Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Drainage Reports - 03/23/1990
Pit )PETTY OF FORT CODS U RrhopimiTinm FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT FOR Amigos Restauant Riverside Shopping Center Ft. Collins, Colorado PREPARED FOR: Rocky Mountain C/M, Inc. Ft. Collins, Colorado PREPARED BY: Shear Engineering Corporation Project No: 1102-7-89 Date: January, 1990 4431 Hollyhock, Ft. Collins, CO 80526 (303) 226-5334 No Text I GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION A. Location 1. The proposed Amigos Mexican Restaurant will be located on Lot A, Riverside Shopping Center in the NE1/4 of Section 13, T7N, R69W of the 6th PM in the City of Ft. Collins. More specifically, the restaurant will be located on the Southwest corner of the intersection of Riverside Avenue and Lemay Avenue. B. Description of property 1. The site is the last undeveloped lot of the Riverside Shopping Center. A majority of the site is currently a gravel open area, generally used for parking. The Right of Way areas adjacent to the site along Riverside and Lemay- Avenues are fully landscaped. The asphalt parking area and driveways for the Riverside Shopping Center bound the westernmost and southwesternmost property lines. 2. The development of the site will consist of the construction of the Amigos Mexican Restaurant, associated parking areas and landscaping. The restaurant will have a drive through. Refer to the Drainage and Grading Plan included in Appendix A of this report. II DRAINAGE BASINS AND SUB -BASINS A. Major basin description 1. The site is contained within the Old Town Master Drainage Basin. The Cache La Poudre River is located to the north on the other side of Riverside Avenue. B. Sub -basin description 1. The site is a part of the original Riverside Shopping Center drainage basin for which detention was originally proposed. The provision for a storm sewer crossing Riverside with capacity to carry flows from a 100-year storm ultimately superceded the detention requirement. This will be documented further in this report. III DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA A. Regulations 1. This report and the Drainage and Grading Plan were prepared according to the requirements of the City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage design criteria and the final design and restrictions accepted during the development of the Riverside -Shopping Center. B. Development criteria reference and constraints 1. The original design of the Riverside Shopping Center considered detention for the fully developed site. Changes were made in the storm drainage design concept during development of the Riverside Shopping Center. Reference is made to the preliminary Riverside Shopping Center drainage report included in Appendix B of this report. Reference is also made to the documentation concerning the decision to abandon the detention requirement, this documentation also being included in Appendix B of this report for reference. It is this documentation which was relied upon for development of this report and the Amigos Drainage and Grading Plan. PAGE 2 Project No: 1102-7-89 B. Development criteria reference and constraints (continued) 2. Site design constraints abut the entire perimeter of the Amigos site. These constraints include existing improvements to the remainder of the Shopping Center, Riverside Avenue and Lemay Avenue. The main site constraints however,are the existing grades for the Riverside Shopping Center and adjacent arterial roadways, and the Riverside Shopping Center storm drainage outlet location and grade. a. The Amigos site is at the low end (northeast corner) of the Riverside Shopping Center with the main storm outlet for the entire shopping center being at the extreme northeast corner of the Amigos site. A major portion of the storm runoff generated on the shopping center site will be routed through the Amigos site to the existing inlet located at the extreme northeast corner of Riverside Shopping Center and the Amigos site. According to the revised drainage calculations which were prepared by Columbine Engineering Management Group, Inc., the 100-year storm peak flow to the inlet is approximately 90 cfs. Refer to the revised calculations for the original Riverside Shopping Center project as transmitted to the City of Fort Collins by Columbine Engineering Management Group; transmittal date, 4/16/85 (see Appendix 8). b. The existing improvements (including landscaping) and grades along Riverside and Lemay Avenues, and the shopping center grades to the existing inlet, define a potential detention situation (see existing grades on the Drainage and Grading Plan). This may relate to the original drainage design concept which included detention. Past documentation indicates a potential for actual detention situations on the site due to modifications made during storm sewer construction and the reduction in actual storm sewer capacity of the storm sewer which was installed across Riverside Avenue. Reference is made to the May 24,. 1985 letter from CDB Development Co. to City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage (see Appendix B). An analysis of potential ponding .volumes was made utilizing the Mass diagram method and a release rate of 53 cfs. Refer to the June 7, 1985 letter from Shiloh, Inc. to CDB-JDI Partnership (see Appendix B). IV DRAINAGE FACILITY DESIGN A. General concept 1. The drainage design concept is unchanged from the concept originally proposed with -the Riverside Shopping Center. All grading design achieves the routing of storm water to the inlet at the low point of the Riverside Shopping Center and the Amigos site. Stormwater is theoretically undetained because of the installation of the oversized storm sewer across Riverside Avenue. As previously discussed, past documentation indicates a potential for actual detention situations on the site due to modifications made during storm sewer construction. PAGE 3 Project No: 1102-7-89 IV DRAINAGE FACILITY DESIGN (continued) B. Specific Details 1. Final site grading design considered all existing grades adjacent to the site. 2. Final site grading design considered the existing Riverside Shopping Center drainage plan, including flow directions and site drainage outlet location. 