Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 07/13/2001 (3)"SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers —DATE: b— 19 — O) LEGAL: LoC' 3�5�}Ip,Qag�ti� �tpC1r (I(.03 Ljut? SAC-,�) INSP. BY: GR.-kDI`G PLAY: 1 J _L nIL I O' P�S' OOO 1�4TF_D I I —� We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the Grading Plan referenced above. During ourobservations our representative measured the relative elevations at the lot sides and corners. top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion: 0 X J The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan. The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following exceptions: It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the above referenced plan. During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme. See the attached "As -Built' grading plan. The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include: Other comments and/or Limitations 4 It is our opinion that the subject lot• as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsite flows unless the grades are changed or barriers are created such as fences, garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change the established flow patterns by diverting or slowing runoff flow. Backfill adjacent to the residence may settle over time and allow ponding to occur around the foundation walls. The backfill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and maintained to ensure that runoff will flow a .,. I dation. The grades measured were compared only to the requirements shown on the above referenq a nimum grading requirements which maybe specified in the soils report or by4her cc96ggctiq • _ scope of this report. i Reviewed bv: / $ Rr W- G _ _ �.1 A � Date: Zo -O 1 tt u) Granite Street.' et �e1and7(olor—a s( ' ' L "nt ob.;•�It;B • Fax: •9701 ;;,;.:;60 •- • ,'Q • err. mK •Agh,oifices in ,.�r..:ngnu u+t l+nrLuvl �4-14 -0 �-o (9) SEP SCI�Ep 1 b -per; co -19 -o I a C�Rr P�tcP'c- ELEVATIONS SURVEYED 6.18-01 P325 31.4 212 T5M-I 31.3 (5.0.111.) �- 33.4(d,b6 ° 33.4 ° A ° n I e DUSTY ° a° a SAGE e d e e COURT s 3.4 a 3.1 a ` 32. < 33. ° °° 31.0 C5.0.111. chase 32.8 31.2 Q o G ` 33.6 Top of Foundation=3�o.2 30.2 30.5 29.5 bsmt ent. 31.0 C 2 S.5 �� 30.3 30.8 (lwst) (lwst) 291 30.3 (lwst) Swale —� 21.5 21.1 SA 30.2 28.3 F,x�5n�1c� vi,.lAt-F- 25.6 26.2 NOTE: THE ELEVATIONS SHOUN HERE ON ARE BASED AS —BUILT GRADING ELEVATIONS ON THE SURVEY PERFORMED ON 6-18-01 JOB NO. I(v64-14-1-8 WESTMARK DATE gCO1 j, COX ! ASSOCIATES INC. 6-18-01 Gonaulting Engineers LOT 35, HARMONY RIDGE SCALE 5110 Grenito 50"t. Suits D • Lw Idnd. C hmodo 80538 FORT COLLINS. COLORADO V - 20.0' DRAVM MC) 663 - 0138 G:21VIL.GRAC)NG GERTSAIESTMARKA661.14-1.DDuri DAP Ml r .same. Lw4g. Le yuw =1 rSWALE SECTOV,. 1 jam low 3t 00 _ 9P L 2a 0 teas" auto r- - 7p Lor AMC Sear c o r . Lola k aLor am