Associates 5 Sheet 12 of 27 of the design drawings for the Shields Street Improvements; prepared - by the City of Fort Collins; plans dated 4-91. 6. West Swallow Road design profiles prepared by James H. Stewart Consulting Engineers for the Poudre R-1 School District on a design sheet titled "Plan and Profile .of Water and Sewer Mains on South Shields Street and Swallow Road"; Stewart Project No: 1645; Plan Sheet dated 04/07/72. APPENDIX I Storm Drainage Calculations FLOW SUMMARY FOR SWALLOW TOWNHOMES PAGE 1 DESIGN CONTRIBUTING AREA C2 C10 C100 Tc Tc I2 I10 I100 Q2 Q10 0100 DESIGN POINT SUB 2,10 100 BASIN(S) ac. - min. min iph iph iph cfe cfe cfe rrrrr rrrr♦:rrrrrrrrrerrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrr»rr rrrr rr+rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr+•rrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrerrrrrrr»r HISTORIC PLOWS A OVERALL 3.47 0.20 0.20 0.25 42.00 40.00 1.20 2.19 3.60 0.83 1.52 3.12 RELRATE A SITE ONLY 1.88 0.20 0.20 0.25 30.00 28.50 1.47 2.60 4.33 0.55 0.98 2.03 REPONLY DEVELOPED PLOWS A SITE ONLY 1.88 0.60 0.60 0.75 14.00 14.00 2.22 3.89 6.28 2.50 4.38 8.84 REFONLY A OVERALL 3.47 0.44 0.44 0.55 15.50 15.50 2.11 3.70 5.98 3.21 5.62 11.35 DETAIN DEVELOPED ONSITE PLOWS A 1a 1.59 0.60 0.60 0.75 15.50 15.50 2.11 3.70 5.98 2.01 3.53 7.13 POND B 1b 0.29 0.60 0.60 0.75 12.00 12.00 2.38 4.17 6.71 0.41 0.73 1.46 INLET ABBREVIATIONS I/P INLET AND PIPE SW = SWALE I = INLET SHEAR ENGINEERING CORPORATION SUBBASIN BREAKDOWN PAGE 2 PROJECT: SWALLOW TOWNHOMES DATE 12/17/96 LOCATION:FORT COLLINS BY MHO PROJ.NO: 1552-01-96 FILE: SWALERUN TOTAL SITE AREA = 1.88 ACRES = 81693 of TOTAL BASIN AREA = 3.47 ACRES = 151153 of BASINS SUB BASINS HISTORIC DEVELOPED 1 2 3 4 ASPHALT 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CONCRETE 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GRAVEL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ROOFS - 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 LAWNS,SANDY SOIL FLAT < 21, 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AVERAGE 2 TO 7$ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 STEEP > 7% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 LAWNS, HEAVY SOIL: FLAT < 2$ 3.47 2.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AVERAGE 2 TO 7% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 STEEP > 7% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 3.47 3.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RUNOFF COEFFICIENT SUB BASINS HISTORIC DEVELOPED 1 2 3 4 C2-C10 0.20 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C100 = 1.25-C2 0.25 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NOTE: THE HISTORIC SITS CONSIDERS OFFSITE FLOWS FROM JON-EL AND WAGON WHEEL DEVELOPED CONDITIONS INCLUDE 0.1 ACRES OF ROOF FROM SON -EL PUD AND 1.49 ACRES OF GRASSED AREA FROM JON-EL AND WAGON WHEEL SITE BREAKDOWN SF ACRES C2 C X A ROOF 19584 0.45 0.95 0.43 CONCRETE 7268 0.17 0.95 0.16 ASPHALT 16742 0.38 0.95 0.37 SUBTOTAL 43594 1.00 0.95 0.95 GRASS 38299 0.88 0.20 0.18 TOTAL 81893 1.88 1.13 CONCLUDE:C VALUE FOR SITS = 0.60 C100 = 1.25*C2 = 0.75 No Text SHEAR ENGINEERING CORPORATION HISTORIC PAGE 3 PLOW TO CONCENTRATION POINT A OVERALL AREA PROJECT: SWALLOW TOWNHOMHS DATE 12/17/96 LOCATION:FORT COLLINS PROD. NO.1555-01-96 PILE: SWALRUN BY MEO AREA (A)= 3.470 ACRES RUNOFF CORP. (C) 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR C = 0.20 0.20 0.25 SEE SPREAD SHEET ATTACHED ON PAGE 2 TIME OF CONCENTRATION (Tc) OVERLAND TRAVEL TIME (Ti) LENGTH = 500 FEET SLOPE = 1.00 t 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR C = 0.20 0.20 0.25 Ti (min)= 37.63 37.63 35.54 TRAVEL TIME (Tt)=L/(60-V) FLOW TYPE L (ft) = 180 S (}) = 1.00 LAWN L (ft) =? S (%) =? ? L (ft) =? S (}) =? ? L (ft) =? S (}) =? ? L (ft) =? S (}) =? ? L (ft) =? S (}) =? ? L (ft) =? S (%) =? ? NOTE: ALL VELOCITIES TAKEN FROM FIGURE 3-2 NO TRAVEL TIME FOR HISTORIC CONDITIONS Tc =Ti+TOTAL TRAVEL TIME 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR Tc (min)= 41.92 41.92 39.63 USE Tc = 42.0 42.0 40.0 INTENSITY (I) (iph) 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR I = 1.20 2.19 3.60 NOTE: INTENSITIES TAKEN FROM FIGURE 3-1 RUNOFF (Q= CIA) (cfs) 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR Q = 0.83 1.52 3.12 V (fps) = 0.7 Tt(min)= V (fps) =? Tt(min)= V (fps) =? Tt(min)= V (fps) =? Tt(min)= V (fps) =? Tt(min)= V (fps) =? Tt(min)= V (fps) =? Tt(min)= TOTAL TRAVEL TIME(Ti)(min)= Ti+Tt = 39.83 CONCLUDE:USE THE 2-YEAR PEAK FLOW FOR THE RELEASE RATE FROM THE DETENTION POND 4.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.29 SHEAR ENGINEERING CORPORATION HISTORIC PAGE FLOW TO CONCENTRATION POINT A SITE ONLY PROJECT: SWALLOW TOWNHOMBS DATE 12/17/96 LOCATION:FORT COLLINS PROJ. NO.1555-01-96 FILE: SWALRUN BY MEO AREA (A)= 1.880 ACRES RUNOFF COEF. (C) 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR C = 0.20 0.20 0.25 GRASS, FLAT, HEAVY SOIL TIME OF CONCENTRATION (TO OVERLAND TRAVEL TIME (Ti) LENGTH = 320 FEET SLOPE = 1.00 % 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR C = 0.20 0.20 0.25 Ti (min)= 30.11 30.11 28.43 TRAVEL TIME (Tt)-L/(60*V) FLOW TYPE NOT APPLICABLE L (ft) =? S M =? ? V (fps) =? Tt(min)= L (ft) =? S (t) =? ? V (fps) =? Tt(min)= L (ft) =? S M =? ? V (fps) =? Tt(min)= L (ft) =? S (01) =? ? - V (fps) _? Tt(min)= L (ft) =? S (%) =? ? V (fps) _? Tt(min)= L (ft) =? S (i) =? ? V (fps) =? Tt(min)= L (ft) =? S 00 =? 