3. The finished floor elevation of Amigos Restaurant was, established to maintain protection from possible stormwater backup due to storm sewer facility malfunction and potential ponding. V CONCLUSIONS A. Compliance with standards 1. The grading and drainage design has met all the. Storm Drainage criteria of the City of Fort Collins and the requirements of the Riverside -Shopping Center storm drainage revisions as accepted and approved by the City of Fort Collins. B. Specific Details 1. The grading of the site'was successfully designed to match the existing grades around the entire perimeter of the Amigos site and to direct all runoff to the inlet at the extreme low point of the Riverside Shopping Center and Amigos site. 2. During development of the Riverside Shopping Center, the original detention requirement for the Shopping Center was replaced with the alternative to provide a storm sewer, designed to convey the 100-year storm directly from the shopping center site, across Riverside to the River. The developers of the Riverside Shopping Center opted to choose the storm sewer alternative. A 30" diameter storm sewer was ultimately provided under Riverside Avenue, placed within a 42" diameter steel pipe casing. During the progress of construction of the storm sewer across Riverside, field changes were made which reduced the design capacity of the storm sewer. Therefore, a ponding potential on Lot A, the Amigos site, was developed (see item 4 in this section and Appendix "B"). The ponding potential is considered at this time, with the design of the Amigos site.: All calculations for ponding volumes are based on peak flows to the site, according to calculations provided for the original Riverside Shopping Center development, and actual capacity of the storm sewer, also based on calculations provided for the original Riverside Shopping Center development. All original Riverside Shopping Center drainage easements for detention areas, have been vacated (Support documentation regarding all drainage easement dedications and vacations associated with the drainage changes for Riverside Shopping Center, may be.found in Appendix B). New easements for the conveyance of offsite runoff through the Amigos site will be provided by separate document. The drainage easement will be defined by the limits of the Amigos parking lots and drives. Stormwater ponding will remain contained within the limits of the.._easement...Overflow.of potential ponding will occur at the southeast corner of.the site.. .The overflow.:will actually PAGE 4 Project No: 1102-7-89 V CONCLUSIONS (continued) B. Specific Details (continued) 2. direct flows to. the Wendys site, which is south of Amigos, and combine ponding with the Wendys site. The overflow from the entire Shopping Center occurs at the sump in Lemay Avenue adjacent to the Wendys site (See drainage and grading plan). 3. The finished floor elevation of Amigos Restaurant was established to maintain a grade higher than the maximum possible high water level in the area based on the existing and controlling surrounding grades and the ponding potential. a. The finished floor elevation and top of foundation wall. elevation for the entire restaurant will be 4957.56 as designated on the stage -storage curve found in Appendix A of this report. b. The high water elevation prior to overflow into Lemay Avenue at the southeast corner of the site, is as designated on the stage -storage curve found in Appendix A. The freeboard between the overflow elevation and the finished floor elevation is also as designated on the stage -storage curve found in Appendix A. 4. The ponding potential was analyzed with documentation found in Appendix A of this report. The maximum potential volume to accumulate prior to overflow into Lemay Avenue during a 100-year storm event is as designated on the stage -storage curve found in Appendix A. The potential water depth prior. to.actual overflow into Lemay Avenue is also as designated on the stage -storage curve found in Appendix A. Refer to the Drainage and Grading Plan for limits of ponding prior to overflow into Lemay Avenue. It should be noted that the actual Lemay Avenue sump location is adjacent to. the Wendys site which is south of Amigos. During potential ponding situations, water will initially overflow from the Amigos site into the Wendys site and visa -versa at the common curb and walk between Wendys and Amigos. The two properties tend to pond together as a single pond prior to actual overflow into Lemay Avenue. 5. A 10' type R inlet and 18" diameter storm sewer lateral will be installed with the construction of the Riverside Avenue Right Turn Lane Improvements (See Drainage and Grading Plan). Detailing for these improvements will be provided with. the Right Turn Lane Improvement plans to be submitted at a later date. The tie in of the proposed. lateral to the. existing inlet will be the only modification to the inlet. VI REFERENCES A. City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage Design Criteria and Construction Standards B. Riverside Shopping Center Preliminary Drainage Study, Columbine Engineering Management Group; January 16,.. 1983 C. Title Policy Commitment Number F-28577, Security Title Guaranty Company, November 9, 1989 (for drainage easement dedications and vacations). D. City of Fort Collins files. for Riverside Shopping Center, Engineering Department and Storm Drainage Utility PAGE 5 Project No: 1102-7-89 VII APPENDICES A. Appendix A Stage -Storage Curve; Amigo site (for ponding potential) Mass Diagram calculations Mass Diagram Drainage and Grading Plan (Stuffer envelope) B. Appendix B. 1. Preliminary Drainage report for Riverside Shopping Center 2. Supporting documentation relative to the deletion of detention requirements and provisions for storm sewer conveyance of the 100-year storm. 