HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 10/25/2002 (17)FROM : Scott Cox & Associates.Inc. FAX NO. : 9706631660 Oct. 23 2002 03:32PM P1
SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers
OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATION SCA l„hl I1?Z-Zi-nZ-vC)
CLIENT;_L6�� w-t �nt�/t2 :n1M�^FI S DATP-/0-7- L
CQ n C„D,�Zr
LEGAL : -•Q'� �C-i. t_c.5 INS?. RVA
GRADING PLAT? ��A t�n �a c�� '� T �4 - 79 Z.: l�a•s,� p $ Z -99
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
('rradingPlan referenced above. During our observations ourrcpresentative measured the relative elevations atthc lotsides
and comers, top of foundation, and lowest openings_ Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
❑ The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
�
❑ The elevations as measured arc in general conformance with the above noted Grading rRtattWl
exceptions; R
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan_
During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our .mon the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme.} i P,ze- Tp Est
t^a� ►••1 M a-r4 S r3�i�a-j
� See the attached "As -Bulk" grading plan.
❑ The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include:
Other comments and/or observations:
M 1vP CW Vn,,,s n a-r orJ t 0 ` J-W&-W-e
3 I< s o, 3A rr rc. cor t 4 3,
AIo A r2.,Pe' 't t:.-4ftdg4C1SACK 04 L4A+-1f-) :J-
Limitations:
It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offb'ite flows unless the grades
are changed or barriers are created such as fences, garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change
the established flow patterns by diverting or slowing tunoff.11ovy`r_g jacent to the residence may settle over time
and allow ponding to occur around the foundation walls<'Ti�abackfil `adjaLtto the residence must be monitored and
maintained to ensure that runoff will flow away frome foundatp..s�xp -measured were compared only to the
C. U.
requirements shown on the above referenced grading�`lar t m1ninizvo�rrdmg requirements which may be specified
in the soils report or by other consq*on documents are liexon he scirpe f th= report.
Reviewed by:
5110 Cranire Street Suite 1) • 1 "land, Coioriak4�5yffti 4 l(9x61 013A FAT- (970) 663•1660
Servins Colorado vAxh ofNces In • Bolder • Longmont • Loveland �(R/
FROM : Scott Cox & Associdtes,Inc. FRX NO. : 9706631660 Oct. 23 2002 03:32PM P2
N�
�m
gym..
44
v�
r �vm
D
�
g
m
S
O
r
f
m
FROM : Scott Cox & Associates,Inc. FAX NO. : 9706631660 Oct. 23 2002 03:
I NOV813S
0-) 0
R
i
r'�►
MM