7 V (fps) =? Tt(min)= NOTE: ALL VELOCITIES TAKEN FROM FIGURE 3-2 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME(Ti)(min)= TOTAL TRAVEL LENGTH = 320 L/180+10= 11.78 < Ti+Tt = Tc =Ti+TOTAL TRAVEL TIME 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR Tc (min)= 30.11 30.11 28.43 USE Tc = 30 30 28.5 INTENSITY (I) (iph) 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR I = 1.47 2.60 4.33 1 NOTE: INTENSITIES TAKEN FROM FIGURE 3-1 RUNOFF (Q= CIA) (cfs) 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR Q = 0.55 0.98 2.03 CONCLUDE:FOR REFBRENCR ONLY USE PEAK FLOWS FROM OVERALL AREA FOR DETENTION POND SIZING I 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.43 FOR REFERENCE ONLY SHEAR ENGINEERING CORPORATION DEVELOPED PAGE 5 FLOW TO CONCENTRATION POINT A FROM SITS PROJECT: SWALLOW TOWNHOMES DATE 12/17/96 LOCATION:FORT COLLINS PROJ. NO.1555-01-96 FILE: SWALRUN BY MHO AREA (A)= 1.880 ACRES RUNOFF COEF. (C) 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR C = 0.60 0.60 0.75 SEE SPREAD SHEET ATTACHED ON PAGE 2 TIME OF CONCENTRATION (TO OVERLAND TRAVEL TIME (Ti) LENGTH = 200 FEET SLOPE _ 1.00} 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR C = 0.20 0.20 0.25 Ti (min)= 23.80 23.80 22.48 TRAVEL TIME (Tt)=L/(60-V) FLOW TYPE L (ft) = 500 S (}) = 0.50 SWALE V (fps) = 1.11 Tt(min)= 7.51 L (ft) _? S (}) _? ? V (fps) _? Tt(min)= 0.00 L (ft) _? S (}) _? ? V (fps) _? Tt(min)= 0.00 L (ft) _? S (}) _? ? V (fps) _? Tt(min)= 0.00 L (ft) _? S M _? ? V (fps) _? Tt(min)= 0.00 L (ft) _? S (}) _? ? V (fps) _? Tt(min)= 0.00 L (ft) _? S (}) _? ? V (fps) _? Tt(min)= 0.00 NOTE: ALL VELOCITIES TAKEN FROM FIGURE 3-2 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME(Ti)(min)= 7.51 TOTAL TRAVEL LENGTH = 700 L/180+10= 13.89 < Ti+Tt = 29.99 Tc =Ti+TOTAL TRAVEL TIME 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR Tc (min)= 13.69 13.89 13.89 USE Tc = 14 14 14 INTENSITY (I) (iph) 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR I = 2.22 3.89 6.28 NOTE: INTENSITIES TAKEN FROM FIGURE 3-1 RUNOFF (Q= CIA) (Cfa) 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR Q = 2.50 4.38 8.84 CONCLUDE:DETAIN AND RELEASE AT 2-YEAR HISTORIC SHEAR ENGINEERING CORPORATION DEVELOPED PAGE FLOW TO CONCENTRATION POINT A FROM TOTAL CONTRIBUTING AREA PROJECT: SWALLOW TOWNHOMES DATE 12/17/96 LOCATION:FORT COLLINS PROJ. NO.1555-01-96 FILE: SWALRUN BY MHO AREA (A)= 3.470 ACRES RUNOFF CORP. (C) 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR C = 0.44 0.44 0.55 SHE SPREAD SHEET ATTACHED ON PAGE 2 TIME OF CONCENTRATION (TO OVERLAND TRAVEL TIME (Ti) LENGTH = 500 FEET SLOPE = 1.00 $ 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR C = 0.20 0.20 0.25 Ti (min)= 37.63 37.63 35.54. TRAVEL TIME (Tt)=L/(60*V) FLOW TYPE L (ft) = 500 S ($) = 0.5 SWALE V (fps) = 1.11 Tt(min)= L (ft) _? S ($) _? ? V (fps) _? Tt(min)= L (ft) _? S ($) _? ? V (fps) _? Tt(min)= L (ft) _? S ($) _? ? V (fps) _? Tt(min)= L (ft) _? S ($) _? ? V (fps) _? Tt(min)= L (ft) _? S ($) _? ? V (fps) _? Tt(min)= L (ft) _? S ($) _? ? V (fps) _? Tt(min)= NOTE: ALL VELOCITIES TAKEN FROM FIGURE 3-2 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME(Ti)(min)= TOTAL TRAVEL LENGTH = 1000 L/180+10= 15.56 < Ti+Tt = 43.05 Tc =Ti+TOTAL TRAVEL TIME 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR Tc (min)= 15.56 15.56 15.56 USE Tc = 15.5 15.5 15.5 INTENSITY (I) (iph) 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR I = 2.11 3.70 5.98 NOTE: INTENSITIES TAKEN FROM FIGURE 3-1 RUNOFF (Q= CIA) (cfs) 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR Q = 3.21 5.62 11.35 CONCLUDE:DETAIN AND RELEASE AT 2-YEAR HISTORIC 6 7.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.51 SHEAR ENGINEERING CORPORATION PAGE 7 DETENTION VOLUME REQUIRED FOR ONSITS POND PROJECT: SWALLOW TOWNHOMES PUD DATE: 12/17/96 PROJ.NO. 1555-01-96 FILE: SWALCUHP BY MEO NOTE: CONTRIBUTING AREA INCLUDES OFFSITE AREAS CUMULATIVE RUNOFF METHOD FOR SIZING DETENTION PONDS DESIGN STORM: 100 YEAR RUNOFF COEFFICIENT 0.55 RELEASE RATE: 0.83 CPS AREA: 3.47 ACRES INITIAL TIME: S MINUTES VERIFY RUNOFF COEFFICIENT TIME INCREMENT: 5 MINUTES INFLOW INFLOW RELEASE STORAGE STORAGE TIME TIME INTENSITY RATE VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME min sec iph cfs cf cf cf ac-ft rrr rrrrr+rrxrrrrrrrrrr�rrrtrtrrtrrrrrrrrrrr+rr++rtr+xrxrrrrrrr+rt:rxrxtr 5 300 9.30 17.75 5324.7 249.0 5075.7 0.12 10 600. 