Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSite Certifications - 07/28/2006r .\ STORMWATER RECEIVED JUL 2 8 2006 July 28, 2006 J•R ENGINEERING Jay Barber A Westrian Company Citv of Fort Collins Utilities 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80521 RE: Harmony School Shops — Third Filing, Lot 1 / Drainage Certification "�w ,m Dear Jay: Y The purpose of this letter is to acknowledge that the detention pond located on the above referenced site will function in general conformance with the approved design based on recently obtained survey information and field inspection. A spreadsheet indicating the originally designed detention pond volume and the estimated as -built volume has been attached. Per our estimates, the as -built pond (Pond 1) provides slightly less detention volume (approximately 0.1 ac-ft) when compared to the approved design. This deficiency as been compensated for with additional detention volume within the parking area as discussed below. The proposed curb cuts have been reduced in width from the originally proposed 5-ft to 5-inches. Our office has reanalyzed the as -built storniwater management system, including the detention provided by the reduced curb cuts. This was accomplished by modeling the curb cuts and various overflows (top of curb and ridges) as weirs that act has outlet structures for small detention areas. This model is further described as follows: West Curb Cut - It was estimated that approximately half the tributary area for Pond 1 was tributary to each of the two curb cuts. The building (0.2-ac) is located in the tributary area for the West Curb Cut, but was excluded since a roof drain system conveys flows directly to Pond 1. This results in a tributary area of 0.3-ac for the West Curb Cut. The curb cut and top of curb were modeled as weirs that discharge to Pond 1. East Curb Cut - It was estimated that approximately half the tributary area for Pond 1 was tributary to the East Curb Cut. This results in a tributary area of 0.5-ac for the East Curb Cut. The curb cut itself, the ridge within the drive aisle to the east of the curb cut and top of curb were modeled as weirs. The curb cut and top of curb discharge directly to Pond 1. The ridge to the east is at a lower elevation then the top of curb, so some runoff will 2620 East Prospect Road, Suite 190, Fort Collins, CO 80525 970A91-9888 • Fax: 970-491-9984 • w jrengineering.com bypass Pond I and flow directly to the swale along the northern property boundary. This runoff was accounted for within the total flow exiting the site. Pond I - Pond 1 was modeled with the as -built volume and inflows from the East and West Curb Cuts. The top of the pond was modeled as a weir to account for overflow along with the 20-inch concrete weir. The discharge was then added to the overflow that bypassed the East Curb Cut over the ridge to determine the total estimated flow from the site. This model results in a peak flow of approximately 5.4-cfs exiting the subject site, which is equal to the allowable flow. All calculations were performed utilizing the computer program Hydraflow by Intelisolve and are attached. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, JR ENGINEERING, LLC /eph parone, P.E. nager cc: Sean Windsor (Delta) Enclosure JCS Project No.: 4 Project Name 39445.00 Harmony School Shops 3rd Filing Lot 1 As -Built Detention Pond 1 - As -Built By: JCS Date: 7/20/2006 Contour Surface Incremental Cumulative Cumulative Elevation Area Volume Volume Volume ft. sq. ft. (cu. ft.) (cu. ft. ac-ft 58.13 0 0 0 0.000 58.50 1000 123.3 123.3 0.003 58.70 2300 321.1 444.4 0.010 59.00 2700 749.2 1193.6 0.027 59.10 2900 279.9 1473.6 0.034 Detention Pond 1 - Design Contour Surface Incremental Cumulative Cumulative Elevation Area Volume Volume Volume ft. (sq. ft. cu. ft. cu. ft.) ac-ft 58.13 �' ,. 