HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 02/07/2001 (2)FR0M : Scott, Cox & Rssoc. FRX NO. : 970 663 1660 Feb. 01 2001 08:31RM P1 U'
J �SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting etnginews
0
OVERLOIGRADING OBSERVAT ON $CA_Iolt (O-04-IS-05
( LIF:\T
LEGAL:
GRADING PLAN;
W'c have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced abovc. During our observations our representative measured the relative elevations at the lot sides
and comers. top of foundation. and lowest openings. Based upon our Findings it is our opinion:
The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
Jtf The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
cxceptions:
it is our opinion these exceptions. noted above. should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above rcfLrcnced plan.
During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on thcabovc referenced grading plan. However. it is ouropinion thegradcs as measured should provide
an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme.
y'{ See the attached "As -Built" grading plan.
The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include:
other comments andlor observations:
Limitations:
It to our opinion chat the subject lot. as graded on the above date, should not interfere with otpske flows unless the grades
are changed or barriers are created such as fences_ garden terracing. sidewalks. and'or any landscaping which may change
the established flow patterns by diverting or slowing runoff flow. Backlill adjacent to thev� Assice,gy v settle over time
and allow' ponding to occur around the foundation walls. The backtill adjacent to th nitored and
maintained to ensure that runotT will flow away from the foundation. The grades zo my to the
requirements %hv«'n on the above referenced grading plan. Other minimum gradi nts whl ified
in the soils report or!!) other conscr tion documents are be%ond the scope oft g
/� n _
Re�icwed by: __.o Q� �� -ti Date' �-
?1;1; Cnvvtc Smvl iukeD • W�eiand. Carcvrado.i,'.. • .1-0 :,,, :.ut .�"Q�.in'•'
�rinp �:.AOLhIJ :.,rh Jirvr.S •n 9r.... Y. • _ norm m 1
=OXT. LOX _SOS Em MU. : +0 s, 560 Feb. n 2e1 e:32m P2
2
, >
. �
$
\
� � q
\ $
�
� � •a�
\§•.
���■
� � ■ �� !
m&�
$ « |
. ® q.� |
i GLU JLLI
|
` . -, § ��§
� • �' � ® § � | |
WA §W
§ �� �U4
q �
? 7
w �
& k �dw
o /wƒ
® ) 2/2 A��
FROM Scott, Cox & Assoc. FAX NO. 970 663 1660 Feb. 01 2001 08:33RM P3
• .... W W
UJLLJ
tCh
r
�tiJ &
• �Q
aI
ty
Q Z •-J W cr
•' • a4 %r = UJ • ' ••
• C U Q ,.t0�
[>
NCH p
.r.
w a.
ti � O'
aAti - Vr
CO
• 4-
LL
LL-
010
•