HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 12/23/2002Fri FROM : Scott Cox & Associates,Inc. FAX NO. : 9706631660 Dec. 16 2002 01:54PM Pi
"I,
COTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers
QVIERL T DIlV' S'14,RVATION SCA-Inh*5Y2 1- 01.01-Oc->
CLIEN M DAM Z-12 -oz
LEGAL: 4=!;a + � Qyc /7t . ai INSP.
GRADING PLAN
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were comparod to the
Grading Plan referenced above. During our observations ourreptesentativemeasurcd therelative elevations at the lotsides
and comers, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
O The elevations as measured arc in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
exceptions:
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
}� During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced a ailing scheme, f� a�,�. Sax 07W, to CvDMME 4T);
X See the attached "As -Built" grading plan.
❑ The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include:
Other comments and/or observations:
Z. �Lov.lEdt
t L-,AQCY! Cm.Bn4!�:e 21., r L^-+tea
W C-TP=G- gannet A-r- Poxrc YAeo :6 Z—V t�r.►elL.
It is our opinion that the subject lo; as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsilc flows unless the grades
are changed or barriers are created such as fences, gardenp.rm.cing, sidewalks, and/or any'landscaping which may change
the established flow patterns by diverting or slowingivitoffflow. Aackfill adjacent to the residence may settle over time
and allow ponding to occur around the fbundatibt ,;; a ls. The backfill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and
maintained to ensure that runoff will flow away,-fror? the foujrdatiori", The grades measured were compared only to the
requirements shown on the above referent `grac zi iin. Othe6iiniriiii� gading requirements which may be specified
in the soils report or by o er suer 'on e ocumevfs ark beyond tlic scope of this report.
Reviewed bv: .,
5)1() Graniw Street, Suite D • Lavekti- lora'do $ 3$� a (970) 663.0138 - Fax: (91e) 663-1 660
5er4ns Colorado with nMn3 in Gould& Longmont - 1-meland
V
FROM : Scott Cox & Rssociates,Inc.
sr, 1a
b m
Q
Sol
L4
FAX NO. : 9706631660 Dec. 16 2002 01:5SPM P2
Z
O
�J^
J
. • r- gyp• r, .
® 11
J
b
e
m�
a
z
✓ FROM : Scott Cox & Rssociates.Inc. FAX
9706631660 Dec. 16 2002 01:55PM P3
ju
g "goll s