3. Additional supporting documentation APPENDIX "A" Supplemental and Supporting documentation re: Amigos Site Amigos Restaurant; Riverside and Lemay Ft. Collins, Colorado No Text Pk6c �O._T_.:i�!_��_R../._✓_ERS/.O_E__Sh_!OPP/_NG__CE�I/_TER_S.C/B� CL3Y ffl/ Df7L 2-7 90 ___.._._.._._._.___.__� _. �_._S.._•T..ORA/l__..l�Ili_I_T�R._..E�ON_O_/_NG PO.TE.N_.T./_AG_____.�..:...�.,�.�_.�._.�./_.,192.=%_=sg,Q___�__ i _ s it __._R2bVOFF . 'CW1A1F�4LL. (c) Q �ONOG I1 A&I /_vn �-I- _ co_EE� _Q-O _ 3_-/_,�8r�o_ _____._ /_•� - ODZ4e_9 —74 x9o_� 109_.TO._ ^" Lzzo— ' 25�7�0_.O 13 14 __..___ �����4 T_0��✓�E��L7.�_4.J/�/A_Gc�._.CA.L.C_LLL.EIT�0�1LS_._FO..��___.__ __.� L_R./_..✓EFL°,51�E__Sh!O_P_.p/N�__CE�/'l_'ER�R..Q✓_.EDT 1 ° 17 18 i9 20 ' �-,�. ��,_."C' ••_ �O._. 90 �9/.11.�PA__FREGZII.E�►LC� BI�,I.U_,SJ.�E�V.T__.._� ,�� 21 22 23 2 25 26 27 exc•cc��ivtr�., 2a oe-07-,90 .464 O "STAGE 41 ,O� LOT 'ARlVeR.51PE! 5 11 _5 90 s5- 00' ,EX/S/N. G- 06 :Rl",� 11.W 000i-71 QOO_.1 : J, .STORAGE: Giff CCL'61C 'camazA71ye' c41AoWL4.r,1ve STAGE COAlrOaR AREA 'VOL!/ME` 41ME' VOL UME V& 'ZIM5 !.,: 7-I(, 0 -sa o.'oo 54 0.44 55.00 /224Lit e,66 0.098, 1.44 50.00 /557 ;I: 582 01 134 56-20 8e,84- No Text APPENDIX "B" Supplemental and Supporting documentation re: Riverside Shopping Center Amigos Restaurant; Riverside and Lemay Ft. Collins, Colorado Index of attached documentation including chronological order of events 01/16/83 Preliminary Drainage report for Riverside Shopping Center prepared by Columbine Engineering Management Group, Inc. 04/1G/85 Supporting supplemental drainage calculations re: 100-year storm flows and associated storm sewer oversizing transmitted to City of Fort Collins from Columbine Engineering 05/24/85 Letter from CDB Development Co. to City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage re: storm sewer construction 06/03/85 Minutes of May 20, 1985 meeting between Albertsons, City of Fort Collins and CDB Development Co. re: several issues including storm drainage 06/07/85 Offsite storm sewer construction modification documentation by Shiloh, Inc. Technical Consultants 11/12/87 Request to the City Council for vacation of drainage easements by Stewart & Associates 02/01/88 Request for dedication of new utility easements for storm sewer by Stewart & Associates. 02/02/88 City of Fort Collins memorandum re: vacation and dedication of easements. 07/15/88 Utility easement for storm sewer dedicated to the City of Ft. Collins. 11/09/89 Title Commitment Number F-28577 dated November 3, 1989, issued by Security Title Guaranty Company t 1 COLUMBINE �P6�� LI �4Ig9 RIVERSIDE SHOPPING CENTER PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY PREPARED FOR: CDB/JD1 PARTNERSHIP 5650 DTC PARKWAY, SUITE 121 ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80111 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE AND SCOPE: The purpose of this report is: I. To determine the rate of flow of on -and off -site historical drainage for the ten and one hundred year frequency storm events; 2. To estimate the on -and off -site developed ten and one hundred year storm events for the proposed shopping center; 3. To determine the volumes of detention storage required to allow no more than the difference between the one hundred year runoff under developed conditions and the two year historic runoff; and, 4. To develop a drainage plan that will ensure that the site is not inundated from off -site storm runoff. SITE DESCRIPTION: The proposed 10.74 + acre Riverside Shopping Center will be located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Riverside Avenue and Lemay Avenue in Fort Collins, Colorado. The "Drainage Plan" included in the pocket of this report shows the buildings and proposed site improvements. The average slope of the natural terrain on' the site is approximately 0.63%. The site currently consists of several commercial buildings, with asphalt and concrete improvements. The slope of the tract is downhill from the southwest property corner to the northeast property corner, with no apparent drainage swages traversing the site. Existing runoff is via sheet flow with discharge into the existing storm sewer at the intersection of Riverside Avenue and Lemay Avenue. CDB/JDI PARTNERSHIP JANUARY f6j 1983 r,_. RIVERSIDE SHOPPING (.R PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY t 1 COLUMBINE 2 We verified that the site does not lie within an officially recognized 100-year flood plain, as evidenced by the City of Fort Collins' flood plain zoning maps. Please refer to the "Drainage Plan" included_ with this report for additional information. METHODOLOGY: This analysis was prepared using appropriate .drainage criteria and incorporates sound engineering practice. Specifically, the City. of Fort Collins "Storm Drainage Design Criteria" was utilized to prepare this report. City of Fort Collins regulations require analysis of the 10 and 100 year storms for commercial property uses. Improvements are to be designed so that the total developed discharge does not exceed the 2 year historical runoff from this site. For the preliminary drainage study, the site has been analyzed as one drainage basin. The detention ponds as seen on the Drainage Plan have been pro -rated from the results of the drainage basin as a whole, We intend to provide a detailed drainage analysis during the final engineering of this site that will address the individual basins within the site. The "Rational method" was used for the determination of runoff quantities and coefficients. Rainfall was determined using the City of Fort Collins "Storm Drainage Design Criteria" Figure I, which has been included in this report. The coefficient of runoff values, used in this report, for both historic and developed calculations, were determined using Table 2 of the City of Fort Collins "Storm Drainage Design Criteria." ON -SITE RUNOFF: Historical runoff rates for the storm waters generated on -site, for both the 10 year CDB/JDl PARTNERSHIP JANUARY 16, 1983. RIVERSIDE SHOPPING CENTER PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY r C t 1 COLUMBINE 3 and the 100 year storms are 3.4 and 7.2 cubic feet per second, respectively (L—= 960 feet; C = 0.20; S = 0.63%= Tc10 = 61 minutes; Tc100 = 57 minutes; 110 = 1.6; I100 = 2.7; Area = 10.74 acres; Cf = 1.0 for the 10 year storm and 1.25 for the 100 year storm). 