Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 10/31/2002 (2)FROM a%. Scott Cox & Rssociates,Inc. FAX NO. 9706631660 Oct. 31 2002 02:43PM PS SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers OVERLOT GRADYNC OBSERVATION SCA I�al-�I-a I CLIENT LEGAL Ift �A GRADLNG PLAN: tj gj "• `)(512--co F::LF 17Q,—F o 4— Z o -99 We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the CrradingPlan referenced above. Duringour observations our representative measured the relative elevations atthe lot sides and comers, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion: ❑ The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan'. ❑ The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following exceptions: It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the above referenced plan. During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme. ?,_k a 94rC TU Q m6e_ 44. See the attached "As-Duilt" grading plan. ❑ The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plun. Deficiencies include: Other comments and/or observations: kwo._ f3ecAVc Ai "We.'1 1•0' r++t�rf�• Limitations: It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with ofisite flows unless the grades are changed or barriers arc created such,*ginces, garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change yf'r. the established flow patterns `divertiiaWiToyving runoff flow- Backfill adjacent to the residence may settle over time and allow ponding to nccur.*0urt� jhe f0- di -walls. The backfill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and maintained to ensure that,nt ff,i ddl11fld1N,aWaf<fafim the foundation, The grades measured were compared only to the requirements shown on tie-above=refcrencei adm'g plan Other minimum grading requirements which may be specified s; in the soils report or bygtlier cot�avc�dgCum�r is are beyond the scope of this ftpoRr � Reviewed 5110 Granite Svc .4-j§a g-r3,.; _'f4pvefand , Colorado 80538 • (970) 663-0138 • Fax: (970) 663-1660 SmWng Colondo with otficaa In . 9.v14ar • Logmont • Lweland FROM Scott Cox & Associdtes,Inc. FAX NO. : 9706631660 Oct. 31 2002 02:44PM P2 ELBVATI" URVEYM 10-30-02 Le,7P 0)5,0 LE.GFN I.O.F. TOP OF FOUNDATION T9M-i - rEMPORARY BENCH MARK itl 5.0.W, = BACK OF WALK L^ar.-uYNE510PENING (rOP OF WINDOW WELL.) SILL - 50TYOM OF WINDOW GLA55 WLKOUT - 5U110M OF WALKOUT DOOR (�cX) - RIVATIONS SHOT b ()(j = 5FE SCA LETTER 5460,0�0)-01 ro- 7, 1-07- HM; TAU ELSVATI" GWaW z oN ARE SAO= Ck T4E SURVEY PEW012'P OM 10-80-4- SZ4 '�PJS.Go �elkA g3ti 7h dS -10 91.S �t j e. CC..)a-S V ojp.v Cj0..1 Ga `(,, sc AS-15UILT GRADMa ELEVATIONS .JnB IQ 0^ II Scott, cox t ,4ssoclATEs, INC. Schroeder Investments I cauuRes Eegmser. LOT f9, BLOCK 10, F0061L LAKE RANCH MT ^;� Deco a«aw Rare. tum o • Love" dwMae son FORT GOLIM, COLORADO (a*) ms� - OUD oulctvvb •^en �re,e�nc niv a rwUi.tienn GID4: FROM Scott Cox & Rssocia Inc. FRX NO. : 9706631660 Oct. 31 2002 02:45PM P3 Y'.-PAN I C 3 7_ "MfN VFC-= 93.7 . UN TF 94A LOT TYPE A 4 !K_7 ,qiD \A