HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 04/19/2001FROM : Scott, Cox 8 Assoc. FAX NO. : 970 663 1660 Rpr. 18 2001 10:28RM P1
��
...
"SCOTT.. COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers
. dft _4
CLIENT
LEGAL
GRADI`
We have measured rehtive elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. During ourobsemationsour represeotative measured the relative elevations atMte lotsides
and comers. top of foundation• and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
p The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
p( The elevations as measured are in general coofotttmrree with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown On the
above referenced plan.
o During our observations our roptesertrativs noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated ontheabove referenced grading plan. However, it is ouropinion the grades as measured should provide
an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme.
See the attached "As -Built" graading plan.
C The elevations measured are not in coefortnWato the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include:
other comments and/or observations: 1
Gesrs !f Ir.�E�• So�7Te1 rti,Q,� /J;M►QSCi1L�'rQ T �e.fc�
Limitations:
It is our opinion that the subject lot• as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsite doer's unless the grades
are changed or barriers are created such as fences. garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any land
scap)na rwhich may change
the established flow patterns by diverting or slowing runoff flow. Backfil l adjacent s'K;;d4trcb kttA,Oettle over time
- f stusi nitored and
and allow ponding to occur around the foundation wells. The backfill adJ aeent Ct . .-nl to the
maintained to ensure that runoff will flow away from the foundation. Theg were eOfAp- eeified
g
requirements shown on the above referenced grading plan. Other minimum ra _ utremants
whicli7h3 . •.bhp
in the soils report o er cons cti documents are beyond the scope oF1 Y V�f}. J ✓ ` .
•r �.�� I I -e71 4. ...
Reviewed by: Date.. t
: q ;wnrte Street, Suite fl • L nelartd .Colorado SOS' iA a-n) i :-i)t�,`b� •=lax :§�O!' i•.
ytnm4 C.,lerldo with atrrc"'M • 3mildr•r • '.rilprlNtnt LrndarlJ .
• FRQM Scott, Cox & Assoc. FAX NO. 970 663 1660 Apr. 18 2001 10:28AM P2
m
v% a wa Z Z
L m
m � D
N m m
r <m A _
Oz 0�
v B L
w tD rn
& t I
r o IDD fI
d s I
9we
e.X. D
w a
8 lot
rn
na()� a m
n
= p+ t9 D
r
� 0
c0
Lp
r � �
e f*AW STREET
m �
D
W