HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 05/18/2010ADVANCED
-, ENGINEERING, LLC
STRUCTURAL DRAINAGE DRAFTING
OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATION ,
Site Observation Date: S- - 10 Advanced Engineering, LLC Project Number: 1 -cam -OI to
Site Observation by: Client Name:__1_Z.,Se At,3N
Site Address: 'f-2--l.Ul F
Site Legal: L_� S 51,-1, F % P,00I -no-1 -to Fo S i
Site Plan and/or Grading Plan by: P4oe-TP44t1 F .l 2aAE: 4 L 001 po Is-b- 0 -'>
Z/
We have observed portions of the above referenced site. During our obs rvations our representative measured the relative
elevations at the lot sides and corners, top of foundation, and lowest openings. The observed elevations were compared to the
Site Plan and/or Grading Plan referenced above. Based upon our findings it is our opinion that:
❑ The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Site Plan and/or Grading Plan.
❑ The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Site Plan and/or Grading Plan with the
following exceptions:
It is our opinion these exceptions, as noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the above
referenced plan.
During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those indicated on the
above referenced Site Plan and/or Grading Plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should provide an
adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme (see comments below).
❑ See the attached "As -Built" grading plan.
Cl The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced Site Plan and/or Grading Plan. Deficiencies
include:
Other comments and/or observations:
O o ,aD o>.J * Z.I 794-1 ND C.47 -A owl
Pic A Pb..4T Ar So..TF4^- �4oIP`En2T( u�° 3* 1.'Q-'Lor4E.L-r3+d1M �NOI cA--r4,D o,4 All
Q So nrl£psr Rz0P&z7Y Coa--[&Z_ Iz- 0.3 "WSe_-ryA,( o,4 PcA I•
® a 4 o,�i r- Rst- EAST ik c ry- � 1 I 'LoWe2.TA4^1 iMDrcA-TY0 vJ RA•.t -To Acc. . DA.,r f_�>cisr- L
Limitations: It is our opinion the above referenced site, as graded on the observation date, should not interfere with offsite flows
unless the grades are changed or barriers are created such as fences, garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which
may change the established flow patterns by diverting or slowing runoff flow. Backfill adjacent to the residence may settle over
time, this settlement may allow ponding to occur adjacent to the foundation walls. To prevent this ponding and related problems,
the backfill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and maintained to ensure that runoff will flow away from the foundation.
The grades measured were compared only to the requirements shown on the above referenced site plan and/or grading plan. Other
minimum grading requirements which maybe specified in the soils report or by other construction documents are beyond the
scope of this report.•�•c`
RE.
EG�S
Reviewed by: Jason E. Baker, P
146 Barberry Place, Lovelalii (ilifkit2i4�. Telephone 970-278-1909 Fax 970-278-1910
LEGEND;
T.O.F. = TOP OF F❑UNDATI❑N
W.W. = WINDOW WELL
B.O.W. = BACK OF WALK
T.B.M.-1 = TEMPORARY BENCH MARK 1
H.P. = HIGH P❑INT OF SWALE
X❑ = SEE ADVANCED LETTER: 1497-07-01A DATED 5/4/10
= NOTE- THIS INFORMATION IS BASED ON THE SURVEY PERFORMED ON 5-4-10.
SITE PLAN AND GRADING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BY CLIENT.
ry
71
85.4 85.4
J4 (B.O.W.) (B.O.W.)
85.5
�Q�P�• I (B.O.W.) Syq`
`�l S 87.1 <O�A
%
r GARAGE �fL
87.3/ SLAB @ F
f C DOOR
87.6
84.9
TBM-1 .� . (B.O.W.)
84.6 \ 84.8
(B.O.W.) %COURT WINDOW +
YARD SILLS
84.9 86.6
87.2 k, GARAGE �� ` W.W. 85.1
SLAB @ H.P. DOOR T.O.F. 85.2 85.1 87.6 G 2 , 90.3 O W. , +84.6
85.0 C J W.W.
85.2 84.4
86.7 (B.O.W,)
' COVERED
85.8
84.2 RET WALL DECK H.P.
+
85.9 84.8
84.0 84.4 [_I I3
83.9 F
LOT 46 �<��°® 83,7
LANDSCAPED x
:. + LOT 44
;Q6 LANDSCAPED
83.7 83.7
/83.5
TOP OF
EDGING
83.7 SLOT LAWN
{'-0-; EDGING TO
l� ALLOW RUNOFF
® TO FLOW
SOUTHWEST
DATE; 5-4-16 TUSCANY CUSTOM HOMES
SCALE: 1'=40' LOT 45, SWIFT ADDITI❑N TO
JOB # 1497-07-01A F❑SSIL LAKE P.U.D.
DRAFTED BY: CPH FORT COLLINS, CO
No Text
03j13/2009 09:49.FAX V04980339 MEN CONSULTING LLC
@ 001/003
i
Y
($mamor
3105 &Mmc do 6Wza
Phenn 1970) 9■e:M-4 Pm, wm e
e p
FAX TR,A,NSMITTAI,
�A-e F.A"G DATE: -I3•�9
cew of
TO: WASorj OF: �«►rS
FAX Ft tea„ rs 3F P WCL. CoNat Ste.,
NUMBER: sTvfk%4uk"2 2-21- 546 143 A jucxa Z M-19 i o
REGARDING: L.ot 4S SAcprrj ib Qsa 4eft Cgs
PER 'yam _
a. �a _ ■f. __ Lac.-
vatIA M S _ -• r� a
Am7
a
_ _ rRBo,, �•t a -T1 S_L� I�iA S
Si c q ks„oA & yo.j MA %e 04,0
G..ir-p•
CLIFFORD P. HAM, M.S.
MEM CONSULTING}, LLC
.RECEIVE'
MAR 1 3 2009
v
Og/13/2009 09:49 FAX' 9704980339 MEM CONSULTING LLC
(lau
r �
1 't
� Ro-
�R
w
O•Zb
-1�`� \\0
A
y
12002/003
ft
.03/13/2009 09:49 FAX 9704980339 MEM CONSULTING LLC 19003/003
��&4�+ /
gnu
\ OW
\ / / '// \
OWN