0`� . 0 _ . 0 ; ' 0.000 ; 58..40 ' 1775;. 1 159.7 , 159.7 0.004 58.60 • IF i -2445. ? 420.2 a 580.0 0.013 58.80 q # r2870 530.9 ,, 1110.9 f 0.026 k .y 59'.10. • �� S;'', , 3045 887.1, 1998.0 0.046 Required Volume (100 YR) = 1934.00 cu-ft Volume Provided (100 YR) = 1998.00 cu-ft @ 59.10 3944500Basin-AsBuilt.xls O i O O } N O 0 O Q O O O O V N O C O O O O Go co V N O c O E I O � H N - - Ln O LO LO LO eM O (h N O _ N Ln O Ln L I O O O O O O 6 O V N O W CO Hydraflow OF Report Page 1 of 1 Return Period Equation Coefficients (FHA) (Yrs) B D E (NIA) 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -------- 2 30.0397 11.3000 0.8439 --- ---- 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------- 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -------- 10 46.9523 10.6000 0.8251 ------- 25 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -------- 50 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------- 100 98.3130 10.8000 0.8304 ------ �:imuyrarn niesviyuranuwrnyuruyrapns mu%uun wnn Intensity = B / (Tc + D)^E Return Period Intensity Values (in/hr) (Yrs) 5 min 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 2.85 • 2.27 1.90:?. 1.64 1.45 1.30 1.18 1.08 1.00 0.93 0.87 0.82 { 3 6.00 0.00 •0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 0.00 0.00 b.00 ` 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4. 10 4.87' 3.87 3.23 2.79 2.46 2.21 2.01 1.84 1.70 1.59 1.49 1.40 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100 9.94 7.91 6.61 5.71 5.04 4.52 4.11 3.77 3.49 3.25 3.04 2.86 c = ume in mimes Pond Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Friday, Jul 28 2006, 1:37 PM Pond No. 1 - West Curb Cut Pond Data Pond storage is based on known contour areas. Average end area method used. Stage I Storage Table Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) Contour area (sgft) Incr. Storage (cult) Total storage (cuft) 0.00 4959.34 00 0 0 0.50 4959.84 650 163 163 0.66 4960.00 2,000 212 375 Culvert / Orifice Structures Weir Structures [A] [B] [C] [D] [A] [B] [C] [D] Rise (in) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest Len (ft) = 0.42 30.00 0.00 0.00 Span (in) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest El. (ft) = 4959.34 4959.84 0.00 0.00 No. Barrels = 0 0 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 3.33 2.60 0.00 0.00 Invert El. (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weir Type = Rect Broad --- Length (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Multi -Stage = No No No No Slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Llir� Cli % o ul G N-Value = .013 .000 .000 .000 Crif. Coeff. = 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 Multi -Stage = n/a No No No Exfiltration = 0.000 in/hr (Contour) Tailwater Elev. = 0.00 ft NoteCulvert/Orifice outflows have been analyzed under inlet and outlet control. Stage / Storage / Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Total ft cuft ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 0.00 0 4959.34 --- --- --- --- 0.00 0.00 --- --- --- 0.00 0.50 163 4959.84 --- --- --- --- 0.49 0.00 --- --- --- 0.49 0.66 375 4960.00 --- --- --- --- 0.75 5.00 - --- --- 5.75 Pond Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve -Pond No. 2 - East Curb