HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 11/29/2001 (2)SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers
do
00
OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATION SCA Whit
CLIErT:::ZI-W t>J DATE: —401
LEGAL: rNSP. BY:
GRADING PLAN: ACSOnIS Ar p Asspc, Avg Z j v O S G P•nJ DAgn Z -4-9+
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The. observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. During our observations our representative measured the relative elevations at the lot sides
and corners, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
o The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
i-
J
The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is ouropinion the grades as measured should provide
an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme.
See the attached "As -Built" grading plan.
a The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include:
Other comments and/or observations:
Limitations
It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsite flows unless the grades
are changed or barriers are created such as fences, garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change
the established flow patterns by diverting or slowing runoff Flow. Backfill adjacent to the residence may settle over time
and allow ponding to occur undation walls. The backfill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and
maintained to ensure th t av from the foundation. The grades measured were compared only to the
requirements shown gv frr� ing plan. Other minimum grading requirements which may be specified
in the soils report or �• ents are beyond the scope of this report.
Rev iewed b gigDate:
t :°boq�}te5treet. iwte D: Lid .Colorado 905;H o
oifice5 n - 3o,ddrr • :unennna - Lmeland
No Text
NORTF
ELEVATIC
2g
(5x
22.4
(B.O.W.)
AS -BUILT GRADING ELEVATIONS
THE ELEYATIgL9 BHOUN MEfE GN ARE 9A0ED
as THE wRver PErraaieo a+ n•n•®i
TBM-I= TEMPORARY BENCH MARK M
B.O.W.= BACK OF WALK
LW$T= LOWEST OPENING (TOP OF WIN. WELL)
BILL- BOTTOM OF WINDOW GLA56
WLKOUT= BOTTOM OF WALKOUT DOOR
T.OF = TOP OF FOUNDATION
= MISSING EXTENSION
• = MISSIN6, DOWNSPOUT
-1
w
O
N
z�
0V
its)0I
z
00
JOB NO.
1161-15-1-6
Dxft�
11/29/01
SCALE
1'=30'
DRAWN,
RLG
CHECKED
CPH
L_L. Q
SHEET NO.t
1 OF I