Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDrainage Reports - 02/16/2012December 15, 2011 Mr. Wes Lamarque City of Fort Collins Stormwater Utility 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80522 Re: Ram Crossing K2 — Storm Drainage Report Dear Wes, JgF;1 INTERWEST I CONSULTING G R O U P City of Ft. Collin ppro d Plans Approved By— Date -I - We are pleased to submit for your review and approval this drainage letter showing the drainage impacts from the proposed expansion and improvements to the Ram Crossing K2. City comments dated November 29, 2011 have been addressed in this letter. The project is located at 914 West Lake Street and is a part of Lots 12 and 13 of College Heights Addition. The site currently has an existing apartment complex and large asphalt parking lot on the site. The project will expand the building, reconfigure and significantly reduce the parking area, and provide for stormwater quality improvements. The area of the site that will be improved is approximately one acre. The site is surrounded by Colorado State University campus and is bounded on the south by Lake Street. There are no offsite flows entering the site. Today, the entire site sheet flows north and east to the northeast corner of the site and then overland through CSU to Pitkin Street and eventually outfalls into Spring Creek. After conversations with CSU there is no outfall adjacent to the site other than the existing location. All of the CSU storm sewer and ponds near the site are at capacity. Please refer to the attached Existing Conditions SWMM Schematic for reference to the outfall. With the building addition and reconfiguration, all water will still flow to the north and east, but around the new building in swales and in a small storm pipe system (lengthening several of the existing flow paths). Please refer to the attached erosion control plan. The site is required to provide water quality treatment, but there is no adjacent storm sewer available near the site and it must flow overland in the northeast corner. Because of the lack of an adjacent, below grade outfall, it is not feasible to install a standard water quality pond. Today, there is no treatment as stormwater leaves the asphalt parking and the site (the asphalt is on the existing property lines). In an effort to improve the stormwater quality, swales have been added on the west and north sides of the site. The swale on the west is at slightly more than 2% and the swale on the north is consistently at 1 %. We propose that neither swale have a trickle pan in an effort to encourage infiltration. The swale on the north is easily maintained and over 1218 WEST ASH, SUITE C WINDSOR, COLORADO 80550 TEL. 970.674.3300 • FAX. 970.674.3303 Mr. Wes Lamarque December 15, 2011 Page 2 of 2 20 feet from the proposed building, so we are not concerned about encouraging infiltration here. At the northeast corner of the site, we propose a modified "sand filter" with a 10'x16' area being lowered approximately 6" below the existing grade with cobble and granular material. A grade beam placed across the filter will force the water through the cobble and sand layers. Please refer to the attached detail. Again, there is not an