2 A?CAIC 5 y Developed runoff rates for the storm waters generated on -site for both the 10 year and the 100 year storms are 44.9 and 83.8 cubic feet per second, respectively (L = 960 feet; C = 0.95; S = 0.63%= Tc10 = 10 minutes; TcI00 = 7 minutes; 110 = 4.4; 1100 = 7.8; Area = l 0.74 acres; Cf = 1.0 for the 10 year storm ' and 1.25 for. the 100 year storm). The "Drainage Plan" shows the new detention ponds and boundaries. All ponds will be connected by 12" storm sewer hich we propose to discharge into the existing City storm sewer 210' + south of the intersection of Riverside Avenue and Lemay Avenue (southwest corner). It is our intent that the post development runoff be no greater than the . 2 year historical runoff, during both the 10 and 100 year storms. This will be accomplished through detention ponding and a metered release outlet. No rooftop detention is being planned at this time. Figures I and 2 show the "Rainfall Intensity Duration Curve" and the "Detention Storage Required"" for the site, respectively. These are based on the City of Fort Collins "Storm Drainage Design Criteria." OFF -SITE RUNOFF Historical runoff rates for the storm waters generated -off-site, for both the year and the 100 year storms are 3.3 and 6.9 cubic feet per second respectively (L = 270 feet; C = 0.2; S = 5.56%; Tc10 = 16 minutes; TcI00 = 15 minutes; 110 = 3.6 1100 = 6.0: Area _ 4.57 acres; Cf = 1.0 for the 10 year storm and 1.25 for .the 100 year storm). 3,500 Cu. Ft. of storage is required to store off -site runoff generated by the 100 CDB/JDI PARTNERSHIP JANUARY 16, 1983 RIVERSIDE SHOPPING CENTER r j C O LU M B fN E PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY 5 CONCLUSIONS Based upon the .analysis presented in the figures and the Drainage Plan accompanying this report, the site can be developed without a negative impact upon downstream property owners or the City of Fort Collins. Through the use of on -site detention ponding, the increased rates of runoff which result from increased imperviousness will be attenuated. Waters leaving the site will do so via historic runoff patterns, no more than the 2 year historic rate of flow. The actual sizes of ponds and storm sewers, and the design of the metered outlet structures will be prepared during the final engineering phase of this project. CDB/JDI' PARTNERSHIP JAN6AI3Y 16, 1983 CULUMEMME Engineering Management Group. Inc. Consulting Civil Engineers ILLEVVEM @V IMUSUMMI aLL B871 Wolff Court quite 220 Westminster. Colorado 80030 13031430-1 B21 TO 0� FO T GA P/0"r;rtj 3Do La PG r f e 19uey uc>_. ✓r Cul �i�s ,. �� 4��SZ2 7T , � c4 DATE on NO. ATTENTION On�ie %i A RLf nn / r WE ARE SENDING YOU 4 Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter Prints ❑ Change order ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION r aiAa9.e CalCy c TOVVIG U _ THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑0 ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US Cuhw.1'i- (—'� GyV1Fh -�kk' SUraPN )s COPY TO � SIGNED: --•...-....• m:�T....+.. r._ ..... it •nclazutas ant nal as naltb tlnd/Y nolih ui ff was, _ iuersicQ2 S6ep)y CentteY 3,30 Dru�na�e s�-uoQy M f, �nsi'r-e l�raina92 urea = �� �1 Qc�fes 62oj �• r- = / 3, 9 min. Ay. Q = C-T )4 = i, o C ,zss)C9 , at c -Fs CDB Development Co. 5655 S. Yosemite St., Suite 104 Englewood, Colorado 80111-3219 303/770-2731 May 24, 1985 Mr. Tom Gathman Storm Drainage City of Fort Collins 300 La Porte Ave. Fort Collins, CO 80521 Re: Riverside Shopping Center Dear Tom: I appreciate your meeting with me and others earlier this week. It's always nice to put a face to the name and to have a meeting at which things do get resolved. I have spoken to Harry Cornell, on -site engineer, concerning the proposed compromise solution for the storm water bore -carrier pipe'sizing. He tells me that a 33 inch PCC pipe, as available, does not fit inside the 42 inch steel casing. The general con- tractor has considered numerous possible pipe products relative to availability to the project and acceptability by you and'the. railroad company. Apparently, there is.some difficulty in finding a suitable pipe, but, after some discussion, a Purma-Loc Series 10 pipe was agreed to.be acceptable by you. However, this product is not avaiable in the 33 inch diameter size, but it is available in a 30 inch diameter size. Even though there will be a slight reduction in the capacity to a point less than the designed flow (90 CFS vs. 82 CFS), you have agreed to accept the 30.inch pipe, conditioned on your receiving this letter. We understand that some temporary ponding may result during the maximum storm occurrence (a one.hun- dred-year storm), but no ponding'should occur during a probable. ten-year storm as a result of the compromise solution. In our view, temporary ponding caused by this solution should not be severe enough to result in property.damage. I shall be pleased if you would confirm receipt of this letter and acceptance of the new sized pipe. Yours Truly, Martin D. Brown General Counsel MDB/gc cc: Harry Cornell, Tom Duffy, Roche Construction k . I CDB Development Co. 5655 S. Yosemite St., Suite 104 Englewood, Colorado 80111-3219 303/770-2731 June 3, 1985 Mr. Tom Gathman City of Fort Collins 300 Laporte Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 RE: Riverside Shopping Center Dear Tom: As requested by you I enclose a copy of the minutes of the meeting that was held in your office with representatives of this firm and Albertson's. As I reread the minutes it occured to me that I had turned what were really comparatively clear Americanisms into unintelligible English -speak. Such is the problem of having a lawyer who speaks English, New Zealand, and American! MDB/jmrm Enclosures Yours truly, vactc_,J" Martin D. Brown cc: Ron Schuckman, Albertson's Harry Cornell, Intri Tech Tom Duffy, Jansen 5 MINUTES OF MEETING HELD MsONDAY, May 20, 1985 a 2:40 p.m. OFFICES OF THE CIT71 OF FORT COLLINS Present - Albertson's, Inc. - Mr. Ted Ridder & Mr. Ron Schuchman City of Fort Collins :err. Toia, Gathman CDB Develooment Co. - Mr. Martin Brown & Mr. Harry Cornell The meeting was held to discuss certain plans of the Riverside Shopping Center which had been amended by Columbine Eng:-:eering Management, inc. to comps.