7.14 13.63 8176.0 498.0 7678.0 0.18 15 900 6.06 11.57 10409.0 747.0 9662.0, 0.22 20 1200 5.21 9.94 11931.9 996.0 10935.9 0.25 25 1500 4.63 8.84 13254.5 1245.0 12009.5 0.28 30 1800 4.20 8.02 14428.3 1494.0 12934.3 0.30 35 2100 3.81 7.27 15269.9 1743.0 13526.9 0.31 40 2400 3.60 6.87 16489.4 1992.0 14497.4 0.33 45 2700 3.28 6.26 16901.7 2241.0 14660.7 0.34 50 3000 3.02 5.76 17291.0 2490.0 14801.0 0.34 55 3300 2.80 5.34 17634.5 2739.0 14895.5 0.34 60 3600 2.60 4.96 17863.6 2988.0 14875.6 0.34 65 3900 2.43 4.64 18086.9 3237.0 14849.9 0.34 70 4200 2.30 4.39 18436.1 3486.0 14950.1 0.34 75 4500 2.17 4.14 18636.5 3735.0 14901.5 0.34 80 4800 2.07 3.95 18962.9 3984.0 14978.9 0.34 85 5100 1.96 3.74 19077.4 4233.0 14844.4 0.34 90 5400 1.87 3.57 19272.0 4482.0 14790.0 0.34 95 5700 1.77 3.38 19254.9 4731.0 14523.9 0.33 100 6000 1.70 3.24 19466.7 4980.0 14486.7 0.33 105 6300 1.63 3.11 19598.4 5229.0 14369.4 0.33 110 6600 1.57 3.00 19775.9 _ 5478.0 14297.9 0.33 115 6900 1.50 2.86 19753.0 5727.0 14026.0 0.32 120 7200 1.44 2.75 19787.3 5976.0 13811.3 0.32 rrrrrr+r+rtxrrrrrr♦rrrrtrtrtxrtrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrxxtxrxxrxrxrrrrr+rrr+r+r DETENTION VOLUME REQUIRED = 14950 cf DETENTION VOLUME REQUIRED = 0.34 ac-ft SEE PAGE 8 FOR DESIGN CONCLUSIONS SHEAR ENGINEERING CORPORATION PAGE 8 DETENTION VOLUME REQUIRED FOR ONSITS POND PROJECT: SWALLOW TOWNHOMES PUD DATE: 12/17/96 .. PROJ.NO. 1555-01-96 FILE: SWALCUHP BY HBO NOTE: CONTRIBUTING AREA IS ONSITB ONLY CUMULATIVE RUNOFF METHOD FOR SIZING DETENTION PONDS DESIGN STORM: 100 YEAR RUNOFF COEFFICIENT 0.73 RELEASE RATE: 0.55 CPS AREA: 1.68 ACRES INITIAL TIME: 5 MINUTES VERIFY RUNOFF COEFFICIENT TIME INCREMENT: 5 MINUTES INFLOW INFLOW RELEASE STORAGE STORAGE TIME TIME INTENSITY RATS VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME min sec iph cfs cf cf cf ac-ft }\t}rtrr\fr\4\f}\frftrrf\frf\}frt}kr\}rtrrrtrr\rtrt}}rt}rt}rt}rt\}rtrt}rt}rt}rt\rt}}rt}} 5 300 9.30 12.76 3829.0 165.0 3664.0 0.08 10 600 7.14 9.80 5879.4. 330.0 5549.4 0.13 15 900 6.06 8.32 7485.1 495.0 6990.1 0.16 20 1200 5.21 7.15 8580.2 .660.0 7920.2 0.18 25 1500 4.63 6.35 9531.3 825.0 8706.3 0.20 30 1800 4.20 5.76 10375.3 990.0 9385.3 0.22 35 2100 3.81 5.23 10980.6 1155.0 9825.6 0.23 40 2400 3.60 4.94 11857.5 1320.0 10537.5 0.24 45 2700 3.28 4..50 12154.0 1485.0 10669.0 0.24 50 3000 3.02 4.14 12433.9 1650.0 10783.9 0.25 55 3300 2.80 3.84 12681.0 1815.0 10866.0 0.25 60 3600 2.60 3.57 12845.7 1980.0 10865.7 0.25 65 3900 2.43 3.33 13006.2 2145.0 10861.2 0.25 70 4200 2.30 3.16 13257.4 2310.0 10947.4 0.25 75 4500 2.17 2.9E 13401.5 2475.0 10926.5 0.25 80 4800 2.67 2.84 13636.2 2640.0 10996.2 0.25 85 5100 1.96 2.69 13718.5 2805.0 10913.5 0.25 90 5400 1.87 2.57 13858.5 2970.0 10888.5 0.25 95 5700 1.77 2.43 13846.1 3135.0 10711.1 0.25 100 6000 1.70 2.33 13998.5 3300.0 10698.5 0.25 105 6300 1.63 2.24 14093.2 3465.0 10628.2 0.24 r rrtrrrrrr+r+rrr+rrr:rrrrr+rrrrrrrr+r+r+xr+rrrrr+rrtr+rr+rrrr+rrrrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrt ONSITS AREA ONLY OVERALL AREA DETENTION VOLUME REQUIRED = 10996 cf DETENTION VOLUME REQUIRED = 14950 cf DETENTION VOLUME REQUIRED = 0.25 ac-ft DETENTION VOLUME REQUIRED = 0.34 ac-ft CONCLUD6:DESIGN POND FOR 14950 CF OF STORAGE VOLUME MINIMUM ` DESIGN OUTLET TO RELEASE 0.83 CPS DURING 100-YEAR EVENT SHEAR ENGINEERING CORPORATION PAGE 9 AVERAGE END AREA METHOD FOR DETENTION BASIN VOLUMES PROJECT :SWALLOW TOWNHOMES PUD DATE: 02/04/97 PROJ. NO:1555-01-96 BY MRO LOCATION:SWALLOW ROAD AND SHIELDS STREET NOTES FILE: SWALPOND CONSTANT: 65.5 = 1 SQ IN. FIRST EVEN CONTOUR 5066 FEET INVERT 5065.5 FEET TOP BLEV 5067.5 FEET INCREMENT 1 FOOT SCALE: 1" = 30 FEET r+xrr+r+ rrrtx+rr +r+rrrrr tt+r++++ +rrrrrr+ rrrrrrr• r+r+rrrx rr+rrrrr rr+r++r+ STAGE ELEV PLANI- AREA AREA VOLUME CUM. CUM. CUM. METER (Al) (A2) (V1) VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME ft ft READING aq in aq ft cf cf cy ac-ft r rrrrrrr ++++r+rr rrr+r+++ +rrrrrrr +r++++rr rr++++++ rrrxt++r +rrrrr+r ++rrrtx• 0.00 5065.5 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.50 5066 183.5 2.80 2521 416 416 15 0.01 1.50 5067 930.5 14.21 12785 7653 8069 299 0.19 2.00 5067.5 1251.5 19.11 17196 7495 15565 576 0.36 FORMULAE:A1= (PLANIMETER READING)/CONSTANT A2= (A1)+SCALE SQUARED POND VOLUME REQUIRED = 14950 CF = 0.34 AC -FEET VOLUME PROVIDED = 15565 CP = 0.36 AC -FEET EXCESS VOLUME = 615 CF = 0.01 AC -FEET VOLUME REQUIRED LESS THAN VOLUME PROVIDED OK REQUIRED WATER SURFACE ELEVATION = 5067.46 FEET - BASED ON 14,950 CF STORAGE FREEBOARD PROVIDED = 0.04 FEET REQUIRED FREEBOARD = 1.00 FEET WATER SURFACE ELEVATION FOR 10996 CF STORAGE = 5067.20 FEET CONCLUDE:POND IS ADEQUATE REQUEST VARIANCE FROM FREEBOARD REQUIREMENT DUE TO OUTLET CONSTRAINTS AND GRADING CONSTRAINTS SHEAR ENGINEERING CORPORATION PAGE 10 OUTLET STRUCTURE FOR SWALLOW TOWNHOMBS PROJECT: SWALLOW TOWNHOMES DATE: 02/04/97 PROJECT NO 1555-01-96 BY HBO PROJECT LOCATION :FORT COLLINS FILE: SWALOUT INPUT FOR OUTLET STRUCTURE LOWER ORIFICE DIAM. (ft) = 0.33 WEIR TYPE BROADCRBSTBD DETERMINE ORIFICE SIZE LOWER ORIFICE INV. (ft) = 5065.50 WEIR LENGTH (ft) = 12.00 FOR MINOR STORM LOWER ORIFICE COEF. (Cl) = 0.65 WEIR INVERT (ft) = 5067.40 Q. CA(2gH)'0.5 UPPER ORIFICE DIAM.