Cut Pond Data Pond storage is based on known contour areas. Average end area method used. Stage / Storage Table Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) 0.00 4959.21 0,40 4959.61 0.44 4959.65 0.75 4959.96 Contour area (sgft) 00 900 950 4,000 Incr. Storage (cuft) 0 180 37 767 Total storage (cult) 0 180 217 984 Friday, Jul 28 2006, 1:37 PM Culvert / Orifice Structures Weir Structures [A] [B] [C] [D] [A] [B] [C] [D] Rise (in) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest Len (ft) = 0.42 24.00 7.00 0.00 Span (in) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest El. (ft) = 4959.21 4959.61 4959.65 0.00 No. Barrels = 0 0 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 3.33 2.60 2.60 0.00 Invert El. (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weir Type = Rect Broad Broad --- Length (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Multi -Stage = No No No No Slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 p N-Value Orif. Coeff. = .013 = 0.60 .000 0.00 .000 0.00 .000 0.00 /1 Cur b�� tc p 43 �J 7010 o f r!u/� Multi -Stage = n/a No No No Exfiltration = 0.000 in/hr (Contour) Tailwater Elev. = 0.00 ft Stage / Storage / Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Clv A ft cuft ft cfs 0.00 0 4959.21 -- 0.40 180 4959.61 --- 0.44 217 4959.65 --- 0.75 984 4959.96 --- Note, Culvert/Orifice outflows have been analyzed under inlet and outlet control. Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Total cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs --- --- 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.35 0.00 0.00 --- --- 0.35 --- --- --- 0.41 0.50 0.00 --- --- 0.91 --- --- --- 0.91 12.93 3.14 --- --- 16.98 Pond Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve -Pond No. 3 - Pond 1 Pond Data Pond storage is based on known contour areas. Average end area method used. Friday, Jul 28 2006, 1:37 PM Stage / Storage Table Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) Contour area (sqft) Incr. Storage (cuft) Total storage (cuft) 0.00 4958.13 00 0 0 0.27 4958.40 1,000 135 135 0.57 4958.70 2,300 495 630 0.87 4959.00 2,700 750 1,380 0.97 4959.10 2,900 280 1,660 1.25 4959.38 2,900 812 2,472 Culvert I Orifice Structures Weir Structures [A] [B] [C] [D] [A] [B] [C] [D] Rise (in) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest Len (ft) = 1.67 140.00 0.00 0.00 Span (in) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest El. (ft) = 4958.13 4959.10 0.00 0.00 No. Barrels = 0 0 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 3.33 2.60 0.00 0.00 Invert El. (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weir Type = Ciplti Broad - -- Length (ft) = 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Multi -Stage = No No No No Slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N-Value = .000 .000 .000 .000 Cu IG U/C�r✓ -i /Iy0 / Clrif. Coeff. = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Multi -Stage = n/a No No No Exfiltration = 0.000 in/hr (Contour) Tailwater Elev. = 0.00 ft Stage / Storage / Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Clv A ft cuft ft cfs 0.00 0 4958.13 --- 0.27 135 4958.40 --- 0.57 630 4958.70 --- 0.87 1,380 4959.00 --- 0.97 1,660 4959.10 --- 1.25 2,472 4959.38 --- Note: CulverVOrifice outflows have been analyzed under inlet and outlet control. Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Total cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs --- --- --- 0.00 0.00 --- --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- 0.78 0.00 --- --- --- 0.78 --- --- 2.40 0.00 --- - --- 2.40 -- 4.51 0.00 --- --- --- 4.51 --- --- --- 5.31 0.00 --- --- --- 5.31 --- --- --- 7.77 53.87 --- --- --- 61.64 Hydrograph Summary Report Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Volume Inflow Maximum Maximum Hydrograph No. type flow interval peak hyd(s) elevation storage description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (tuft) (k) (tuft) 1 Rational 2.89 1 5 1,301 ---- ------ ------ Prop1A West 2 Rational 1.93 1 5 868 --- ------ ------ Prop1A West Roof 3 Reservoir 1.66 1 6 866 2 4959.90 238 West Curb Cut 4 Rational 4.82 1 5 2,169 ---- ----- ------ Prop1A East 5 Reservoir 4.24 1 6 2,167 4 4959.75 457 East Curb Cut 6 Diversionl 3.15 1 6 1,402 5 ------ ------ Offsite 7 Diversion2 1.10 1 6 765 5 ----- ------ To Pond 1 8 Combine 4.49 1 6 2,499 2, 3, 7 ---- ------ To Pond 1 9 Reservoir 2.81 1 10 2,499 8 4958.76 791 Pond 1 10 Combine 5.43 1 7 3,901 6,9 ----- -- Total From Site F //p Rational 9.93 1 5 4,468 ---- ------ ------ 13 Prop 1A 14 Reservoir 6.44 1 9 4,467 13 4959.12 1,707 Pond 1 0,,16 64, �S) As-Built.gpw Return Period: 100 Year Friday, Jul 28 2006, 1:38 PM Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 1 Prop 1A West Hydrograph type = Rational Storm frequency = 100 yrs Drainage area = 0.3 ac Intensity = 9.937 in/hr IDF Curve = fort collins1999.IDF Prop1A West Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 1 -- 100 Yr MIN 2.00 1.00 Hyd No. 1 ;7 Friday, Jul 28 2006, 1:38 PM Peak discharge = 2.89 cfs Time interval = 1 min Runoff coeff. = 0.97 Tc by User = 5 min Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/2 10 Hydrograph Volume = 1,301 cuft Q (cfs) MIN 2.00 0.00 15 Time (min) Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 2 Prop1A West Roof Hydrograph type = Rational Storm frequency = 100 yrs Drainage area = 0.2 ac Intensity = 9.937 in/hr OF Curve = fort collins1999.IDF ProplA West Roof Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 2 -- 100 Yr 2.00 1.00 1 11 0 5 Friday, Jul 28 2006, 1:38 PM Peak discharge = 1.93 cfs Time interval = 1 min Runoff coeff. = 0.97 Tc by User = 5 min Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/2 10 Hydrograph Volume = 868 cuft Q (cfs) 2.00 1.00 — Hyd No. 2 Time (min) Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Friday, Jul 28 2006, 1:38 PM Hyd. No. 3 West Curb Cut Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 1.66 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 1 min Inflow hyd. No. = 2 Max. Elevation = 4959.90 ft Reservoir name = West Curb Cut Max. Storage = 238 cuft Storage Indication method used. Hydrograph Volume = 866 cult Q (cfs) 2.00 1.00 5 Hyd No. 3 West Curb Cut Hyd. No. 3 -- 100 Yr 10 15 20 25 30 35 Hyd No. 2 Q (cfs) 2.00 1.00 0.00 40 Time (min) Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 4 Prop1A East Hydrograph type = Rational Storm frequency = 100 yrs Drainage area = 0.5 ac Intensity = 9.937 in/hr OF Curve = fort collins1999.IDF Prop1A East Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 4 -- 100 Yr -M 4.00 2.00 1.00 Hyd No. 4 5 Friday, Jul 28 2006, 1:38 PM Peak discharge = 4.82 cfs Time interval = 1 min Runoff coeff. = 0.97 Tc by User = 5 min Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/2 10 Hydrograph Volume = 2,169 cuft Q (cfs) -M 4.00 3.00 N OM 1.00 0.00 15 Time (min) Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 5 East Curb Cut Hydrograph type = Reservoir Storm frequency = 100 yrs Inflow hyd. No. = 4 Reservoir name = East Curb Cut Storage Indication method used. Q (cfs) 5.00 i OR 1 2.00 1.00 East Curb