HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 04/10/2000FROM Scott, Cox & Assoc.
1.
FAX NO. 970 663 1660 Rpr. 10 2000 01:03PM P1
SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC.
7
Wilk r
April 6.2000
Odau c0115trLtction APR $3,
P.O. Box 271372
Fort Collins. Colorado 80527
Project No. 1455-22-01-06
00/200c)
cor»ujting ongineors
�� M_
-
Gentlemen:
We have measured the relative elevations for the over lot grading at Lot 90, Hearthfire P.U.D. V Filing, (3326
Hearthfire Drive) For Collins, Colorado. During the investigation, we metlsured elevations at the lot sides and
corners• top of foundation. lowest opening. and the drainage swales on the north and south sides of the subject lot.
ch
Our representative noted that the swales on The north and south sides of the subject lot allowed p1°� to �atgr,al
the sidewalk, west. ofthe residence. The residence to the south of subject lot (Lot nv .
and the lot to the north of the subject lot (Lot 91) was unoccupied at the time of our investigation.
le
residence were
Our rcpresentativc also noted that the finished grades d the dsouthwest ntheI aster Gradinportion of lg Plao fortthis subdivision.
approximately four and t.vo-tenths (4.2') feet lower than indicated on file
It is our understanding. that the grades at the southwest portion of the subject residence were set at an elevation to
alla++� rtmi)ff to flow away from the residence and not require substantial till material to be placed there. Furthernxxe,
information received from Shear Engineering Corporation indicates that the grades at this portion of the subject
cient fall 1s established to the south Swale. It is our opinion that. this condition
residence are acceptable as long as suffi
has been satisfied.
e in
Based on our observations, and the. information available [o this office. the slopes and elevation' Curcasurcd oration,lrJob
Substantial conformance with the'Mastcr Grading Plan completed by Shear Lngineerinl p
Numberl552-01-90.revised October 10..1997. Please refer to the attached copies of the As -Built GradingLlevations
and Master Grading flan for further information.
Furthermore, it is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded, should not interfere with otfsite flows unless the grades
arc changed or barriers are created such as fences, garden terracing, sidewalks and/or any landscaping which may
Ch.inge the e5tahlishcd flow pattcrns by divcrtin� or slowin_ nrtloff (low. Backfill adjacentto the residence may settle
over tine and allow poriding to occur around the foundation walls. '! he backfiil adjacent. to the residence must b
monitored and maintained by the homeowner to ensure that runoff will flow away from the foundation.
Thank you for consulting with us out this phase of the project. If you have any questions, please feel free to call.
Sincerely.
SC.OTT, COX & ASSOCIATES
Reviewed by:
C)rd . l a1 .S.
vironmcntal 'peciali;t
P:\TEC.HS\(:i..1171=\GRADING\FCGRADINGI,.E-I'"fER.wpd
ovetl by
James A. Chi
;1'{1} l �f�lulA �lrF•?r, Slll(f, D ' Lo+'d.11)C1 , (.Morado =1)8 • t4701 ¢dCt d)1 "I ' Fa:: ON) 663-'1660
ierving COlOrdd/:"IhciiiCCa 11 - 9opldrr, • L�nJguwv ' IO cllind
IFROM : Scott, Cox & ASSOC.
FAX NO. 970 663 1660 Apr. 10 2000 01:04PM P2
m
r z
m O
a� A
h>
m m .
o a
r �R p9y ZR a a: ytig60rb4TE8� MG. OD AU
�I 7 1 wx �Oi 90. �EAR7 KFIRE 16T
I�;P"I� r
II I {I 4 � E�I�rr
�00 bir b,R 6�b o •foblm
y r41Yr M) • O�
FROM Scott, Cox & Assoc. FAX NO. 970 663 1660 Apr. 10 2000'01:04PM P3
f yy
LO
i 1
000000
00005
:t.
�J
�o
eti 1 G
✓ t
L^
1