HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 04/13/2006FROM :KIVR ENGINEERING INC FAX NO. :9706631660 Rpr. 13 2006 01:34PM P1
STORMWATER
%iva Zn�waertni nc, RECEIVED
Strzac�urat �et7ti:ckrtiicai C�.✓tit APR 1 3 2006
OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATION DATE;
CLIENT: Ab&&o KIVA JOB #:
LEGAL; LVX 1141 ",r'= �. FF,ssw , INSP. BY: _
ADDRESS: [15 - iL. —L ids=
SITE41ADIN LAN: / 04V, &GrJ I9gSR3. Fi: F-4rsi3O 4 3o-C I
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed.elevations were compared to the
GradingPlan referenced above. During our observations ourmpresentative measuredthe relative elevations atthelotsides
and corners, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our fmdings it is our opinion:
❑ The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan,
❑ The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
exceptions:
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above re&renced plan.
JK During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our opinin the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above rcfcrmrcd grading scheme, t.V 5kt oTTf_� Cb,4f+14e1r5
0 See the attached "As -Built" grading plan.
❑ The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include:
Other comments and/or observations;
i
AK
Limitations;
It is our opinion that the -subject IM as graded on the above date, should not intesfere with offeite flows unless the grades are clanged or barriers are
created such as fences, garden tormc(ng, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may ebange the established flow panems by diverting ar slowing
runoff flow. Recall adjacent to the teaidenee may settle over tinte and allow, prmding to occur around the foundation walk. The hackflll adjacent
to the residence most be monil67et1 and main iWMMltpq t runoff will flow away flour the foundation. The grades measured were compared
only to the requirements shown on the abav 00termhrimum grading requirements which may be specified in the aena r port
or by other conaeuedon documents are �• �
Reviewed by: •� O Date: ��/��
W l u_4A-y
Main flut
•
!r%C.
5110 Graartc Strew; Sul to P
Loveland, Colorado 80538
Phone:
S. ��y� ••G�
��A •..�a•••e���`, .
(970) 66MI38
Fax (970) 663-1660
��!/���RA1. "'vy""�vuenbincering.1
plI/1Ap"111ttuA
lovelanduldvaenRlneering.eom
lSuO Kitnha Street utte l07
Longmont, Colorado 80501
Phune: (103) M-0661
Fax: (3t13) 774.8413
long'tnortt@kivaenginrxring.com
4/zi/be,
FROM :KIVR ENGINEERING INC FRX NO. :9706631660 Rpr. 13 2006 01:35PM P2
1
g
CLCVATIONS SURVEYED
4-5-06
T.O.F. - TOP OF FOUNDATION
TBM-1 a TEMPORARY BENCH MARK #1
8.O.W. BACK OF WALK
W.W. TOP OF WINDOW WELL
SILL BOTTOM OF WINDOW GLASS
WALKOUT A BOTTOM OF WALKOUT DOOR
XX.X = ELEVATIONS SHOT 3-7-06
® = SEE KIVA LETTER 1525-27-17,6 DATED 4/7/09
TBM-1
95.1
(B.O.W.) STORMWATE
95.6 RECEIVED
- 9 6. 3 C4 ale 1
APR 1 32006
�<u " 97.3 '
V f 97.5` `� 96,0 OF
20 r 95.3
O ' t= c�
97.7 97.0
(W.W.) 94.7
MISSING DOWNSPOUT (TYP.)
TOF = 98.0 97.7
95.3 (W.W.)
(B.O.W.)
95.2
(BRK)
_ 97.8
94.9 `--- (WW) 97.7 r:
97.1 (W.W.)
(B.0.W.) 94.7
94.5
(/ (B.O.W.) � 94.3
M
SkRq T cR
e
Fk (e o.w.)
93.7
NOTE: (B.O, W, )
THE FIFVATIONS SHOWN HERE ON ARE BASED
ON THE SURVEY PERFORMFD ON 4/s/D6 AS -BUILT GRADING ELEVATIONS
§A 26-2E —17_6
a 7 06 StrwetwrAj JCRotgck*jW Ci-vil LOT 14, BLOCK 9, FOSSIL I.AKE RANCH 2ND
1"-20' — 5110 Crorule Street. Suite D Phone: (970) Res — m3s FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
PRAunk Lowland, Colorado 30538 Fam (970) 653 — 1660_—
CPH ww.klwengineering.eom IowlandOkiwenglneroing,com —_.,_—