Cut Hyd. No. 5 -- 100 Yr 5 10 15 Hyd No. 5 Hyd No. 4 Friday, Jul 28 2006, 1:38 PM Peak discharge = 4.24 cfs Time interval = 1 min Max. Elevation = 4959.75 ft Max. Storage = 457 cuft Hydrograph Volume = 2,167 cuft 20 25 30 Q (cfs) 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 iffl1l7 0.00 35 Time (min) Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 6 Offsite Hydrograph type = Diversion1 Storm frequency = 100 yrs Inflow hydrograph = 5 Diversion method = Pond - East Curb Cut 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 Friday, Jul 28 2006, 1:38 PM Peak discharge = 3.15 cfs Time interval = 1 min 2nd diverted hyd. = 7 Pond structure = Weir B Offsite Hyd. No. 6 -- 100 Yr 5 10 15 20 Hyd No. 6 — Hyd No. 5 Hyd No. 7 Hydrograph Volume = 1,402 cuft 25 30 Q (cfs) 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 35 Time (min) Hydrograph Plot HydraFlow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Friday, Jul 28 2006. 1:38 PM Hyd. No. 7 To Pond 1 Hydrograph type = Diversion2 Peak discharge = 1.10 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 1 min Inflow hydrograph = 5 2nd diverted hyd. = 6 Diversion method = Pond - East Curb Cut Pond structure = Weir B Q (cfs) 5.00 4.00 C1 11 2.00 1.00 0.00 0 5 — Hyd No. 7 To Pond 1 Hyd. No. 7 -- 100 Yr 10 15 — Hyd No. 5 20 25 — Hyd No. 6 Hydrograph Volume = 765 cuft 30 0 (cfs) 5.00 4.00 tM 2.00 1.00 0.00 35 Time (min) Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Friday, Jul 28 2006, 1:38 PM Hyd. No. 8 To Pond 1 Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 4.49 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 1 min Inflow hyds. = 2, 3, 7 Q (cfs) 5.00 4.00 c We 2.00 1.00 0.00 0 5 Hyd No. 8 To Pond 1 Hyd. No. 8 -- 100 Yr 10 15 — Hyd No. 2 20 25 — Hyd No. 3 Hydrograph Volume = 2,499 cuft 30 35 — Hyd No. 7 Q (cfs) 5.00 4.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 40 Time (min) Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 9 Pond 1 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Storm frequency = 100 yrs Inflow hyd. No. = 8 Reservoir name = Pond 1 Storage Indication method used. Q (cfs) 5.00 191111, 3.00 2.00 1.00 Pond 1 Hyd. No. 9 -- 100 Yr Friday, Jul 28 2006, 1:38 PM Peak discharge = 2.81 cfs Time interval = 1 min Max. Elevation = 4958.76 ft Max. Storage = 791 cuft Hydrograph Volume = 2,499 cuft Q (cfs) 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 ' ' ' ' ' ' 0.00 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 Hyd No. 9 Hyd No. 8 Time (min) Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 10 Total From Site Hydrograph type = Combine Storm frequency = 100 yrs Inflow hyds. = 6, 9 Q (cfs) 6.00 5.00 4.00 M If 1 2.00 1.00 0.00 0 5 — Hyd No. 10 10 Total From Site Hyd. No. 10 -- 100 Yr 15 20 Hyd No. 6 Friday, Jul 28 2006, 1:38 PM Peak discharge = 5.43 cfs Time interval = 1 min 25 30 Hyd No. 9 Hydrograph Volume = 3,901 cult 35 40 Q (cfs) 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 45 Time (min) STORMWATER RECEIVED JUL 2 12006 July 20, 2006 Jay, Barber City of Fort Collins Utilities 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80521 RE: Harmony School Shops — Third Filing, Lot 1 Drainage Certification Dear Jay: ENGINEERING A Westrian Company The purpose of this letter is to acknowledge that the detention pond located on the above referenced site has been constructed and will function in general conformance with the approved design based on recently obtained survey information and field inspection. A spreadsheet indicating the originally designed detention pond volume and the estimated as -built volume has been attached. Per our estimates, the as -built pond provides slightly less detention volume (approximately 0.1 ac-ft) when compared to the approved design. Due to the minor nature of the overall pond and the deficient volume when compared to the regional area, it is our opinion that the as -built pond is satisfactory and is in general conformance with the original design intent. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, JR ENGINEERING, LLC /sepch. Sparone, P.E. anager cc: Sean Windsor (Delta) Enclosure JCS 0 2620 East Prospect Road, Suite 190, Fort Collins, CO 80525 970-491-9888 • Fax: 970-491-9984 • w jrengineeringxom Project No.: 39445.00 By: JCS Project Name: Harmony School Shops 3rd Filing Lot 1 Date: 7/20/2006 As -Built Detention Pond 1 - As -Built Contour Surface Incremental Cumulative Cumulative Elevation Area Volume Volume Volume ft. (sq. ft. cu. ft. cu. ft. ac-ft 58.13 0 0 0 0.000 58.50 1000 123.3 123.3 .0.003 58.70 2300 321.1 444.4 0.010 59.00 2700 749.2 1193.6 0.027 59.10 2900 279.9 1473.6 0.034 Detention Pond 1 - Design Contour Surface Incremental Cumulative Cumulative Elevation Area Volume Volume Volume ft. (sq. ft. cu. ft. cu. ft. ac-ft 58.13 0 0 0 0.000 58.40 1775 159.7 159.7 0.004 58.60 2445 420.2 580.0 0.013 58.80 2870 530.9 1110.9 0.026 59.10 3045 887.1 1998.0 0.046 Required Volume (100 YR) = 1934.00 cu-ft Volume Provided (100 YR) = 1998.00 cu-ft @ 59.10 r.: . 3944500Basin-AsBuilt.xls DRAINAGE CERTIFICATION FORM Please fill out all applicable items in this certification form for single family, multi -family and commercial properties. Write "OK" for items checked or actual number checked in field. Use "N/An for items that are not applicable to the property that is being certified. A. Drainage facilities certification 1. Pond Certification -volume verification ()AC a.topographic records and volume b.cross-sections and spot elevations -positive fall to pan O x/ -side slopes O k -invert elevation O -spillway elevation 04 -placement.and size of riprap ok -side slopes O)z -grading -orifice plate installation and size- Off -compaction of berm Ok -structural integrity of pond Ok 2. Swales -location (are they within easement) 04 STORMWATER RECEIVED JUL 2 12006 -dimensions and cross-section verification OK -longitudinal slopes and side slopes OL/- -spot elevations p,� -permanent -erosion control measures (drop structures, riprap, etc....) 04 -tie-in to pipes, pans, curbs, etc.... pK -weir size (elevations, size, opening, etc.)�/� -available freeboard A111 -landscaping infringement on swales OJ/_ 3. Pipes / 14 -size/.and�Ttype -slopes. (as -built and comparison to minimum 0.4% slope) -pipe capacity calculations if slopes are significantly altered -invert elevations -installation and backfill material -cover -encasement and clearance from other utility lines close by -joints 4. Concrete Pan Channels -size U(C -slope ()/L -super elevation(/� -cross -section �j k -thickness U/C -elevations Cik< 5. Inlets N %k -size and type STREC VED JUL 2 12006 .. .,.Car- : _ -size of:opening (or•name of standard used) -grate elevation -invert elevation -box size 6. Cross pans 1J/ //A -size -type -grade -elevation -cross-sectional depth -tie-in to curb and gutter 7. Culverts. IVIA -size /7 -type -invert elevation -headwalls 8. Underdrains N/ -size -type -cover -backf ill -geotextiles -cleanouts 9. Curb cuts B STORMWATER RECEIVED JUL 212006 -size V -tie in to swale, pipe, etc ... Or_ Certification of Grade Elevations Adjacent to Drainage Facilities: .