opportunity to install an underdrain, but smaller storms will be slowed and allowed to infiltrate in this area. Once the filter area is overwhelmed, the stormwater will overtop the sump and flow to the northeast as it does today. The existing and proposed imperviousness of the lot was compared as a part of this study. Exhibits are attached which show that the existing imperviousness is 78% while the proposed improvements will lower the imperviousness to 75%. This is mostly due to the required 5' offset on the north and east from the property line to the proposed parking. Because the impervious area will decrease with this project, detention is not required. Attached is a summary of the flows for the existing and the proposed site. With the reduction of impervious area by 3%, the 100-year flow off the site is reduced by 8%. The proposed 12" PVC storm system is the only hydraulic system on the project. Our calculations show a 100 year flow to this system of 4.8 cfs. The system is a series of small sumps and overtops to the east and west prior to reaching the existing or proposed building finished floors. We have verified that the system can convey the 100-year flow, with the safeguard the overtopping occurs below the finished floors. This area has previously been studied in a master drainage plan for the CSU campus by Ayers Associates and is included in the Braiden Hall Basin. All possible measures have been taken to provide water quality for the site through the proposed grass swale and sand filter and the lengthening of flow paths from existing conditions. The proposed expansions and improvements have been designed with provisions for safe and efficient control of stormwater runoff in a manner that will not adversely affect the downstream detention system and will improve water quality for the Ram Crossing K2 project. Overall, it is evident that the proposed revisions will have a positive impact on the proposed stormwater management system. We appreciate your time and consideration in reviewing this submittal. If you have any questions or need additional information please feel free to call at any time (970) 674-3300 Ext. 102. Sincerely, Michael Oberlander, P.E. Colorado Professional Engineer 34288 Interwest Consulting Group Attachments No Text OdW :AS 03M33HO anOtlD DNliln8H0� •MY�iM1 V£90-4ZZOL6:XV3 N�d-Id"70MINOO NOISOa3 53 :A643N•JI63p com�oWW ya OE90-VZZ'OL6 :3NOHd "B10LB1'"'p1la 17ZGOB OO 'SNI-I1071tlOd :W 3-IVp6 OROB'm•WLM D •gq'Wv'M YLL1 3Ay NIV1Nf10W '3 L L L SJ.3311HDHV VH ZM 9NISSOMO WVM .OZ-..I :tM3'1tlOs 21OA O3tltld3ud 3 W V N 1O3f02ld Z I iozi 1 :31va O z a0 U t �u W ME I Go Z- ! z 7¢7= I CU ' as 0x pU I zo of pp I I W ZW O. N l7 < I m ttza 0�� � z zp0 0z >0 Z�w UI gaa �+ �wz mzm Z :00 II II II II II I,I I II I II I II Ii II II I/I I I II I II I II II I II II I II � II I II II II I I I I I I I II II II II II 7M ,09 x3 I II I I II I II I I II II II II II II II II II I II I II II I II II II II II II II II I II I II II II II I .42 w z N � r O U x N O •- u Q W �M NC� OQNC� w ^�D riLL. U �0 ° D p 0 o a Goo Z of uj O co ��� °� ° �� :L° W 000 W � ,6 u- m w p z w O a ~ r. O O lf) J W rof WF z p �5= 00 LO O 0 ILI w N -� Q~H Da�Q D Ld � Q NQw D 0 cr- a 0Qw D /° D 0 N Q Q