HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 03/05/200302/26/2003 13:45 9706631660 SCOTT COX LOVELAND PAGE 01/03
SC OTT, COX &ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers
OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATION SCAT^���—z5-1�-0�
CLIENT: 1 J DATE 2--2-4--01
C 3Z;- `-�-G Ca
LEGAL :1- ^T 1 13a 0LA F= SSrL- + - ra INSP.
GRADING PLAN
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
GradingPlan referenced above. During our observations ourrepresentative measured the relative elevations at the lot sides
and comers, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
❑ The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
X The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
d-
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
❑ During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme.
See the attached "As -Built' grading plan.
❑ The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include:
Other comments and/or observations:
FEB 2 6 2003
Limitations:
It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsite flows unless the'grades
are changed or barriers are created such as fences, garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change
the established flow patterns by div runoff flow. Backfill adjacent to the residence may settle over time
and allow ponding to occur aro tje(Q. The backfill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and
maintained to ensure that run PPV fro foundation. The grades measured Were compared only to the
requirements shown on the vexe yced gr er minimum grading requirements which may be specified
in the soils report or by o oonnsftitr n ddoc�urr( s ar eyond the scope of this report.A.
Reviewed
5110 Granite 5Veet4WdJ0JVMek4W1crado 80538 • (9701 663-0138 • Fax: (970) 663-1660
with offims in • Boulder • Longmont • Loveland
02/26/2003 13:45 9706631660 SCOTT COX LOVELAND PAGE 02/03
m
iD 1
{
N � �
! j� L
NjG3
a�
a�
m
02/26/2003 13:45 9706631660 SCOTT COX_ LOVELAND
PAGE 03/03
5
1�p
r -am
14,0 1�
FOM
W= ii&0
/3 G)
a a A*
a ;-
Mm` 1411%
*TFi�
0
*14
3 a
kj FG=
1 TF3
13,E