- with City requirements. It transpired during the course of the meeting that some matters are not within Mr. Gathman.'s department but were rather within the purview of ?fir. Webb Jones of the Water and Sewer Denartment. It was agreed that Mr. Corne?: would meet subsequently with Mr. Jones to discuss matters relating to the sanitary sewers and the water. owever du_li_:g the course of discussion some comments were made about those issues and these are referred to in this memorandum where applicable: A. Plan C-3 M= Gathman commented that between 2 and 4 percent was typical slope for sewer laterals and 2% was specified by the UBC. He did not nnow why they had been prepared other than in accordance with the code of. the City of Fort Collins. The spr:;ng which is shown on the plan, and for which storm water removal is required, apparently flows much of the time. By putting the storm water sewer in behind Longs, we will, be getting rid of off site flows but the flow.is historic and the City requires B. Plan C-5 Mr. Gathman think-s that the developer wail have considerable problems putting the storm water sewer easement in as designed.. The essential problem is that it is so deer that there will have to be a lot more dirt removed and this will spill onto the adjoining la.:d. In addition he anticipates that the contractor will have difficulty getting down that deep and getting down the bike. oath. Mr. Gathman said that the..24 inch sanitary sewer pipe which did not appear ir. the previous plan, was shown on the.plans of the City of Fort Col1dns: However lie.. could not a�firmatively state that the sanitary sewer ran along the line shown on Columbine'.s plan, nor could he assure us that it was at the depth shown on the plan. Indeed, it was noted that there is a note on Plan C-5 as follows: "Verify (lepth and location prior to construction". In essence,.Mr. Gathman felt that the developer's possible coursesof action were limited not- only by the sanitary sewer but also by the amount of water that the 42.inch pipe could.carry. f 1 if the PVC insert is accepted as sugresteL b M.r. Cornell, then L be carp `nq less water than with the concrete and the water may pond on . :e developme-nt at the height of a severe stor;;., but not far long. Mr. Gathman thought that if the develoner down_ -sized the niDe and created r etentio: on site it )ni�sat be 7r�ti� ule :o. e-n �-:pot%e ter sewer �.;pF. _�i.�� would recaire a shall or_ding a - ea at each inlet bu+- on the ogle_ • har_d ;t w(_ - C be a s:na er Nine and a s ]a' ow.er s'one. tioweVer, he was anticipating that there would be G'7.7 c.f.s. frog. Riverside and 23.4 c.f.s. from Osorey so he anticipated_ that there would be nrob.lems with a smaller pipe. Mr. Gathman was of the opinion that the exit point of the storm wate_, sewer as it appeared in the prior Plan of Columbine was not nractical. a possible 90 c.f.s. debouchir_g from the- o'ne the bike oath would rapidly be turned into a ra.=. e . He did rat t__in' that curbing and guttering would wor". The previous proposal of Columbine simply did not work in fact although it may ^c'iC wor-ked. in theory 1t was discussed WflE't!`_e?" the developer could kee_J the storm water easement at a higher lever; come.out at the -ooirt o~to the bike oath previously discussed and nut a smialler pipe in so as to carry underneath the oath by way of a. ripe 'anv% water ru:. off which wo, _r- be occasioned by way of , irrigation on the Riverside and Osprey sites. Gathman thought -:.is would not work as there was potential for blocking, and if it did not work we would again be faced with ha :Jinc- water coming over the too of the bike path and forming a ravine. C. Plan C-7 In Mr. Gathrian's view the inlets in t'-_F s hopping center would not cone with all the.run.off-from the site because they were not big enough. Accordingly,.as a trade of` for the consideration that the City was giuring to the deveiooer, the .developer should be prepared to to _e storm drainage water off of Lemav through its nine. He pointed out that the develoner was not paying a storm d„ainaae fee as it would rave to if it were in another basin... There was no money in the account of t:r,e storm water basin and it was not possible to ta'_:e ::ioney out of one basin to another. In effect however :Huth the City might like to nay us, the -re was no. mechainism with which to oav .us.. He feels, however,that it would be actually cheaper to build this ir:?.et as, shown on Plan C-7.than'what.has-been built before. Mr. Gathman a d v J F,e s A _1 be'r tson' s that re would have no objection now that we were dealing with the storm water problem to - ssue a .i'iI � idinc; Z r-2-r,J.t t'r) AtL;c,;l' S . Shiloh, Inc. Technical Consultants r � �z�Y 1 Ce � I T b�2L - 2 need v 6J0 Ci - \cj `i Y12. pv eLf j�y1')S MCP if June 7, 1985 'Tv CkLck f6y r ,Lt Project #068-001 erodes ' CDB-JDI PARTNERSHIP / Harry A. Cornell P.E. P.O. Box 646 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 Re: Riverside Shopping Center Storm Drainage Outfall Dear Harry: As requested by you and your client, we have investigated the basic situation concerning the proposed boring under the intersection of Riverside Avenue and Lemay for the proposed storm drainage discharge to the Poudre River. We visited the site on June. 3 and 6, 1985 and made several field observations. We also made an investigation into some of the existing utilities shown on the project drawing. The drawing referred to is: Riverside Shopping Center, Storm Sewer Extension, by.Columbine .Engineering, Westminster, Colorado of 8-22-84.