Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDrainage Reports - 01/17/1989STORM DRAINAGE REPORT REPLAT OF LOT 1 SOUTHMOOR VILLAGE EAST SECOND FILING Lot 1 of Southmoor Village East Second Filing presently has one residence, a pool, two out —buildings, a barn, and a paved driveway and parking area. The entire area drains to the southwest corner of the property, from which a drain swale runs south to the Shepardson channel. There is very little to no offsite drainage onto this site. Drainage from the west is intercepted by Lemay Avenue, the lots to the south drain southerly, the lots to the east drain to the east, and the lots to the north drain north to Springwood Drive except for a part of the rear yards of lots 7 and 8 of the Southmoor Village East Third Filing. This off — site drainage drains toward the existing drain swale along the west property line. The existing impervious area of the site is 21,440 square feet, which calculates a run—off coefficient of 0.338. The proposed developed site will have an impervious area of 25,280 square feet, due to the additional driveway required for fire access. The calculated run—off coefficient will be 0.363, which is below the 0.5 coefficient normally used for residential areas and which is below the coefficient of 0.4 which was originally used for the Southmoor Village East development. The existing regional detention pond located along the east boundary of the Southmoor Village East subdivisions was sized to detain run—off from the entire Southmoor Village East development, as well as the run— off from Bartran's property to the south. Therefore, the run—off from the proposed replat of Lot 1 was to be detained in the regional pond. The existing and developed storm run—off quantities for a 2, 10 and 100 year storm are calculated on the attached sheet. There is a very small increase in the run—off for the developed condition. We request that additional detention not be required for this replat because the regional pond is supposed to detain for this site, and also because the very small increase in run—off should not cause any problems to the Shepardson channel, which drains into the regional pond. Sheet 2 of this report shows calculations, and sheet 3 is a map of the area showing existing and proposed conditions. Phillip I. Robinson, P.E. & L.S. \P I. ROg.� .�G1STEgF, .P C #' 4502 SI,Jl'oF &`5 ,,, ' F C0 n,nnn, J�� OCOMPUTATIONS 0 James H. Stewart & Associates, Inc. 214 N. Howes St. Ft. Collins, CO 80521 (303) 482-9331 By: F1E Date Mh?-i 60 Client:e T-erre 1 Sheet No. Z of 3 Chkd By: Date Project: Lo)- f S/`NF 2. ^= Job No. Subject Gr-(555 career ev i.S1e GiralrlJn p jShe�Grr�SU C�iannC� , .. �_ xls %�- � _. e�-v/o✓s Area- - i-I O, ' r-�t � I I I t71 j �%, s I 7-c -- ! ! 8i �.I•.1 ;. ,33b) I¢I} Q j �_ �..�0:3I B)1/.,4' T(2IG175) 6t,fi jI il3 1 ¢q)C.c s.oilcA,i ��s I i ��_�-o-��� I i 6��3 IS z;R �_ ' I,-r ��� �,,o I rh I .fie✓e% e .3(;3)(1.I5)1L1 Flo I G//a I - C0I -3C.3) Z.C115 Z.G7S) I I 1 Cff I a ' � X� NIHW3!! O-L I i �N3ar53tl ONItSI Xp 0 p — a Vj \ a � L 10'7 Q