(ft) = HA WEIR COBF. (Cw) = 2.60 A - Q/(C(2gH)"0.5 UPPER ORIFICE INV. (ft) = HA TOP OF BERM (ft) = 5067.50 H (ft) = 1.96 UPPER ORIFICE COEF. (Cu) = HA INIT. DELTA (ft) = 0.50 C = 0.65 100 YR RELEASE RATE (cfe)= 0.83 DELTA HEAD (ft) = 0.50 Q (cfe)= 0.83 OUTLET PIPE DIAM. (ft) = 1.00 100 YR HEEL REQUIRED (ft)- 5067.46 A (ef) = 0.11 PIPE SLOPE (t) = 1.00 OVER FLAW YBS R (ft) = 0.190 MANNINGS n = 0.013 WHIR TYPE BROADCRESTED D (ft) = 0.380 WEIR LENGTH (ft) = 10.00 USE 0.33' DIAMETER (4x) i WEIR INVERT (ft) = 5067.58 ORIFICE WEIR COEF. (Cwo) = 2.60 }f *i!r!i r!rlrrrr +TTrTiT• *OUTPUT} ******** ******** ******** **T}*}*x PIPE AREA (SF) = 0.79 WETTED PERIMETER = 3.14 FEET HYD. RAD (FT) = 0.250 FEET R'2/3= 0.3967 OUTLET PIPE CAPACITY = 3.56 CPS LOWER ORIFICE AREA (A) = 0.0855 SQUARE FEET UPPER ORIFICE AREA (A) = 0.0000 SQUARE FEET e**iTfllTlfllflffl+lltr+*}TT*txTTTxTR*1!}T!}f!lifli+it+i++rTrir+rrtxrxrtTtTTxTt TTflTfflflf lxflTif xf i!!lf+lf! LOWER ORIFICE UPPER ORIFICE PRIMARY WEIR OVERFLOW SPILLWAY *i***** ******♦ ******* ******* ******* ******* •****** ******* *•***** ******* HEAD HEAD HEAD SUB HEAD ELeV. OVER LOWER OVER UPPER OVER WEIR TOTAL OVER WEIR TOTAL ELEV. LOWER ORIFICE UPPER ORIFICE WEIR FLOW FLOW WEIR FLOW FLOW ORIFICE FLOW ORIFICE FLOW ft ft cfe ft cfe ft cfe cfe ft cfe cfe ft 5065.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5065.S0 5066.00 0.34 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.26 5066.00 5066.50 0.84 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.41 5066.50 5067.00 1.34 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.52 5067.00 5067.50 1.84 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.99 1.59 0.00 0.00 1.59 5067.50 5067.40 1.73 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.59 S067.40 5067.439 1.77 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.24 0.835 0.00 0.00 0.835 5067.44 5067.46 1.80 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.46 1.06 0.00 0.00 1.06 5067.46 !rlr+r+* **rx*i*r *r+i*r+r xr*xrx*x lx+xxxxx *xi*lx+r arrrrrrr +rrtrrTx xlx+*iri i++r*rtr *xxx*i**'*!!!r+li ORIFICE EQUATION: CA(2gH)"1/2 WEIR FLOW EQTN. : CwLH^3/2 NOTE: HEAD OVER ORIFICE = HEAD OVER CENTER OF ORIFICE APPROXIMATE W.S.EL. FOR Qrel = 0.83 CFS = 5067.44 CONCLUDB:IT IS NOT PRACTICAL TO INSTALL ANYTHING SMALLER THAN A 4" DIAM. ORIFICE BECAUSE OF MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS. THE ACTUAL 100-YEAR WSBL IS WITHIN 0.02 FEET OF REQUIRED WATER SURFACE ELEVATION. ALSO A 4" DIAMETER ORIFICE CAN BE BUILT WITH LESS COST THAN AN ORIFICE PLATE. THEREFORE THE OUTLET IS ADEQUATE SHEAR ENGINEERING CORPORATION DEVELOPED PAGE 11 FLOW TO CONCENTRATION POINT A FROM SUBBASIN la PROJECT: SWALLOW TOWNHOMES DATE 02/04/97 LOCATION:FORT COLLINS PROJ. NO.1555-01-96 FILE: SWALRUN BY MEO AREA (A)= 1.590 ACRES RUNOFF CORP. (C) 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR C = 0.60 0.60 0.75 SEE SPREAD SHEET ATTACHED ON PAGE 2 TIME OF CONCENTRATION (TO OVBRLAND TRAVEL TIME (Ti) LENGTH = 500 FEET SLOPE = 1.00 $ 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR C = 0.20 0.20 0.25 Ti (min)= 37.63 37.63 35.54 TRAVEL TIME (Tt)=L/(60*V) FLOW TYPE L (ft) = 500 S (t) = 0.5 SWALE V (fps) = 1.11 Tt(min)= 7.51 L (ft) =? S (t) =? ? V (fps) =? Tt(min)= 0.00 L (ft) =? S (t) =? ? V (fps) =? Tt(min)= 0.00 L (ft) =? S (t) =? ? V (fps) =? Tt(min)= 0.00 L (ft) =? S (t) =? ? V (fps) =? Tt(min)= 0.00 L (£t) =? S (t) =? ? V (fps) =? Tt(min)= 0.00 L (ft) =? S (t) =? ? V (fps) =? Tt(min)= 0.00. NOTE: ALL VELOCITIES TAKEN FROM FIGURE 3-2 TOTAL TRAVEL TIME(Ti)(min)= 7.51 TOTAL TRAVEL LENGTH = 1000 L/180+10= 15.56 < Ti+Tt = 43.05 Tc =Ti+TOTAL TRAVEL TIME 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR Tc (min)= 15.56 15.56 15.56 USE Tc = 15.5 15.5 15.5 INTENSITY (1) (iph) 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR I = 2.11 3.70 5.98 NOTE: INTENSITIES TAKEN FROM FIGURE 3-1 RUNOFF (Q= CIA) (cfs) 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR Q = 2.01 3.53 7.13 Qrelease= 0.83 CONCLUDE:PEAK DEVELOPED FLOW TO DETENTION POND SHEAR ENGINEERING CORPORATION DEVELOPED FLAW TO CONCENTRATION POINT B FROM SUBBASIN 1b PROJECT: SWALLOW TOWNHOMES DATE 02/04/97 LOCATION:FORT COLLINS PROJ. NO.1555-01-96 FILE: SWALRUN BY MEO AREA (A)= 0.290 ACRES RUNOFF COEF. (C) 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR C = 0.60 0.60 0.75 SHE SPREAD SHEET ATTACHED ON PAGE 2 TIME OF CONCENTRATION (Tc) OVERLAND TRAVEL TIME (Ti) LENGTH = 40 FEET SLOPE = 1.00 6 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR C = 0.20 0.20 0.25 Ti (min)= 10.64 10.64 10.05 TRAVEL .TIME (Tt) =L/(60-V) FLOW TYPE L (ft) = 340 S (i) = 0-.5 GUTTER L (ft) _? S (k) _? ? L (ft) _? S (!) _? ? L (ft) _? ,S (4) _? ? L (ft) _? S (6) =7 ? L (ft) _? S (k) _? ? L (ft) _? S (t) _? ? NOTE: ALL VELOCITIES TAKEN FROM FIGURE 3-2 TOTAL TRAVEL LENGTH = 380 L/180+30= Tc -Ti+TOTAL TRAVEL TIME 2 YEAR 10 YEAR Tc (min)= 12.11 12.11 USE Tc = 12 12 INTENSITY (I) (iph) 2 YEAR 10 YEAR I = 2.30 4.17 NOTE: INTENSITIES TAKEN FROM FIGURE PAGE V (fps) = 1.11 Tt(min)= V (fps) _? Tt(min)= V (fps) _? Tt(min)= V (fps) _? Tt(min)= V (fps) _? Tt(min)= V (fps) _? Tt(min)= V (fps) _? Tt(min)= TOTAL TRAVEL TIME(Ti)(min)= 12.11 < Ti+Tt = 15.16 100 YEAR 12.11 12 RUNOFF (Q= CIA) (cfs) 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR Q = 0.41 0.73 1.46 Qrelease= 0.83 Qtotal = 0.41 0.73 2.29 CONCLUDE: PEAK DEVELOPED FLOW TO INLET ON SWALLOW INCLUDES RELEASE FROM POND 12 5.