HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 08/29/2002 (12)FROM : Scott Cox 8 Associates,Inc. FAX NO. : 97e6631660 Rug. 28 2002 12:53PM PI y
PPP C 4/v
(jUTSCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers
OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATION SCA16hitla9z-�s uz-��
CLIENT
LEGAL
DATE, S•23• 0o _
ISP.
GRADING PLAN: �1 # �O�•�� � o c> 1�. A,"�6Q I (-9S
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. During our observations ourtepresentative measured the relative elevations at the lot sides
and corners, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
❑ The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Platt.
❑ The elevations al; measured are -in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
exceptions:
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
KDuring our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme. "R445te S „-
Coe-�MEwtrS ..
See the attached "As -Built" grading plan.
❑ The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include:
Other comments and/or observations:
It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not inierfcrc with offsite flows unless the grades
arc changed or barriers are created such as fences, garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change
the established flow patterns by diverting or slowing runoff Il adjacent to the residence may settle over time
and allow ponding to occur around the foundation walk nt to the residence must be monitored and
maintained to ensure that runoff will flow away frotdatiagdes measured were compared only to the
requirements shown on the above referenced gradirfg n. f�t6rmi ~� ng requirements which may be specified
in the soils report or byAher construction docum� is arE� yond the'srop Adis reports
Reviewed
5170 Granite Street, Suite D • Loveland, C iU'W&ffnz,!n0t
13a Fax: (M) Mlb r hh0,,,1 'Iserving CAlnrndn vArn eNIMr in Loveland 1�"'
FROM Scott Cox & Associates, Inc. FAX NO. : 9706631660
Aug. 28 2002 12:54PM P2
WVATI" &ARVVTW
84VO2
72�(�
232
CHASE
22B
21.1
21.3
21.5
23.4
22.4
BILL 24.2
28.0
(50LU)
25.1
21.8
T.O.F. = 30.2
20.9
i-ee 7c6p19.1
—
L 0 1 N 12-
T,M, . TOP OF PatMATION
TM-1 - TO-OhORAW 001014 MA K 41
JWJA , 15ACKCPWALK
"aT - LCUWT PMUM Map CP mciall UNLU
M.L . W"VM CP WMM OLAW
UyAff a Mcirm ap WAL=W mm
M"Ars" OW"
am aQA LffFrWt 152
171.2
NOTES
TW FIRVATZM SWORM WEW ON ASE SAGED
ON Ti-e WmYty Fwaircm m Sam
SILL 24.1
2 -11A
0
23.2
20.1
242
28.1
(Bm)
21.5
(SOUP
26.4
(50w)
AS -BUILT GRADING ELEVATIONS
5owTT, cox 4 ASS=AIES, Nc:. 15 ON6EP.T
As /02 22 AP 2 L: 24, wAMONY RIDGE
fV00% SW &Mts 5L-w MW p. LoveUrA Colorado NOW FORTCOLLIN6
MAWPO MIS) ass . Ow
20.9
i-ee 7c6p19.1
—
L 0 1 N 12-
T,M, . TOP OF PatMATION
TM-1 - TO-OhORAW 001014 MA K 41
JWJA , 15ACKCPWALK
"aT - LCUWT PMUM Map CP mciall UNLU
M.L . W"VM CP WMM OLAW
UyAff a Mcirm ap WAL=W mm
M"Ars" OW"
am aQA LffFrWt 152
171.2
NOTES
TW FIRVATZM SWORM WEW ON ASE SAGED
ON Ti-e WmYty Fwaircm m Sam
SILL 24.1
2 -11A
0
23.2
20.1
242
28.1
(Bm)
21.5
(SOUP
26.4
(50w)
AS -BUILT GRADING ELEVATIONS
5owTT, cox 4 ASS=AIES, Nc:. 15 ON6EP.T
As /02 22 AP 2 L: 24, wAMONY RIDGE
fV00% SW &Mts 5L-w MW p. LoveUrA Colorado NOW FORTCOLLIN6
MAWPO MIS) ass . Ow
FROM Scott Cox 8 Associates,Inc. FAX NO. 9706631660 Rug. 28 2002 12:54PM P3
t
sy.o .led
NOW
bar✓
■
z S QL l 0, FY -.30,2
Orr ■
LOA
IL -IL
°� �` � 1. a� � � • # ,79. Z "' �.�
.r L
�+ T {N. ,
ti