D 00-1 D D D a p a Da D �/ p ° � � J (dAl) a1J s _ i W N MW'�N I- U .1 ii Z Z Q U W m m w a I � a m m 7 �90 Q O0 uj LLj m K a m a uj Er QUO Z O umuj O U J O Jcr oaW U m Q w w p �-- m In W �W O ai� m NOd �.. a �o:) (4J W N O ir Le) 0 2 F 0. Zo z d Q w m ju ci�i a � � m 1 WLu W Li II II co X z o ul d' m m a a w�a w� ma > 3 O N uj H J J N J Q^ Q po (r c, U' W O Lj I W d' NO � Z Q i a' a' Q OU Q O cn —ld��w C7 Z ;p r, OJ J W m i p I ~ o m m m OM zcr a W a� W (A J 0 IL F J W ^� U Z wa- ui O W t I` na co m� U_ Z .n N M Z W L MH^ O d' a LLj ma x a LLj Q _ Wi % � 7)= W (JA x -,QJ UQ Q cr J0 Z - U W U O W W m p J Q Q< w LW Ljw LjElf � Z ZO LIjU om Q O aoa 3 U N J � 4 W M o �J I - W io 5E Z. W FA W OAF ORSINI 1111 11''I'll I I I I I I --- WIWI RAM CROSSING K2 PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 63,000 SF = 75 f 25' 0 50' SCALE: 1"= 50' O > U It m LLI N a � p m o N � C C _ m U m � z O N IL .- tL `o U LL U m LL C W O `p m A E LL LL y O 0 z c� z 'Ec 0C? E� u o N O = E 7 z Q1 O U N al O o � C En o z F o ro OFF¢- m a) E E E o 0. u 0. C) of D� a o U 5 y 1 7 o_ a a)Z o M rn v o E _ C �n m o LO 0 N O O O O O CCD0 U a N_ ON c 61 � W v d ¢ C W NO � � O c c O N Q 2 0 o n m ^ ^ m E LL z W U m m ^ � O U ¢ 0 0 o co co C ¢ m Z N J W W z O ¢ — O W = < — o 0 0 W I- w U < N o ¢ — U Ow LL 0 0 a ¢ Q m J H Q O ¢ C m P m O N J O 0 o z z O o c < < ¢ ¢ c � U CO z m U z ° m In cn w n O o 0 o CL a` N m 0 E U m `0 07 c d U NC � ` Co U � U ro fII � ° n m m m i m N L N U o E 3 C t U 0 N O U � ` N a) Co E 2 m` 0 ¢ II it C II cQ N ¢_ C () .LD U W II oU U ro N � c co o � U � U w U Q W O to Z 20 O Q O � K F oZ W <U n Z O U LL O W E r C " > U a N y Y � c c v Q c W 3 a0 z o LL N c O y Ln _ � 9 UI O C C � � - w O a` N c` z " E o m m Z N o m c ih _ E 0 mU O = Q 0 N U r U O LL U � o m m c o Ni m o J w = 2 Q x j m K] N t0 N O m U m m m O _oi c c m � w � o w r L_ m in C J � c J r m O> N m o. 0 O O O 0 L � � C J O Q O Q O Q a J C o 0 0 > J �+ Q W z � � y U N Q � Q Q ir, o c c o � U < m d o v � � u'S O a O o C = z z_ � m C-D Q ic-) m W O LL Ln o z O� F•- Q + C3 II W I J U U co �I cu cf6 L 01 N C O U r O LL _T U O O D o) LL 0 m O N O U O II L O cc w rn QI c C cu 0 T E 11 } 0 Q LL Z m p f � o9LL O � a Z ow Z U r Z In 0 U LL O w _2 '" U a N y Y � a m Q w3 c ami � o LL O m h F O C C c m oN 0 ❑ x W o d 5u Q ? LL r E 0 0 o � m O N _ E m IU ❑ r W Z = Q m J N C N it U � c0 N 7 c o ri ri o LL J uj Z m N O a s > ? V O c c o 0 0 W � o 0 0 w co r L LLJ ICl J Q � v K _ C y E � r� In N m 0 o 0 0 0 inn ` J 0 a 0 0 a U OI o W 0 0 O U Q L LLI m > > J r U o 0 0 Q W H � zF a m m _ a rn e rn � O c m O m C m U Q m m 7 % w 0 N 0 U = a a I Z to Z� a � m m F w O � Q p C fn O I J U U r` �I (m 7 ccc C O7 Q7 O c O U t 0 LL O U O C7 Cl) m 7 LL O N 0 N O U O 11 3 C 0 cc 7 cr N 7I C 0 U O y N Z U Y LL �O L U O C N c L a Q N C � [C � C 7 -E a Lo c m n U �, C .o E E 7 E C E II 0 O 0 m Hill 1 F C �! O 0 u U E `o ti 0 V- I,A11191�1Y1d1 I, 0 0 LL LL O z D w Y Q W aQ a W O �- = o Ell H W � J Q z O R c C1 Ln z O _C) H W U L) O a O A ■ Nn�nu 1 I,I�NII Q U n 0 0 0 U IL 0 E 0 II II — li 0L) �I Q 0 a 3 0 LL r aF 2o° 0 C: C �> W> o U U D E w0 r U) 1 C w ts J a v� m m m NXJ co N ` ^ D co RV n CD O r a� (9 a I' 3 ^ C O g 1 O w a' CCC A \ v JN _e W W