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.11 APPENDIX II Erosion Control Calculations Erosion Control Sequencing schedule Erosion Control security deposit estimates RAINFALL PERFORMANCE STANDARD EVALUATION 1 PROJECT: SWALLOW TOWNHOMES STANDARD FORM A COMPLETED BY: MEO DATE: 12/17/96 rrrrrrrrrr+rx+xr+r♦r++rrr♦r♦+rrrr+xrrrrxrrrr+r+rr+rr+rxrrr++r+rr+rx+rr+r++rrrxxxrx+r+rrxrr DEVELOPED BRODIBILITY Asb Lob Sob Lb Sb PS SUBBASIN ZONE (ac) (ft) (t) (feet) (t) (10 rr+r+r+r+rrxxrrrrrr+r+r+rrr+r++rr+rrr+rrrxr++rrr++rrrxxrrrrrrrrxxxxxxrxrrr+r+r+r+r+r+r+xxx I MODERATE 1.88 520 0.40 977.60 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 xrr+rr+rr+r+++xrxrxrxxxrxr+r+rr+r+rrrrxrrx•rrr+r+rr+rxrrxxrrr+++rr+xrr+r 1.88 520.00 0.40 USE 0.5 FOR SLOPE SLOPE STRAIGHT LINE INTERPOLATION LENGTH 0.50 500 72.70 520 X 600 72.80 X = 72.72 t EFFECTIVENESS CALCULATIONS STANDARD FORM B PROJECT: SWALLOW TOWNHOMES PRAT. NO.1555-01-96 BY: MBO DATE 12/18/96 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EROSION CONTROL C-PACTOR P-FACTOR COMMENT METHOD VALUE VALUE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ HAYBALBS IN SWALE 1.00 0.80 ROUGHENED GROUND 1.00 0.90 SEDIMENT BASIN 1.00 0.50 NORTH SIDE OF ACCESS GRAVEL INLET FILTER 1.00 0.80 SILT PENCE 1.00 0.50 ASPHALT 0.01 1.00 SOD 0.01, 1.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ MAJOR PS SUB AREA CALCULATIONS BASIN 4 BASIN acre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I 72! I 1.88 ROUGHENED GROUND = 0.45 ASPHALT/CONCRETE = 0.55 SOD = 0.76 SEDIMENT BASIN = 0.12 C = 0.2463 P = 0.3021 EFFECTIVENESS = 92.6$ EPFECTIVENESS IS GREATER THAN PERFORMANCE STANDARD ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CONCLUDE:SROSION CONTROL PLAN IS SATISFACTORY FORMULAS: EFF = (1-C-P)•100 C = WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF C VALUES P = WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF P VALUES MULTIPLIED BY P VALUES FOR HAYBALBS SILT PENCE, GRAVEL INLET FILTERS ETC. Swallow Townhomes P.U.D.; Ft. Collins, Colorado Project No: 1555-01-96 Const Seq. Date: 12/03/96 File: Wells/ Erosion / Const Seq. Revised: 12/04/96 CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE PROJECT: Swallow Townhomes P.U.D. STANDARD FORM C SEQUENCE FOR ONLY COMPLETED BY: MEO / Shear Engineering Corp. Indicate by use of a bar line or symbols when erosion control measures will be installed. Major modifications to an approved schedule may require submitting a new schedule for approval by the City Engineer. Year 197 Month J J A OVERLOT GRADING *** WIND EROSION CONTROL *_ Soil Roughening *** Perimeter Barrier Additional Barriers Vegetative Methods Soil Sealant Other RAINFALL EROSION CONTROL STRUCTURAL: Sediment Trap/Basin *** Inlet Filters *** Straw Barriers *** Silt Fence Barriers Sand Bags Bare Soil Preparation Contour Furrows Terracing Asphalt/Concrete Paving Other VEGETATIVE: Permanent Seed Planting Mulching/Sealant Temporary Seed Planting Sod Installation Nettings/Mats/Blankets Other 98 S O N D J *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** F M A M *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** STRUCTURES: INSTALLED BY: DEVELOPER MAINTAINED BY: DEVELOPER VEGETATIONIMULCHING CONTRACTOR: DEVELOPER DATE PREPARED: 12/04/96 DATE SUBMITTED: 12/23/96 APPROVED BY THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS ON: February 5, 1997 Project No: 1555-01-96 Basil Hamdan City of Fort Collins Stormwater Utility P.O. Box 580 Ft. Collins, Colorado 80522 Re: Erosion Control Cost Estimate Swallow Townhomes P.U.D.; Fort Collins, Colorado Dear Basil, Attached is the erosion control security deposit estimate for Swallow Townhomes P.U.D. ESTIMATE 1: 4 - Haybale barriers Q 75.00 each $ 300.00 275 lineal feet silt fence O $3.00 per foot $ 825.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $ 1,125.00 x 1.50 $ 1,687.50 ESTIMATE 2: re -vegetate the disturbed area of 1.88 acres at $ 531.00 per acre 998.28 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $ 998.28 x 1.50 $ 1,497.42 In no instance shall the amount of the security be less than $1,000.00. Therefore, the total required erosion control security deposit for Swallow Townhomes P.U.D. will be $ 1,687.50. If you have any questions, please call at 226-5334. Sincerely, I NO Brian W. Shear, P.E. Shear Engineering Corporation BW S / meo cc: Anchor Development Corporation; Russ Wells Dave Stringer, City of Fort Collins 4836 S. College, Suite 12 Ft. Collins, CO 80525 (970) 226-5334 FAX (970) 282-0311 3 February 5, 1997 Project No: 1555-01-96 Re: EROSION CONTROL SECURITY DEPOSIT REQUIREMENTS: Swallow Townhomes P.U.D.; Fort Collins, Colorado An erosion control security deposit is required in accordance with City of Fort Collins policy (Chapter 7, Section C: SECURITY; page 7.23 of the City of Fort Collins Development Manual). In no instance shall the amount of the security be less than $1000.00. a. The cost to install the proposed erosion control measures is approximately $ 1,125.00. Refer to the cost estimate attached in Appendix I. 1.5 times the cost to install the erosion control measures is $ 1,687.50 b. Based on current data provided by the City of Fort Collins Stormwater Utility, and based on an actual anticipated net affected area which will be disturbed by construction activity (approximately 1.88 acres), we estimate that the cost to re - vegetate the disturbed area will be $ 998.28 ($ 531.00 per acre x 1.88 acres). 