Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 08/09/2001FROM Scott, Cox & Assoc. FAX NO. : 970 663 1660 Rug. 08 2001 02:59PM P7 SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVAIM SCAT Iy°�Z -48-0 0 CLIE` LEGAI GRAD; We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the Grading Plan referenced above. During ourobservations our representative measured the relative elevations at the tot sides and corners. top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion: ❑ The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan, a The elevations as measured are In general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following exceptions: It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the above referenced plan. During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those indicated on the above referenced grading plarL However, it is ouropinion the grades as measured should provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme. SfZ gT14ff, COoMMF�� See the attached "As -Built" grading plan. G The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include: Other comments and/or observations, ©'Tcp OCT ;�..t,SAIro f:zoC;,P- f CL4,4VA4S.2 M1150a- (�I'aDFS Art t � A• t0 NtoRsiu,ttx t0,'f3'- 1.7 t ltGtt+eSG Limitations: It is our opinion Char the subject lot as arraded on the above date, should not interfere with ot'fsite flows unless the grades are changed or barriers are created such as fences. garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change the establ fished flow patterns by diverting or slowing runoff flow. Backfl 11 adjacent to `` tie�1^`r'trty�,ttle over time and allow ponding to occur around the foundation walls, The backftl I adjacent to qii eogtgso-G a itored and maintained to ensure 'hat runoff will flow away from the foundation. The gradly to the requirements shown on above referenced grading plan. Other minimum grading t.1rpnents %vhicct tt_} e� ecified in the soi Is report o y er co ru ion documents are beyond the scope of alas V Rov iewed bv:--_ . _ -_ Date: b tii !�' i^ 't t9 cran,te Street. Suite 0 • Luveland , Colorado SOS: a • nYN id,'At .en u,t wlw�,b wah o�F,[es ;r 39idttrr • L.met"Mil - 34.6 34.8 Top of Foundatiamc31,1 34,1 .33.4 TSM-1 32.S (5,0.W.) -ibe-t scA L �F-JTEre- -c::> I 32,1 33 &4 338 33----43 33.2 • (LWST) SLUM SAGE DRIVE 33.3 32.5 340 34.0 32.1 NOTE: THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN WERE ON ARE BASED ON THE SURVEY PEFF-04/20 ON 'V30/01 31.1 4 32.1 0 33.1 (LUJST) 33.0 (LWST) 32.1 0 32.3 133.1 (LWST) 32.1 31,9 AS-5UILT GRADING ELEVATIONS PATS cox a58oc1aTEs, MG 5RON5ERI sAlolSCGTT " coftulting Eflewww* LOT 36, HARIONY RIDGE SCALE 1,#2", Wo 6w#qti $Ww M - I ldmk CatmrAdo 0&430 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO umcw- 0130 In M92MM! DAP 170MATIM FROM : Scott, Cox & Rssoc. FRX NO. . 970 663 1660 Aug. 06 2001 03:00PM P9 Ab ,ob�r eo rwa W . n.. w ,♦" r�c�sr 7 ram LOT JF;ice ga i 10, r�n Law Ap Lora Send 9 __ .ter• ' .! �� •''-'�•._„•1r1 {ice