HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 12/13/200412/09/2004 '09:12 9706631660 KIVA ENGINEERING PAGE 01/03
STORMWATER
7�iUayt�iv�eerivi.9, TvtG. RECEIVED
Sirwtctwtrest �CeotecFnrLAt Givit DEC 08 2004
OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATION DATE: *
CLDRgT:
KIVA 708 :a: /S'Lte-3o—ot��
LEGAL: L*T ?-I 5, j ser Am.l n or_ Lac E INSP. BY: -
ADDRESS:
SMIGRADI
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. During our observations ourrepresentativc measured the relative elevations atthe lot sides
and comers, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
9
0
The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan,
The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
During our observations our representative noted that the as mmsured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is out opinion the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme.
See the attached "As -Built' grading plan.
The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include
Other comments and/or observations:
It is our opinion that die subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsite flows unless the grades
are changed or barriers are created such as fences, garden tarracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change
the established flow patterns by wing runoff flow. Backfill adjacent to the residence may settle over time
and allow ponding to occur walls. The backfill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and
maintained to ensure that the foundation. The Fades measured were compared only to the
requirements. shown on V. an. Other minimum grading requirements which may be specified
in the soils report or by er tt f s�a�iQ.tten beyond the scope of this report.
Reviewed by: Date: 1 0
RrI4� ute Strem Suite D
Loveland, Colorado 80538
Phone: (97e) 663-0138
Fax (970) 663.1660
loveliurd/kivaenglnaeririg.,.vu%
w .kivaanginearing com
Amral Office
500 Kimbark Street, Suite 101
Longmont. ColoraEo 80501
Phone: (S03) 702-0661
Fax: (303) 774-Ba13
lmtauront�ki vaertbJraerir�.cum
3
12/09/2004 09:12 9706631660 KIVA ENGINEERING PAGE 02/03
ELEVATIONS SURVEYED
12/6/04
90.9 90,
t (BRIC)
TBM-t
90.2 gp5
(B.O.w.) (Tap of wAl
x �
TOF = 92.5
rs.f: 90.9
ARK
89.9
l
69.5
T.O.F. = TOP OF FOUNDATION
TBM-1 n TEUPORARY BENCH MARK #1
&O.W. - BACK OF WALK
L.W.S_T. we LOWEST OPENING (TOP OF WINDOW WELL)
SILL - BOTTOM OF WINDOW, GLASS
WLKOUT - BOTTOM OF WALKOUT DOOR
ICJ
EX — ELEVATIONS SNOT
o SM SCA LETTER 1528-70-2-0 06712 12=9
.6
85.0
DE«
10
SRE E VET R
DEC 0 8 2004
NOTE!
THE ELEVATIONS SHOW NERE ON ARE BASED AS -BUILT GRADING ELEVATIONS
ON THE SURVEY PERFORMED ON 12/6/04
i05z6 30-z-a ABBCO
12 SCOTI, COX &ASSOCIATES, INC.
12/7/04 Conaultitty Engint:tas LOT 21, SWIFT ADDN ®FOSSIL LAKE RANCH
5,.�
1' =30.0, 3fl0 GIMIte Street Suite D t.a.eana Caaraea ao53a FORT DOWNS, COLORADO
("Q) M! — elm Ki a CF.17edC CPx15 MM lass- 2—MWIC
l.rl'1 ftrrMO Qd do MIA de:am h . eMY .tmaye . \oyoM
12/09/2004 09:12 9706631660 KIVA ENGINEERING PAGE 03/03
IFT-32
"3 �—f�—C33•
_ � "�2olt 0►sP �� G,��� ,
� � .��.- • � : �: �� '.ram• .. �', - �
+ •.. •i•J:^ ri ^' � ., .-• S.. .`^p^'ems. . _ - - .
I= ��...
MAIL ON
lidlllEr EDAM
1
1 of MUM
OVAL
FC
GWATE
RECEIVED
DEC 0 8 2004