(rev 4-25-85) Sheet C-5. Aspects we were to address are the following: 1. Investigate the conflict with the proposed manhole #1 and the City's 24 inch sanitary sewer; recommend needed changes for the manhole. 2. Maintain a minimum capacity in the pipeline of 53 CFS (revised downward from 82 CFS required by the City earlier). The carrier pipe proposed for the crossing is 30 inch Permaloc series 10.plastic pipe to fit into the specified 42 inch diameter steel pipe casing. 3. Recommend any changes applicable to the deep cuts proposed on the referenced drawing between manhole #2 and the discharge point. Cover over the proposed pipeline varies from one foot to 13.5 feet. Based on the above information, recommendations.in the form of a Field Order to the contractor are attached. The proposed changes are intended to convey clarification of the above referenced.drawing sheet C-5 without changing the design or its intended purpose. Details, existing conditions or specifications shown on the referenced.drawing sheet C-5 or other portions of the Contract Documents remain unchanged by the attached Field Order. The Field Order shall be accepted by the City.of Fort Collins prior to 211 W. Myrtle Fort Collins, CO 80521 (303) 482-1557 uction. Cert i f i cat i.on of the contents of issuance or commencing constr the Field Order will be jointly done by Intri—Tech and by Shiloh, Inc. of Fort Collins. Record of the Field Order information for ithe use oofSthetCity of aol.t Collins shall be incorporated into spa ater date. Be further advised that our data shows the staked distanceThe in nothe field for the bore is 174.01 less 25 foot offse149.01 feet.ation for manhole #1 is now revisions use the same staking; the proposed 7.71 feet from the existing offset 3 feet. The Thecomputed staking should be changed revisedboring, center to center, is 166 using the location of existing staking as reference. Be further advised closer that our data shows the staked position of inlet #1 to be eet 7.4 (should this to the street than squthedattachednfie d ordershow onecan abenimplemented as situation be satfactory, is. This should complete our services clear sepiathe Mylar offor Sheetthe bCrSnandfKeep the crossing. Please provide the necessary in touch regarding progress by the contractor. Sincerely Shil h, I c o n R. Clark P. Attachment: Field Order :of June 109 1985 cc: City of Fort Collins,'Tom Gathman P.E.. —....u,s, UO 80521 . (303) 482-1557 t V� Intrz•Tech A FuII Service Project Manakgement Concept P.O. BOX 646 • FORT COLLINS, CO 80522 (303)482-2252 Project: Riverside Shopping Center Riverside Ave & Lemay Ave. Fort Collins, Colorado Date and Time: June IQ, 1785; 12 NOON FIELD ORDER TO: ROCHE CONSTRUCTORS, INC. JOB SITE / FORT COLLINS, CO C/O AL CHIRPICH, PROJ SUPER SUBJECT: STORM SEWER -EXTENSION; REVISIONS TO 1. REVISIONS ARE HEREBY ORDERED FOR THE STORM SEWER AS PER THE ATTACHED DRAWINGS. CONSIDER THIS FIELD ORDER AN AMENDMENT TO SHEET C-5, SUPERSEDING CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THE LINE, GRADE AND OTHER DATA ON THAT SHEET. 2.•THE CHANGES HEREIN ARE INTENDED TO CLARIFY THE ABOVE REFERENCED DRAWING WITHOUT CHANGING THE DESIGN OR INTENDED PURPOSE OF THE STORM SEWER. DETAILS, EXISTING UTILITIES AND OTHER CONDITIONS SHOWN, OR SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON THE REFERENCED SHEET SHALL REMAIN UNCHANGED. OTHER PORTIONS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL REMAIN UNCHANGED BY THIS FIELD ORDER, BY: INTRI-TECH, INC. --------------- SHILOH, INC. ATTACHMENTS: PLAN SHEET (SHT 1 OF 2) PROFILE (SHT 2 OF 2) RECEIVED BY: ------------------------- COPIES TO: CITY OF FORT COLLINS, INSPECTION STORM DRAINAGE a y. . of 5� 7. 36 INV IN 416.10 INV auf 4l0.40 INV IN 4z.03_ INV OUT +1.03 L!5,q 33 o LF qhe� -11.5 t� L v' l� It 100.3 LC 30" 'PIP, L 'f : S� GP 3 l �o C30" � t$ 4 Z% tN 42" CASINC., @ .5= 2.11 12 I1 to. -9 NOT9 : SIN SASI51,12F."f Ll GC s 'rA'rION IN 4 RlVgIzSIDE SHOPPING, C'fR. 5'I'ORM DRAIN EXYE4510N ( REV151sD P O. of ZrUN9 , 1985 SNE1:? 2 OF 2 sMI1.0H , INC. 85 OGS l00 •- 8090 s8 - s• AD • �Nt ' HO'IIHs z �o I �-�3Hs S8c I' Nn-c •0 (C.qS IA321 NOI SN!J.Xl NIVZI<l W2joj q .'aj.7 '9NIddOH% JQIS?1� 11 N lav}.Hhlb CINY y��'�1 �VN r4o j. j.s s 9.10N Z t yLn 70 i �� -AV. r ft � yMs 33S �� i a b FS ' bS bi► � �lC.tf1 3ZI1�.. 1 ll3NNvg , Y IV. YV 9y CO Y AA a a r STEWART&ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers and Surveyors November 12, 1987 Fort Collins City Council City of Fort Collins P 0 Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 Dear Council Members: We are requesting the vacation of the three separate drainage easements on the Riverside Shopping Center Subdivision situate in the Northeast I of Section 13, Township 7 North, Range 69 West of the Sixth P.M., Fort Collins, Larimer County, Colorado. Originally the drainage easements were required for onsite detention of storm drainage. The original drainage design was revised and constructed to eliminate the need for onsite detention, therefore the request for the vacation of the three drainage easements. If you have any questions regarding this request or need any additional information, please let me know. Sincerely, STEWART & ASSOCIATES, INC. Franklin D. Blake, P. E. L. S. Secretary/Treasurer ALBERTSON'S INC., NORTHLAND FINANCIAL COMPANY, A Delaware Corporation A Minn rota Corporation Thomas R. Saldin, Senior Vice President Frank J. Duke, V`i�ce��President LONGS DRUG STORES CALIFORNIA, INC., formerly named LONGS DRUG STORES, INC., MAIN STREET PARTNERS, A California Corporation A Missouri Gen 1 Partnership Or Jones Senior Vice President D. Douglas Dannen, Managing Partner Ikm James H. Stewart and Associates, Inc. 214 N. Howes Street P.O. Box 429 Ft. Collins, CO 80522 303/482-9331 �E/ISE1'E//T MCAT10A5 1'! r' ST'EWART &ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers and Surveyors February 1, 1988 Mike Herzig City of Fort Collins P 0 Box 580 Fort Collins, Co. 80522 Dear Mike: - The reason we are requesting the dedication of new utility easements for Riverside Shopping Center Subdivision is to comply with the City of Fort Collins requirements of easements for the storm sewer that is in place in the subdivision. At present there are no easements to accommodate the existing storm sewer. 