1.5 times the cost to re -vegetate the disturbed area is $ 1,497.42 The $ 531.00 per acre for re -seeding sites less than 5 acres was provided by City of Fort Collins Stormwater Utility personnel. CONCLUSION: The erosion control security deposit amount required for Swallow Townhomes P.U.D., will be $ 1,687.50. 4836 S. College, Suite 12 Ft. Collins, CO 80525 (970) 226-5334 FAX (970) 282-0311 APPENDIX III Backup Diagrams and Exhibits Table 3-3; Rational Method Runoff Coefficients for Composite Analysis Table 3-4; Rational Method Frequency Adjustment Factors Figure 3-2; Estimate of Average Flow Velocity for Use with the Rational Formula Figure 3-1; City of Ft. Collins Rainfall Intensity Duration Curve Table 5 Circular Pipe Flow Capacity for Mannings 'n' = 0.013 DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL' RUNOFF 5( 3C H 2C z w U cr w CL 10 z ' w a 6 O 5 w cc 3 O" cU 2 cc w H 3 1 5 MINN ,�■ / I I■o■■= _���� moll oil 1� •I • Il ,' IN WAN MWIM WM �YANI//��NO NNI� �■�r��r�0AW eINr,�►,M00011�� 1 2 3 5 10 20 VELOCITY IN FEET PER SECOND FIGURE 3-2. ESTIMATE OF AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY FOR USE WITH THE RATIONAL FORMULA. *MOST FREQUENTLY OCCURRING "UNDEVELOPED" LAND SURFACES IN THE DENVER REGION. REFERENCE: "Urban Hydrology For Small Watersheds" Technical Release No. 55, USDA, SCS Jan. 1975. 5 -1-84 URBAN DRAINAGE & FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT No Text R-M-P Medium Density Planned Residential District — designation for medium density areas planned as a unit (PUD) to provide a variation in use and building placements with a minimum lot area of 6,000 square feet. R-L-M Low Density Multiple Family District— areas containing low density multiple family units or any other use in the R-L District with a minimum lot area of 6,000 square feet for one -family or two-family dwellings and•9,000 square feet for multiple -family dwellings. M-L Low Density Mobile Home District — designation for areas for mobile home parks containing independent mobile homes not exceeding 6 units per acre. MW Medium Density Mobile Home District — designation for areas of mobile home parks containing independent mobile homes not exceeding 12 units per acre. B-G General Business District — district designation for downtown business areas, including a variety of permitted uses, with minimum lot areas equal to 1 /2 of the total floor area of the building. B-P Planned Business District — designates areas planned as unit developments to provide business services while protecting the surrounding residential areas with minumum lot areas the same as R-M. H-B Highway Business District — designates an area of automobile -orientated busi nesses with a minimum lot area equal to 1/2 of the total floor area of the building. . B-L Limited Business District — designates areas for neighborhood convenience centers, including a variety of community uses with minimum lot areas equal to two times the total floor area of the building. C Commercial District —designates areas of commercial, service and storage areas. I-L Limited Industrial District -designates areas of light industrial uses with a minimum area of lot equal to two times the total floor area of the building not to be less than 20,000 square feet. I-P Industrial Park District —designates light industrial park areas containing controlled industrial uses with minimum lot areas equal to two times the total floor area of the building not to be less than 20,000 square feet. I-G General Industrial District —designates areas of major industrial development. T Transition District — designates areas which are in a transitional stage with regard to ultimate development. For current and more explicit definitions of land uses and zoning classifications, refer to the Code of the City of Fort Collins, Chapters 99 and 118. Table 3-3 RATIONAL METHOD RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS FOR COMPOSITE ANALYSIS Character of Surface Runoff Coefficient Streets, Parking Lots, Drives: Asphalt................................................................................................ 0.95 95 Concrete............................................................................................. 0. Gravel................................................................................................. 0.50 Roofs.......................................................................................................... 0.95 Lawns, Sandy Soil: 0.10 Flat<2%............................................................................................. 0.15 Average2 to 7%.................................................................................. 0.20 Steep>7%.......................................................................................... Lawns, Heavy Soil: 0.20 Flat<2%............................................................................................. 