HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 08/29/200308/27/2003 15:13 9706631660 SCOTT COX LOVELAND PAGE 01/03
STORMWATER
RECEIVED
SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers AUG 2 7 2003
OVERLOT "GRADING OBSERVATION SCA TMA 4824-03203 -O
CLIENT: l 1 t 1 Pik ( f0� I DATE-
,
LEGAL: Lot' 1 S; Pk.�e—T =. e.4 I Sr INSP.
GRADING PLAN- SYkFr'�� #�SZ-OI—c)% to-3 g�
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. During our observations our representativemeasured the relative elevations at the lot sides
and comers, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
❑ The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
exceptions:
n r1aQaN Sr l PM a c�.3rLa-f�2
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
❑ During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme.
l5f See the attached "As -Built" grading plan.
The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include:
Other comments and/or observations:
Limitations:
It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsite flows unless the grades
are changed or barriers are created such as fences, garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change
the established flow patterns by slowing runoff flow. Backfrll adjacent to the residence may settle over time
and allow ponding to occur n walls. The backfrll adjacent to the residence must be monitored and
maintained to ensure th gtiH m the foundation. The grades measured were compared only to the
requirements shown on gv 4e plan. Other minimum grading requirements which may be specified
in the soils report or b igostruction G•yme s beyond the scope of this report.
Reviewed
5170 Gani d ,Colorado 80538 (970) 663-01 38 •Fax: (970) 663-1 660
oithVA ofiin • 9ouWer • Longmont • Loveland
08/27/2003 15:13 9706631660
t)UU I I UU^ Utl". -
0
I
I
R b
9
b
I
^ �6
3215 wr:ARTNFIM DRIVE
08/27/2003 15:13
ff i
I
SCOTT COX LOVELAND
1
ri
PAGE 03/03
tz� �¢
r— 1
0 19 £ Ol
bi �01 m
3 yo
zol
dw
,l �
J