HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 10/09/2002FROM Scott Cox & Rssociates,Inc. FRX NO. : 9706631660 Sep. 36 2992 11:11RM P1 f
ZJYrSCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers
OVERLOT GRADIN I OBSEgVATION SCA 1abb 43z4-d3'-oz-o+
CLIENT: '- l,{nP 14,.,11 DTP. 9 Z_4_t>Z.
LEGAL: L
INSP.
GRADING PLAN
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. During our observations our representative measured the relative elevations atthe lot sides
and corners, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
o The elevations as mcaeuted are in genera) conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
O The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
exceptions:
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan,
During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced lirading plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme. " Z SS. Vr we'.e-
1� Sce the attached "As -Built" grading plan_
O The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan, Deficiencies include:
Other com ents and/or observations:
=FO Or s orA i = G• S'
Limitations -
It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsite flows unless the grades
are changed or barriers arc created su!4,,LPftc% garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change
the established flow patterns bydi�ceFEtrr
and allow ponding to occur i�slvy¢ntunotf flow. Backfill adjacent to the residence may settle over time
d'ifie foua
arahi ejgitil6is. The backfill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and
maintained to ensure that ruridf€tvill;4jp kaw��iotg�.i� foundation. The grades measured were compared only to the
requirements shown on the above rierenced g pleb Other minimum grading requirements which may be spocifred
in the soils report or by o clip ocnri .03)
ors az ' beyond the scope of this reports J.:.: y
Reviewed
;•.. •. - .. t ..
5710 Ganile Street, Qi;g�•_ti}
90538 • (970) 663-0138 • Fax: (970) 661.1660
ScMnt Colorado w1rh Mice& in
80u1dcr • I not . nt • I nvrland
FROM : Scott Cox & Rssociates,Inc.
FRX NO. : 9706631660 Sep. 30 2002 11:12RM P2
NORTH
RADIUS: 4M50'
CHORD, tee' -�
smu N*Wm'l9•e
T$M-I
OLS
(50w)
3638'
N 68-44'533 E
SNaLE FAMILY
pr
T.OF. =�?J 1020,mL2
. LWST 02.4
0U
LUST 02A
Mare=
T1 E ELEVATION" $NOUN HERE
ARE 9ABED CN THE SURVET
PEON4,W
Top. • TCP CF Pa NDATM
TOM-1 • Tl IvaRAW 8ENW MARK 11
IWA OAC K OP WALK
LWS.T. . Lamw 0MR0 G (top OF WNP W ueLu
GILL • BOTTOM CP Um4DOW CA.As8
ur xaff - ma?Tam OF WAWICOR DOOR
xxx ■ ELEVATloW
sty acA Lt_'rTBQ
JDR EL 2_l 1" AR< CIPRIAN
D
SCOTT, COX A ,4950CL41E8, A LOT 18, SIRE
srt0l02 car"a Bg�� RMT COLLNB, COL.ORIIDO
elly arms awsp. 6AW 0 • LOVAKA cowaee mom
ptpy�y ma "3a - am
W.%
0
98.2
FROM Scott Cox & Rssociates,Inc. FRX NO. 9706631660 Sep. 30 2002 11:12AM P3
018 ��. o.s- Ca° av
ow
1.45
--
10 ois r....
FG I 03. 2 7
g I FG 'f02. 87� FG102.4
TOWt03_ 94 i i `
TOW 103. 5 TOW 103.1
Q2.o T.O,� _ 5 .a.SJ i
10101 99.s
y9 94 99.84
5
3