HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 04/24/200304/17/2003 16:47 9706631660 SCOTT COX LOVELAND /03
STORMV1WfEff
RECEIVED
ES INC. consulting en inArR 18 2003 A COX & ASSOCIATES, g $
OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATION SCA th[2-ZI-C7'I 0
CLIENT
LEGAL
V
GRADING PLAN —� E.�(C�2 ' �c�4 9�Zc3rfA 2-`OJC3
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. During our observations our representative measured the relative elevations at the lot sides
and comers, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
❑ The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
❑ The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
exceptions:
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
0( During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme. R+`..ASfr. SG& OT?W4 60mM6*-W5
J4 See the attached "As -Built" grading plan.
❑ The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include:
Other comments and/or observations:
* i.
Limitations:
It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsite flows unless the grades
are changed or barriers are created suc fences, garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change
the established flow patterns b ng runoff flow. Backfill adjacent to the residence may settle over time
and allow ponding to occ e o walls. The backfill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and
maintained to ensure tha the foundation. The grades measured were compared only to the
requirements shown on �aBopreferenc ]an. Other minimum grading requirements which may be specified
in the soils report or by dmmen are -beyond the scope of this report. f `
Reviewed by-.
5110 Granite —QrrgA` d , Colorado 80538 • (970) 663-0138 • Fax: (970) 663-1660
Serving Colorado with offices in • Boulder • Longmont • Loveland
04/17/2003 16:47 9706631660 SCOTT COX LOVELAND PAGE 02/03
lip
m
m. < O
-(m 6108 GLAIR COURT 14
gull
m 9 e
1 s�
C4
y� v ■ Y
fus
Wa
a.
tp
tffl
i�-
� -4
N � �
0 u
i w u
U
17/2003 16:47 9706631660 SCOTT COX LOVELAND PAGE
11.04'''"`
IR
m
_ ,W
4B-
kq_...----
TA^-A "C
9,04-19z,3 n
sz•-,) _cNcl C ,4D,^�,
I@-
IV
APR-18-2003-FRI 03:28 PM P.001
"SCOTr, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers
-- 1 t_;_ 1 1 I : —
•
V16 have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
OradingPlan referenced above. During our observations ourrepresentafivemenmmdthcrelative elevations atthe lotsides
and corners, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan
The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Orading Plan with the following
exceptions:
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above refmmeed plan.
Oi During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is oar opinion the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme. P-rXASf- S9F4I-- C ITH" COMM 9;1-"
A See the attached "As -Build grading plan.
D The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include:
Other comments and/or observations:
It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with o Biite flows unless the grades
an changed or barriers ere created sn en terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change
the established flow patterns by ' 0r noff flow. Backfill adjacent to the residence may settle over time
and allow poatimg to occur f �� The bacldtI] adjacent to the residence must be monitored and
maintained to tastm that iR� foundation. The grades measured were compared only to the
requirements shown orl the very enced � ' p er mirrimum grading requirements which may be specified
in the soils report or by eyond the scope of this report.
Reviewed
5110 Granite Street, 5 'Colorado 80538 • (970) 663-0138 • fax: (970) 663-1660
SetvlttgColorado with of lom In • Boulder LoRvmnt • Loveland
APR-18-2003-FRI 03:29 PM P.002
m
n, m � z
6108 GLARE COURT
6 � �
Vim
N �
mm•
z ,� •
{
�• r r r •
v
!� Ga
APR-18-2003-FRI 03:29 PM P.003
�_�
lkCK
to
►ZZ -
- 4B
4W-
If