0.25 Average2 to 7%.... :............................................................ ................. 0.35 Steep >7%......... :...................................................................... ........... MAY 1984 3-4 DESIGN CRITERIA 3.2 3.1.7 Time of Concentration In order to use the Rainfall Intensity Duration Curve, the time of concentration must be known. This can be determined either by the following equation or the "Overland Time of Flow Curves" from the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, included in this report (See Figure 3-2). Tc =1.87 (1.1 — CC,) D't2 S Where Tc =Time of Concentration, minutes S = Slope of Basin, % C = Rational Method Runoff Coefficient D = Length of Basin, feet Cf = Frequency Adjustment Factor Time of concentration calculations should reflect channel and storm sewer velocities as well as overland flow times. 3.1.8 Adjustment for Infrequent Storms The preceding variables are based on the initial storm, that is, the two to ten year storms. For storms with higher intensities.an adjustment of the runoff coefficient is required because of the lessening amount of infiltration, depression retention, and other losses that have a proportionally smaller effect on storm runoff. These frequency adjustment factors are found in Table 3-4. Table 3-4 RATIONAL METHOD FREQUENCY ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Storm Return Period Frequency Factor (years) C, 2to 10 1.00 11 to25 1.10 26 to 50 1.20 51 to 100 1.25 Note: The product of C times C, shall not exceed 1.00 Analysis Methodology The methods presented in this section will be instituted for use in the determination and/or verification of runoff at specific design points in the drainage system. These methods are (1), the Rational Method and (2).the Colorado Urban Hydrograph. Procedure (CUHP). Other computer methods, such as SWMM, STORM,:and HEC-1 are allowable if.results are not radically different than these two. Where applicable, drainage. systems proposed for construction should provide the minimum protection as determined by the methodology so mentioned above. 3.2.1 Rational Method For drainage basins of 200 acres or less, the runoff may be calculated by the Rational Method, which is essentially the following equation: Q = C,CIA Where Q = Flow Quantity, cfs A =Total Area of Basin, acres C, = Storm Frequency Adjustment Factor (See Section 3.1.8) C = Runoff Coefficient (See Section 3.1.6) . 1 = Rainfall Intensity, inches per hour (See Section 3.1.4) 3.2.2 Colorado Urban Hydrograph Procedure For basins larger than 200 acres, the design storm runoff should be analyzed by deriving synthetic unit hydrographs. It is recommended that the Colorado Urban Hydrograph Procedure be used for such analysis. This procedure is detailed in the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, Volume 1, Section 4. MAY 1984 3-5 DESIGN CRITERIA to { O Oto qr.+O OMM co tD t► 1(»M Q»' eT 00 to to .tt OD M 00 0) W G M OD M N N OO.+Ntt') Mti-4N •"rt-O .M-4.p•1N �'t0 1.4 O 00 0Q� Mt-M NN NtD�t O0 MN et N...iLO �U) O0 4CV) WD o tOO.r Off N� r+N Mtn t- NN M'd' O O M t- tO 0 O t- IRr M M M N V't-N t- CA 0) et Q-,WLO M .r M OOO t-��� 00.E-� NM NCC71OO to d' O to M to tr) .-1 t- t- O O . + •� .-ICV) tA00M awto04 tDOt- MtDd' N . . . . . . . . . M N OOOO.y MCnO LO On .O iNM Vq'CD0 rO+N CQ ti O Nt-MMW4 Oerd' w-4M O.•+M tr).-4 V- CMgrt-t- r 0" ODd'M O0OCl) 03 . . N M 0000.-4 t7In00 d'NN M00q' q'O HNCV) qw m0) .-yN tO N tf) t0 •? O O .•+ Ln O tD M t• tD M .•+Nett -CD Mt`M 0) 0) MNN MO .-� O O O O r+ N qr 00 C N N Wit LO 00 --+ ry •^ �+ O .•� M N M 00 00 CD t- Met M N M ytO Nd tD•? CDMM ODvt- MNtD Mtn QIYi .+ 0 0 0 0 .• N et l- M N .N • .4 t uli OD .N-� •�-� tyy� U R O tO M M CD t- r+ IO 00 N a' N M tr) CD t- to CD N Mr 00 N tO et MN t-t-N CD 00 to 4 O N M O M •. • • • • •. • N O 0) N M t- .-+ t- M et tO et r. tD O O' O O r+ .+ ry N M el' t- .+ r. CH W W U MOtnro00 M(OCD OtnN tiNO OCD R.0 )0 44 oo MMiON r. er In coCDtD Ol WO O.r . OM C1. a NM CD OtnN 0r W O� U �yy -� O O O O . + .-+ r+ N M -T co r+ • + 3 p.tn titOMtot- 00 a) ONM NNto O Ot- t-CD CD Do m' MOtn t-to 00tOt- r- .. Nd' O O k. to ca O 14 M tO Mm O) tD tO t- DN OD N O O O O r+ .-t .-i N M 117 •--� U .1 O mr -ef IONt MOO OOtD r.tD to mwr M to en M to to to et N O M O rr+M00 0 N . p .4N d' t rr CD ry M t- t-0 0 0 0 O O .•+ � N N et r. to NM•Op N In 0r N t- 00 Nt-CD tnO M M. -�fXi NMM MNa' Orr+N CM't- fT to p .••� N M CD M M C; 0; to OD 00000 ••+ r+N M O Otnetr+O 00mM OMN 'tnetM Met N e!' 00 to m et M to 00 t- O .•� OD M 00 M N O O .� N tO O O .•+ N et t- O CM OD M .1tr a' 00000 CV a ID O 000MhN MCl) d' Nr4to Ml-M NN .� N CD O t- 00 CD rn O co O r+ N M O 00 et O O r+ N Cl) to t M. 00000 N M V' tO OCl) t-tn0 0) q' to at to Mt-�4 ON M O Ne?'t-N t- at OO eY M Lin M-0) to ry .� O O 0 •4 N O O 0 0 N M I n t D M C 4 00000 O 11 N Nt-M Mr .-tO ry Mel'O 00OM Mr+ O CV) tOM CNN MOOd NM C O.000rr O O O O 4 .N C4 et to M .48 O O O O O r+N 0) �. etCV) r4r O ettON t- 00 r+q' rl O 00 O to . 00 M W CD O •0' N t- . M �U OOMd'tD0 C .4L, 1n06CD MOCD OM Q 41 Orq M to NMCD OION Or to Oa' U t:. .•i .-+.