-minimum opening elevations �/A o -top of "foundation elevations �V/� '� ILf J l -comparison to 100 year WSEL's (FreeboardNl,( dd�6P,n tD requirements and floodplain issues) (ii�Y Q C. Certification of Erosion Control Measures: 1. Permanent Measures: 2 0 E -Permanent vegetation (6" bare spots and weeds under control) C/ riprap -riprap bedding 0`C -drop sections Al -sediment basins/water quality ponds/VA -netting ma�,t/s/blankets/V//4 -mulching /V/A / Temporary Measures: /V //j -mulching ` `� STORMWATER RECEIVED -inlet filter installation -check bale dams - JUL 2 12006 -seeding and temporary vegetation -silt fence Site Cleanup After Construction -construction clean up C2X -smoothing of ruts. 0 K -reseeding 0 16 Statement of Compliance This certification is signed and stamped and by signing this form the engineer(s) attests that they have inspected the site and to the best of their knowledge the as -built conditions of the drainage facilities are as described in the above form and in the redlined plans enclosed. - Failure to properly disclose all known information could result in the rejection of this certification and prevent the release of any Stormwater Utility holds on Building Permits and/or Certificates of Occupancy- F. Signature and Stamp by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer. S RECEIVED . JUL 2 12006 a I m I � I rl I 1 I ! I I b I I rl , 1 I ! , � I I I rl , , I a , V I I I I rl I I 1 a I I � 1 I I 1 rl I I I ! I V 10 � II 0 II II � u W C Z J IZ W DO IM � II II f ra II Ni IIIIIIII�oil w_____ w_____ w_____ w_ MILESTONE DRIVE w-----w---- RECORD SURVEY AS OF 6=07=06 01' ASSUALT SPOT EI-EVAMN! - x- 20 10 0 20 CALE1' = 20 1. 11E�TOP FOUNDATION BF A 2. ALL SPOT IEVATICNS DEPICTED ME FLOXINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. ALL WRB UID OUTIER SHA L BE 'WTFALL CURB AND CUTTER' UNLESS OUIERMSE NOTED. 1. A MIN SLOPE OF 0.5% TO BE PROADED ALONG THE FLOW ME OF ALL CA CH CURB AND GUTTER AND 1.5% ACROSS ASPHALT PA1aMENT. THE MAX. SLOPE ACROSS ASPHALT TO 5R 5, EXISTING U DERGRGND INSTALLATIONS AND PRIVAR UPIIDES S. ALL WORK TO BE ACCCNPUSIED N STRICT ADHERENCE WIN ALL LOCAL ORDNANCES, CITY OR STATE. ). CONVURIGHT- ttIF TO COORDINATE HIEA DIN Au AU. Wast 0104 PUBUC WdIT-IaF_-Ifi1FIF_AYN1_WCO APPROPRIATE P IATE UTILITY CGIPAMES. COMPANIES. -------------- EXISTING PIPES a INLI -_� PIPE 1��P1ROPOSED rI LARED END SECTION V PROPOSED INLET OR OUR -ET STRUCTURE Is ROPOSED INLET LOCATION IMIn OF CONSTRUCTION - EXISTING 5- CONTOUR EXISTING. V CONTOUR PROPCSED 5' CONTOUR 1' CNTOUR UNLESS LABELED OMEFUMSE FRCPOSED RTICAL CURB W/ CATCH WITTIER ® ETAINING WALL FF RUSHED FLOOR SW DEWALK CRT AM ELEVATION OR NISHED GRADE BE N15HED GRADE EAST CAW NISHED GRADE WEST PL OW LINE TC P OF CURB HP GH PONT UP W POINT EC GE OF CONCRETE TW P OF WALL n OF ISLAND 0TTOM OF ISLAND PREPMED UNDER THE DIRECT AIFFRMMN p IWwWE mz T�<I�saera$ 20 Q m F may €ap p> 6 p w p0UDTZU,p F waa-0- 1Z�_j j-«660W6 Y m N J0d < p Do O �pp0 li ZpV w ��N Q ZJ1Jz OL 0 ~ -1 Of I�50 OL 0� ¢ N o r 0 0 PANW. GE WAT NS DATE cc COLORADO P.E. N0. W25 FOR Near OR BOIAU[ Iw IL .El ENGINEERING O � `' City of Fort Collins, Colorado cc O Q UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL J C J NHISIWD CL GRAM APPROVED: O r' Z U' GlY ErgMw Dale J Z L SEC ION CHECKED BY: WOW t a Wa,le.a,r DNRy Oat. CHECKED BY: ` iC 0 a HIS Slamxala UNily Oale !0 i CHECKED BY: IN: F- ILfI a Power ulmly Dal. INC CHECKED BY: PVR9 a ReamtR Dale CHECKED BY: Traffic ngMr Dale SHEET 4 CE 10 CHECKED BY: Dal. JOB N0. 39445.00