C O 9. � / U C W O L m 1 m _ ID W Ele E m€ co o � a c a � W � W co�W N � N \� n� W U) co 0 00 . O . co ^ , UW O (U) L 0. O O LO N M t OCl?O co • T N Q 7 Fr � C) L T Nq fA C CO75 r . (V CL C= -0 E E `°emu O (D V N Ovi CA O T cV Q E Cc c)OO — _ r I, O N '- N d m M E J in C:)O N r- N N N Q 7 CO C/) c O O W O O O N VV f4 tM T T U O O r C C C O > > p.N-O C C O CD W d C ^ N O Q) O L T T U a N 0) O N"' ZZ N E c N T C:)t0 QCN NO J :D C) L! 4 C9 l O) O> L �' r T U 00 M. L.: C 10 a)OO TM p W J�oJf!)C!1 w OO n O OO O O V T vs� N a C C- r C) N J ��JCnCA ch O NN UGO CL CD a) O N LD N C CV r O N Q � O O O LO T O O + N O C) T O O 0 n� 0 6 0 0 m c o CD'm � 'o m a N � o � U Q U m E � o m c a m 0 0 m m m 2 s- Calculation Results Summary Scenario: Base »» Info: Subsurface Network Rooted by: 0-1 »» Info: Subsurface Analysis iterations: 1 »» Info: Convergence was achieved. CALCULATION SUMMARY FOR SURFACE NETWORKS I Label I Inlet I Inlet I Total Type I I Intercepted I I I Flow I I I I (cfs) I -------I--------------- 1 I-3 1 Generic Inlet I--------------------- -I------------- I Generic Default 100% 1 0.00 1 I-2 1 Generic Inlet I Generic Default 100% 1 0.00 I I-1 -------------------------------------------------------------- I Generic Inlet I Generic Default 200% 1 0.00 CALCULATION SUMMARY FOR SUBSURFACE NETWORK WITH ROOT: 0-1 Total I Capture I Gutter I Gutter I Bypassed I Efficiency I Spread I Depth I Flow 1 M I (ft) I (ft) I (cfs) I I I I -------- I I --------I ---------- 0.00 1------------ I 100.0 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 I 100.0 I 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 •------------------------------------------ 1 100.0 I 0.00 1 0.00 1 I Label I Number I Section I Section I Length I Total I Average I Hydraulic I Hydraulic I of I Size I Shape I (ft) I System I Velocity I Grade I Grade I I I Sections I I I I Flow I (ft/s) I Upstream I Downstream I I I I I I I (cfs) I I (ft) ----------- I (ft) 1 I ------------I I-------I----------I---------I----------I--------I--------I---------- 1 P-1 i 1 1 12 inch I Circular 1 7.50 1 4.80 1 I 6.11 1 20.57 1 20.44 1 P-2 I 1 1 12 inch I Circular 1 22.10 1 4.80 1 6.11 1 21.10 1 20.86 1 I P-3 I 1 1 12 inch I Circular 1 38.70 1 4.80 1 6.11 1 21.80 1 21.39 1 P-4 I 1 1 12 inch I Circular 1 42.50 1 3.20 1 4.07 1 22.30 1 22.09 1 I P-5 I ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1 12 inch I Circular 1 42.50 1 1.60 1 2.04 1 22.48 1 22.43 1 I Label I Total I Ground I Hydraulic I Hydraulic I I System I Elevation I Grade I Grade I I I Flow I (ft) I Line In I Line Out I I I (cfs) I I (ft) I (ft) I I - ------I-------- 1 0-1 I I 4.80 I -----------I-----------I-----------I 23.30 I 19.53 I 19.53 I I J-1 I 4.80 I 23.20 1 20.86 1 20.57 1 1 1-2 1 4.80 I 23.00 1 21.39 1 21.10 1 I I-1 1 4.80 I 22.70 1 22.09 1 21.80 1 I-2 I 3.20 1 22.70 1 22.43 1 22.30 1 1 I-3 I ------------------------------------------------------ 1.60 1 22.70 1 22.51 1 22.48 1 Completed: 11/02/2011 12:28:29 PM Title: RAM K2 - Minor Storm Sewer Project Engineer. Interwest Consulting Group x:l..\drainage\designVam k2 storrn.stm Interwest Consulting Group StormCAD v5.5 (5.50051 11/02/11 12:29:01 PM 0 Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page I of 1