•ti N C) eY CD •-•� rr M t0 M m' to CD 00 O N In DO r4 mil t- O tD N 00 •ri N N N M M et v A •rl v C Q k M N X CD M et 1 4+ 0 ts. O U 0 I" APPENDIX IV Stuffer Envelope Master Grading Plan Master Drainage and Erosion Control Plan e ;;aate�?�� t. LEGEND 'rk«wrw ,•mua m«kf« R' 7' Rrf,r•' 1Rw h xwuwetlro _om,r•como� er Wo triewsl.�ux.w<holcv —...-- aAunaounu.Nax Y _ i row r:q: L. mr r wH.pkn suYe.l.,ll1 Vn M M 10 M _ rnMMa`. 4: h,u kurN !«t.4 r A kh UA r ICNA9ON ...............................-• ..A ... .. J �,*�5� h N Sr. F9' CW'¢ SY M" l'mYa° W Od5N4 OM IW.' uYb vie 'pX d a c 00c-ikrs�naxuno""rvLvrNmclrm A ssr.. «,• ,• • •0V •k u '4iAriv '' or Jm ua:..wl .. adH n,T t „ k l n In Hrlw uYT Y.•,. ' p:o✓M=r •:xk .. m :1 x ®canCCNrYAfwNrvvrt [rY «Lx .i H I r.- �COCA 1, An .vi.1O'vx" W YAYs a: Wrm4• aq.'ra0 a«m.A lrV«Pxkrso er, r r A r 0 x o 1 d n A Mintill rrowDwrnen wm •11 .•,,.,, ct, •••,. .r.I w^km mq w , .no "x ... A.raw:aL�Yk c•,ru.rr /r�>. bN +'w A.ua .0 wYrMaw dA?A EROSION CONTROL LEGENDrera"•xpn,H _ 1 °",dn'„`r'� W, - y 6q :.x kW wwl dm +Ltl.v. Ik.vwR Y.. saY runes Om�•'pP4�� IIAYMLLBNIa1rJl ' « • A. u„un ,v n o•r , Jr^v% y OR". Jml � nl x n.k r ua Y m".w '" 'i' k x w uFAEm SCIIE: 1•=30' m s "xX ri e:R.«Mkk.l wY u .[ .n yJ z.•[^'P xY 9�kohM'a°a ) P^ I§vLmbdwY N V xy FAVOL lu AN :m h'A,I Gh 4en Ial 4 LV ur ... ... .. ... ... ... ... AM. uyk .o ..«. VA jVMfil le•,"or �'� «. Abob Am.Iw�NWp yCIA Al 1114APAi]1'n)n)IvrF ASn nD v. M « t9 94 Ilk ep}rM�Wiex ur..hA " VW .wA A= l..: :w.l.. 'L (: r""• _ .. i. "- 1"kn Y✓uouk era LY 4we'MYLghi• h9wi::.w�(1tiv���,:'. I - .pW:y SAVOCAL AAA . m ••py sift.Iv .rty"md w Dort IV. m ANrc '^ nAll VIC Ak Oft e. I u CAI u 6 iM'Id.9 :b .a«uSRn•npu�> I w 7� n w F r 0.� u,ollI w..� .°:'m. a:w."e"m An 1 wywrt� b «r...Iwwlew,y.W«"y.".'AYwwS5yyrff1-1 'i o I � vw.� r' All LIMAL _ ... A.I.v r' Iry nd"me wlf' "Mle-IRAmw«Y14pto lNwvayevi uo e 1 b MJI IM mim�'Pot eb,rw. ROCKY MOUNTAIN HIGH SCHOOL :MCA ;mow �w Po®� a A O a 4CAR � TO u, , aaYY er•.x VY 7 FORM � R n e chil It i" `AM M OR �g°'D%l 'A I sp« m,uY .w•w.m xa .. IN A, CALAv_ /7 6 WTI NA a r. _ _ _ _ tl .. L'. .c_1^r .. su rr .n «ry Mill L.1 ALL ...'All _:.._„=;1,Am t,.i.. ,.�... --- - �Z rOF 0 ._*s*y„tp3,T, . ?aS e'Am �r4,�,:� �r ,:.;a. wYyr` _.10, _o..: wm�l5,i�'a Pl.'Wa^�t.Hh�w`a'' 3tti++arv�NdwR' - -3aw- : %A ..er. .7F .. r -.,_� - w WEST SWALLOW ROAD ' a J: - - �mn ONLY Flil _. A `Alm ll ok 9-OA_- "� a _. _s.;' c.«,wce B ® ` ILL � I"Ill fty- to Ill _ u IV Am w M A �CALL V. NILI b \ I ,T ® ® AM NO:Aa[Ai�I. V `) Fr"irdliD a OSIONCO bLCONS1aI ON AIAN NOTBY ��'" 1. _yl i 16 ! D• `. �, �Fsal/A I ® n Oil rFAIL w�mrALl U INVyVIA V, I kx look w«m« mm b, mT•a•I Ma24JLL VC CAL I RmLl ALL A.IL ' "r I „_ rr.na 3;' 4 rr.ntll - A .I w. a �d " f fw k. TT-` T-1--', - A li A al 41 d p•w su l r W lI be Il J ph Ill "Awl ,iml IIAw b by md,Im IIY I a� < ((j�am,D, J L,.J L 1 2 5 6 7 8 11 12 A V-; A aaxvu e, mpp'Xamdd ) All A m r i I, 4 fO now 1 W m a h,VN a' a pp JM I I� «. w.s - I (4d1 C I s «rmrmM plw.rw w w- w n r I I j / I r` I A ' I F ��'° Lwywt dv Con hol li l Jw w1 aL s°orid For lam. ru ' • I d„m xYud�J, h,V,L ki 1 I { •/.. r- - _I C I a Iral 4 bl�rLy W4 al.www nr 4 .wl" t •ldppl"u roa mrlur M. MAL L___�___J �.. _ - r 1:' Illi -' oW )Vwllbx,q in•murM.9 aIk gµtiv�ly amW.ma Lm y - •••-.. (� �Ad r A' .ywl'^ ((qawuMofd Irl Ika Ne w6 "I >. \ '.'. « .. —0 ':`\ I1'. ml{. 9N'M X Idsbrw4 Yeb•W' pz dbYnwl d� b t "IYr , Am.. >• I xa I rT- YY�. \ ;,' Q I ! na«p`uLolg5wpr',e an°.'°'m pp olabr s DII y- N W<I w .r_."....,. / l �J L-J Li --. :, « .._'�...� ., '^ Y xtm YdMI_I?,� .I:aori 4bw yyWyuryd. ... I __-.• ' `1 A II Q Wf W All IUW my Nxa xle Jnt1 h a' I d n:vd ;'Y rS4Jd° b r F yFl ® W NAW 11 N All mPwM aw, All by CRY t r mIr« L • I 1- , ,_ j+ IL'E`t Fy All ym 'Yrla yyl o ioll 4NN !o il II o Vr W d W M or. 'kv� F Y Ia I it tt(a'uylw dPL flH oll rvq�oNotJ.,fit ( W[ JOrtmol ld ,i U] dwal kId ALL aAl ✓ In nY npax•r.M IflA,bduly w••I ,mow m1,k AM r 1 }EyMy or ¢ kllr IOa•d wn Uo)f {In hlNL All II kplu Ilbep ar rr A, a ii a drl�� M1Po Mti 8 tl a L rm. L NY vtil 1 k�lOJer,�lh ekJ N Il aw �'rA bra -nra Nrp r ial npyl kuy AAL at"It AM tkamn'roi JON EL P.U.D. Epp] _ _..,r'Y'«'^�`''rP'narfw rr{l1lk►�,j, I � � - 23 ._ - r I :. �15 `� : f) YII 7 )i 154. 0.25, �' f „AN, 17 d w I�'.A t Unix. ;e A 24 '� _ 6 t 16 `a>✓ }' Ir _A P ---------- -- —— .. — r= I m ° ALII� i [ arm '«m wm VIC Al _' _ uem. OUTLBT STRUCTURE, wm — i 5367 ----- - � - -- �I �" City of FO4d CORNa, COlorodO TRACT "A" - PI L'iIi- : UTILITY PLAIT APPROVAL IN - AIrKOVFbrxoix¢Il,w on WAGON WHEEL PILING NO.9 CXECKfO BYE— . CHECKED % wm CHECKED VC — MOD R[V9IXls pme -- Np _ CADfrOa CLIFF _ T'rtI B',IASTER DRAINING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN Mill NO, I. v VO OF m SHEAR ENGINEERING CORPORATION " tHIIT. FNao« CK�IW B.ws. ANCHOR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION A836 SO. COLLEGE AVE, SURE 12, FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80525 SWALLOW OWNHOMES iP. C.U. 555-01-BB_ sH 5 pr gnyil SmN Ipplw•3'. B.W.9. PHONE: (9]0) 22fi-SSSA -(8]OJ 226-Aa51 FAX: (WO) 282-0311 EGR'E' GI,I,R'J$, OGLDRADp wNkclw t