1km James H. Stewart and Associates, Inc. 214 N. Howes Street P.O. Box 429 Ft. Collins, CO 80522 303i482-9331 Sincerely, Franklin D. Blake, P.E. & L.S.. Secretary/Treasure No Text CITY OF FORT COLLINS OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, PLANNING DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M TO: Bob Snow, Mountain Bell Gary Huett, Public Service of Colorado Lou Phillippe, Columbine Cablevision Mark Taylor, Water and Sewer Dou Martine Light a Power 193_l.en Schlueter Storm Drainage Rick Ensdorff, City ra Ic ngineer FROM: Mike Herzig, Development Coordinator DATE: February 2, 1988 .RE: Vacation and Dedication of Easements: Attached is a request from Stewart & Associates for the vacation and dedication of easements in the Riverside Shopping Center Subdivision. The request is made in behalf of Albertson's, Inc., Longs' Drug, and Northland Financial Company. The easement vacations are for those areas originally designed for on -site detention. A redesign of drainage facilities eliminated the need for detention storage and, therefore, the corresponding drainage easements. The easement dedication is necessary to comply with City requirements that the new storm sewer be in a utility easement. P.lease respond by Friday, February 12, 1988. No Problems (% tt��]� X Problems - Which are:S�>�-wfZ'�''` ✓-l�'tx it-a'� �U��✓%W`ti. � I.GYL/O'..� .f JClt'%�M�wP�.CC� GL� �.C./7��.4tC1.*/:Nw�..•'l'L�i �f �✓&•.il���t..tu�.`•t�. V0 l c �ra� M.v 4o7w•.4 Xe"," �� .QQQI?/YYl�1L��¢ C✓/ ✓d��ilirl i 74 �' ��-G'(,� . (.CI:i �' a.�ctl•{d� �t./'Ec.�C�x..r�!�lr' .cr t1� n .•u�r�<�,., -ate-ellLrLi �t ,(� )'.%U'�-. [%%c':�I/ .Lttvi!'.'4if "t..w r�fri;T �,��.'•'JI`� .,�.•,�..:i �...c r CY...tr.. r'c.tl ,:t✓Y-"e'�:!rr° ..�!��}!G�!r'%✓ a.'.f.✓'/��•.f%C!.•�si�../..1�%� �A�''�i'�.t,.R...`.liiJa.,�•. /�-�fi-u"��..�d�l_Qi •••(� iC/v' •( .I�CY.Cd•7Wi G'PC .rrtG�Lx.�.t"�.o'k `�1.✓k ...cad/rr . ".-«.1�lv�l •�• .(/(,61.0 } ..Gv-�� F� , . offI"p� -q C1y d�.�'aJri� <,At�') d `,( � �, - � �� '� t7�✓e �t. tt �� ��`• •"� i` �i..+flP e�� �} ✓ � � f�tt t rl, *�K+�, . `�'t X+ R .f. �.i=�� r ��w '•S'itirFf.. ... a1.A`if iti`i�4� ,v. ......, .. ` C�•"` .,.., iJt-`.�� t t /)JN f 3 .,.L•ra..� f -� 5;Vv7fj Tl i YF� OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT 300 LaPorte Ave. • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 (303) 221•6750 SERVICES, PLANNING SECURITY TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY 343 WEST DRAKE #200, FORT COLLINS, CO 80526 226-1901 STANDARD COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Commitment date: November 3, 1989 at 8:00 a.m. 2. Policy or policies to be issued: ( Form 1987 ) (A) Owner's Policy- Proposed Insured:. EXAM: RANDY TYPIST: gu Commitment Number F-28577 C3 Amount $200,000.00 GMC AMIGOS CORPORATION -FORT COLLINS. A Nebraska Corporation (B) Loan Policy - Proposed Insured: $450,000.00 Premium $50.00 UNITED BANK OF FORT COLLINS NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ITS SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS (C) Loan Policy - Proposed Insured: TOTAL ------------ $735.00 3. The FEE SIMPLE interest in the land described in this commitment is owned at the date of the Commitment Date by: NORTHLAND FINANCIAL COMPANY 4. The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows: Lot A, RIVERSIDE SHOPPING CENTER SUBDIVISION, County of Larimer, State of Colorado. PURPORTED ADDRESS: vacant land Issued on: November 9, 1989 No Text Alf M 1... 17 � 1f. �t''I'li=f" t''t ��; � t•�• I '• �. f,i• +' i'.1�� �.ti�•rr�,►:a t ��•�: 1;! .• �•r�•. �' J •'•.! r1.•': � \ �•� tl�� •�tt � 1 ..1 .�i ,'� .�"l,l .r•';- •• rl1 %i: I� . V1 lit fill J� 1141 .%%1. t ►4% zill j. It k k! I! III flit" irn t. - 1Z > ki Q 7777, > X 7.7 X4 T,7 14 Olt 6 I It Z lit, i !IE No Text - 41 ' , wl ,:. :. , EASEMENT ADDENDUM .. .. 1 I t . 1 . ,L Grantor: ".UBERTSON'B,.INC`i. LONGS DRUG STORES CALIFORNIA, INC.t NGRTHWID FINANCIAL COMPANY"AND MAIN STREET PARTNERS _ GranUe, `CITY,;CF FORT COLLINS 'COLORADO 1 i i. Jnstrumont Date•. Decemtior 16, 1987 , `' An by thin ... ; . .`. .,..' i Y g' !n .this .Instrument to;. the contrary notwithstanding, .;Granted,.`. `'recording : this. Instrument,: and/or exercising ;the rights --:.herein 'I granted agrees to the following conditions (a) ,.The:easement(:) herein 1e granted are, sub ect to all easements and encumbrances of 'record and= are:,.'non-exclusive provided later, ' grouted easements shall sub)ect, "t to Grantee's :rights'and uses; ' (b) :'All: line:, equipment and their, related components :and: sup ? ports placed .within the' described easement.',area(s): by' Grantee, ,or,;; Grantee's. agents ' or r contractors," '';purswnt:",to ; =`this Instrument :: r ('Grantees Property") shall remain•ths property;of Grantee1. (c) Grantor and .Its successors '.and< assigns 'retain:the 'right to,. full use of the surface of ,the described easement ;area(:),:,`except:,' where .Grantee' has placed•:Grantee's:: Property, .'provided,; however, :; : Grantor will, not erect any building or''major structure wi,thtn the ' described ., easement area(:), All lines shall be' bel�w'th• surface' � of the described areas) %: ,. (d)`: "Grantee. shall ' at .. timesa safely ;'operate .and ,maintain Grantee's: Property within `.the described :easement areas) and: shall promptly repair and:: restore to -,It Priorcondition "°an 5 ''paving, parkin lot stri m Y 9 p' g •'' or'' ,other .`improvements, :: except buildings, ; :` existing within the .described; easement' area(:),"which ';disturbed ors - I' by the construction, or '''maintenance "of` Grantee's Property by L. Grantee, or Grantee's agents or contractors. ., . , 4 (e) Grantee shall not in, the exercise,.of, the within easement(:) 1, unreasonably..interfera or obstruct Grantor, or Grantor's a ants or g contractors, ..in.-'tha.:location or construction:::of an located...in. the:;area ,adjoining the;- described�'.easement ar a(sl) . g. unreasonably' Y interfere with, an business `of.'G.rantor Nothing in this Paragraph' (e),;' however, 'Grantor shall allow or. Grantor s agents .orcontractors-:to `construct. r 'buildin or, other ;major ,- structure ;within the..described'easement' area : as9 graph ,(c) herein, ore to ",unreasonabl Provided In ;.Para rights':' to Y.: Interfere: withr Grantees _hereunder. construct operate and maintain Grantee s; Property .. (f) • . After recording',: this ;:instrument, Grantee shall provide `_G rantorwith the date, instrument number, book recording, and page of 5} .., .. ... t • - ..: .. .;.:. .: } ' d I 1\ i ,1l V� '.r 1 I 1 4.. i. Y , n r .; .... i.. : S t r� r .. ,. .. .., ,, ': '. '1 ! ' I a ?" t t s. ,; .1 .. �. .. .: :: ..; .,, 1 t ♦i'. No Text :. 1 'ai 1 Witness our. hinds and 'seals thlt Arty'pf.. ,. , A.D. 19t1 ' ,-:,,�.. LONGS DRt10'STORES'CALJlt)RNIA0 t C.., ormar1y.nam`-*d ` OWNERf = LONGS � URUG• STORES, INC.,,, a Cal lforMe:,Co oratl,on . . rP 9Yt BY, .: I.''" Orlo eslrento" vice PresldAf,1: Alan. E. Barker `. .r ,. '' State of California ) �. Artsitstent secretary s $`' J —:* County of Contra Costo� '," ` ; r -, �l r, , - .• ,I r the forIgotrg Instrument was _'ecknowl,e4ed before :ri►o this' day T, .of A.D. >198 ,`by Orlo-Jones, Senlor�lce:President of ' ., ongs.. rug. tores,. nc., a California Corporation,. • rr , ..1�.: �0,"� '` t Notary Pubttc .I tly, conunlssion exPlrest . My, business address. 1tt •.... i. .. , ' :. ,' ' :. .;,b Witness our hands and seals this ��� day of t ' A,D 19fs2 sc '° , 0Wb.- NORTHLAND FINANCIAL COMPANY, .a Minnesota Corporation ,. . , . ,� _ - a -:.. Frank J ';putk ,..vice President 3. ,.� `'`'' T State of: Minnesota) , ss �.�� .r.. Count of Hennc to y P �1� .,..,�� .:,;.�. I', Th foregoing instrument ,1 `me 1..�-; was ecknowledgad before this day of .-.'' A.D. by Frank. �, , ;198'. J. Dutke, vice President of North and inancia P -. ompany, n;Minnesots Cor ore ion. • �:". .1_.'� , � i MGtMYa1UaO "►` fJo ary Pub 1c *1 oma Emm 0% at >f� /? My, e c�CTOBE,P Z!o l49.3 '*�. Mybusiness .address;.ls: �'g�(!L. 3J So � iAiA/FnppuS A7A/ / I�. :%.1 ,; ...�;-.-z�.:. �,-"�� � .-_ - , ._;�t1�.-_,_;.', Wi•ness our hands: and setls this :day of �',,L,, .'„- A,D. 1S8§_ „� t.' OWERMA1N STRE PARTNERS, a"Missouri General Partnership .-1 .��.,! > + `— • .. l.r 4 D Doug1as Omen, Mana9ing Partner ... 4, ' ..,, ` ' State of Florida): �, .,.,;," . Coy ,;�,;l ;,F n y of Orange), 4L , z,,. ,._;1L. ne'foregcing instrument + way acknowledged before nre;'this,"/3 :^:do of y ..a D 198"' by:D Douglas Dannen Managing aartnor of ,-in ire t �tnp•s, a ?iisso rl uere,•a� "n ".frs'.' ' Iv• ' ; : �. ,J , Hoary rubli:. °tata ct FMr�do t hr 1 / 1Aj Cemn.ac.�cn .ic; c nw I t _' F �L— ' 6N 1 r ;Jr ` i F "`id , .' UJKLLU U nW� 1 TUT , 1 Ltf i Notary Pub c ' ' 1 rc .wNa1mUR?nvCT6ltir�DSdw. 4y conntssion expires , . t + m`oa , ,:' . M ,business e4dress is f4n1yt�+ •,.,_Aa °a � ; �r 4u, £ Jio r f.. :;,,�� +. __,e�:. 1, '. ..:. � !.,;. ",�. l , :� , -.. , ', . .;'".. :;�,,�". , ;,,...:_.. :'1 ,%1 :': -. .,.�., , Page 2 of:2 ,�: :,�- �-,. .�,� �'1 FI.w. �: ,�.�".`',.,,,!;,% t-�: :,. "_�b,., ; * .,��I �:".�.,- . ..,. , .:,, � � .'..., m.:a;- ,: . ,t 1. .. ...-.. .-. l.�.. <.. , . .. . . `, )Ss County of Ada ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me`•� dey,'of A.D. .198_. by .Thomas di,n.• en��r Yice President -- — j� PLAN VNIN w : A -- MCTNNI MA r ra r� . • Li —rr, MCTNwIey0 If ��p M: of .19"1 A& ` e AL h,OMWALK 6AJLVMM-i 1 ' rDY VER071GAL UJR61 1 I:.E.� G..fTE2 AHV l�IVBWP.I,K DETAICA• Wool r N I 1. s> / 4Q1 I SAY aC WENDYS 7 pp`O j G.Z ® It .>•V^3�4 IP I 'IY k Y ` nf` ff Y wV A If M A raboyabobbobabobaboollabobby FdX\ a u tow NI-N� NOO°55St, E w.0 T.___________________ awn. ® _ _� ice.'=`F'=`�e=x�sal>:e=�� _ �rsw-w.ab-- PRIMARY e 4=__ by. R' 4i-Oo RIVERSIDE SHOPPING CENTER OVERFLOW A.19Y936 Lj 21.90 fl• 23.00' CN9.. N2VOVI2"W-20.93' Lemay Avenue ' z s• m\`iI`4[iee"v=a°CF3.eo :` It Sawale°e V Iwr IS y,ye.me maro IK[o vzw ftCyJ If Ta .� AW—A!y+, Ao VERTICAL 6 INCH CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK NIS 414 «9NrI.= 4114, s.emelo I 2 N } 2 R. TI� -I6— GUt'� ANV GU�"%� DETAII`j [ l I{' E . / 1 t wxwB l.+*Iuw eansMrrr / �� [41 k, n.. LOCATION MAP ,; / x » =-I,=. A Site Plan for i / of Amigos Mexican Restaurant IF Riverside Avenue & Lemay Avenue m' // �//3�9T Fort Collins, Colorado ol ;;�f7111 Drainage & of Grading Plan 3° of P—� P TI� x December 5 1989 ©of YxAon9Ax9 oaAxawE nw xDTEs WAWAWAAAAW xIVFMICE ME.%FxngY S1pM 4EWEx FtlP. srob stal ECIST WIVVP x9' NTaIP y_ PROW co ».fI All ffi ��.� A. Q4.. SA �4 Y xfell A, tob, ...MSAW .3 h. 0 all (I)eadybow doW, utd, Art twayba Ad WASS - Stan, WASSIA'All, W SAWS �� A of. for, A, W.V. Wt al m.._. Way Mara to USA AS Fort dDle, State AWASSWAL .4 AS So, "New fly r.r YA= I.al � rrr.r. booll AS n..I. 4...I I. 0jAW`,w booftrobe SAW .. Way. Italy" ball W III. I. ..meµ;,=�..�.nlw[a. LIA Muu�I.w..[efory Say u....IA unu. SAWSWASIALWAy W "by few So, .n ..sw....In wl .Wee.ly,. The ..ruw \\y, Ow O'v.Iw xl...r..Y.I. `Iw u4 u n.u. uu •.nav•• ittal All AW.1 N.[. M.... S,EASA .., C.rI..I CIAIra,. beer)hey LWASSAW 0 LAWS Weap Wool We SWISS AW Waybe SAW 0. ". by %W IWAMAyboyeat 0 111 Wayoratan baby .11 �k I'l OYua..r[s.M. xU labot. AS depay, Cable, All, waIr mm Y....r r aby trACHIS UP SWAP, Onw .r'raalm..a.r.xalr�.I..YM W441rI. Prepared by: STEPHEN E. OLT Planning Consultant Fort Collins, Colorado (303)2211702 CITY OF FORT COWNg COIORADO UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL Brian W. SM1ev, Y.E. SNEAN APPBBVED CIS, "I'll" Carr CHECKED BY rxr'Ire, urrr, unu.r wr. LFELNED rxr trove nn.i..ra III Call C4( N Pon F q UP If Wall,xu.a. .Y ofSwa.m..